The stupidity of Socialism does not interest me, Feryl. However, just to be helpful here, why don’t you put a link to your blog home page in the 3rd textarea that Mr. Unz has provided (to the right of your handle)? If I hadn’t read yet read your idiotic insistence on Socialism as the answer to our problems, rather than a big part of the problem, over and over again here, I’d click on that to go there. I’ll let T.P. try to talk sense into you this round.
Yeah, but there’s still a – 15% there, A.E. Shouldn’t that mean NR and such would get it, or is it that their editors are not a part of bringing that red bar down?
The problem is that Republicans are not a big percentage of Jews to begin with.
MIKE
Yep, Manila is that bad. Stay away from it if you can (My business was in Cebu).
Jeff, Mike
Eons ago when i was working my very first job in the financial racket in NYC i met this Pinoy American dude employed as a stock broker.
Like every professional haughty upper-class Pinoy wannabe he claimed partial Chinese and Spanish ancestry. Not surprisingly the guy spoke of his Motherland with a mix of bitter venom, utter contempt and sheer terror.
Specifically he told me the place was hell on earth for Filipino Americans. That’s because at the time there was a kidnapping epidemic going on. A kidnapping epidemic specifically targeting them as they were perceived as fabulously wealthy.
The guy relayed to me the story of some other Filipino dude working at the IT department of the firm whose uncle had just been taken away a few months before during a trip to visit his relatives. The poor sod had his ear sawed off within hours of the kidnapping.
The whole Filipino coomunity basically organized a collection to get uncle Ramon back as his family, although far from poor, couldn’t even dream of coming up with the ransom money they demanded.
Mind you this was the late 90’s, since then the local economy and the overall situation somewhat improved so I don’t know if it’s still such a hyper-violent $hithole.
I visited the place (only Metro Manila) just once in 2012 for what turned out to be the most bizzarre “business” trip I ever experienced.
The whole place oozed a really odd vibe, like I don’t know an East Asian country that went through a nuclear holocaust only to be rebuilt (in the loosest meaning of the word) as a mix of Idiocracy and a low-budget Asian porn.
Lol
2 days ago you were saying that I’m a caricature for talking about the Jews.
Now you’re posting as if you’re some kind of visionary.
Jews hate you.
Parbes, you are a sick Bolshevik defending the very people who destroyed the Russian Empire, one of the greatest civilizations on earth, and who continue to feast on the carcass. Lukashenko and Putin are both traitors to the Russian nation. They are building nothing, they are simply squirreling away wealth and selling their resources to China. I meet Belarussians in Poland all the time these days. There is no future in Belarus for anyone with an ounce of ambition or dignity. Russia at least can offer interesting careers to people who want to live in Moscow but the countryside and small towns remain impoverished and bleak in a way most Americans can’t imagine. The willingness of the American right to suck up to Putin is squalid.
I decided to show your comment just to see if by chance you had anything to day about UFO's comment above:
Look at yourself in the mirror.
I mean, since you're our resident Supercilious Moralizer, I mean Guardian of Virtue, I thought such an outrageously degenerate and dehumanizing comment might warrant some sort of reply from you, given that you claim to be a Christian and all.
Sluts are just there to fulfill a physical need
I thought such an outrageously degenerate and dehumanizing comment might warrant some sort of reply from you
I don’t read every comment, especially when it is not written to me.
promote division in the Whie right.
Indeed. Good luck with the unity of the “Whie right.”
I would argue that most young liberals tend to believe that they are righting historical wrongs
Well you can’t blame them. After all back in the 1950s lynchings of black people were an everyday occurrence. Husbands would beat their wives if dinner wasn’t on the table when they got home from work. Women were not permitted to work outside the home. Girls were not allowed to go to school. Church attendance was compulsory. Blacks had to address all white people as Master. Jews were not allowed to play golf (that one’s a nod to iSteve readers). These things didn’t start to change until Bill Clinton got rid of the Jim Crow laws and gave women the vote.
One thing you have to give them, Millennials and Gen Z-ers know their history.
Redstan would be overwhelmingly White and Christian
I think it’s a bit foolish to put so much faith in the idea of Redstan as a Christian state. Christianity is in decline throughout the West. Even in the United States. And most modern Christians are extremely Woke. As soon as Redstan declares its independence you’re going to have Redstan Christians putting up Refugees Welcome signs. Lesbian Episcopalian bishops will be in the forefront.
As a means of resisting the Poz and resisting immigration Christianity has been an abject failure.
White Christians, on the whole, are most definitely not going to support your goals.
The part I can’t make sense of is why American Jewish zionists want to dilute the white gentile population in America. How does that help them either here or in Israel?
Maybe the key is that American Jewish Zionists have no desire to live in Israel. They’re strongly in favour of Zionism as long as they can stay in Manhattan. They support a Jewish homeland, for other Jews but not for them. There’s a pretty major fundamental contradiction there.
Maybe what they really want is some absolute guarantee that Manhattan will always remain a Jewish homeland.
It’s also quite likely that they really sincerely believe that they’re in mortal danger from white supremacists. Part of it is just what happens to people who live their entire lives in the richer sections of big cities. They end up being terrified of everybody who isn’t a wealthy urban dweller. The gentile elites who live their whole lives in the rich parts of big cities are also terrified of non-wealthy non-urban people.
Ris_Eruwaedhiel:
In NYC the Jews* likewise have the reputation of being the first to flee from the marauders while the Italians are renown for being the last to depart.
*One exception being the Ultra-Orthodox who are self-contained and very resistant and/or oblivious to attack. You could set them down in the middle of the Gobi desert and they would just dig in.
To minimize additional price inflation resulting from the distribution of the UBI, as well as to make the cost of the phase-in less onerous, it could be phased in over four years.
As for the potential regressive effect of taxes used to find the UBI: Yang, as you know, has proposed a federal VAT as the main means of funding the UBI. Can the VAT can be imposed at a higher rate on the process leading to the sale of luxury items and not imposed on groceries, health and hygiene items? I think so but don’t yet actually know.
How about increasing the corporate income tax on large corporations and phasing out income tax on most people?
There are two other new federal taxes that would help fund a UBI without affecting the great majority (80%-plus) of US Citizens:
excise tax on marijuana products (jokes aside, it could yield 150-200 billion or more annually with nationwide legalization), not such a high rate that it would drive sales back underground when combined with state and local pot taxes).
Excise tax on remittances of cash to recipients outside the US (could yield 150-200 billion dollars per year).
Yes it can be a dangerous place. The brother of one of the Black Eyed Peas was shot dead in Angeles City some 10 years ago as well as others.
There were even cases of somebody getting killed almost on arrival, like outside the hotel after the ride from the airport. And people were killed by robbers coming out of money changers.
