@GeeBee

The astounding conceit of Left-Liberal Progressivism is that it upholds the collective bequest of the wisdom of several millennia

At the same time, it has to reject everything written on logic, philosophy, wisdom and good taste that can be found in libraries as “patriarchic” or “white”. Barring that, it retcons ancient Greece as negro paradise to break the contradictions.

Insane barbarians.

Maybe not insane. They’re associates of a powerful club, and the price of membership is to parrot whatever comes on the newsfeed.

Soviet apparatchiks did the same. Mostly, they didn’t actually believe the Marxist-Leninist claptrap that they were repeating, but it did usefully allow them to have access to consumer goods and a relatively good lifestyle.

The Liberal-Left dogma works the same way. It’s designed to be maximally humiliating to Anglo-Americans because that’s the class that’s being targeted.

IMO when Anglo-Americans can be verbally abused every which way, then the game switches to physical abuse (detentions, transportation, “re-education” etc.) and the US is in full Bolshevism II.

Many members of certain minority groups sense White Christian weakness and are taking advantage of it.

They are attempting a takeover.

Mexico is trying a demographic takeover of California and states in the southwest.

Read the book Camp of the Saints.

It is not too late for White Christians to save themselves. They must come out onto the street.

They can’t say they’re White “nationalists” or “supremacists”. Those would be attacked by the leftist-dominated media and Democrats. The latter are largely anti-White Christian.

They have to use other terms such as Christian pride, Christian freedom, European heritage pride, Christian patriotism day, and European heritage day.

White Christians have to be comfortable enough to hit the streets.

There should be resolutions in Congress to celebrate European and White heritage. Who would sponsor that? Maybe Cong. Steve King?

Extremism on the left needs to be countered by extremism on the right if for no other reason than that people in the middle need to be able to say they are rejecting extremists on both sides.

IOW there’s a middle ground that probably sympathize with one side or the other but which isn’t going to do anything. When the war is over they’ll adapt to the philosophy of the winning side.

For instance Western middle classes have adapted to the post WW2 victory of Jewish leftism (and in fact sustain it). This (mostly white) middle class has basically adopted a non-negotiable religious style leftist package with its interlocking set of views on gun control (removal), multiculturalism, LGBT, free immigration, anti-Christianism, free sexuality, feminism plus a selection of taboo subjects such as 9/11.

It’s not a pick and choose. If you want to be invited to the dinner parties, the whole package is required. It even has its own counter-cultural dress code – formal jacket & worn blue jeans.

The real problem with Capitalism is a moral problem: that power corrupts. Since the goal of Capitalism is to frantically amass money, the wealthy become more corrupt and corrupt the system as they use their money to buy off politicians. And these people are also unhappy, since the pursuit of happiness divorced from virtue and righteousness always leads to unhappiness and misery.

Agreed that the ethical dimension to society is most important. And it comes in two parts 1) participation in formal religion with the acceptance of ethical rules* 2) the need for a society to apply it to, as in a group of ethnically homogeneous people living in their historic birthplace.

* It doesn’t really matter if you believe the religious myths. It’s enough to subscribe to the morality. Also, if the whole population is going to be included, it needs to be well organized and simple to understand.

“Anti-white racist” is definitely the term to use, for sure.

Since they use “racism” in such an ill-defined and overbroad way they can’t refute the charge without watering down or contradicting their own term.

That’s why they have invented the super-lame counter-argument that, by definition, “only whites can be racist.”

The response to that, is: “Well, that just proves your an anti-white racist because that’s the most racist thing you could say.”

They’ll sputter and disengage on the ground that they won’t talk to a “white supremacist,” or something. But you’ve won the point.

A good article.

Bourgeois as a class. class struggle, kulaks, wreckers, saboteurs and nationalist enemies of the people, corrective labor camps.

Bolshevik Jews developed a whole lexicon to justify their totalitarianism.

Now they’re staging a coup in the US, using a new package of demon words targeting Anglo-Americans. And it isn’t Latinos, Blacks or Asians who develop and spread these poisonous concepts – it’s pure Jewish activism in a bid for absolute Jewish power.

So, it looks like Anglo Americans (the class enemy) are on track to share the nightmarish fate of the ethnic Russian middle class after 1917.

A threat/reminder from the US to the UK to grovel harder:

[Ref. Gibraltar’s release of the oil tanker previously impounded on instructions from the US]

The American officials said the U.K. should think of the tanker issue in terms of the broader relationship with the U.S., particularly as Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government presses forward with departing the European Union and seeks a free-trade agreement with the U.S.

Bloomberg today.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-15/gibraltar-court-agrees-to-release-detained-oil-tanker?srnd=premium-europe

The US/Israel want their Iran war and the UK’s going to be dragged into it. Out of the EU frying pan and into the US fire.

As many people have pointed out, leftism is a disguised form of religion.

I’ve noticed that It works in a very similar way – especially socially. The middle class is basically leftist with this interlocking set of views making a religious style package.

In the same way that Islam answers all questions for the devout, Anglo-Jewish leftism includes the non-negotiable package of gun control (removal), multiculturalism, LGBT, free immigration, anti-Christianism, free sexuality, feminism and a selection of taboo subjects such as 9/11.

It’s not a pick and choose. If you want to be invited to the dinner parties, the whole package is required. It even has its own counter-cultural dress code – formal jacket & worn blue jeans.

Some countries don’t have these problems. For example the Japanese are comfortable with being ethnic Japanese in Japan, same as Chinese in China and Jews in Israel.

The reason it works is that they don’t shy away from a conversation on race/ethnicity. They view their success as based on ethnic unity.

Anglos could do the same (although they won’t). It would reinstate the primacy of race/territory. The “blood and soil” argument could take a milder or harder form, with both not making much difference to the lives of ethnic minorities in the UK or US.

MILD VERSION: Everyone in the US who has/had parents/grandparents who were US citizens in 1950 receives a new US citizenship card with 1) full political rights and obligations 2) the right to hold political office and be employed in the US administration. People who don’t qualify receive a US residency card with the same rights as US citizens (other than political) if they pay taxes.

HARD VERSION: Same as above, but everyone in the US who has/had parents/grandparents who were US citizens in 1950, and more than 50%s ethnically Anglo (or Anglo European).

Either version would produce a massive Jewish, MSM, SWJ, multi-cult outcry, but it would define the political “ownership” or Anglo countries and wouldn’t affect the day to day lives of foreign residents. In fact, in the longer term it would improve their lives since it would stop the Brazilianization of the UK/US and produce a more stable and less conflictive society.

Unfortunately, it’s so late in the day that only a dictatorship could realistically introduce it, and halt the present UK/US multicultural struggle for power.

From the Guardian article:

Indian prime minister claims genetic science existed in ancient times.

Narendra Modi gives examples of Karna and Ganesha to support view that cosmetic surgery and reproductive genetics used thousands of years ago

Modi went on: “We worship Lord Ganesha. There must have been some plastic surgeon at that time who got an elephant’s head on the body of a human being and began the practice of plastic surgery.”

This is the person who is pressuring the Moslems in Kashmir and who controls India’s nuclear arsenal – so the outlook there is not good.

Getting back to the unpleasant facts of hangings. State hangings (e.g. Saddam Hussein) are calculated with a drop, to break the neck, with a more or less normal facial appearance on the corpse.

In contrast, a suicide hanging will be something like a lynching, with a slower dead ( struggle against strangulation) with facial distortion and discolouration

Epstein’s face visible on the gurney (if it was in fact him – and he was dead – not just sedated) wasn’t a strangulation death. Also, he wouldn’t have materials to arrange a suicide by hanging in his cell, so there’s already a good deal of fakery here.

Another blank in the Epstein story, is the unusual blue and white striped temple with the golden dome situated on his island. Isn’t the object of a temple to house some kind of ritual? So what kind of ritual was that? Maybe Bill Clinton could help with this one.

Agreed that this is a must read book: James Stanton Evans, “Blacklisted by History”.

The hatchet job on McCarthy, was because he exposed leftist US traitors, at a time when this still had some consequences.

