If Russia is helping a neoliberal, Russia is good. If China is helping a neoliberal, China a good. Follow the neoliberalism.

Many cross-over voters who embraced Republicans due to their fake championing of reduced immigration were motivated mostly by economics, albeit the fact that minority groups stick together in racist skin-pigmentation factions in workplaces and politics is troublesome, particularly since they are close to being the majority in this nation if grouped together. Since each of the minority-group factions regards its skin-pigmentation brethren as superior to the other minority factions, Democrats may be kidding themselves about rainbow coalitions.

But cross-over voters do not care about the mechanics of how corrupt, bought-off politicians weave together enough minority voters by pandering to them to keep their jobs at $174k. We care about the impact of immigration on wages, hours and job access. We care about our lack of leverage in a labor market flooded with immigrant laborers, many of whom are able to undercut Americans due to multi pay layers from Uncle Sam for womb-productive sex—for producing little US citizens—while taking jobs in a country where 95 million working-aged citizens are out of the labor force and where the average employed person works only part time.

We do not need more workers in a part-time / gig economy in which so many citizens are sidelined from the labor market. We need a labor market where work has more value. It never will if employers continue to have access to a multitude of foreign-national job seekers, especially since many of those workers are aided by the US government, which subsidizes their basic living expenses, like groceries and rent that has gone up by 72% since 1995 for the majority of American workers whose wages are not supplemented by government for womb-productive sex.

Fake Republicans are not calling for an end to the means-tested welfare programs that rig the labor market against millions of US citizens. Fake Republicans support free EBT food, subsidized rent, free electricity, monthly cash assistance and up to $6,431 in yearly child tax credit cash for citizens and noncitizens. Fake Republicans support rigging the labor market for some groups, rewarding citizens and noncitizens for womb-productive sex and part-time or gig work that keeps them under the earned-income limits for means-tested welfare programs.

Republicans used to be the party that opposed welfare. Then they discovered how welfare helps employers to reduce their labor costs, not just through a welfare-fed immigrant workforce, but through a single-breadwinner-mom workforce.

Those of us who crossed over to vote for Republicans simply let ourselves be conned by the siren song of a pro-American-worker labor policy that none of the Republicans on the ballot, including Trump, ever supported.

But there is no alternative on the other side, not when even Bernie Sanders puts skin-pigmentation factions ahead of American workers’ wages, even though American wages have fallen for 40 years concurrent with the massive increase in immigration. Sanders is the closest thing to an old-school FDR Dem that they have, but even he gets down on his hands and knees, bowing down and spouting out the corrupt Neoliberal Uniparty’s talking points on immigration.

I always regarded wishy-washy independent voters as uniformed people who did not have a comprehensive understanding of the Democratic Party’s platform. They just shifted in the wind, voting on single issues in some cases. Well, a single issue can unveil what a party really stands for, as opposed to what it pretends to stand for.

I was a loyal Democrat for decades until finally switching over since the immigration issue revealed the fakery of the left side of the Uniparty. There is a big gap between theory and action in the Democratic Party. When your party acts against the key issue that distinguishes them from the “opposite” party, you’re not “informed” when continuing to vote for them, but you are letting them get one over on you.

Post-FDR, the Democratic Party was supposed to be the party that represented the interests of American workers, not the interests of workers who are Mexican nationals, Indian nationals, Central American nationals, African nationals, etc., etc., etc.

The Republican Party always represented the interests of business, and I once owned a small business, like many Americans who have been shafted in a rigged labor market that is anti-American-worker, albeit Republicans mostly represent big business. And I knew that. But why was I voting for a pro-labor party that did everything it could to undercut American workers by representing the economic interests of foreign nationals?

Many cross-over voters have now admitted to ourselves that Republicans just used the issue of immigration to gain power so that they could push through a massive tax cut for the employers of the foreign nationals who have displaced so many American citizens in the labor market. And they’re bragging about it while 95 million American citizens remain out of the labor market, with millions more underemployed.

I’m not enough of a math person to know whether or not the cross-over voters who have jumped off of the Trump train due to the bold betrayal of American workers are the “Silent Majority” of Trump’s 1% victory margin. Most of those cross-over voters won’t bother to write a multi-paragraph post about it. They’ll just vote for the other side or stay home on voting day.

There are a few Republicans who have the integrity to stick with American citizens on the issue of reducing mass-scale immigration, but they are not on the ballot, likely for a reason, whereas Trump looked like a real outsider on the surface. He is not. Trump is the Establishment. He’s just a fabulous actor, as some actual actors have noted.

In Australia, the current America-besotted government is prosecuting two whistle-blowers who revealed that Canberra’s spooks bugged the cabinet meetings of the new government of East Timor for the express purpose of cheating the tiny, impoverished nation out of its proper share of the oil and gas resources in the Timor Sea. Their trial will be held in secret.” http://www.counterpunch.com

East Timor should send more people to Australia until the country recants and reorients its course.

There’s a ‘proper’ Aussie beer called Coopers, owned by Australians. The bottled Pale Ale is nice stuff and available in the UK.

https://coopers.com.au/our-beer

Fosters became ‘iconic’ in the UK back in the day because of the Barry McKenzie comic strip in Private Eye magazine and the associated films (see youtube). Here’s a still – he’s arrived in France and is being checked by French Customs.

Nearly all ‘iconic’ national beers are now owned by giant multinational brewers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AB_InBev_brands

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heineken_brands

So the problem is that Australians simply cannot vote out either of the two mainstream parties.

Of course they can. They simply choose not to. If enough people vote for a minor party it ceases to be a minor party and becomes a major party. If you can make the right preference deals you can win an election with less than 40% of the vote. Julia Gillard won the 2010 election with 37.99% of the vote.

But Australians won’t do it. It would require long-term thinking. It would require putting that nation’s interests ahead of selfish personal interests. It would require putting some thought into voting. So they won’t do it.

Just as Britons won’t vote out either of the two mainstream parties, and Americans won’t vote out either of their two mainstream parties. For the same reasons. Short-sightedness, selfishness and stupidity.

The horrifying thing about democracy is that you really do get the government you deserve.

Quote: “You can take issue with Senator Anning’s bluntness, and even with his arguments. I, for example, would take issue with his saying that Australians didn’t vote for mass immigration and weren’t asked.