“Moderates” are pathetic excuses for human beings.
Look at yourself in the mirror.
Can anyone help me out with that?
Look at yourself in the mirror.
I decided to show your comment just to see if by chance you had anything to day about UFO’s comment above:
Sluts are just there to fulfill a physical need
I mean, since you’re our resident Supercilious Moralizer, I mean Guardian of Virtue, I thought such an outrageously degenerate and dehumanizing comment might warrant some sort of reply from you, given that you claim to be a Christian and all.
Alas, I am confirmed in my assessment of you as a dishonest hack who only cares about morality when you can use it to promote division in the Whie right.
Back to ignore.
I don’t read every comment, especially when it is not written to me.
I thought such an outrageously degenerate and dehumanizing comment might warrant some sort of reply from you
Indeed. Good luck with the unity of the “Whie right.”
promote division in the Whie right.
Are you suggesting that I’m sympathizing with the Jews of the late 19th century? Uh, Hell no I’m not. I was describing their possible attitude, not supporting it.
And my blog is denofinquiry2.blogspot.com/. It has lots of GSS data, I don’t just make stuff up.
And when did the evil boomers do this? When has that generation been in charge of government? Government has bankrupted the country and the “greatest generation” has had a grip on government power that is just now beginning to slacken.
Greatest Generation is a term coined by Tom Brokaw in the 1990’s. Brokaw is a Silent. Before the late 90’s, the term “World War Two generation” was generally used to describe people born in the 1910’s and 1920’s. Neil Howe and Strauss use the term “GI Generation”. Stop with the derisive use of Greatest Generation. Boomers have now been making fun of Brokaw’s coinage for 20 years, and the joke has gotten stale.
And why do you Boomers act so butt-hurt about things? The oldest Boomers are now about 74 years old. When is your generation going to accept responsibility for anything? You did unprecedented levels of drugs in the 70’s, fought to destroy unions and market regulation in the 80’s and 90’s, removed taboos regarding homosexuality, got divorced at higher rates than other generations, and so forth. Maybe not every single Boomer was on board with these things, but that didn’t seem to make any difference.
By 1980, many members of the world war 2 generation were either dead or retired. So what’s happened since then can be attributed mostly to the Silent, Boomer, and X-er generations.
People born in 1910 would now be 109 years old. They aren’t in charge.
Lost Generation: 1885-1900
GI Generation: 1901-1924
Silent Generation: 1925-1944
Boomer Generation: 1945-1960
Gen X: 1961-1980
Millennial: 1981-1996
Gen Z: 1997-?
The Warren court of the 1960’s was actually comprised mostly of Losts. Some (but not all) of the bad changes of the 60’s and 70’s can be attributed to Losts and GIs, but after 1980 it was up to Silents and later generations to run society as they saw fit.
Italians and the Jews are the most clannish of the listed groups
Yeah, sure, Feryl, but which generation are you talking about?
Can anyone help me out with that?
Look at yourself in the mirror.
I decided to show your comment just to see if by chance you had anything to day about UFO's comment above:
Look at yourself in the mirror.
I mean, since you're our resident Supercilious Moralizer, I mean Guardian of Virtue, I thought such an outrageously degenerate and dehumanizing comment might warrant some sort of reply from you, given that you claim to be a Christian and all.
Sluts are just there to fulfill a physical need
“*Ashknenazi Jews, by the 19th century, resented gentile white society and began to show less and less qualms about undermining it, perhaps as retribution for what had been done to them.”
Really? What was done to them by the populace of the USA, anyway? For that matter, what was done to them anywhere? How could undermining a society that welcomed them and allowed them to become citizens and to do business be justified by something unstated that had to have been done to them before they immigrated.
“And Western Boomers, who came to believe that “whites” were uniquely sinful and sanctimonious, were hoodwinked into betraying their ancestors, destroying the family, and bankrupting their countries.”
And when did the evil boomers do this? When has that generation been in charge of government? Government has bankrupted the country and the “greatest generation” has had a grip on government power that is just now beginning to slacken.
Is this the kind of nonsense you post on your blog?
Greatest Generation is a term coined by Tom Brokaw in the 1990's. Brokaw is a Silent. Before the late 90's, the term "World War Two generation" was generally used to describe people born in the 1910's and 1920's. Neil Howe and Strauss use the term "GI Generation". Stop with the derisive use of Greatest Generation. Boomers have now been making fun of Brokaw's coinage for 20 years, and the joke has gotten stale.And why do you Boomers act so butt-hurt about things? The oldest Boomers are now about 74 years old. When is your generation going to accept responsibility for anything? You did unprecedented levels of drugs in the 70's, fought to destroy unions and market regulation in the 80's and 90's, removed taboos regarding homosexuality, got divorced at higher rates than other generations, and so forth. Maybe not every single Boomer was on board with these things, but that didn't seem to make any difference.By 1980, many members of the world war 2 generation were either dead or retired. So what's happened since then can be attributed mostly to the Silent, Boomer, and X-er generations.People born in 1910 would now be 109 years old. They aren't in charge.Lost Generation: 1885-1900
And when did the evil boomers do this? When has that generation been in charge of government? Government has bankrupted the country and the “greatest generation” has had a grip on government power that is just now beginning to slacken.
The nationalist right has dropped the ball on the issues of “sanitary conditions” and “assistance to Central America”.
While we may not really care about these specific subsets, moderates do.
It starts to make more sense when we realize that part and parcel of strong ethno-centrism is living by one standard and then asking another group to live by a different standard. If elite level American patriots began to demand the same security that Israel enforces, that would probably bother Jews who might start to feel that Americans care more about themselves than they do anyone else. And before you know it, we might start to withdraw our unconditional support of Israel that’s existed for 50 years. In other words, Ashkenazi Jews (AKA the Jews who dominate the West) whether they realize it or not care more about their tribe and it’s homeland (Israel) then they do about America.
We are to blame for this to a large extent, because giving out “blank” checks to those for whom dual loyalty might be a a teensy bit of a problem has been a disaster. The American Right especially has a huge blind spot about devotion to Israel and it’s tribe. The Anglo-Right has been forced to renounce many populist and socially conservative outfits because they get on the nerves of Israel firsters and elite Jewish “conservatives” who are cultural libertarians but want tax cuts for the rich and pork for Israel*.
*The lack of interest in protecting most cultural conservatism that we see among the Right elite isn’t hard to figure out; big donors and trend setters in the modern elite Right never really cared that much about social conservatism. Since the 70’s, Market de-regulation and Pentagon pork have always been the most important items on the agenda. Back in the New Deal era, kids saw educational movies in school that warned them about gay predators. It’s not just that conservatives have failed to continue that sort of conservatism, it’s that most of them never even tried after circa 1970. They often make excuses about law suits, losing your job, etc. Well, ya know, if enough people started doing something than it would be hard to stop, right?