But that conventional image is all wrong, as veteran journalist and author M. Stanton Evans reveals in this groundbreaking book. The long-awaited Blacklisted by History, based on six years of intensive research, dismantles the myths surrounding Joe McCarthy and his campaign to unmask Communists, Soviet agents, and flagrant loyalty risks working within the U.S. government. Evans’s revelations completely overturn our understanding of McCarthy, McCarthyism, and the Cold War. Drawing on primary sources—including never-before-published government records and FBI files, as well as recent research gleaned from Soviet archives and intercepted transmissions between Moscow spymasters and their agents in the United States—Evans presents irrefutable evidence of a relentless Communist drive to penetrate our government, influence its policies, and steal its secrets. Most shocking of all, he shows that U.S. officials supposedly guarding against this danger not only let it happen but actively covered up the penetration. All of this was precisely as Joe McCarthy contended.

[OT] Interesting singing from Maria Devyatova (?) It makes totally alien mental connections relative to contemporary Western music.

Americans should demand to see the body…

This would decide it one way or the other – but when you say Americans, I would suggest a group unnamed forensic pathologists chosen at random from around the US and strictly shielded from the press, politicians and the usual collaborators.

If, in fact, the pathologists can’t find the body, then that in itself would answer the question.

From Epstein’s POV this is pretty good. He’s 66 (with too much heat) and it’s time to retire. So he requests that they get him out:

– He’s arrested (big surprise – How did that happen?)

– Goes to jail.

– Gets removed from jail and declared deceased.

– Flies out the US.

– Has lunch Bibi and is thanked for his contribution.

In essence, (1) and (2) say that exposure of the information would be a game changer, would delegitimize the entire current political elite.

There could be more to it than messing around with underage girls. The same crowd were involved in much heavier stuff in Pizzagate and from the testimony of the Dutch banker Ronald Bernard.

… will be memory-holed and drown in the swamp of total apathy that rules post-historic, rootless, post-modern western man. But it is hard to believe the potentially most explosive case in post-WW2 US history could just end like a forgotten footnote.

Equally, US elites could be eliminated in this complete moral vacuum, and themselves become a forgotten historical footnote.

It works both ways. Once the ethical basis of society has gone then “Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be the Whole of the Law”.

In Western Europe, too, ethnic autonomy is a way to trouble. Spanish Catalonia has autonomy and it’s dissatisfied, rebellious and separatist. French Catalonia has no autonomy and doing fine; no separatism at all. The reason is simple: ethnic autonomous areas produce native leadership that will forever play on nationalist feelings. This form of organization is old-fashioned and out-dated, unsuitable in our age.

Jean Monnet, who more than anyone can be regarded as the founder of the European Union, said in his book, “Memoirs”, that he was aiming to build the USE (United States of Europe). This would be equivalent to the USA and function much the same way.

Until recently, his project has been a continuous (suitable in our age?) process of removing national boundaries and centralizing power at a EU government level, with the introduction of community laws, a single currency etc. In this context, national identity and national histories are “bad” (and somewhat correctly) are viewed as likely to lead to the type of endless European conflicts that culminated in WW1 and WW2. Monet saw the EU as more of a project of political reconciliation than an economic one (particularly between France and Germany).

That the EU has been hijacked by Zio-Globalists and Cultural Bolsheviks is a separate issue and nothing different from the United States.

Ethnic autonomous areas (usually countries) produce native leadership that will forever play on nationalist feelings because these feeling are real. For example, you can explain all you like to ethnic Chinese and Indians that they are global citizens and part of a Coca Cola advert, but they’re still going to regard themselves as ethnic Chinese and Indians with their respective interests and attachment to their respective homelands.

Realistically, the best that can probably be done, is to accept the realities of race, history and territory and (for example in the EU) link independent and sovereign countries within a loose European Confederation. This would have some historic and ethnic validity to the extent that Europe isn’t Arabic or Asiatic and European states developed from their tribal pasts through their common experience of Christendom. And a looser European Confederation could usefully accommodate Russia and the Ukraine.

… by enforcing the maximum pressure on Iranians, India has effectively joined the Trump-Netanyahu camp against Iran

Iran is quite central to all this. China happens to be its main trading partner regardless of US (Israeli) sanctions and anything India might say.

… a new approach to the international order is emerging that’s based on brute military power,

I’ve long thought that India/Pakistan is the likeliest place for the world’s first nuclear war. Their territories adjoin making hopelessly short reaction times. Both governments contain unstable populists/extremists. Also strong religious differences, and a history of violent conflict and continual Indian expansionism.

One “good” aspect of a localized India/Pakistan nuclear war (with the consequent vast destruction) would be to provide a salutary shock to the rest of the world. The reality of nuclear war would be so terrifying that it could produce a complete international political reset based on respectful and peaceful relations.

So Britain can be 100% free to do the bidding of the Anglo-Zionist Empire’s current overlords/puppets without any Continental foot-dragging?

Because that now is what is revealed: the UK totally out of the EU will serve the interests of Israel and NYC and Hollywood and DC every day, all day.

Why are these non-White non-men even in the government? How are the English fine with it? Why does nobody ever vote for the BNP? They deserve all that it coming.

The British do have a racial awareness, and current mass immigration is the Nº1 political issue (same as the US).

The EU forces open borders (technically within Europe – but in fact with the rest of the world). How else could places like France, Germany and the UK have had such massive immigrant invasions over the last few decades? The EU leadership uses the same arguments as the elite US Globalist/SJW’s: proposition nations, refugees, ageing workforce, need for multiculturalism, equality, save the world etc.

The British public forced through Brexit, mostly through a desire to take back control of UK borders – and they did it against their own united Zio-Glob / Cultural Bolshevik elite.

Similarly, the US public forced through the election of Trump to take back control of US borders – and they also did it against their own united Zio-Glob / Cultural Bolshevik elite.

However, it seems to be all for nothing. Trump was either a plant from the start, or has been blackmailed, so he’s spending his time looking after Israel and forgotten about the border. In the UK, “Friend of Israel” Boris Johnson has taken power (internal Conservative reshuffle) with a maximum pro-Israel, multicultural SJW cabinet, and has quickly got back on track threatening Iran, and vaguely talking about immigrant amnesties.

Johnson will do Brexit, since otherwise, the public will vote him out. But apart from that, he has every intention of linking up with his Zio-Glob / Cultural Bolshevik allies in the US.

Once again i suggest that the model of governance which the USA uses is so strong that it can operate without elected or representative leaders of any kind.. The voters will vote on the laws in general elections, and a voters court(not part of the government at all) will be established that has no connection to the sitting government. The government will be run by bureaucrats who will be charged, by their job descriptions, to operate in their position and to do only what the voters have voted on as goals and laws.

OK. The problem is with the corrupt representatives and they can be removed.

However, someone has to make the political decisions and control complex modern government. It can be done with power at the local level (county/state voting, taxation and spending) but it needs a lot of organization, it’s very hard work, and needs a high level of obligatory citizen participation.

So, if the Zio-Globalists and Cultural Bolsheviks somehow miraculously relinquished power, are Americans really willing to do the work?

I’m not very familiar with modern Britain though I suspect God is dead on that island.

That’s true. Here’s a church converted into a house (for sale and retaining the special church features).

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7340721/Grade-II-listed-church-tucked-Harrods-goes-sale-55m.html?offset=149&max=100&jumpTo=comment-450416123#comment-450416123

Britain is escaping from the corrupt EU bureaucracy – but rather than planning an independent and positive relationship with Europe (like non EU states, Norway and Switzerland), Boris Johnson, the elite friend of Israel, is working hard to link fate of the UK to the United States (which is also sinking fast). The Europeans don’t want a war with Iran, but he seems quite happy to ally with the US and make it happen.

I think it is important for us all to remember that there was only ONE senator,Russ Feingold, who actually read “the Patriot Act” before it was voted into law.

He happened to be the ONLY senator, among the entire lot,..who voted AGAINST it.

Had this bill been examined . scrutinized, and debated before its passage.into law ..the USA might be 20 trillion dollars wealthier then it is today . . and tens of millions of innocent people lives would not have been destroyed due to our catastrophic forays into illegal war.