“It is true that in Australia, as here and in Britain, all the big old political parties, with various degrees of honesty, promoted mass Third World immigration. It’s also true that there are difficult institutional barriers to getting a new party established.

“Still, no-one has to vote for the established parties.”

As you admitted, voting is compulsory in Australia. Further, voting for fake politicians like Mickey Mouse for example, or writing GTFO on a ballot paper is a criminal offence. The other problem is that just about all Australian electoral parties are divided into two camps: Satellites of Liberal (Oz Rep.) or Labor (Oz Dem.) Through the use of preferences, a vote for the satellite is a vote for the Lib/Lab.

The entire idea of Independents being able to form a bloc to bring about the rise of a government that the majority voted against has only arisen in the last ten years. This has also lead to Independents turning votes over to what their constituents would consider to be the enemy.

Australians also do not vote for the Prime Minister. Australians vote for a local politician in the House of Reps. Which is modelled on the UK Parliament. If your local rep. gets in, it’s a point towards one of the two, Lib/Lab taking the lead.

The Australian Senate is modelled on the US Senate.

So the problem is that Australians simply cannot vote out either of the two mainstream parties. Like Americans, all Australians can do is swap one for the other as both lurch further to the LEFT.

Referring back to the 1970’s, there was a Prime Minister named Malcolm Fraser of the Liberal – or what in those days was considered to be the Conservative Party. Fraser was elected in a landslide in an attempt by many to stop the imminent death of the White Australia Policy – a massive influx of Vietnamese and other Boat People/Illegal Aliens, international students and non-White immigrants. Fraser later laughed that he was not in any way at all Conservative. Fraser boasted that he was raised in a Jewish family, and it was his ambition to destroy White Australia. <– All of this was available on Wikipedia until some years ago. Now it is considered to be anti-Semitic to tell the truth. You should be able to find reference to it on Malcolm Fraser's Wikipedia page in the page history section … compare old versions.

As for voting for Fraser Anning and his new party, we can't. Only the people that live in Fraser Anning's electorate can vote for him, and if they vote against him, his party is dead. IF Anning has others join his party, it's the same with them.

And still, when Anning gives his preferences to the dual party Lib/Lab system, then a vote for Fraser Anning is a vote for Lib/Lab.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/04/10/two-incisive-marxist-accountings-of-past-and-present/–Clinton’s decision to use a private email server while serving as Secretary of State was motivated at least in part to circumvent public records laws about official correspondence, a practice gleaned from the previous George W. Bush administration, and therefore one is compelled to deduce that included obscuring the origins of the attack on Libya, which in turn trace back to, among other things, personal financial gain for the Clinton Foundation and its operatives like Sidney Blumenthal. That email scandal, a goldmine for the conspiracist-inclined loons in the Republican base, provided Donald Trump with reams of talking points that were undeniable and gave him an edge when combined with his economic populist and nativist rhetoric. The humanitarian disasters that we have seen occur at home and abroad since Election Day 2016, in other words, are indebted to the Libya disaster, ”
m.”

Let Srteve Bannon,Miller, Trump, Spencer know and let Mr Derbyshire figure this out that Domino Effect was not inbuilt in Communism but in US policies which still have not been corrected repudiated and held accountable.

I really enjoyed watching Anning punch that little snot in the face. Perfect way to ruin his video, too: “yeah this is epic watch me get punched in the face twice.”

I was about to add: “indeed, no-one has to vote at all …” Then I remembered that Australia does in fact have mandatory voting, with a $20 fine if you fail to vote—not a bad idea, in my opinion. [How Compulsory Voting Works: Australians Explain, by Tacey Rychter, NYT, October 22, 2018]

I prefer our electoral system, which has a sort of mandatory voting, via the electoral vote; those who don’t vote are, in effect, voting to agree with their majority (IOW, electoral votes are powered by population but decided by voters).

AP story from a couple of days ago. Mexican police used to just wave the caravans through but now are making them apply individually for a transit visa. No doubt the Mexican police can be bribed but the net effect is to stop the caravanistas at the Mexican border and without the safety of numbers and official permission and assistance getting to the US border the numbers will fall as long as Mexico keeps it up.

Perhaps down under, the major party candidates are well selected too, and there is not much choice but to vote third-party. There is where I DO agree with you, John. There is always that choice, but NO, “you’re throwing away your vote” is the stupidity you hear about that. People have been voting for the lesser of 2 evils and getting evil every time.

Australia uses instant run-off voting, so you can vote for small, single-issue parties without fear of throwing your vote away. Theoretically, this makes it much easier for small parties to grow into big parties, although it hasn’t really happened yet. The Greens are displacing Labor as the biggest left party in a handful of urban constituencies, and One Nation is threatening to do the same to the Liberal-National coalition (ie conservatives) in a few others on the right. But two-party dominance largely remains.

It may be of interest to readers here to learn that the Labor candidate for Prime Minister in the 2004 election, Mark Latham, recently joined One Nation.

Kevin McAleenan, Top U.S. Border Enforcement Officer, Is Named Acting Head of Homeland Security https://t.co/p6qWPp6fwN

— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) April 8, 2019

Breaking News: Kirstjen Nielsen is out as the homeland security secretary. President Trump blamed her for the rise in migrants entering the U.S. illegally. https://t.co/XvjzOZ6njO

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 7, 2019

wwebd said – I drink beer a couple times a week.

Fosters is reliably good.

In USA grocery stores they put it next to the Kirins and they usually sell by the can, not by the sixpack, which is good.

Hey, anytime you want to make fun of Americans for not appreciating good beer, go ahead, but lots of us know a lot about beer.

Not to derail the thread, but I can tell you so much about bad beer – the iron filings taste in upstate New York cheap beer, the Pizza hut mozzarella trick that Budweiser used for about 40 years (approximately 1975 to 2015, the first year their beer ads at the Superbowl were a flop), the horrible water that Schiltz used, the Milwaukee water in bad Milwaukee beers, the desiccated hops in Coors, the cheap trick of putting lemon peel taste that Texas cheap breweries engage in to cover the cheap yeasty/moldy wheat – all that.

The Fosters that is sold in the USA has none of those faults.