Someone should remind MMM that impulsively lashing out without proper fact-finding first is a stereotypically black behavior. Oh, no, I am sounding like Thomm!
Do Liberals Think They Won’t Be Harmed by National Suicide?
2007, October 03 | Lawrence Auster
... This is one of the great mysteries, which we’ve discussed a lot: what is the left actually thinking? While I can’t put my hand on any previous posts on this subject at the moment (if anyone can, please point me to it), the short answer is that people on the left, including many “conservatives”, define society AS openness and tolerance, and place no value on the historic society as a society. As a result, they cannot even conceptualize the idea that excessive diversity can harm society ...
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008925.html
I would argue that most young liberals tend to believe that they are righting historical wrongs*, it’s just that what is “history” and what is “wrong” are always changing. But that gives liberals an advantage, everything is very slippery. Without necessarily realizing it, they make things up as they go on.
Whereas “conservatives” tend to be prone to arguing with each other about what set of traditions and “values” we should stick with. Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushes all had their own “take” on what was best about the past and what present things ought to be continued.
So liberals tend to agree with each other on the latest fads, while conservatism fragments into tons of sub-groups whose goals and temperament don’t always align neatly**.
If conservatives actually would quite fighting each other on often frivolous and pedantic grounds, they’d succeed at defending what they had to start out with…But which they easily piss away because they fail to make a good case for why we should save something. I mean, they can’t even get along well with each other, much less their opponents.
*Sometimes they do have a point, but sometimes it’s just unnecessary whining and agitation.
**Ask 10 conservatives about what the government should do about two men having sex in a private home; you might get any of the following answers:
1)It’s not the government’s business to legislate sex partners
2) If nobody gets hurt, fine. But if the activity is harmful, then we should do something.
3) We should never let that happen. The authorities need to stop it.
Well, say the government does stop the two men. Then what? Tell ’em to go their seperate ways, and leave it that? Arrest them? If so, what then? Fine them? Put ’em in jail for a couple days? Sentence them to prison? Kill them?
Conservatives won’t be able to coherently talk sense to to liberals if “conservatives” can’t make up their own damned mind about these issues. Like Agnostic pointed out, a “conservative” judge in the late 70’s basically admitted that abortion morally offended him, yet he also couldn’t stomach giving the government greater power to regulate our personal affairs. Make up yer damned mind already.
Well you can't blame them. After all back in the 1950s lynchings of black people were an everyday occurrence. Husbands would beat their wives if dinner wasn't on the table when they got home from work. Women were not permitted to work outside the home. Girls were not allowed to go to school. Church attendance was compulsory. Blacks had to address all white people as Master. Jews were not allowed to play golf (that one's a nod to iSteve readers). These things didn't start to change until Bill Clinton got rid of the Jim Crow laws and gave women the vote.
I would argue that most young liberals tend to believe that they are righting historical wrongs
In the 80’s, Jews were only 6% less likely to support pot legalization then they were in the 70’s. Jews were the quickest to abandon New Deal norms of caution, there’s no question. In the 70’s, just 21% of white Protestants wanted to legalize pot, while 48% of Jews did. That’s basically 2 1/2 times more libertarian.
It’s true that the Boomer revolution in values reached all Western countries, but as someone else hinted at, it’s not hard to figure out who the “accelerationists” tended to be drawn from; moreover, the “generation gap” was strongest with gentiles, while much of the New Left rhetoric was inspired by older generations of Jewish rabble rousers; minoritarianism, sexual degeneracy, hostility toward the military, and so forth were all things that Jewish “thinkers” had been cooking up since the 19th century*, but had to wait until the 1960’s, when many young naive gentiles were gullible enough to believe anything, to get the full revolution going.
The end result of radical “youth” culture (often cynically steered by older gurus) has been to annihilate the foundations of stable and responsible society.
*Ashknenazi Jews, by the 19th century, resented gentile white society and began to show less and less qualms about undermining it, perhaps as retribution for what had been done to them. But, asking people to hate themselves is not easy, so it was not until after WW2 that gentiles could be guilt-tripped into letting go of certain traditions and norms. And Western Boomers, who came to believe that “whites” were uniquely sinful and sanctimonious, were hoodwinked into betraying their ancestors, destroying the family, and bankrupting their countries.
Indeed, it is a perplexing conundrum. Lawrence Auster covered this many times, as in this discussion from over ten years ago.
Do Liberals Think They Won’t Be Harmed by National Suicide?
2007, October 03 | Lawrence Auster… This is one of the great mysteries, which we’ve discussed a lot: what is the left actually thinking? While I can’t put my hand on any previous posts on this subject at the moment (if anyone can, please point me to it), the short answer is that people on the left, including many “conservatives”, define society AS openness and tolerance, and place no value on the historic society as a society. As a result, they cannot even conceptualize the idea that excessive diversity can harm society …
Yeah, I went and updated my blog with the RELIG16 (household religion when you were 16) results. Since “are you Jewish” (OTHJEW) has only been asked a handful of occasions, that basically leaves RELIG (present religion) and RELIG16. Unfortunately, RELIG includes a lot of lapsed people and presumably, some Jews reject a religious ID while obviously still having an ethnic ID. So RELIG16 is probably the best way to discern Jewish ethnicity with the GSS.
From the 70’s-90’s, RELIG16 shows that Christians and “not raised in a religious household” are much more conservative than people raised in Jewish households. After 2000, the non-religious household people start to draw closer to Jews in terms of GSS responses to moral questions. So either a lot of modern atheists were raised by Jews who imparted no Jewish identity to their kids, or, more likely, over the last 20 years Jews and gentile atheists have converged to some degree and become very hostile toward heartland Christians.
Yeah, I did make that connexion. And, as with your other observation, it makes sense – if we recognize that there are innate, immutable differences between men and women.
When these groups are the majority, as they are in the MENA, they act like ethno-nationalists. When they are in the minority in other countries, they play the victim and pretend to be noble multi-culturalists.
Many groups that are liberal in the West aren’t so liberal in their homeland. Moslems are the biggest hypocrites — favoring religious freedom and equality in the West, while typically favoring the opposite situation in their homelands. In Moslem lands, public rejection of Islam might be punishable by death.
You are correct. It’s only “bigotry” when you are the victim, not when you yourself do the same thing. That’s different.
A breakup of the US into Bluestan and Redstan would probably lead to the further breakup of Bluestan. The different groups would tear each other apart, fighting for dominance. Redstan would be overwhelmingly White and Christian. Like the America of the much-maligned 1950s.