If a “Red Flag bill” is rushed to the floor, let us ensure every single congressman and senator has read it, in full, and that it is thoroughly discussed and debated , before it passes.

Once bitten, twice shy.

How about local Direct Democratic capitalism/socialism (or whatever the locals decide that they want) combined with a respect for their patch of the Earth – its habitat and wildlife.

That would be nice as an ideal. You are right, “isms” don’t matter much, “isms” affect propaganda but don’t change the reality.

The problems are: a) how would this state of affairs emerge from today’s world; b) what mechanisms would make it stable; after all, in the past numerous tiny states existed, but were invariably conquered by the most ruthless predators among them and combined into aggressive empires; c) how will goods and services in these communities be distributed to keep them stable and prosperous. There are many other problems, but these are the most glaring.

a) Not clear at all. If things get really confused, local communities could just opt out and start to look after their own affairs (and fund them).

b) Stability would come from a strong national definition of local county/state political rights and obligations. Also rules for the interaction of states and rules for passports, common currency, national military service etc (with power always held at the lowest practical level).

c) There wouldn’t be any economic borders between counties/states but there would be a duality in local politics. For example 70% of meetings and votes could concern local issues (schools, healthcare, policing etc.) and 30% national issues such as borders, immigration, military service, gay marriage, currency , banking, credit etc. The national issue votes would take place in all communes with the final tally becoming national law and funding coming from all communes to support the joint agreed national decision.

There’s nothing vey original here. It’s more or less the system that the Swiss have been running successfully for centuries.

While there is some evidence for what says about the architects of the founding documents and structure of the US federal government, that was not true for the founding and developing of the colonies that ended up being united into a country. They were founded by religious Christian people and were functioning as Christian societies. The fact is, a society has a value system that it runs on like an operating system. It is the culture, but the culture draws values from somewhere. If it isn’t going to be from the belief in a creator that requires us to see all humanity as sacred and requires us to be humble in the face of that creation as Christianity does, than it is going to be something else.

Right now that something else is dominated by Hollywood and Madison Avenue promulgated values of materialism, nihilism, narcissism, hedonism, and arrogant atheism. Basically, we are being conditioned to adopt the values of atheist Jews. If one thinks that state of affairs doesn’t mean our country is already lost – regardless of the DNA of the people here – they are in denial. If we don’t figure out how to return to being Christians, we will all remain something worse than Jews – Jewish supremacists who worship Jews and hate ourselves, our own families and our own society. We will be defeated tools ready to accept the Noahide laws.

How do you think we can rebuild the country into a rational, sane and peaceful society without Christian values that protect people from the enticements meant to enslave us to those who hate us? There may be another way, but I don’t see it. Many on UNZ comments rail against “inferior” people, but do you really have proof it is their DNA that holds them back? Healthy children growing up in a healthy and secure family with one mother (preferably staying at home) and one father have the best chance of developing into intelligent, responsible and dependable citizens. The Black community in the US is even more devastated than the society at large, but don’t forget that they were targeted first by those who like to control other people’s communities for their own interests. The disproportionately Jewish run slave trade was only the first step in that process. The NAACP and Harlem Renaissance were later examples. The destruction of the Black family by Federal policy was a later very important example. Jewish control over Black cultural productions such as hip hop music is another. Today, we have Black Lives Matter funded by George Soros and any Black leader, such as Tamika Mallory in the Women’s March, has to disavow the respected Black leader Louis Farrakhan. The Black community has been targeted for destruction. Will they rise from the ashes? It is possible if they become aware of who their enemies really are and embrace a value system that protects them from these enemies. Same for White America. The problem isn’t a new one. Will we create a society based primarily on free people who serve others – God, their family, their community or people docile and enslaved by the full time job of servicing their addictions?

Last February, he (Indian Prime Minister Modi) sent Indian warplanes to attack Pakistan after Kashmir nationalists (‘terrorists’ to Indians) attacked an Indian military convoy. India humiliatingly lost one of its MiG’s to Pakistan’s crack air force. Worse, Modi ran a very dangerous and totally unnecessary risk by attacking nuclear-armed Pakistan. But Hindu nationalist mobs loved it. Just as many ill-informed Americans love Trump’s war threats against Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, and, of course, Russia.

Now he’s at it again (August 2019), stripping the Kashmir of its special status and enforcing a lock down and curfew. 95% of the Kashmir population are Muslims so this can only mean big trouble with neighbouring Pakistan. Very stupid.

They tried the “direct and obligatory (i.e. every citizen has to grow up and attend local meetings , study issues and vote” part. The result was that the orator who could convince the Paris mob to storm the Representative Assembly and depose his rivals became the new Chief of State.

When a society is in a civil war nothing Democratic is going to work. Positions are maximum hard and loyalty is all that matters.

Genuine local Democracy is something preventative that happens before things get out of hand, or afterwards to reconcile society and promote sane bipartisanship. Right now, the US is probably too far gone on the route to civil war to change course. Positions just harden until some spark sets it off.

“Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, homophobia, xenophobia, misogyny — these tactics aren’t a new perversion,” Booker went on. “They’ve been ingrained in our politics since our foundation.”
Are American voters supposed to respond warmly to this?

Chick-Fil-A vs. Coca-Cola: The Strange Trajectory of Two Southern Companies

By Paul Kersey August 3rd 2012

Isn’t it time to rerun Paul Kersey’s excellent article from 2012. Chick-Fil-A is still closed on Sundays and Coca Cola is pushing harder than ever to promote homosexuality.

http://www.unz.com/sbpdl/chick-fil-vs-coca-cola-strange/

Now, if we take a birds-eye view of recent history, both Soviet-style “socialism” (which in reality was state capitalism) and “free market” capitalism (where market in reality is anything but free, the system is predominantly monopolistic financial = parasitic capitalism) are bankrupt as social systems. I don’t know what comes next if humanity is to survive, but it certainly will be none of the above.

How about local Direct Democratic capitalism/socialism (or whatever the locals decide that they want) combined with a respect for their patch of the Earth – its habitat and wildlife.

You’re clueless. Slavophile ideology was as weird as pan-Germanism or pan-Turanism. Slavs are people who speak Slavic languages, period. There is something unnatural to try to “bond” those different peoples, who are as different as are English, Germans, Dutch and Swedes. Why would Swedes, Scots and Dutch have some special love for each other? Why would Romance language speakers, Italians, Portuguese, Romanians & French have some special sympathy or connections?

Maybe not so clueless. Germans, Swiss and Austrians don’t go for pan-Germanism (and they happily criticize each other) but there is an identity there. They speak variants of German and are more likely to be found together socially outside their countries than with British or Russians.

Equally, Ukrainians don’t go in for pan-Slavism (and see themselves as distinct from Russians and Poles), but still, they have a relation something like the Scots and the Irish with the English. They’ve been together for a long time, speak similar languages, and are more likely to be found together socially outside their countries with Russians or Poles than with Germans, Anglos or Latins.

The founders of America were mainly white Christians, but they did not adhere to Christianity but rather were Free Masons, Deists, and even Atheists.

Weren’t they all white Christians? From where is the idea that they didn’t adhere to Christianity?

There’s plenty of evidence that they were practicing Christians and that their Christianity was basic and taken for granted.

We are two supreme court justices away from “well regulated militia” being deemed to be the National Guard.
After which Australian gun confiscation will ensue.
You will be powerless, facing the mob alone.
You and your family will die.

The National Guard are also people with families, and they’re only in it for the money. If things get difficult for them, they could abandon their gear quite fast.

Apparently adult-adult relationships are hard to come by.

Agree with that. Most people want to retain the child state, and be “looked after” ( by their government) from the cradle to the grave (Adult -Child relationship). This was the promise of Communism.

Real democracy is Adult-Adult. Citizens study, think and vote issue by issue in meetings with other Adults, and vote their own tax money to pay for their own schools, education etc. These Democratic communities are supported by law with paid time off work, meeting halls, research staff etc. and they’re real hard work (i.e. attendance needs to be obligatory).

Far easier to outsource the whole thing to Washington, and put your faith in some magic father figure like Trump.

That’s a very good quote. De Toqueville could see it clearly even back in 1835.