Not a beer that can withstand being enjoyed at less that the optimal temperature, but no recurring faults. If an American offers you a Fosters it is a fucking compliment, don’t be a pussy and make fun of the offer.

Fraser Anning must have the thickest of skins. The amount of abuse he is copping from the despicable Australian SJWs * from the south of his country is off the charts. Yet still he keeps coming. There seems to be a rich seam of reactionary conservatives in rural Australia (from where Tarrant himself sprang from) and it will be interesting to see how many (extremely shy) votes he gets in the anonymous silence of the ballot box.

* the most hysterical and deranged in the English speaking world with the exception of private school Dubliners.

What actually divides our two main parties? We know of course that Republicans are the Stupid Party while Democrats are the Evil Party; but what are the substantive issues that really separate them?

Republicans are nutless and Democrats are brainless. There are no significant differences, both are wings of the Deep State. Any issues that appear to be at odds are to mislead.

E-Verify, birthright citizenship, visa tracking, stop remittances(or at least tax them), … “All of that is on the table.”

Ole Tuck should have demanded to know who long those things are just going to sit “on the table”. My guess is they’ll still be on the table when election day 2020 comes around and carnival barker Trump will tell us we have to re-elect him so he can exercise those options. Then if by some miracle he wins he’ll just dither and tweet for four more years.

Trump gets a B+ for rhetoric but a D when it comes to action.

Australia is lucky to have a man of courage like Fraser Anning. If America had a representative of like courage he would be unceremoniously booted out of the Jewish occupied Cohengress in “free” America. Apostasy to militant multiculturalism is not allowed. Every brand of racial nationalism is permitted except for white nationalism.

America need to reinstitute the “white America” immigration policy we had up until 1965 when Jewish activism ushered in a “brown America” policy which now delivers one million hostile non-white aliens every year on a “legal” basis and more when you include the various work visa scams, “refugees” and phony asylum seekers.

“We want action—clear, decisive action, like your directive the other day to import 30,000 foreigners to do seasonal work—but we want action forAmerican workers, for American sovereignty, for a demographically stable nation to bequeath to our grandchildren.”

Derby baby, you’ve got to stop!!! You imported and created a Chinese family that is demographically UNSTABLE into the USA. Your grandchildren will be Chinese or black. They will never be American.

Again, the best way to help the demographic stability of the USA is to move yourself and your Chinese family to Asia.

TRUMP CALLS NETANYAHU ‘YOUR PRIME MINISTER’ WHILE SPEAKING TO AMERICAN JEWISH GROUP

Stating the obvious.

In parliamentary procedure, when a bill or a motion is “laid on the table,” it means that it will no longer be considered. Perhaps DHS Secretary Nielsen is secretely letting us know that there are no plans for any measures cutting back on legal immigration or significantly impeding invasion.

I had the same reaction, but just try to find Victoria Bitter outside of Oz!

Derby advocates for “a free self-governing society” yet is sympathetic to Australia’s “mandatory voting” which is enforced by a fine. These ideas are self-evidently contradictory. A free society CANNOT COMPEL its citizens to engage in the voting process or it is NOT FREE! Free people have the right to be left alone. But, if they do choose to vote, then it should be made harder, as our Founding Fathers intended.

Just wondering, unit 472, but are you sure that large migrant caravans are still stuck on the Mexican border? Tucker Carlson has been on the illegal immigration issue almost nightly, and he hasn’t said anything about migrants being stuck for some time. Before the midterms Tucker had stories of Central American migrants being stuck in Tijuana, and how thousands of them camped there were ruining the city. The mayor and local officials were interviewed about the appalling unsanitary conditions. Trump stationed active duty military on the border, though then SecDef Mattis was opposed to it.

Now, Tucker is saying that more migrants are making it into the US than ever (more than under Obama) and are able to stay indefinitely as they know to bring a child with them (who may not even be theirs). So, both things cannot be true. Also, isn’t it true that active duty military have been pulled away? Some National Guard has been mobilized, but they are no match for active duty soldiers, I think.

Yes. This is what society’s descent will look like–not an apocalyptic event, but the persistent erosion of competence.

If you ever find yourself out here on Long Island, the Fosters are on me.

The resilience of this trope is pretty funny when you consider how unpopular Fosters actually is here (in Melbourne anyway). I’ve literally never seen or heard anyone order it, nor have I ever known anyone to nominate it as his favorite beer. I barely even recall it being advertised. The most recent memory of an ad I have is the “Foster’s Cup,” a preseason football competition that ran in the early 1990s.

“It’s a tectonic shift”

Or, as Ariel sings in The Tempest, we have “suffered a sea change.” Oops, so sorry, so immoral of me, for quoting from the traditional Western canon, which now has been “refreshed” into a new and improved version. File the Boeing Max and the PG&E wildfire prevention program into that file. File the fallen Santa Anita Racetrack horses into that file. File landscapers who have a degree in horticulture into that file. File torque wrenches and tightening patterns. File destroyers that get hit by merchant ships. File 250,000 annual deaths caused by medical negligence. I call this new, relaxed-proficiency, relaxed-conscientiousness philosophy “Get it basically okay.” (I wonder where this came from.) This, perhaps more than anything, is our tectonic shift.

Are you the Unz Review columnist Fred Reed who insults en masse but doesn’t respond to commenters?

If so, can we scratch “too busy” from the potential explanations?

Soviet tyranny was dogmatic.

Globo tyranny is just crazy.

https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/04/fined-55-000-for-calling-a-male-a-male/

Thanks, Mr Derbyshire. We need a bit of good news now and again.

Trump isn’t doing nothing on immigration. There was an encouraging story that Mexican police are no longer giving ‘humanitarian’ transit visas to migrant caravans heading towards the US border and that they are stuck at the Mexican border. This was, apparently, the result of Trumps threat to close the border.

Obviously that got Lopez Obrador’s attention. It won’t stop lone migrants infiltrating through Mexico but it will end the formation of caravans of thousands of women and children which is the real problem as it is hard to deport them once they enter the US. Single male immigrants ( and some now stuck at the migrant camp are from the Congo and Haiti) garner little SJW and media sympathy so can be deported much more easily.