I think it's a bit foolish to put so much faith in the idea of Redstan as a Christian state. Christianity is in decline throughout the West. Even in the United States. And most modern Christians are extremely Woke. As soon as Redstan declares its independence you're going to have Redstan Christians putting up Refugees Welcome signs. Lesbian Episcopalian bishops will be in the forefront.
Redstan would be overwhelmingly White and Christian
Netanyahu has lent moral support for American immigration restrictionism on multiple occasions. UR commentariat aside, Americans who want a clamp down on immigration are the same ones who support Israel (and wars for Israel). The part I can’t make sense of is why American Jewish zionists want to dilute the white gentile population in America. How does that help them either here or in Israel?
Do Liberals Think They Won’t Be Harmed by National Suicide?
2007, October 03 | Lawrence Auster
... This is one of the great mysteries, which we’ve discussed a lot: what is the left actually thinking? While I can’t put my hand on any previous posts on this subject at the moment (if anyone can, please point me to it), the short answer is that people on the left, including many “conservatives”, define society AS openness and tolerance, and place no value on the historic society as a society. As a result, they cannot even conceptualize the idea that excessive diversity can harm society ...
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008925.html
Maybe the key is that American Jewish Zionists have no desire to live in Israel. They're strongly in favour of Zionism as long as they can stay in Manhattan. They support a Jewish homeland, for other Jews but not for them. There's a pretty major fundamental contradiction there.
The part I can’t make sense of is why American Jewish zionists want to dilute the white gentile population in America. How does that help them either here or in Israel?
Yes, Jewish sentiments on immigration and abortion really are radically to the left of the rest of the US population. It’s remarkable.
There have been controversies involving her, but at least she didn't smoke crack cocaine like the late mayor of Toronto. If you guys deny the existence of competent women in politics, you'll just be laughed at as the ignorants you are. But if your priority is to out-edgelord each other in your cozy circle, then by all means go on.
The explosion they heard was from the now-infamous 1979 train derailment in Cooksville. While that terrifying event saw the entire city evacuated for almost a week, not a single person was injured or killed. During that entire week, McCallion slept for a mere 14 hours and showed the grit that endeared her to Mississauga for the rest of her life.
"I really don’t think one week can make or break a career. But what that week did show, under intense media scrutiny, was that I always work for the people and the city of Mississauga. I show up for work every day, doing my best for the people of Mississauga, always trying to deliver value for their tax dollars and putting people first."
That event secured re-election for McCallion and allowed her to instil her plans without the stress of campaigning. In fact, her re-election became such a foregone conclusion that she barely ran any campaigns whatsoever in the 90’s and 2000’s.
During which time, growth spread out from Square One Mall, which was deemed the city centre. Things moved quickly with downtown changing from an area with a few fields and cows, to become an urban sprawl with a new city hall by 1987, followed by countless restaurants, a big library, the Living Arts Centre, Sheridan College, and multiple expansions of Square One itself. Further expansion around Mississauga included the Hershey Centre, new bus lines and stations, the Riverwood Conservancy, and the initial stages of the Light Rail Train.
The expansion was so rapid that Hazel became known as the “Queen of Sprawl”, with six thousand permits being issued annually. “We were waking from a slumber, getting the sleep from our eyes and no longer simply a ‘bedroom community’ wearily serving our giant neighbour to the east. Mississauga was becoming a lot more than that.” Amazingly, she ran Mississauga debt-free all the way up until 2012, when the city took on some debt in order to fix ageing infrastructure.
https://www.yoursauga.com/mississauga-retrospective-the-life-times-of-hazel-mccallion/
She endorsed Trudeau now sauga is a Muslim shithole.
That alone undid any previous good work.
Trudeau is a traitor.
Hazel McCallion ran Mississauga, Canada’s 6th largest city, in 1978—2014 (she retired at 93) and was re-elected 10 times.
The explosion they heard was from the now-infamous 1979 train derailment in Cooksville. While that terrifying event saw the entire city evacuated for almost a week, not a single person was injured or killed. During that entire week, McCallion slept for a mere 14 hours and showed the grit that endeared her to Mississauga for the rest of her life.
“I really don’t think one week can make or break a career. But what that week did show, under intense media scrutiny, was that I always work for the people and the city of Mississauga. I show up for work every day, doing my best for the people of Mississauga, always trying to deliver value for their tax dollars and putting people first.”
That event secured re-election for McCallion and allowed her to instil her plans without the stress of campaigning. In fact, her re-election became such a foregone conclusion that she barely ran any campaigns whatsoever in the 90’s and 2000’s.
During which time, growth spread out from Square One Mall, which was deemed the city centre. Things moved quickly with downtown changing from an area with a few fields and cows, to become an urban sprawl with a new city hall by 1987, followed by countless restaurants, a big library, the Living Arts Centre, Sheridan College, and multiple expansions of Square One itself. Further expansion around Mississauga included the Hershey Centre, new bus lines and stations, the Riverwood Conservancy, and the initial stages of the Light Rail Train.
The expansion was so rapid that Hazel became known as the “Queen of Sprawl”, with six thousand permits being issued annually. “We were waking from a slumber, getting the sleep from our eyes and no longer simply a ‘bedroom community’ wearily serving our giant neighbour to the east. Mississauga was becoming a lot more than that.” Amazingly, she ran Mississauga debt-free all the way up until 2012, when the city took on some debt in order to fix ageing infrastructure.
https://www.yoursauga.com/mississauga-retrospective-the-life-times-of-hazel-mccallion/
There have been controversies involving her, but at least she didn’t smoke crack cocaine like the late mayor of Toronto. If you guys deny the existence of competent women in politics, you’ll just be laughed at as the ignorants you are. But if your priority is to out-edgelord each other in your cozy circle, then by all means go on.
Sluts are just there to fulfill a physical need while you keep looking hard for the right white woman to raise a family with. For instance, non-white women often make good sluts; you can keep a clean conscience as you know you are not defiling a more valuable white woman, while simultaneously meeting your basic needs.
This must be an example of that excellent male capacity for empathy at work.
Mike himself provided one in the very podcast I linked above. After reporting on some White girls who got their lives ruined after being caught on camera saying “niqqer,” he dismissed their misfortune on the grounds that women are “always employable” because we have a “pussy.”
IOW, I don’t have to show any sympathy or solidarity with racially conscious White girls because they always have the option of becoming whores!
Isn’t that special?
And to think, he is among the best White men have as advocates. Sometimes I think White men really are just too irrationally hateful to deserve a future, but then I remember that the data show that White men don’t agree with manosphere misogyny. Like Mr. Sailer says, there’s too much fraternizing with the enemy.
It can be explained without the anti-semitic tropes, though they are not really wrong, but just by explaining how a people lose control of their government. Come on, readers, just look at A.E.’s graphs. If all these peoples are against immigration, how come all branches of our government don’t give a rat’s ass about that?