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power,
which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications, and
to watch over their fate.
That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it
seeks on the contrary to keep them in perpetual childhood: it is well
content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing
but rejoicing.
For their happiness such a government willingly labors,
but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that
happiness: it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their
necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal
concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and
subdivides their inheritances–what remains, but to spare them all
the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?
Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less
frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range, and
gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of
equality has prepared men for these things: it has predisposed men to
endure them, and oftentimes to look on them as benefits.

In Eric Berne’s useful terminology, centralized representative Democracy tends to degrade into a Parent-Child relationship between central government and its citizens.

A healthy Democracy needs an Adult-Adult relationship . This presupposes that 1) the public doesn’t behave like irresponsible children 2) citizen representatives really represent their electors interests 3) citizen representatives aren’t corrupt.

In the US this is far too much to ask, so Democracy has to stop being “representative” and needs to become low level, direct and obligatory (i.e. every citizen has to grow up and attend local meetings , study issues and vote, and look after – and pay for – their own healthcare, education etc.).

If they can’t get that together, then it’s a dictatorship (a permanent Parent-Child relationship), maybe dispensing altogether with the Democratic facade.

Ref. Eric Berne ” What Do You Say After You Say Hello?”

I agree with your remarks. When Trump used the word “white supremacists” he became dead to me. I voted for him in 2016, never again. We need a third party candidate.

> As Voltaire wrote,” To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

To the best of my knowledge there is no evidence Voltaire said this.

I can’t find any evidence either. However, he did say:

“Le droit de dire et d’imprimer ce que nous pensons est le droit de tout homme libre, dont on ne saurait le priver sans exercer la tyrannie la plus odieuse.”

Questions sur les miracles (1765)

[The right to say and print what we think is the right of every free man, which cannot be removed from him without exercising the most odious tyranny].

Which is just as relevant 250 years later.

Have you read the trilogy of the spanish civil war by Gironella ? , magnificent

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Mar%C3%ADa_Gironella

I’ve never heard of this one. There’s a lot of literature out there regarding the Spanish Civil War but I’ve found it to be mostly radical leftist propaganda .

Some recent titles are more balanced. They admit for example, that traditional Spain might not have celebrated having its churches burnt down and priests shot.

Anthony Beevor’s “The Battle for Spain” was not bad. Julius Ruiz’s “The Red Terror and the Spanish Civil War” gives useful information on the mass executions of civilian prisoners by Bolshevik style militias (when they realized that they were losing the war). George Orwell’s “Homage to Catalonia” recounts how the Bolsheviks started murdering their anarchist allies (including his own group) to gain control, making a war within a war.

Stanley Payne’s “The Spanish Civil War” is the most balanced that I’ve found.

Whereas the Dayton shooter wants to kill fascists, which presumably includes white supremacists, the El Paso shooter is portrayed as a white supremacist who hates Hispanics.

When the shooting starts, it can already be too late. In polarized societies were bipartisan conversation has broken down (and two sides just throw abuse at each other), it’s easy to get tit-for-tat murders, and a slippery slope to civil war. Most people in the US know little about it, but the best example is probably the Spanish Civil War (1936). Bolsheviks dominated government, and they, and traditional Spanish society, were no longer on speaking terms. The leading traditionalist politician Calvo-Sotelo was murdered by a leftist militia on 13th June 1936 with a government investigation leading nowhere, and shortly after that the civil war started.

There are some remarkable similarities to the current USA in Stanley G. Payne’s, “The Spanish Civil War”.

Will the president’s catastrophic response be the final straw for Trump’s sorely-tried base? If they can’t count on their champion to defend their Second Amendment and free speech rights, they will stay home.

More likely, they will turn to someone who will enforce the border and defend the 2nd Amendment. This is the route to increased radicalization – not staying at home.

By now, any thinking person can see that Trump and Congress are a Soviet style Nomenklatura, there to enact the wishes of the US Zionists and US Cultural Bolsheviks. The interests of Anglo Americans don’t come into it, and the efforts they made to elect Trump were a waste of time.

Hands down one of the best comments here.

I like Tulsi Gabbard too. And her appearances on Tucker give us a glimpse of one aspect of America that we don’t see enough of, ie; two people with different points of view having a thoughtful and respectful discussion about the issues.

Yes, I know we could go hardcore on them both if we wanted and find something we object to (as if we couldn’t do that with ourselves – no one’s perfect).

On the subject of an “official narative.” All of the smaller ones are in place to support the ultimate narrative – Political Correctness/Identity Politics.

It’s the most fanatical and barbaric belief-system in history.

It attempts to explain all facts by simply attributing them to single variables (Racism, Antisemitism, etc) vague abstractions (Whiteness) and glittering generalities (White Supremacy) that all instantly collapse into absurd absolutes (White Man Bad! Us Good!).

The whole thing has an occult-like vibe to it. Not surprisingly it didn’t take long for it to devolve into something so weird and creepy that it’s reduced to punishing anyone in the world who doesn’t want to have anything to do with it, ie; any reasonably sane person.

But it’s even worse that that.

In totally and aggressively abandoning all rigorous thought, consistent reasoning and cautious judgment it has turned the entire Western world into an open asylum for ignorance, intellectual laziness, moral imbecility and violence.

And because it, like all pathologies, tenaciously resists exposure, it has no choice but to run around punishing the sane for refusing to bow down in blind obedience to its authority.

In a word, it’s unsustainable.

And we’re going to find out just how true this is much sooner than later.

To be a true Slav means to be a rebel, rebel against the arrogance and the ignorance of the West, who fell in love with themselves long time ago and now that love is only turning pathological – hence the fa***try problem in the west.

You can look after your own house but be friendly with the neigbours. What Anglos do in the West is their business – but exporting their SJW religion is a bad idea. For example causing gratuitous offence in Hungary with their recent in your face homo Coca Cola ads.

So, is the United States Congress Israeli and also, by extension, Jewish occupied territory? I think the question answers itself.

It’s too obvious. The US is a colony of Israel and is exploited as a colony of Israel.

The US needs a candidate who doesn’t talk in euphemisms and puts all Giraldi’s points to the public. After the storm, the US can get back its Independence and find some clear, fresh air.

Yup. Screw all the Chi-comms, and Russkie – comms and all of the frickin Muslim hordes and all the rest of the parasites. Let them all rot in their own filth.

America doesn’t want them or need them. [Military] isolationism is the way to go.

Onbebornfree is going off the deep end.

First of all China government is communist, but their economy isn’t. Russia is no longer communist.
You have to be under a rock or seriously deranged to not know basic facts.

Military isolationism? What happened to your free-dumb libertarian idiocy? Free markets imply free movement of goods and people… the opposite of isolationism.

And of course your free-dumb is good for the Jew as Jews form ethnocentric nepotistic modes that allow them to be predatory. Middle eastern ethnocentric peoples are not compatible with white European types who operate with individualism.

This is why Libertarians are in cognitive dissonance… the ideology itself is full of contradictions, and people that take it up are dupes.

It declares support for the gunman who killed 51 in Christchurch, New Zealand,

Something I noticed is that both these manifestos reference video games:

Remember: it is not cowardly to pick low hanging fruit. AKA Don’t attack heavily guarded areas to fulfill your super soldier COD fantasy.
Crusius

Yes, Spyro the Dragon 3 taught me ethno-nationalism. Fortnite trained me to be a killer and to floss on the corpses of my enemies.
Tarrant

Is this some kind or real life version of first-person shooter games?

Russians are Europeans not Asiatics. They take their holidays in western Europe, buy property in western Europe and send their children to schools there, and actually fit in very well.

The fact that Russia is demonized by elite western Zionists is a different question. Fabrications like “Russian hacking”, Skripal, etc. and the tearing up of vital international security agreements (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces INF Treaty and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action JCPA with Iran) can only drive Russia into a defensive alliance with China.

A more natural situation would be for the traditionalist societies of eastern Europe (e.g. Poland and Hungary) to build links with similarly traditionalist Russia – and fade their links with the multi-cult, multi-gender, anti Christian open frontiers West.