Anecdotally I notice far fewer arrests of Guatemalans etc for drunken driving here in SW Florida. Apparently the word is out in the tomato and strawberry fields that get caught doing that and you get turned over to ICE for deportation not spend a few days in jail and get released.

… and the Immigration Patriots (whether they are patriots is highly debatable) want to prevent assimilation.

I have no idea where you’d get this idea from, Mr. Reed. Immigration patriots would be overjoyed if the 40 – 50 million immigrants to the US had been assimilating, but assimilation does not work for large numbers. That’s why they’d like this Feral Gov’t of ours to STOP DIGGING, and would rather many illegal aliens and green card holders leave, since they’re obviously not going to assimilate.

I think you have this whole “exhange of bodily fluids” thing that you got from somewhere on your mind. Many white nationalists don’t believe in interacial dating and marriage, but that’s not all assimilation is about. Not a big share of immigration patriots are white nationlists either.

I take it we are in replacement full swing.

Well,

that is unfortunate. But it’s not as if it wasn’t coming.

Haha, Rich, but water boy better make sure he melts every part of her, or his body will be found a few months later, the tragic result of a suicide via 3 shots to the back of the head … or falling asleep on the railroad tracks. If you’re going to take on the Klinton Klan, you’d better go all the way.

a{ll true and well said. But is it going to stop in the US? How? The open-borders people want millions more immigrants, and the Immigration Patriots (whether they are patriots is highly debatable) want to prevent assimilation. So, at least, various of their leaders have said, though I do not include Mr. Derbyshire in this as I do not know his views. Together, they ruin the country.

Not ardBSpencer or any white nationalists, but @RealCandaceO gets to testify.

Honk Honk https://t.co/s5XIL1Tp70

— Shooter ⛳️ McGavin (@6ShooterMcGavin) April 5, 2019

White National Liberation means White Nationalists minding their own business in their own white nations.

White Global Domination means White Globalists serving Jewish supremacism to wage Wars for Israel, oppress Palestinians & deny them nationhood, and to spread globo-homo garbage all over.

Under White Nationalism, whites nations remain white, and non-white nations are left alone.

Under White Globalism, white nations are invaded demographically by non-whites, and non-white nations are taken over militarily, financially, and by cultural imperialism by the Zionist-controlled globo-homo West.

White Nationalism sounds better than White Globalism.

What we need is a hearing on White Globalist Crimes of Empire and Genocide.

But the US is ruled by Jewish Imperialists who do everything to persecute White National Liberationists and Palestinian National Liberationists who say NO to (((White Globalist))) Empire.

Australia should be wrested back from the descendants of the rapist convicts and war criminals ( of Vietnam war of Afghanistan war of Iraq war 2003 ) No mercy . The leaders like her should be tried for contempt of humanity, for falsifying realities, and for incitement to violence against 3 rd country’s immigrants and should be sent to the Jail that housed the slaves in West Africa .

It’s VB, not Fosters, you chud.

Can we make this Anning guy Dictator of the English Speaking World for a year or two until the mess we’re in gets straightened out? The guy is great. I could see Trump throwing a couple of punches if someone hit him with an egg, but the rest of the American politicians? Sanders head would be split open, O’Rourke would be flailing his arms around, all the dem ladies running would probably just screech and cry, Biden would give the guy a hug. If someone had thrown a bucket of water on Hilary, everyone who’s seen “The Wizard of Oz” knows she would melt.

That clip is great. Fraser Anning is 70 years old and he could slap the tar out of a handful of these ANTIFA-styled punks with one arm tied behind his back. Fraser is healthy and robust. May he be around for another 20 years. Australia needs hime. The west needs him.

Again, this one should be 2 posts to keep the comments section organized – could you bring this up to Ron, please?

On post 2:

I could watch that video over and over! Egg boy must have taken a pretty good blow to have dropped his phone. Any self-respecting young person today would feel naked without that smart phone in his hand, and I think all he’s doing near the end of that video is trying to figure out what he did with his phone – dazed and confused, haha.

Your point on the voting history of Australians brings up this: Just as in the US, the major parties are nothing but different squads of The Party. By “major parties”, I mean the high-level politicians IN them. You write about the median B- score of those 23 congresscreatures of the Appropriations Committee. So what? What about the rest of them? How come, since 1995, every single thing out of the Congress/Senate is something I don’t like, especially about immigration? Nothing good gets done. There are gentleman’s agreements to make sure the guys in the more conservative districts have their asses covered for re-election.

I agree that Americans themselves can be split by party line pretty well based on their view on the immigration invasion.

Perhaps down under, the major party candidates are well selected too, and there is not much choice but to vote third-party. There is where I DO agree with you, John. There is always that choice, but NO, “you’re throwing away your vote” is the stupidity you hear about that. People have been voting for the lesser of 2 evils and getting evil every time. (The “stupid” of the Stupid Party is just a ruse by this point, IMO.)

Your response lacks any evidence. You say disease wiped out hundreds of thousands of Aboriginal people, but largely left Europeans alone. Which diseases do you mean? Can you be more precise and name the deadly conditions that spread across remote tribes and regions, to islands and through desert and tropics.

Why were these fatal outbreaks, which killed hundreds of thousands, not recorded by European settlers? Why were quarantine stations limited given these epidemics you claim occured? If Darwinean science worked, why didn’t it kill 90%+, as diseases did in Central and South America when the Conquistadors brought deadly illnesses to that continent.

I await your learned reply Anon.

I am sorry that I don’t have the time or inclination to tutor someone whose knowledge of the biological sciences, and specifically evolution, I would expect a bright 13 year old to have these days, at least in a major modern city. Though it is probably uncongenial to your intellect to think in terms of statistical distributions and probabilities just try thinking of the effect of Eurasians acquiring a few mutated snps that each makes a bout of flu just a little less likely to kill and of those gene variants not all coming as a package but with greater individual prevalence in some families or clans than others.

Sorry, calling someone an “autistic nerd” is just disgusting. If you cannot debate reasonably without resorting to offensive and frankly, childish, name calling then to troll elsewhere.

The point about Irving is that a centre-right Government in Germany made it a criminal offense to deny the Holocaust. This is relevant to free speech. You would be aware the laws of libel and anti-vilification in Australia mean that some content is subject to legal sanctions. For instance, to incite people to commit hate crimes.