What you don’t do is let your governments get out of control to where they don’t have to care what you think about their policies. Our Founders knew this and did their very best, but over the last 5 decades our idiot Socialists have created the Feral Beast we have now. Nice going, assholes!
Well...the population of the entire* World wants to evacuate their homelands and immigrate to a white nation. Why is that?
WNs make...presenting whites as awesome
I think that is in the early stages of changing wrt Asia.
Big time. In another thread, I mentioned how Alexander arranged a wedding between 80 of his officers and Persian noble women. There were Christian armies fighting along Turks in multiple battles against other Christians because that prince or king was the brother in law of the Sultan/Caliph.
in other words marriage
A great example of the contrast between now and then is the relationship between the Turks and the Kurds. The Kurds were some of the most loyal subjects of the Ottoman caliphs, but that all changed to mostly animosity between the two peoples now:
States were united by loyalty to a king or emperor even if the kingdom comprised a multiplicity of ethnicities, cultures, religions and languages.
To extend all the way back to ancient Greece again, the Delian League is a perfect example of that last paragraph.
national power is ultimately based upon REAL military prowess and the full cycle of research/development/manufacturing that facilitates said military prowess.
it is obscenely evident that this thesis is correct.
simply look at the once great powers that are no more: england, france, germany, sweden, spain, portugal even poland if you go back far enough.
all are now second rate powers at best and more likely lower than that. forget car making. on this planet real power is military at its core with the industry to support it.
on this basis american real military is VERY fast ebbing. the pentagons obstensible omnipotence is being for the moment only kept alive by BS war porn from hollywood and clever media manipulations that make us military prowess appear more robust than it in fact is. this is why you do not see any washington blustering taken to the point of actual attack……..whether it be russia, iran, china or venezuela.
washington simply can not afford to show the world how badly and how fast the pentagon can be damaged in a real fight with a real foe.
so forget israel, aipac and the jewish billionaires that control the us congress. israel in real military terms can not even beat hezbollah right now without suffering massive casualties while seeing all its northern cities down to tel aviv smashed by a barrage of unstoppable missiles and the pentagon would be irreparably hurt trying to save them……ergo no war on the horizon despite all the bloviating from washington and tel aviv.
israel will be lucky indeed to make it through the 21rst century intact. forget jewish power, it is peaking right here and now and for that group the trend is down as eurasia assumes the mantle of global leadership…. a land where jews are insignificant with no prospects of improving that position and as an added benefit to humanity eurasia is immune from the holocaust guilt shakedowns that have crippled the west for decades.
Brynner’s Wikipedia bio has crypto-Jew written all over it; so does Stalin’s (and just about anyone else who is famous) was my main point.
Incidentally, if you really think millions still remember Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra from the 1963 movie by the same name, then you’re probably a boomer in his 70s.
Most people under 50 remember her if at all, as the fat and unlikely love interest of the late and formerly black Micheal Jackson, who, speaking of selling Whiteness, did more of it ironically than anyone else I can think of in the most recent past quarter-century.
I have yet to decode what that just-too-weird relationship was all about, but some have suggested that Taylor was really a male-to-female transgender (a little Jewish man) and Jackson was a female-to-male transgender.
In any event, Jackson’s transformation from a black man to a female-looking white and young Elizabeth Taylor look-alike is indeed very curious and conspiratorial to me.
The Oligarchs love to mock us, sometimes they do it openly by taking their pants off and shitting in front of us.
But because we have been so brainwashed and or so dumbed down we believe that a fat and old hag could be the love interest of the “King of Pop” who could have screwed any woman he wanted but chose Taylor instead.
I mean, only a “crazy conspiracy theorist” like me would not believe any of this BS, right?
To make things more complicated, Jackson was also rumored to be a pedophile and molested children at his Neverland Ranch. Confused?
It seems the Oligarchs love to confuse us as much as they love to mock us.
So why weren't the English trying to kick out the foreign Norman invaders and restore a native English king? Why did the Egyptians accept being ruled by a foreign Macedonian ruling elite for three hundred years? Why did the Roman Empire survive for so long? Why didn't the Hungarians fight to regain their independence from the German Hapsburgs? Why don't the Bretons want to break away from France? Why did the Poles elect so many non-Polish kings? Why do the Russians consider the German Catherine the Great to be one of the greatest of Russia's rulers? Where did the Arab Empire come from? Why aren't the British bothered by having a German royal family? Why did Hungarians, Croats, Italians and Walloons fight for the German Queen-Empress Maria-Theresa? Why did the subject peoples of the Roman Empire fight for Rome?
Subject peoples have always been aware of, and resented, their subjection.
The history of the Roman empire is one of many proto-nationalist uprisings against Roman rule, especially in the north, but of course also in the middle east involving every UR reader’s favorite people.
(and moreover, as the causes of it, they’d only deserve it if they were).
Still no evidence. Are you stupid, or are you a liar?
I have been in favor of raising the retirement age in keeping with changes in life expectancy for at least the past 35 years.
That’s a terrible idea. Young people have enough trouble finding work as it is.
News Flash:
I have excellent news to share with you all. Mike Enoch has informed us that men are more empathetic than women. Therefore, you can all stop blaming women for undue pity to strangers. Who’s up for a debate on whether men should be disenfranchised on account of their excess empathy and concomitant inability to think rationally about White interests?
https://therightstuff.biz/2019/08/14/tds480/ (second half)
Many groups that are liberal in the West aren’t so liberal in their homeland. Moslems are the biggest hypocrites — favoring religious freedom and equality in the West, while typically favoring the opposite situation in their homelands. In Moslem lands, public rejection of Islam might be punishable by death.
When these groups are the majority, as they are in the MENA, they act like ethno-nationalists. When they are in the minority in other countries, they play the victim and pretend to be noble multi-culturalists.
This actually isn’t all that offensive, because, after all, they are doing what they perceive to be in their interests. What is offensive is when these groups complain about others doing the exact same things that they themselves do. Hypocrisy and double standards.
I am not celibate, am “angry at women” regardless, and rightly so. This “gee, look in the mirror loser!” boilerplate is pointless. It’s nonsense and I’m immune to it.
and you try.
The “trying” part is actually an enormous problem: years upon years of what should have been peak productive and creative activity squandered on socially useless zero sum sexual competition (which only a minority will get much out of anyway).
Biste meschugge?! Doch net inn AIGENEN Land!
(ancient inside joke about “building socialism” 😛 )
I once remarked to a Jewish friend that IMO one of the reasons why Jews tend to be liberal is because Jews tend to be affluent and so can escape the consequences of their purported idealism. She agreed with me.
A wise Frenchman, Louis Veuillot, once observed in the 19th Century: When I am the weaker, I ask your for my freedom because that is your principle; when I am the stronger, I will take away your freedom because that is my principle.