Saker is 100% wrong about China. It’s a hegemon, as its SE Asian neighbours can clearly see. Overseas Chinese elites have for year played the same role in S.E.Asia as Jewish commercial elites in the Anglo world . Their corrupt alliances with local leaders allow them to continuously loot the economies of places like Indonesia and the Philippines.

World industrial and trade leadership inevitably leads to Empire. The British after 1850 and the Americans after 1945. The difference (as others have pointed out), is that the Chinese are more ethnocentric. Thus their Imperial project will probably have more in common with Japanese and Nazi German efforts – with a primary target (when they’re strong enough) being the natural resources of Russia’s Far East.

Actually, Czech nationalism was a strong movement that got its start in the 19th C, along with a lot of other nationalist movements that emphasized the language and culture of the “indigenous” people (to the extent that there is any such thing anywhere). In the case of CZ it was the native Czechs in the coutnryside rebelling against the Germans/Jews, mainly in the urban areas, who controlled everything. The new nation of Czechoslovakia was cobbled together from two historically “Austrian” (Bohemia and Moravia) and one part historically Hungarian (Slovakia). Things do get complicated in Eastern Europe! But it is wrong to say there was no local drive for independence.

It was inevitable that the Sudeten Germans would be driven out of CZ after WW2. It was they who started the whole thing, or were one of the excuses to start the whole thing. They were certainly in the way of Czech nationalism from the beginning.

Here are some basics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czech_National_Revival
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czech_nationalism

In the US, MAGA (Make America Great Again) turned into MIGA (Make Israel Great Again).

The UK looks exactly the same. Johnson and Brexit will supposedly Make Britain Great Again, whereas in reality it’s the same harmful Jewish/Israel project.

So it looks like the US/UK will continue as colonies of Israel and stay on their downward trends.

Most large countries are mixtures of different but similar ethnicities.

The British Isles comprise of Anglo-Saxons (Germanic), Irish and Scots (Celtic), Welsh (the Old British – or native inhabitants), Danes (Scandinavians) and Normans (French). The different identities are still there genetically, regionally and in surnames but no one pays much attention.

There is some tribalism among the Welsh and Scots (who lost out badly to the Anglos) but these races are all northern European, and Anglo culture currently treats everyone equally, so it has been in everyone’s interest to get along. Also they have been together for a thousand years. But, if the economic incentives change, the UK could still break up along the remaining fault lines – for example Scottish secession if the Scots see their economic interests seriously threatened by Brexit.

The US is now entirely different.

First of all it’s a recent creation. Until the 1950’s it had a similar racial identity, which was European (North, South, East and West European) with the original Anglo founders being dominant and giving it its language and culture. It had a small African minority that lived apart and came to have equal rights.

Similarly to the UK, US Anglo culture treated everyone equally – although now, the US is made up of a much larger proportion of non-Europeans (mostly South American native Indians) who may integrate and probably want to. The problem is elsewhere, in that the Anglos themselves have been pushed out of power by a small (non-integrationist) Jewish tribal group who are enforcing an entirely different culture.

America’s new Jewish tribalists don’t treat all citizens equally. They prioritize Jewish interests across the board, especially the social and economic destruction of the previous Anglo power holders. They direct US resources towards their true home country (Israel ). This gives the US the status of an Israeli colony, with organized US Jewry being the harsh administrators, controlling the press, finance and politics and rooting out dissent.

The question then becomes the fight for US independence (second time round).

Another brilliant article by Ron Unz

I would like to agree twice to this.

But even direct democracy – although an improvement – is still flawed without strong and effective means to prevent the emergence of partisan and dictatorial power.

The ” strong and effective means to prevent the emergence of partisan and dictatorial power” is really boring. It’s just a group of local citizens telling the political dictatorial types in their meeting to take a hike (and voting them down).

In fact it’s double boring because all local citizens are obliged to attend these meetings (with positive incentives such as paid time off work, research material, meeting halls and refreshments, and negative incentives such as fines for non-attendance) .

Localism is nothing new. While the US was opening up the West, frontier towns worked OK with a Sheriff, Deputy, Judge, doctor, schoolteacher + a general store and hotel/whorehouse.

Do you mean that while the holo-biz “survivors” have been milking others for 70 years, they had no means to check the facts?

You pretend on naivete while you know pretty well that any research related to WWII and Jewish holo-biz claims would result in a harsh punishment (including imprisonment) of the researcher plus the attacks of Jewish thugs.
https://www.unz.com/acockburn/truth-and-fiction-in-elie-wiesels-night/

Though Wiesel offers himself as a paragon of moral virtue, the truth is somewhat seamier. … Wiesel has for decades tried to pass off his short book “Night” as a true account–a “testimony” in his words– of his experiences at Auschwitz, even though key scenes in the book have been exposed as fiction.

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

Lipstadt’s absolute horror at having someone actually dispute the tenets of her academic doctrine could not have been more blatant. Surely no zealous theologian of the European Dark Ages would have reacted any differently. …

…there have been so many fake Holocaust memoirs over the years that they nearly constitute a literary genre of their own.

The vicious attacks on honest researchers by the thouroughly dishonest holo-biz activists in the UK and US:

Dr. Germar Rudolf was a successful young German chemist working at the prestigious Max Planck Institute when he heard of the controversy regarding the Leuchter Report, which he found reasonably persuasive but containing some weaknesses. Therefore, he repeated the analysis on a more thorough basis, and published the results as the Chemistry of Auschwitz, which came to the same conclusions as Leuchter. And just like Leuchter before him, Rudolf suffered the destruction of his career and his marriage, and since Germany treats these matters in harsher fashion, he eventually served five years in prison for his scientific impudence.

Most recently, Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, who had spent eleven years as a historian of science on the staff of University College, London, suffered this same fate in 2008. His scientific interests in the Holocaust provoked a media firestorm of vilification, and he was fired with a single day’s notice, becoming the first member of his research institution ever expelled for ideological reasons. He had previously provided the Isaac Newton entry for a massive biographical encyclopedia of astronomers, and America’s most prestigious science journal demanded that the entire work be pulped, destroying the work of over 100 writers, because it had been fatally tainted by having such a villainous contributor.

It seems that the UK & US are back to Jewish Bolshevism. Same methods and same dishonesty.

The US has a problem with a corrupted democratic process. Elected representatives don’t actually represent their electors, they represent a whole range of special interests, such as Zionists, healthcare, insurance, the MIC, outsourcing global corporations, farmers etc. etc. and they protect worthless institutions like the FED, the FBI and the CIA.

The way to fix this, is to drive Democracy (and taxation/spending) down to the lowest practical level. In many cases this would be the county. The ability of counties to look after their own affairs is probably seriously underrated.

They can organize their own schools, police, justice and healthcare and look after their own roads and water supply – and raise their own taxes to pay for it all. More complicated issues like electricity supply and specialist hospitals could move up to the lowest practical level (i.e. the state) and each county would contribute to the cost.

“Looking after their own affairs” would imply a high level of citizen participation, with issue by issue investigation (pros and cons) and voting. Participation would be an obligatory duty of citizenship to justify the consequent benefits – made easier with paid time off work, meeting places, study material etc.

Basically the United States would convert into a loose American Confederation with minimal Federal power and some kind of rotating figurehead presidency.

The existing financial mess would probably need a ground zero approach. America’s giant debts would have to disappear, and the quick way to do this would probably be to introduce a new currency (Confederate Dollar?) with non-convertibility to US Dollars. The Confederate Dollar would apply to output and fixed assets after ground zero day (with issuance strictly matching output = a classic hard currency), and the value of old US Dollar obligations (e.g. Chinese US Dollar bondholders and US pensions) would evaporate. US taxation and spending would have switched to the Confederate Dollar.

The race issue would also take on an interesting new aspect. For example Blacks in majority Black counties would realize that they were on their own, and need community meetings to decide on their own healthcare, education, police, justice etc. using their own resources.

There would be myriad other issues but the guideline would be that political power/decision making would be at the lowest level (County/State) with obligatory citizen participation.

Moreover, I don’t think you know much about “racism,” which isn’t necessarily the same as racial bigotry and can proceed from love as easily as from hate.

Agreed. Altogether an excellent comment.

Jews. Need. a New. Brand.