I note that your response to me free speech was to be abusive. That is why laws limit what can be said. Irving breached these laws, and was sanctioned both here and in Europle. He also lost a court case (twice) when it was proved beyond any doubt whatsoever that the Holocaust occured.

I’m guessing your father wasn’t a WWII veteran or that you have partaken in any armed conflict or lived in a war zone?

Sorry Anon [436] but you are wrong. If there is a natural section as you claim, then Europeans and Australians would not need innoculations or vaccinations against most diseases because we would have established a ‘defence mechanism’ as you call it.

Are you vaccinated? Your logic would suggest not as centuries of anglo domination would have protected you from diseases such as flu, colds, viruses etc. By your logic, Australians (not new migrants) and Europeans would not need contract any known conditions.

Natural selection would suggest that there would be no genetic abnormalities or heridatry conditions.

I invite you to explain how this works.

Your unassisted pose as an intellectual isn’t looking too good. Only an autistic nerd could think your #113 was a relevant reply to Bukowski and your astonishing #114 has been too kindly dealt with in #116.

Wow! You really are unaware of acquired immunity by natural selection!

Eurasians had some immunity acquired over thousands of years to endemic Eurasian diseases. By contrast they didn’t have Africans’ defence mechanisms which made West Africa “the white man’s grave”. And so on around the world.

Smallpox was one of the big killers in Australia and the Americas. The Black Death (as the disease caused by the Yersinia pestis bacterium is usually called) wiped out a quarter to a third of Europe’s population in the 1340s but left behind people with much better immunity which was presumably why plagues such as in London 1665 did not kill nearly as high a proportion of the population.

I don’t want to correct every comment here, but the population of Palestine in 1900 was put at 700,000 by the British. Today it is 5 million.

This makes no sense. Vaccinations and immunizations were not invented then, so how can you account for diseases that killed Aboriginal people but not Europeans? You may recall the Spanish Flu which killed 13 million. Or the Black Plague that killed over 20 million.

Actually, Irving was jailed in Germany where Holocaust denial is a criminal offense.

Heroin doesn’t come in pills.

I reckon you lot are scared of Jews because they achieve so much. This all looks like a bunch of underqualified white people getting upset by intellectuals, those who publish and are in the media and promote ideas that scare you.

I always wonder why people go to such lengths to hate a religion – usually Jews and Muslims. But it’s fear, isn’t it? And envy. Muslims and Jews created modern civilization – they gave us education, medicine, architecture, water management, agriculture and so much in the arts. Muslims invented the toocth brush, maths and coffee – try living without them! And Jews, well if you don’t like them, stop using and recahrging your mobile phone (SMS messaging), or having a camera used in operations, or stents to save your life, or hyroponic food, or the movie industry, and so on.

But go ahead, spend your days cryign about conspiracies against the White Man, truth is, you would be living in a field in Europe eating your dogs if it wasn’t for Jews and Muslims.

Remember, the (((left))) always accuses others of what they’re doing. They are the ones intent on seeking genocide of all, but their first order is to remove the only people capable of stopping them – their intellectual and physical superiors, the non jewish white peoples of the world. The holohoax was concocted to place them atop of the victim heap and they are building their empire based on this victimology which they institute in the schools and media that they control. And the cold hard reality is that the religious jews would side with them in any conflict. They must be eliminated from the face of the earth if the human race is to avoid a fate worse than WW2 and the dark ages combined.

I first became aware of the Jew attack on free speech in 1993 when David Irving was banned from Australia. All of their talk about “democracy” and “tolerance” went out the window and it was truly sickening to see what hypocrites they are. David Irving offended Jews and was banned. Salman Rushdie offended Muslims and was allowed into Australia. Some people are more equal than others in the Australian version of “democracy”.
https://codoh.com/library/document/2417/

Be suspicious of Jewish groups who yell about the Holocaust.

The leading Jewish groups in the US have long been against recognition of the Genocide of Christian Armenians committed by Turkey.

But most Jews are not living on the verge of death in the United States-poor whites, blacks and Mexicans are.

Most Jews live in fairly nice suburbs and are overdosing on heroin pills or piling up in the prisons.

There are a few instances in New York of Jews being victimized by blacks or Mestizos, but it is really poor white proles that end up in the harm’s way of blacks.

I don’t, for example, hear of Jewish girls being groomed by Pakistani gangs in the UK.

For that matter, Jewish South Africans did not end up victimized in South Africa.

Of course they have the escape hatch of Israel.

Double oops! Clumsy me. Or clueless me. No underline either. Trying again.

Jacinta Price, aboriginal woman, has debunked in a few words essentially everything Tony Barta and Colin Tatz write on the subject, defending the current date of Australia Day, and urging aborigines to stop being “professional mourners”. And more. Including that “if we are pressured enough to change the date then there will be something else for aboriginal middle class activists and guilt ridden white fellas to be offended about.”

Good summary of The Jewish War on Australian Whitefellas.

There is nothing morally wrong with just death dealing, say to the convicted and existential enemies of just law and order.

Though, true justification and judgement of death is only the realm of the Western god who specializes in Law and Order (the Western Father). Traditionally, the culturally varied forms of this god included An, Amun, Anubis, Yama, Mitra, Mars, Tyr, etc.

The Jewish god of (unjust) Life (Adonai, Adonis, Pan, Dionysus, etc) specializes in unjust death as a protest against the Law and Order of just Death (ie: sees nothing wrong with child sacrifice as a means of provoking an unnatural act against the natural order).

However, the Holocaust never happened. Stating that it did would be, again, the realm of the Jewish god that despises metaphysically derived (true) law and order in favor of lies that would unjustly have innocent people persecuted for generations to the benefit of the actual murderers.

Jesus is a Jewish-Greek invention: a refinement of their Dionysus Cult, which was the ancient equivalent of cultural Marxism and just as vicious (they would murder those who got in their way).

He is the equivalent of Adonis, Adonai, Tammuz, Dionysus, and Baachus. All of the symbolism is seasonal/calendar symbolism. It’s a Jewish cult, through and through, meant to destroy Rome via subversion of cultural standards. After Rome ejected the Jews for promoting the cult (in the form of Sabazius), and executed 7000 Dionysan cult members, the cult finally won in the more refined Christian form.