Many groups that are liberal in the West aren’t so liberal in their homeland. Moslems are the biggest hypocrites — favoring religious freedom and equality in the West, while typically favoring the opposite situation in their homelands. In Moslem lands, public rejection of Islam might be punishable by death.
When these groups are the majority, as they are in the MENA, they act like ethno-nationalists. When they are in the minority in other countries, they play the victim and pretend to be noble multi-culturalists.
Many groups that are liberal in the West aren’t so liberal in their homeland. Moslems are the biggest hypocrites — favoring religious freedom and equality in the West, while typically favoring the opposite situation in their homelands. In Moslem lands, public rejection of Islam might be punishable by death.
First in reference to jews. Most jews are white as Mr. Bill Mahr is white. Being a jew is a cultural distinction not one of color and any claim to unique biology — well, let’s just being scattered to the four winds as well as inter breeding before that renders most of that a moot issue.
Second, What matters to my stead is whether US citizens support US citizenship. And all of the replacement theorists get know traction and shouldn’t be given any despite their skin color wealth connect or power.
If the constitution we have is to have any lasting meaning and value —- then we had better put the breaks on immigration. And say that despite the 12 year old childish responses of name calling and the ridiculous claims that I am not heterosexual ——- tiresome as it is.
It should come as no surprise that the groups you reference oppose more immigration. They readily understood the benefit of barring black citizens from having to compete for labor – that they would oppose more makes perfect sense.
Here in NJ, Italian-Americans were typically the last White ethnicity to leave a neighborhood when it started Blacking. The Italians are more aggressive, clannish and, ahem, the boys will keep the crime down for a while.
anyone know what happened to Steve Sailer’s blog?
Jews in the USA overwhelmingly push and support nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration.
Trump is a complete and total politician whore for Jew billionaire Shelly Adelson.
Republican Party donor and Trump donor Shelly Adelson has forked over hundreds of millions of dollars to the Republican Party and issue advocacy groups associated with the Republican Party.
Shelly Adelson pushes mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration.
Shelly Adelson wants to continue to flood mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration into the USA.
Shelly Adelson is strongly against flooding Israel with mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration.
Shelly Adelson and the Republican Party CHEAP LABOR FACTION both agree that mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration must be allowed to flood into the USA.
Shelly Adelson wants to continue to use the US military to fight wars on behalf of Israel.
The corporate propaganda apparatus goes on and on about the Koch boys but ignores the loot that Shelly Adelson showers on the Republican Party. Why is that?
If it is true that certain Jews have disproportionate power in the corporate media, is it fair to say that Jew billionaire Shelly Adelson is being ignored in the corporate media because it would shine too much light on the power that Jew donors have over the Republican Party?
At a globalizer Jew meeting in New York City in 2014 featuring Israeli Prime Minister Benny Netty-Yahoo and sponsored and paid for by Shelly Adelson, Netty-Yahoo said this in regards to Israeli immigration policy: “We don’t have to open our doors to be swamped by the way other people run their economies.”
The Immigration Question And The Jew Question Are Inextricably Connected
Tweets from 2014:
Netanyahu: “We Don’t Have To Open Our Doors To Be Swamped” https://t.co/RnSyg1q2XH US Jews Push Mass #Immigration Invasion #nhpolitics
— Charles Pewitt (@CharlesPewitt) October 7, 2014
The Jews in Israel — led by Netanyahu — rightly reject mass #immigration. Why do US Jews push mass immigration for the US? #nhpolitics
— Charles Pewitt (@CharlesPewitt) October 7, 2014
That's all going to come to an end fairly soon. Not because people are going to take a more "responsible" attitude towards sex, but because an increasing number of us are becoming, in a very Nietzschean way, "better and more evil."
The separation of procreation from fornication is a development we are woefully biologically unprepared for.
Yup.
Look at the Trump family.
Don Sr. – 5 kids
Don Jr. – 5 kids
Eric – 1 kid but more coming
Jewvanka – 3 children
I know Trump isn’t too popular around here but I do like that part of him, and how old school men operate. Old school men actually like having sex and having babies. Trump is a greasy bastard but give him credit, he has done his part and raised 5 children.
There is literally nothing manlier than having many children. I’m not a fan of Muslims but I have to respect them for having so many kids.
2 kids = wimp, but at least he procreated
3 kids = he has at least some manly tendency
4 kids = solid man
5 kids = has a breeding agenda (good thing)
6 kids + = Alpha male God status.
Nothing more alpha than a man who likes fucking AND who likes having kids.
There is a colossal amount of baggage regarding historical European antisemitism carried around by Ashkenazi Jews. This in practice translates to never-ending campaigns to de-whiten formerly white countries.
And using the GSS, Jews, no matter how they self-ID or where they grew up (North, South, East, West, Country, Suburbs, Big City) are always consistently more liberal on abortion and homosexuality than gentiles of any race. I remember being surprised to find that small town Jews self-ID’d as more liberal than urban secular white gentiles.
Jews want cultural libertarianism, which they, as the upper class, do not find to be overly threatening or destabilizing. On the other hand, gentiles are more likely to be middle to lower class and do not want to live in Sodom. It should be noted, however, that upper class white gentiles are less libertarian than Upper class Jews. So it’s fair to say that a lack of noblesse oblige is not evenly distributed.
I think I’ll run some stuff and put it on my blog.
Few things anger me more than does pornography.
What worries me most is porn bleeding into popular culture in general. Bleeding into mainstream movies, into pop music, etc.
“Years ago, somewhere in Canada if I’m not mistaken. Canada doesn’t have absolute free speech as in the First Amendment . . .”
Despite the noted flaws in the photo to the the discussion,
your use of a photo that has no relation to the US Constitution or to our discussion is deeply disappointing.
Canada . . . nor the US has an absolute right of free speech . . . but even in Canada your argument fails as does that photo.
good grief.
Unsurprisingly, the industry is completely jew – owned and jew – run.
Is that actually true? Or is it just one of those things that some people believe because if porn is bad it must be run by the Jews because the Jews must be responsible for everything that is bad? Is it like Democrats who assume that if Democrats lose an election that’s a bad thing so therefore it must be a Russian plot?
You might be right, but do you have actual evidence?
I’m just tired of your blackpilled whining. I (and others) have already given you multiple strategies to help cope with your depression and get your life back on track, but you keep ignoring the advice, instead choosing to make whiny comments on the UNZ Review.
Work out, pray, learn a hobby, stay busy, improve yourself, learn to cook good food.
If you choose to be celibate for now, don’t be angry at women. Focus on being at peace with yourself, and perhaps you may find the right woman, maybe not. But that’s ok because you are at peace. Just relax, and let God guide you.