The old brand is falling apart; its bald-faced falsity is apparent to ever more people.

Agreed that it’s falling apart on various fronts.

– It’s difficult to play the part of an “oppressed minority” when you hold so much power.

– It’s difficult to push the “White Privilege” story when the reality is Jewish Privilege.

– The fashion leftist, protest Hippies are now in power. Problem being that they aren’t going to allow any protest (AKA “hate speech”).

– Their media worship of Blacks is obviously false. Black society is seriously dysfunctional and they encourage it. Respectable Blacks are “Uncle Toms”.

– Heroic little Israel of the 1960’s is turning into an intolerant, orthodox and murderous place.

– Even the stupidest Americans wonder why they are fighting (and paying for) trillion dollar ME wars.

Good article here:

What Is The Elites’ Obsession With An Owl Named Moloch?

The owl known as Moloch is riddled throughout history the more commonly known occultic owl is the 40 ft statute at Bohemian Grove, and more recently mentioned in Hillary Clinton’s leaked emails as well as seen on rich elite pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s island. So why do the elite worship this owl and what is the owl’s connection to ancient history? A forewarning, going forward the information provided in this article will be well sourced and stomach churning. The beliefs presented are the elites not my own I personally think they are off their rocker insane.

https://steemit.com/owl/@an0nkn0wledge/what-is-the-elites-obsession-with-an-owl-named-moloch

Trump wasn’t their candidate (which suggests that he’s clean), and (so far) he hasn’t enabled a war with Iran, so what happens with him is an open question.

I wonder what makes you (or anyone) so sure that “Trump wasn’t their candidate”.

The Deep State, Empire, Zio-Glob, or whatever you want to call it, was obviously 100% behind Hillary Clinton. She and her husband were totally blackmailable, and the media fury when she lost was something to see.

For his part, Trump looked surprised (and not too happy) that he won. It’s clear that he has links to the Deep State, but he was set up to lose (the media from the start presenting him as the joke candidate – the irrelevant clown). The script was for serious, boring and ineffectual Jeb Bush to lose to the heroic champion of Social Justice, and first woman President Hillary Clinton.

When Trump actually found himself President (and could see the trouble he was in) – for survival, he fully committed to Israel and the Zionists. The idea was that they would defend him , against their Cultural Bolshevik cousins in the US. The Adelsons and the Israelis love him while the US Cultural Bolshevik Jews hate him.

The US public are just extras in this show. If he cared about them he would do something about 9/11 – which he won’t. He’s a high rise developer from New York and knows better than anyone that 9/11 was all fakery. Here’s his first public reaction (on the day):

The most urgent question though is why are so many high & mighty tempted by pedophilia in the first place

While there is abundant evidence that the political class is composed primarily of sociopathic megalomaniacs, it’s a category error to conclude from the recent revelations that they’re ‘tempted’ by paedophilia.

Rather, they are people who are selected and promoted for their willingness to perform reprehensible acts, rather than an actual desire to do so. (The two characteristics intersect, and probably significantly more than the societal average; in the same way, on average butchers are less squeamish about blood, than are housewives).

Black male actors don’t do ‘drag’ roles because they want to; they do those roles because it pleases the people who control the arc of their careers.

C.S. Lewis nailed it in his talk entitled “The Inner Ring”. Some people are extraordinarily keen to belong to a group they identify as ‘exclusive’; when that exclusivity involves access to unmerited wealth and power, it’s easy for the unscrupulous insiders to up the ante.

FWIW, as part of an initiation I once stood with one trouser leg rolled up, a noose around my neck, a compass point held to my exposed left pectoral… in front of a glass coffin that held a human skeleton. Looking back it just seems monumentally retarded, but that’s humans for you.

When faced with the inevitable downstream “Oh, we all do this”, I walked away well before crossing any serious moral lines. Two colleagues who faced similar choices, are now a Deputy Commissioner of Taxation and a QC, respectively.

Make of that what you will… being a senior bureaucrat is no feat of skill or talent; being made Silk likewise marks one out as being ‘safe hands’, rather than a genuinely talented advocate (it’s possible to be both safe hands and a talented advocate, but the safe hands predominate among the “junior rabbis” of the modern QC/SC ranks).

This video is quite hard work (40 minutes long in Dutch with subtitles), but it’s valuable testimony on the Pizzagate Mafia world. IMO quite genuine.

But as the media continued to avert its eyes from these newly revealed facts, even those disclosed in the pages of the Times itself, I gradually began to consider matters in a different light. Perhaps McCain’s elevation to great American political power was not in spite of the devastating facts littering his personal past, but because of them.

Agree with this. The message from the McCain funeral was that the blackmailed US political class would be well looked after -right to the end – if they remained docile and obedient and followed their scripts.

For “War Hero” McCain, it was his unswerving hard line calling for the destruction of Iran.

But, the Zio-Glob still failed to get their war through McCain, and they also failed to get it through Hillary Clinton. Both of them were rejected by voters despite massive media support. This points to a basic problem that the Empire’s has with Democracy. The public clearly doesn’t want another ME war, and is now aware that it was tricked into Iraq (WMD), and significantly, their (the public’s) resistance to war is sufficiently strong enough to overcome massed MSM propaganda pushing the other way.

If the MSM can’t swing it, then they need to get a compromised candidate elected on an anti-war and immigration control platform, who then does a 180º turn when in office. Trump wasn’t their candidate (which suggests that he’s clean), and (so far) he hasn’t enabled a war with Iran, so what happens with him is an open question.

Also agree that the media reaction to the Pizzagate (pedophilia) story was one of extreme sensitivity – almost panic, with a massive and coordinated overreaction. This suggests that Pizzagate is in fact the nightmare subject at the root of American politician’s worst dreams.

In 2015 the EU admitted a million+ Muslims, and threatened member states who would not take their quota.

This is the reason why there is hardly any discussion of WHY the UK is Brexiting, as indicated in the article. Actually the K is no longer very U, since Scotland and Northern Ireland did not want out of the EU. The Brexit movement is English to the core.

Any discussion of the real reason is verboten under the no freedom of speech laws in the UK. Were I to mention such a thing in the comments section of The Guardian, for example, the comment would quickly be deleted.

Regarding the Electoral College, I’ve always thought it was unfair to give all of the EC votes to the winner of that state. If it went by congressional district (as is done in Nebraska and Maine), with an additional two EC votes going to the state’s winner to account for the Senate, it would not only be more fair, but it could help the conservatives. How many tens of thousands of conservative residents of California, New York, and Illinois, to name three, don’t even bother to vote for president as they know their vote is totally meaningless in such overwhelmingly blue states?

Going back to the Red/Blue County voting map of 2016, one argument is to prioritize the real local community (i.e. the County) and make it more responsible for itself by raising and spending its own taxes on its own services.

On that plan, each County would elect its own red or blue based local government and look after its own healthcare, schools, police etc. With most taxes raised and spent locally (and little sent Washington) – then Washington (and the Presidency) would become mostly irrelevant.

Added benefits would be 1) Counties wouldn’t vote for ME wars 2) citizens would be much more involved in local politics – to see how their money is being spend and by who 3) they would have the psychological benefits of rebuilding communities (for example deciding what was taught in their own schools).

The United States of America would then convert into the Confederation of American States, with each State being an association of Counties (one representative per County) and each State carrying out activates best suited to the State level, such a roads and specialist hospitals – while following the decisions of their County representatives.

Of course, the SJW activists and Washington Zio-Glob would 100% oppose the idea – but if all States/Counties got involved in it unilaterally, it’s difficult to know what the centre would do.

Some Swiss communities were able to purchase their freedom from the Catholic Church and the Habsburgs, but these independent towns came to an end at the Congress of Vienna.

When the dollar finally collapses and the boomer retirements go up in smoke, the federal masonic government will be desperate for real money, likely gold and silver (not BTC). At that point communities who managed to hang onto some liquid wealth may be able to purchase their independence from ZOG and then join together in small confederations. Just like Switzerland in the middle ages.

The problem with the US, is that it’s sliding into totalitarianism. It has a controlled press with an obligatory SJW ideology, SJW education, censorship and speech codes. Say the wrong thing and you can already lose your job.