Its the cult of the Bull, disordered life, and a rejection of law and order in favor of the Father (Aryan man, Death, Law and Order, Judgement, Protection, the Ram, the original and real god), mixing with the goddess of the East (“Easter”, Eastern women), to form mixed race. This result, the “Bull”, or Adonai, Adonis, Pan, Dionysus, and even symbolically the Minotaur (all mixed race symbolism – man and the lower beast), is the primary Jewish god that represents the Mongolian-Western admixture that we find in most Jews and Turks.

Jews concentrate on Life, yes? That is not what it seems. The original god was death, which resulted in proper social morality, ethics, and an ordered society (think the struggle of the farmer against disorder). This is the god of oaths and judgement. His free reign is represented by the death of the Bull at the Autumn equinox. The god of life is tolerant to promote disorder (think the disordered life of spring and the forest). He is represented at the death of the lamb-ram at the vernal equinox.

We need some blackfellas to comment here.

Not really.

What’s the best way forward?
The best future scenario?

You mean for them? I’ll tell you:look at South Africa.
True, numbers aren’t good for them in Australia; a lot better in NZ though.

So….take South Africa as a model/foundation and customize it for Kiwis/Aussies, in that order.

Having said that, that’s what “blackfellas” elites want. Simply to rule, be on the top.
Will it happen, who knows?
The “problem” in that desire/vision are Chinese and Indians. Something like in Fiji, for example. We know how local “blackfellas” elites fixed that issue.

Time and demographics mate……….time and demographics…..

Oops! No need! Jacinta Price has said it all!

We need some blackfellas to comment here. Come on, you blokes and sheilas! You abos! Agree with Onus-Williams? With Tatzarlatan? What’s the best way forward? The best future scenario?

Your revisionism is amazing.

That’s an easy one – almost a Dorothy Dixer.

It all comes down to Yahweh the Foreskin-Obsessed Sky Maniac.

When he was considering conferring Master-Race-ness over part of his earthly bits of creation, Yahweh plumped for an incestuous couple of Mesopotamian[0] goatherds (Avram and Sarai were half-siblings: same father).

Yadda yadda, Moses, 2 million people taking 40 years to travel 150 miles but leaving no archeological trace (Exodus), yadda yadda Assyrian/Phoenecian/Roman conquest yadda yadda Diaspora…

So the jurisprudence is absolutely clear: if I’m a Zionist lawyer, and you disagree with my analysis, you’re a despicable anti-Semite and basically exactly the same as that shouty-gesticulatey Austrian dude from 80 years ago with a red armband and a weird moustache.

Sounds fucking stupid, right?

But that’s basically the story: some Litvaks and other Eurotrash conduct a campaign of ethnic cleansing in 1948, legitimised because a provably-ahistorical fiction says that Yahweh promised the land to the descendants of some incestuous Mesopotamian nomads. (Otherwise the Hill of Foreskins[1] is for naught).

Compare that to: the Poms craft a dodgy treaty in 2 language versions with different meanings, and now the NZ government relies on the English version to buttress its claim to rightful sovereignty over Maori land (sovereignty that the current government inherited from the “Magic Genitals” system in the UK).

The second example, while stupendously risible, is more plausible. It will not survive judicial review; in another half-century Crown land in NZ will be owned by Maori, and all major cities that are on illegitimately-acquired[2] Maori land will pay reparational taxes – that is the plan, and there’s no stopping it now.

[0] “Ur of the Chaldees” might also be in modern-day Turkey; depends who you ask. In reality, Avram was a fictional character anyhow, so it’s like trying to work out the lat/lon of Smallville, Kansas. (At least we know Spider-Man is real, because Peter Parker was born in New York)

[1] the Hill of Foreskins is a thing. It’s 100000% retarded, but it’s a thing.

[2] Some cities in NZ are located on land that was legitimately acquired. Not many in the North Island, but most of the South Island is fine. That’s why American billionaires are buying land down there.

Hate-filled words, say you?

Luke 14:26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters–yes, even their own life–such a person cannot be my disciple.

Try harder next time, ok? Morons like you don’t even know what the hateful Jewsus character said. You’ve been schooled.

The Jew Paul writes in the Jew Testament that Christians are of lower intelligence and ignoble to boot.

One Corinthians 1:18-26 “For the message about the cross is nonsense…the nonsense of our preaching…Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…”

Do you think that applies to yourself? You are making low intelligent comments? Or is the Jew Paul wrong? Please bring your inept fanaticism to bear on my questions.

The subject of the article is “Jewish War on White Australia”. How do your hate-filled words and deceptive Bible quotations fit into that?

Are you a Jew expressing your hatred of Australia, or of Christians?

Or are you a nothing, trying to stir up Christian hatred of Jews? If so, why?

Enough with the holohoax. We’re all tired of the lie. Go sell it somewhere else judeo-supremacisf.

Jesus not a Jew

https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/jesus-was-not-a-jew/

‘Love the irony of the aboriginal activist demanding all of Whiteness be removed while she is speaking with a microphone and a cell phone in her hand. Will this lovely POC refuse to have any of the things like electricity and cell phones that evil White people created and shared with POC?’

For a real hoot, imagine Ms Overfed Mulatto trying to live with bunch of actual Australian Aborigines living the actual Aborigine lifestyle in the actual Outback.

She’s a parasite in the worst way possible. Not only is she utterly dependent on her host, she sees it as her duty to abuse him as much as possible. At least your basic tapeworm tries to keep quiet about it.

You’re not alone:

The history of almost all of humanity- not just White history – has been one of fighting for resources and conquering others. That Whites have emerged (currently) as the victors in this eternal struggle does not make Whites “more guilty” than POC of universal human behavior.

The openly stated purpose of forced immigration of POC into White Western Civ is to destroy what Whites have built by bringing about “diversity” which is just code for White Genocide.

Love the irony of the aboriginal activist demanding all of Whiteness be removed while she is speaking with a microphone and a cell phone in her hand. Will this lovely POC refuse to have any of the things like electricity and cell phones that evil White people created and shared with POC? POC hate Whitey but man they sure love the White man’s inventions that have made their lives one million times better.