I didn’t do this. I’ve emailed Ron about it.
And fertility, which will be much more determinative than war in terms of who controls the future, is even worse for Jews than for white gentiles. Who will write The Decline and Fall of the Western World remains an open question, but my money is on the Chinese. Yes, their fertility is disastrous now, too, but I ultimately think they’ll be able to figure out a way to turn it around before we do.
It really isn’t that hard to get laid as an average looking guy, if you want it and you try.
But, as I stated before, it’s still not an ideal situation.
Getting laid =/= starting a good family and raising a multitude of white children.
Sluts are just there to fulfill a physical need while you keep looking hard for the right white woman to raise a family with. For instance, non-white women often make good sluts; you can keep a clean conscience as you know you are not defiling a more valuable white woman, while simultaneously meeting your basic needs.
But our number one goal is to have white children. Anything less than 6 redpilled offspring is unacceptable for a D-righter.
The “trying” part is actually an enormous problem: years upon years of what should have been peak productive and creative activity squandered on socially useless zero sum sexual competition (which only a minority will get much out of anyway).
and you try.
This must be an example of that excellent male capacity for empathy at work.
Sluts are just there to fulfill a physical need while you keep looking hard for the right white woman to raise a family with. For instance, non-white women often make good sluts; you can keep a clean conscience as you know you are not defiling a more valuable white woman, while simultaneously meeting your basic needs.
The separation of procreation from fornication is a development we are woefully biologically unprepared for.
That’s all going to come to an end fairly soon. Not because people are going to take a more “responsible” attitude towards sex, but because an increasing number of us are becoming, in a very Nietzschean way, “better and more evil.”
I will explain.
Fornication without procreation, or at least the possibility thereof, just isn’t any fun. The whole thrill, the whole heart-pounding mystique of fornication—and especially of adultery, of raiding and seducing women, or of having otherwise illicit sex with a woman who is normally out of your league due to barriers of age and class and social position—comes from the implicit knowledge that you are “doing the deed,” that you are overcoming barriers and begetting new life in a higher, better, more purified stream than where you began. For a few moments you feel like the king of the world; and indeed you are, for in your being life is accomplishing its primary purpose.
Things like birth control and coitus interruptus frustrate the act and, in doing so, poison the experience. Whatever else you may thing about Freud, he certainly got that part right.
I’ll need to truncate the rest of my intended comment due to constraints of time, but my general point is that those who seek real glory want not only to have sex with women but they want the consequences thereof. They want children, big families, many descendants, and the thrill of overcoming. They don’t want to be alpha douchebags squirting their juice into a plastic sleeve, but real men.
The greater evil overcomes the lesser evil and becomes the good.
Ha, yes, because the rise and fall of Hitler wasn’t the ultimate in white self-destruction!
Italians and the Jews are the most clannish of the listed groups, but while Italians perceive further waves of aliens to be a threat to their community and posterity, Jews figure that anything that adds to multi-culturalism will further dilute the “host” nation and diminish the likelihood of mass nativism. Interesting to see that while Italians feel as if they are protecting their investment in America, Jews on the other hand, as usual, do not feel the same sort of patriotism; indeed, they consider it their duty to further alter and transform America to make it more to their liking, before they will fully march alongside other white Americans. This is the sort of attitude, as you can imagine, that fueled centuries of European distaste for Jews. The “Host” is obligated to absorb the culture of Jews, not the other way around.
And yeah, the “Ellis Island” sentimental memes, for all intents and purposes, means “Jewish”. We all know who entered East and West Coast journalism in large numbers in the 20th century. They usually didn’t have surnames like Hanrahan (unless the newspaper was based in Boston) or Feretti. As a matter of fact, the (((MSM))) now regularly employs all kinds of post-1965 immigrant stock people. It’s pretty conspicuous that after the Jewish diaspora was established in the US by circa 1900, they nursed a variety of grudges against various Euro folkways (Anglo-Dutch founding stock, Germanic folk who mostly arrived after circa 1850, and then their fellow Ellis Islanders, the Slavs, Irish-Catholics, and Italians*) but have been substantially more welcoming of post-1965 non-white arrivals.
*It’s clear from post-Ellis Island narratives in Hollywood that Italians may have been the culturally weakest group to arrive before the late 60’s. No other ethnic group has been so consistently vilified or mocked. In hindsight, it looks like (((Hollywood))) may have been projecting their own flaws onto Italians, the ethnic Diaspora in America who are the most genetically and temperamentally similar to Jews. Imagine if Jews had gotten this unflattering treatment; we wouldn’t hear the end of complaints that the public was being primed for another anti-Jewish campaign.
It’s not a “conspiracy” to point out that since 1945, no “white” ethnic group in America is permitted to argue for it’s own interests if this raises the possibility of Jews being displeased by such activity. Italians may complain that they haven’t been treated fairly, however if this reveals Jewish culpability for the unfairness, or becomes a “nativist” campaign to rid America of unwanted alien peoples and influence, then it’s not ok to question the (((narrative))) of the last 74 years, which was already being devised in the 19th and early 20th century but would not gain acceptance in the West until 1945.
I have been in favor of raising the retirement age in keeping with changes in life expectancy for at least the past 35 years. And I was about 25 years old when I adopted that position
What took you so long?
If it has to do with nurturing or human health, women do relatively better. Notice in that iteration that men and women do about the same on the question about the zika virus and the water in Flint.
The Pew “news IQ” surveys are a thing I used to track here years ago. Without fail men always perform considerably better than women. It’s always been this way and it probably always will be.
A side note: How well do women compare to men on 10 questions of national interest recently asked by Pew research? Ruh-roh.
https://www.pewresearch.org/quiz/the-news-iq-quiz/
MIKE
I don’t doubt that. One American who lived in the bowels of Cebu city told me that when two motorcycles come by with four shooters the target doesn’t really have a chance. They’re done.
And it is surprisingly easy for foreigners to get shot. One Korean told me a Filipino woman will drop everything to have an affair with a foreigner she perceives to be a ticket out-her husband, her kids, boyfriend, whatever.
The foreigner had no idea she is married and he is shot by someone he never met.
And sometimes foreigners were shot for simply being rude.
Jews on the whole are more sentimentally pro-immigration than even non-Jewish white Democrats are. That is pretty remarkable.
The French sample size is only 75 over the time period in question, that’s why I didn’t include it.
:sad emoji:
Emphatically agree about Ron. He is the living embodiment of free expression and open inquiry. I don’t think he hates anyone, and if he does, he’s too gracious to let it be known.
There seems to be a uptick in tryhard keyboard warriors around here lately. Must be climate change.