The ongoing Sovietization of the US is probably going to follow the Bolshevik pattern. Every community receives a commissar office to monitor Political Correctness and find/ detain dissidents. That would be the end of any move towards local political independence.

When the dollar loses its reserve status (which it will), everyone will be a lot poorer, but this can coexist with totalitarianism. The population of Soviet Russia lived at a very basic level and the US public would have to do the same.

Tulsi Gabbard is the most interesting and perhaps the most independent Democrat candidate. The media lords at Google however want a manageable, anti-Iran, pro-Israel candidate. Therefore, Google has a thousand ways to steer information, adjust rankings, and skew search to areas that are hostile to her candidacy. They can also deplatform her if they choose.

Russiagate? Baloney.

Googlegate? Most certainly.

I’ve just said another Hitler is the only answer. I stand corrected, perhaps. But how does the USA achieve Swiss democracy? Not by “democratic” means. They still need a dictator to force that transition.

My suggestion, would be for the lowest level local communities (counties in the US) to institute local Democracy, and make realistic plans for their own self-funded communities (healthcare, justice, police, education) and go ahead with it.

If Washington sends in Homeland Security then fight them.

Broadly speaking, I suppose I liken the US presidential candidates to people arguing over who gets to be captain of the Titanic after the ship has struck the iceberg and is already starting to sink, something they’d see for themselves if they’d figuratively just look out a porthole, or, simply notice the six inches of water washing over their feet.

But, then, I imagine a lot of people on the ‘unsinkable’ Titanic didn’t want to face the harsh reality until it was too late either.

Agreed that it’s something to see. The nostalgia and faith in the old “unsinkable” Anglo-America has a tremendous grip on the inhabitants of N.America.

The question is how much reality they need in their faces until they realize that it’s gone.

Orthodox Jewish woman named cyber security chief for US spy agency – Times of Israel
https://www.timesofisrael.com/orthodox-jewish-woman-named-cybersecurity-chief-for-us-spy-agency/

Well, a MAGA Anglo Christian isn’t going to be appointed cyber security chief of Israel’s spy agency.

Eventually you have to conclude that that lazy, cowardly and corrupt Anglo Americans deserve everything they’re going to get.

The UK is an important part of the Zio-Glob Empire – particularly the Conservative Party.

The actions from Johnson are confusing, and maybe the only way to interpret them is through his desire for power. He’s fully for Brexit which the Zio-Glob hate. They have an arm lock on the EU and want the UK subservient to it (open frontiers, outsourcing etc.). But having said that, Johnson knows that Brexit is his only route to power.

He’s supporting the US provocations towards Iran, calling Corbyn (Labour leader) the “Mullahs Friend” and sending more warships to the Gulf.

Johnson’s two most important appointments are Dominic Raab (Foreign Secretary and Deputy Prime Minister) who’s father was Jewish (which may not be relevant) and Priti Patel (sacked from the May administration for making a supposedly private visit to Israel – while in fact holding secret unofficial meeting with Israeli ministers including Netanyahu. She visited the occupied Golan Heights and asked if her department could arrange UK aid for Israeli Army field hospitals.)

Israel clearly wants to promote Patel and she’s co operating. Johnson knows this, and the odds are that he’ll do the same when the next election is out of the way, and his position as Prime Minister is safe.

So the UK deepens its bonds with the US/Israel and continues its downward trajectory.

Kartoffelstampfer you exaggerate.

Local Swiss Communal meetings are not likely to be hijacked by Jewish activists. And the locals are never going to vote to send their tax money to Israel.

If 9/11 had happened in Geneva, the Swiss would have been all over it in micro detail and would have a total technical understanding of how the buildings collapsed.

It’s true that there are plenty of North Africans in Switzerland, but they have work permits and aren’t being offered Swiss citizenship.

Also, (maybe not unrelated) Swiss come near the top in the world in self assessed wellbeing, and their teenagers are near the top in PISA world academic rankings.

Born and raised in San Francisco and a young adult in the hippie era. It was phenomenal how Jewish were the hippies and SJW carpetbaggers. And most of it was a Jewish media created phenomenon.

Hippie leadership was heavily Jewish and they were the big counter-cultural activists/heroes.

There are some real parallels here with the Jewish Bolshevik activist heroes in Russia prior to their successful October 1917 coup (St Petersburg).

They were the primary agitators for workers rights and social justice, with a big following among the Russian gentile intelligentsia (i.e. they were fashionable). They worked to subvert the loyalty of the 125.000 soldiers in St. Petersburg with various lies, promising private land, farms, stopping the war, avoiding the return of landowners etc. and they unilaterally issued General Order Nº1 (invalidating orders from officers and forced removal of their insignia).

Of course, after they gained (absolute) power, all that changed. Anti-Semitism carried the death penalty, and the whole of the media was used to demonize the ethnic Russian middle class, with arrests and transportation for the most minor dissent.

Source: David R. Francis’ book, ” Russia from the American Embassy, April 1916 – November 1918″.

An invaluable firsthand account from someone who knew personally, Trotsky, Kerensky, Rodzianko, Miliukoff etc.

David R.Francis was the mayor of St Louis, the Governor of Missouri, U.S. Secretary of the Interior and finally the U.S. ambassador to Russia for 5 years from March 1916 to March 1921.

https://www.amazon.com/American-Embassy-1916November-Classic-Reprint/dp/B008CB8WTU/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=russia+from+the+american+embassy&qid=1563973377&s=books&sr=1-1

Oh, what a great observation: “don’t blame the jews, blame the boomer hippies.” Hasbara troll.

Jewish activism and it’s capture of the US media and government are a big problem. Now that they have the power, they’re looting the place.

What I’m saying, is that it could have been avoided. If you are careful about security checks, your house is less likely to get robbed. Opportunistic thieves will move on to an easier target like the neighboring house with open doors and windows.

In an active low level Democracy like Switzerland (with little power at the centre), they raise and spend their own taxes locally with obligatory citizen participation (voting issue by issue). It’s hard work but the chances of a national Jewish hijack of Switzerland are zero.

It’s the concept of Guardianship. The Boomer hippies were handed the Guardianship of Anglo society and they surely dropped the ball. There’s always a crowd of thieves ready to invade and steal unguarded property.

There is something perversely funny in the notion that the greatest nation in history, with the best military in the world is really nothing more than just another occupied land.

Probably not the greatest nation in history, and (in their time/place) other militaries were better, but no doubt that the USA has become a colony of Israel.

As generations move across time, there’s a view that each one becomes the Guardian of their people’s history and culture, through their own families, teaching and government.

From this POV, the Baby Boomer hippies (starting with Woodstock) were the worst Guardians imaginable. They trashed everything to do with traditional Anglo American society, while claiming their sleazy, self indulgent “freedoms” and converting themselves into eternal teenagers.

I don’t really blame the Jews. They’re opportunists, and like wolf packs, they choose to attack weakened, sick and disorganized herds. Of course they’re going to facilitate the collapse of Anglo society – it’s less risk and a quicker meal.

https://www.ae911truth.org/

I’ve just clicked on (from Europe) it and it works fine.

Trump’s tweets connected with his base in the way that his proposal of a Muslim ban connected in 2016 primary. All the respectable commentators said Trump was finished for voicing such an “un-American” idea. Prominent Republicans condemned him. Yet Trump stood by it and rose in the polls.

The problem with “respectable commentators” is that they have a consensus in their bubble which is different from the consensus of the public at large.

The same thing is happening in the U.K. – British “respectable commentators” were convinced that the “Labour Anti-Semitism” media fabrication would finish Jeremy Corbyn.

It caused chaos at the top of the Labour Party, but now they’re realizing (the Labour Party) that the UK public couldn’t care less. The Daily Mail pushed the story for weeks but the public just find it boring . Their problem with Corbyn is something completely different. He’s not solid on Brexit, and is waffling about a second referendum.

Some invariant rules about declining Empires seem to be:

1) They become smaller (i.e. they break up). The centre weakens and alternative power centres reassert themselves (usually the traditional ones suppressed by Empire).

2) The money goes bad with inflation and economic stresses.