Always remember, it is not wrong if Jews do it. Because y’know six million or something…

That option is already implemented. Just press alt+F4.

Duh! What proportion of Israelis, even just Israeli Jews, do you think are Ashkenazim?

Isn’t there a simpler explanation for Frank Lowy’s pro immigration views? It’s good for the bottom line if you are in his business. A test would be to see if he agrees with Australia’s current immigration criteria which does not favour cheap labour or adding to the Labor Party’s ethnic supporters (much). It would be very suspicious if he supported open borders.

Calling people Nazis? Do you dye your hair purple too?

Indeed. This is something anti-religionists do a lot. A given group of people adopt a faith — and then all of a sudden, every single failure and moral shortcoming becomes the fault of that faith.

Yes, those with an axe to grind against religion always find a hundred different ways to attack it, perhaps to counteract a guilty conscious, i.e. justify sin. Or, because they hate a particular group and want to justify harming them. It’s ironic how so many of the pro-Hitler supporters fail to discern how evil national socialist Germany was under his reign. Just for the record, opposing Hitler doesn’t automatically mean favoring the Weimar Republic or the Bolshevik communists, as I’m opposed to all.

They say that Ashkenazi Jews are of higher intelligence than the rest of us.

This isn’t true at all.

As you can see, Israel ranks around 40 overall in math, science and reading. If what you said were true then this would be reflected in the overall scores.

From one of Australia’s greatest success stories with a 9/11 connection:

Australia ‘moving in the wrong direction ‘says Frank Lowy

Lots of Shoah grist for the mill in this one yet still it’s never enough for Australia to have welcomed him we must discriminate against our own children in favour of his.

““There is a rising crescendo of opinion from columnists and politicians saying we should reduce our immigration intake.”

“And in the past year our immigration intake has declined. We have gone from migration targets to migration caps. I think we are moving in the wrong direction.”

I don;t blame “Sir” Frank for being pro his people but ffs fuck off to Israel if you’re so concerned about our immigration policy, and take your bleeding heart pom Churchillian contingent with you as you go.

We owe you nothing, Frank. You owe us everything.

There is only ONE Australia:

It is White.

It is Celt-Anglo at base.

It is completely at ease with itself:

“If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews.”

Tada!

Talk about deceptive nonsense; that’s the Magic Soil narrative, on steroids. Read some European history, they already tried out your silly story.

Simple denial gets you nowhere, with or without the tone of mockery. Why no quotations and cited sources? In any case it’s not a matter of opinion, it’s a formal change of religion.

That your dear late friend Adolf was in full agreement with you, insisting for pragmatic reasons that modern Jews are a race, brushing aside post-Biblical history, does not advance your credibility one little bit.

Ron, Ron, Ron!

Deep flaw in your software. The numbered Anonymous. So many! Can’t you give us the option of switching of comments from and replies to them all, so that those mainly nonsensical posts are not even seen?

I have ‘Judaism’s Strange Gods’ and ‘ and ‘Judaism Discovered’ on a shelf beside me. What point are you making?

“Whites killed most of the Aboriginals”. Absolute BS. They killed some, and there were some mass murders as at Myall Creek for which white men were hanged. But most deaths were from Eurasian diseases Aborigines had no.immunity to.

If you were an Israeli lawyer advising the New Zealand government do you think you could assure them that the settled disposition of sovereignty and possession of property as at 1948 should be an adequate test of validity?

The Jewish population of Australia is only about half of one per cent and Aborigines, even including those just cashing in on having some Aboriginal ancestry are only about 2.5 per cent so bizarre characters like Katz are not likely to be remembered in 20 years time. The selective immigration by ethnic Chinese and Indians (already much larger than the Aboriginal and Jewish populations combined) will also probably fortify Australia’s resistance to the American and British PC diseases.

One correction. I once had some correspondence with Dirk Moses – also a purveyor of bizarre views – and, in the course of it he said he was not Jewish.

Given that you’re such a stickler about the word genocide being used correctly, you should agree with me that all the white nationalists and alt-righters making a fuss about “white genocide” are a bunch of nutcases.

I don’t know how many times this has to be said.
Here we go again.

There are plenty of people alive today who consider themselves to be Tasmanian Aborigines and are accepted as such
Just as there are plenty of people in North America who claim to be of a specific indigenous American tribe and are accepted as such even though they are of mixed heritage
There is a large community in New Zealand who call themselves Maori and yet it is doubtful if any of them have 100% Maori ancestry

Tasmanian aborigines were always few in number – a couple of thousand at best -and their numbers were decreasing before whites entered the picture.
Just another guns germs and steel episode of many

Between 1500 and 1900, an ever-increasing flood of culturally confident, technologically supreme, and numerous white people joyously washed over the earth, taking just about everything they wished to.

True as far as it goes, but for a goodly chunk of that space (from the miod-1700s onwards) the Eurotrash were putatively – according to their own law – operating under a system whereby if the indigenes had a recognisable set of rules that governed property, they had to be invaded “properly” (i.e., with a declaration of war) or they had to be negotiated with. If they didn’t have that sort of institutional infrastructure, then the land was declared terra nullius (which absolutely does not mean “uninhabited” – it just means “There’s nobody here we can meaningfully talk to“.

In places where they did not apply the doctrine of terra nullius, the Poms were particularly bad at working out which of “invade/negotiate’ they claimed to be doing – and often, it was clear that they were deliberately keeping things opaque.

Furthermore, their ‘negotiations’ were often underhand and in obvious bad faith, as is has been made abundantly clear by the ‘diff’ between the Maori and Pakeha versions of Te Tiriti o Waitangi; in the Maori (which is what the Maori signatories understood), the rangatira (chiefs) invited the British to set up a system of governance (kawanatanga) over the growing (white) immigrant population… but they specifically did not cede sovereignty (rangatiratanga) .

The English version… not so much. The British claimed sovereignty, and also asserted that the Crown was the only valid purchaser of land.