No, it isn’t women who suffer the most (and moreover, as the causes of it, they’d only deserve it if they were). You’re just posturing by insinuating that you’re part of the minority of men who ostensibly benefit from the dysfunction. I’ve only seen this routine, oh, about 1000 times
Still no evidence. Are you stupid, or are you a liar?
(and moreover, as the causes of it, they’d only deserve it if they were).
Bezos, Slim, Brin, Page, Soros, Zuckerberg, Koch–yeah, disproportionately Jewish.
I was just teasing Rosie. I’m not sure accusing someone of being Jewish is helpful, that’s all.
And there you have it. No self-respecting woman would ever allow themselves to be subjected to any of the above. I feel terrible for them that they feel the need to do these things.
I am pleased to know that someday the purveyors of this material will be involuntarily relocated to a considerably warmer environment.
Jews didn’t invent the social cycle; they just gave it a vigorous spin. An accelerationist might thank them.
The world through porn:
-negroes have a big penis
-white women love negroes
-white women are sluts
-white people love to have sex with their step parents
-asian women want white cock
-asian men don’t actually exist
Unsurprisingly, the industry is completely jew – owned and jew – run.
Even Arab women are getting BLACKED these days.
Is that actually true? Or is it just one of those things that some people believe because if porn is bad it must be run by the Jews because the Jews must be responsible for everything that is bad? Is it like Democrats who assume that if Democrats lose an election that's a bad thing so therefore it must be a Russian plot?
Unsurprisingly, the industry is completely jew – owned and jew – run.
Yes, for the most part. Some women eventually get this, but by that time it’s too late:
It’s really women who are getting screwed over
Few things anger me more than does pornography. I have long said that if 95Theses were king, it would be outlawed. And trafficking in it would carry stiff fines and punishments.
What worries me most is porn bleeding into popular culture in general. Bleeding into mainstream movies, into pop music, etc.
Few things anger me more than does pornography.
Weren’t you just scolding someone for seeing a “Jew around every corner?”
The above graph means nothing anyway. I’ve been told right here that whites are the sole cause of all their own problems, and could never be the victims despite a massive, century + old disinformation campaign, facilitated by a group of elites disproportionately represented by the same group of people that strangely pop up on the right side of that graph.
I mean, when you think of the top 10-15 people currently alive in the world who use their power and influence in way that are detrimental to the West, what do their last names look like? Smith, Kelly, Giovanni and Schneider? Not so much.
But no no goy, it’s never the Jews!
Further, Sailer just had a post theorizing about the real meaning behind that poem at the feet of Liberty. It’s almost like Jewish ethnocentrism is a real thing and they work harder than most to promote their own interests, at the expense of pretty much everyone and anything else.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-emma-lazarus-poem-was-little-known-until-wwii/
If the HF says it, well then by golly it must be true.
the Heritage Foundation
I have been in favor of raising the retirement age in keeping with changes in life expectancy for at least the past 35 years. And I was about 25 years old when I adopted that position – so I understood even then what that would require of me.
Of course, I realize most Americans won’t agree to the changes, but so what? Your rebuttal doesn’t undo either the thrust of Lott and Kenny’s monograph or the know-nothings at Heritage Foundation’s recommendation that America is in need of more defense spending.
What took you so long?
I have been in favor of raising the retirement age in keeping with changes in life expectancy for at least the past 35 years. And I was about 25 years old when I adopted that position
That's a terrible idea. Young people have enough trouble finding work as it is.
I have been in favor of raising the retirement age in keeping with changes in life expectancy for at least the past 35 years.
IMO, Ron Unz is not a “self-hating Jew,” but a fair man who believes that people have a right to speak to their minds even if he disagrees with what they say. The old, “I don’t agree with what you say, but will defend to death your right to say it.” At one time, liberals liked to quote that line.
Liberals used to oppose conservative attempt to censor, which tended to involve obscenity. Now, they want to censor “hate speech” — speech that they hate. Smut and bad language are fine.
Self-hating Whites? Liberal guilt? Ha ha ha! Loud-mouthed Liberal Whites don’t feel guilty about anything because they’re amoral. Moral peacocks parading their superior pseudo-morality, ranting about “bigotry.”
Hulk Hogan’s stunt double was killed off set in Manila by a drive-by shooter in the 1990’s.
Italians are very based, bro.
They are the most redpilled people in Canada.
Lou Barletta and Matteo Salvini are amazing people.
I find it embarrassing when Italians are doing more to preserve their adopted country than the founding stock WASPS are.
Wake up!
(I would also like to see French included on this graph; many in Maine and Louisiana).
That’s one take on sex. Here’s another (with which I agree):
Chastity is the most unpopular of the Christian virtues. There is no getting away from it: the old Christian rule is, “Either marriage, with complete faithfulness to your partner, or else total abstinence.” Now this is so difficult and so contrary to our instincts, that obviously either Christianity is wrong or our sexual instinct, as it now is, has gone wrong. Of course, being a Christian, I think it is the instinct which has gone wrong,
But I have other reasons for thinking so:
1. Biology: The biological purpose of sex is children, just as the biological purpose of eating is to repair the body. Now if we eat whenever we feel inclined and just as much as we want, it is quite true that most of us will eat too much: but not terrifically too much. One man may eat enough for two, but he does not eat enough for ten. The appetite goes a little beyond its biological purpose, but not enormously. But if a healthy young man indulged his sexual appetite whenever he felt inclined, and if each act produced a baby, then in ten years he might easily populate a small village. This appetite is in ludicrous and preposterous excess of its function.
— C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
Anon 375.
I haven’t been able to find it for awhile, but there is a quote about the futility of attempting to reason with certain people that really gets to the heart of the matter. The upshot is that they continue spreading the same lies and fallacies regardless of how many times they’ve been called out.
Can anyone help me out with that?
Look at yourself in the mirror.
Can anyone help me out with that?
Thanks. I definitely recall the incident, but I do not remember seeing this photo.
Okay, that makes sense. I do not recall the photo.
With some of the much smaller “meme ethnicities” like yugoslav-americans or somalis it’d probably be down even further tbh
Left/liberal Jews are at least consistent — they want open borders everywhere.
Right-wing Zionist Jews want closed borders for Israel, open borders for everyone else.
If the data represented in this graph are correct, then how can one explain the continuing flood of immigrants into the United States without resort to “anti-semitic tropes”?
“I regularly speak of my opinions with women…. ”
…He said, trying clumsily to adjust his new wig.
Terrorist attack in Nice, a muslim scumbag took his truck of peace and ran over 84 people, including 10 children. That girl was one of them.
Not the same as muslim scumbags torture and murder 180 people in Paris, or muslim scumbags blow up the subway in Brussels, or muslim scumbag blows up little girls at degenerate concert in Manchester, or the various others trucks of peace that muslim scumbag asylum liar freaks have used for indiscriminate murder. The list goes on.