3) Military defeats or hopelessly costly wars.

4) They fall behind technologically.

5) They develop decadent elites disconnected from the public.

The better designed Empires can last a long time (for example the Roman or British ones) by providing real benefits to Imperial citizens, but purely extractive ones dedicated to looting, for example, the current ZioGlobalist one, quickly collapse when they lose their coercive power.

The ZioGlob is more Genghis Khan than Pax Romana.

This late-capitalism death spiral will not cure itself. There is no world in which corporations and their pet politicians and corrupt media propagandists will “recognize the vital role of the state.” They will not regulate themselves. They will not create “a new social contract.”

True, but it’s not necessarily a death spiral, it can be deep long term poverty. For example, the hopelessly corrupt Philippines has been stumbling from one economic crisis to the next for years.

From Joe Studwell’s excellent book “Asian Godfathers”;

The 2006 World Development Report said, “15% of Filipinos were living in absolute poverty, and 47% subsisted on an income between US$1 and US$2 a day. Half of the 12 million population of Manila lives in shanty towns that line the expressways, rail tracks and waterways of the metropolis. After 25 years of repeated economic crises, the Philippines economy is now critically dependent on the overseas earnings of an estimated 10 million, mostly female workers – out of a population of 80 million – employed as child carers, nurses and more in richer states around the world.”

The Philippine’s best known living author, Francisco Sionil José (from an interview in the far Eastern Economic Review December 2004) says quite simply “We are poor because our élites have no sense of nation.”

Daily Mail is surprising good in publishing stories w/o any spin. Also lots of photographic and video evidence in ‘terrorist attacks’ stories that other media outlets withhold.

There are a lot of people reading the Daily Mail online. My latest comment there just got 1326 up votes (and 145 down votes).

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7265837/Melania-Trump-working-State-Department-free-AP-Rocky.html?offset=1&max=100&jumpTo=comment-444007715#comment-444007715

Another useful move would be for Europe to formally end NATO. The Soviet Union and the Cold War are long gone and there is no longer any reason for US bases in Europe. They should close them (including Incirlik in Turkey).

From the price/technology point of view, Russian equipment seems just as good as anything from the US. Also, they can jointly manufacture it in Turkey.

Erdogan can see that he’s more likely to have trouble with the US/Israel (they sponsored the Gulenist coup) and that air defense is critical. The days of US ME land invasions are probably over. Iran and Turkey have similar sized populations of around 80 million people (about the size of Germany) with large modern cities like Teheran (pop. 9M) and Istanbul (pop. 15M).

MikeatMikedotMike wrote:

No, the most destructive form of racism in this country are the elites – a combination of jews and whites – who actively work to turn the working class white population of this country into a permanent servant class.

Well, in the larger perspective, it’s all part of the same process: largely white (both Gentile and Jewish) elites with some token minority members abuse and exploit ordinary people of all races — black, white, Hispanic, Asian, or whatever.

However, I’m not sure it is a reasonable use of language to call the abuse of the white working class “racism”: it is simply evil, just because it is evil to abuse innocent people of any race or social class.

Mike also wrote:

Some of your points would be better received if you’d cut out the negro pity. Pretty much the entire city government of Chicago and Baltimore is made up of blacks, including the mayors, police chiefs, and states attorneys. I don’t hear them saying anything about black on black violence.

Yeah, the “official” black elite are just as corrupt and abusive as the mainstream white elite. I do not think, however, that this should reduce sympathy for the decent black folks who are the victims of those elites. (In fairness, there are of course blacks, such as Thomas Sowell, John McWhorter, Clarence Thomas, et al. who are speaking out for the truth. But, of course, the ruling elite denies such people the title of spokesmen for blacks.)

I don’t think we should accept the false dichotomy of either we sympathize with the abused white working class or we sympathize with innocent abused black folks.

It is really one injustice: decent people of all races who are abused and oppressed by the ruling elite.

You don’t need all this. Just the technical aspects show that it was an inside job. See https://www.ae911truth.org/

“Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”
Binyamin Netanyahu

Unfortunately, poorly sourced: http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/2304897-anti-american-netanyahu-quote-has-been.html

I can’t see anything wrong with it. Do you need Netanyahu to include this statement in an official speech ?

http://web.archive.org/web/20060512234448/http://www.onlinejournal.org/Special_Reports/092105Madsen/092105madsen.html

There’s no doubt that Netanyahu wanted Pollard released, but his really interesting private conversations would be the ones regarding 9/11.

Daily Mail is surprising good in publishing stories w/o any spin. Also lots of photographic and video evidence in ‘terrorist attacks’ stories that other media outlets withhold.

It’s also great on black crime in general.

What it does, is run the description of the crime and photos of the (Black) criminals, but then exclude from the text the fact that they’re Black. Comments are then “moderated in advance” with anything adverse about Blacks excluded. It’s not so great, but the real story is there.

The DM is now aware that it’s online comments section is it’s Crown Jewel, and has turned the DM into a national leader in news publishing. A converse example is The Guardian that that banned comments and quickly died online. The DM is also aware that its readers don’t like comment “moderation”, so it’s got a bias towards open commentary with any “moderation” still allowing the reader to see what’s happening (and down arrow the permitted positive comments).

… get the Pentagon to attack Iran, all bets are off. I don’t think such a war is capable of being contained, because Iran can and will take out US and allied assets throughout the Gulf region, probably precipitating nuclear retaliation.

The US is moving its forces into the Gulf with a view to air strikes. This seems to be the game plan – to destroy Iranian infrastructure, the same as Iraq infrastructure was destroyed. Iran is better prepared than Iraq and has more effective air defense. Also, the US commitment to new ME wars is weaker now (seeing how the other ME wars have turned out).

A failed US air war could turn nuclear but this couldn’t be entered into lightly (even for Trump).

Europe (apart from the UK) would conclusively dump the US. They are already looking for ways to disentangle themselves from the US politically and economically. Russia and China would do the same. The present day US only gets by, through its world economic hegemony, which is nearer the “dry up and blow away” stage than it’s given credit for.

“Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”

Binyamin Netanyahu

I think Trump’s trying to break up Jewish support for the Left.

Well, I support Israel becoming a partisan issue. This is one of the reasons I voted for Trump over Clinton.

The new game seems to be the declaration of undying support for Israel , while at the same time whacking the US multicultural left. The next move could be Trump highlighting the problem of Black criminality, and telling them to sort themselves out.

What’s he got to lose? His base would love it (along with many undecided voters) and he’s going to get called a racist anyway, whatever he does.

There’s a lot to be said for friendly neutrality. The UK got dragged into the Iraq war by the US (WMD lies and Neo-con collaborator Tony Blair) and had open frontiers forced onto it by the EU SJW elite.

The UK is physically located in Europe, and Europeans are its main trading partners, same as for Norway and Switzerland. They are friendly with the EU (but not EU members) and usefully keep their political independence.

Trump is very popular with Israeli Jews in Israel, but very unpopular with leftist SJW, Democrat Jews in the US.

It looks like the Zionist Jews love Trump for giving them everything they want on Israel (apart from a war on Iran ), while the SJW, open frontiers US Jews hate Trump because he’s interfering with their Multicultural Revolution (with themselves as leaders).

Israeli Jews and US Jews therefore have different interests and politics. Israeli Jews are more National Socialists, while US open frontiers Democratic Jews are more Cultural Bolsheviks.

Here is from today’s Zerohedge

“Combat Ready” Missile Seized During Police Raid On Italian Neo-Nazis

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-15/combat-ready-missile-seized-during-police-raid-italian-neo-nazis

The BBC claims that these neo-Nazis were supporters of the Russian-speakers who do not wish to be controlled by the ZioNazis of Kiev.

In reality, the Italian police said the precise opposite. This weaponry was destined to help the ZioNazis of Ukraine. They were to be used against the beleaguered defenders of the Donbass region.

The lies of the BBC are constant. This is an ongoing phenomenon – MH17, Syrian Chemicals, Skripals, Iran’s nuclear weapons, Hong Kong’s peaceful protesters, concentration camps for Uighurs, Global Warming, Building 7 collapsed 20 minutes after broadcast that it had fallen etc.