Nek minnit, Poms were turning up with what they claimed were titles to land (as it happens, land near Waitara, which belongs to my tribe); deeds of sale signed by people who did not have the right to sell so much as a square inch of soil. (In fact under Maori law, nobody has the right to dispose of land; it belongs to the iwi and can change hands only by conquest)

That has been the cause of 4 wars, and litigation ever since… and now the NZ government is about to sign a $300 million settlement with Ngapuhi (the tribe next door to mine) for the punitive seizure of land after an insurrection in protest at Treaty violations by the Crown.

Let me be clear where I stand though: I have some sympathy for the Aborigines. They weren’t ‘invaded’, in any formal sense, so the land was not acquired by the Crown by dint of conquest, which would have made the acquisition valid; there were also no negotiations worth talking about, and the Aboringinal societies certainly had a system that qualifies as ‘property law’ (they excluded; they inherited; they asserted sole right to occupy).

They got dudded, big time – but unlike the Maori they did not fight back with enough alacrity to get the Poms to notice. This is a big ask for the Aborigines because of the huge distances involved in Australia, but bear in mind there were more Aborigines living within 500 miles of Botany Bay, than there were Maori in the whole of New Zealand… and yet the Kiwi chocolates were able to fight England to a draw (which, against a superpower, counts as a win), whereas the Aussie chocolates got thumped.

Kinda like modern rugby.

Oh… and one final thing (about flags): the Aboriginal flag is a fiction invented well after Australia was colonised.

By stark contrast, the flag of the United Tribes of New Zealand dates from 1830 and along with the Declaration of the Independence of New Zealand (He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni) served as the assertion of sovereignty prior to negotiations with the Crown (which in turn pre-dated British attempts at colonising NZ after 1840).

That Declaration of Independence was the primary piece of evidence that the rangatira did not ever intend to cede sovereignty to England, and so the English version of the Treaty is invalid in the law as it stood at the time (and subsequently).

If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews.

Tada!

Talk about deceptive nonsense; that’s the Magic Soil narrative, on steroids. Read some European history, they already tried out your silly story.

There are millions of Christian Jews.

Data from the Pew Research Center has it that, as of 2013, about 1.6 million adult American Jews identify themselves as Christians, most as Protestants.[52][53][54] According to the same data, most of the Jews who identify themselves as some sort of Christian (1.6 million) were raised as Jews or are Jews by ancestry.[53] According to a 2012 study, 17% of Jews in Russia identify themselves as Christians.[55][56]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian

What exactly was your point?

That is deceptive nonsense. If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews. You are implying that they become Christians but remain of the “Jewish race”. There is no such thing, with the single exception of the Palestinians, who are Muslims and Christians of the ancient Jewish race. Your Wikipedia reference explains that with its opening words, that Jewish Christians were Bible-era geographical Judeans. If there’s something devious further into that Wikipedia article I didn’t come to it.

In other words there are ZERO Christian Jews today.

The more primitive hunter-gatherers, on the other hand like those Indians who originally inhabited the San Francisco Bay Area promptly died — so fast that we barely know anything about them.

No, they are still around. Digger Indians were prominent in San Francisco hippydom. Indians harvest acorns from the public spaces as allowed by treaty. If you go at the right time, you can watch them from the Mountain View public library.

They caught on quickly. You can’t tell from the census data. By a quirk of California law they were counted as white as soon as they could speak Spanish or English. Just over the hills near Los Baños there are Indians who still speak their native language.

Jewish immigration, like this?

And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world.

Jesus, AD 33
Jerusalem, Israel
(((Mark 16:15)))

You are right about the destruction.

For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (((Matthew 10:35)))

There are millions of Christian Jews.

Data from the Pew Research Center has it that, as of 2013, about 1.6 million adult American Jews identify themselves as Christians, most as Protestants.[52][53][54] According to the same data, most of the Jews who identify themselves as some sort of Christian (1.6 million) were raised as Jews or are Jews by ancestry.[53] According to a 2012 study, 17% of Jews in Russia identify themselves as Christians.[55][56]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian

What exactly was your point?

That is deceptive nonsense. If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews. You are implying that they become Christians but remain of the “Jewish race”. There is no such thing, with the single exception of the Palestinians, who are Muslims and Christians of the ancient Jewish race. Your Wikipedia reference explains that with its opening words, that Jewish Christians were Bible-era geographical Judeans. If there’s something devious further into that Wikipedia article I didn’t come to it.

Moi? Not a zionist, not a jew. Never read the talmud. Never met a rabbi. So that makes you a liar.

But Jesus was a Zionist. Jesus was a Jew. Jesus was a Rabbi.

So how is a Zionist Jewish Rabbi “far superior” to Zionist Jewish Rabbis, hmm?

Luke 4:15 He [Jewsus] taught in their synagogues and was glorified by everyone.

Ah, you can’t explain anything rationally like a White man, you just say “trust me.” Just like the Hebes.

Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is confidence.

The Hebrew tribe of confidence men is definitely your kin. You’re playing a confidence game just like Bernie “Trust Me” Madoff.

Zio troll! I am no Christian but Jesus was far superior to your talmudist shite rabbis and you

I’ve been wondering for 30 years when people will wake up to this tribal disease that is talmudism

The first step in the destruction of a country is Jewish immigration

The Jew Paul writes in the Jew Testament that Christians are of lower intelligence and ignoble to boot.

One Corinthians 1:18-26 “For the message about the cross is nonsense…the nonsense of our preaching…Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…”

Do you think that applies to yourself? You are making low intelligent comments? Or is the Jew Paul wrong? Please bring your inept fanaticism to bear on my questions.

How many Jews moved to America to live in wigwams and teepees, and experience a stone-age and nomadic existence? Exactly none. By Jewish logic, the tribe is attempting to receive stolen property. What they are really attempting to do is conquer the West and repopulate it with people that they believe they can dominate or work with and still remain privileged.

‘Insults followed by apoplexy. Much resist. Very progress. Are you a Hillary voter too?’

No, I’m not a Hillary voter. I didn’t even become apoplectic.

…but your graph really is stupid. Trust me.

‘…Being anti-Jew makes one into an “anti-religionist?” Wow, you’re fully kiked now, if you imagine there are no other religions other than Jewdeo-originated…’

I have to admit that inasmuch as it was previously decided I was a Jew in disguise, it would make sense that I’m ‘fully kiked’ as well.

Oh, whatever to do…