You’d be considered racist to even ask such a question to any of these organizations. Legal defense of these lawsuits are very costly and go the line the pockets of another group of (((undesirables))) who are more than happy all of this is is taking place.

We are all familiar with Burke's comment on what the triumph of evil requires. Why then do not the talented tenth among the black race speak out against the crimes committed by their financially less well off brethren? The Irish immigrating to this country eventually became civilized. If they could any group can.

As a black attorney who once served as a public defender, I have to say that I am shocked to see that white people think of me in such horrid ways without giving me (my husband and children) the benefit of the doubt. I am now wondering how the white man or woman that I represented in criminal court for crimes such as rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault, assault and battery, pedophilia, malicious wounding, manslaughter, public drunkeness, drug possession/paraphernalia, murder, theft, destruction of public property, stolen credit cards, bad check writing, felony hit and run, DUIs, reckless driving…. I'm now wondering if those white people I represented REALLY thought that it was me who was uncivilized…for trying to mitigate their circumstances. All I can say is this…I feel sorry for any black person who has to get services from any of you people. I'm sure there are nurses, doctors, lawyers, preachers, teachers, waitresses on this blog. God help us all! GOD HELP US ALL!

I am a black attorney….I will continue to follow this blog. I didn't know that white people felt this way about black people. So…now I'm thinking back to the white guys and girls I represented in criminal court for drug possession, armed robbery, domestic violence, rape, DUIs, disorderly conduct, aggravated assault, murder, manslaughter….I wonder if they felt the same way about Me, as you folks feel about blacks. I certainly provided excellent representation. Wow…ten months of practice as a public defender tells the truth about who is committing the crimes..FOLKS…it ain't just a black thing! .. You people should take your blinders off and mind your manners…lol..

I'm of melanin and I'm sorry you can take your children to what you want. But, let's be fair and honest it's not just my people but all are acting up and out at society. The gangs, bikers, drug dealers, mob and any other organized crime like police, government officials, CIA, FBI and so help shape this reality we all live in. Dr king had a dream for all who are civilized

This entire phenomenon is caused by the popularity of those awful season passes. A form of corporate welfare by whichever park is stupid enough to sell them at less than the price of two admissions. While the profitable parks who don't beg for bankrupcy protection price them at x3-4 times the regular price, the parks that will remain nameless still feel that allowing parents to dump their delinquent kids off at the park 20 times a year when they go to park is more important than profits.

Wow, I didnt know people could be this ignorant in their stereotypes about "Black Folks".. What I'm wondering is all these stereotypes wouldnt have to do with Whytes enslaving blacks and creating these supposed behaviors, that you now complain about,,, your ancestors made your beds,,, now lay in them!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I just found this site today. It has instantly soared to the top of my favorites list. You are mistaken about America 101 (whoever excluded only the blacks). Mexicans and Puerto Ricans can join the blacks. They act just like them!

HAHAHA!!!…I THINK THIS BLOG IS HILARIOUS!! SBPDL..I dont know if ur white or black or neither…I don't care….It's unfortunate that so much of it is true….& even more unfortunate that some people don't even want to shatter the stereotype…what's even worse is the fact that now those of the ghetto mentality seem to feel VALIDATED in their disgusting behaviour even more because they voted their color & now they have an angry RACIST black woman in the white house with her husband pressing forward their socialist agenda…its a shame that even if we don't want to generalize, or stereotype, there's a whole future generation that still wants to live as tho they're actually oppressed!

"THIS is the most racist site I have ever been to in my life… I mean come on!"

Hey Kevo. Does telling some unpleasant truths make this site racist (TM)? Or is it the simple fact that the truths are uncomfortable to you that makes this site Racist (TM)?

I've never considered myself a bigot or anything of the sort, but I've reached a point in my life that I refuse to bow to political correctness any longer. I wish no harm for blacks at all, but I won't sit back and allow black culture to inundate every aspect of my life either. The media pushes the rot of ghetto culture constantly (rap, idolatry of black athletes, etc.).

I don't blame blacks for this necessarily, because they don't control the media, but please don't insinuate Racism (TM) into the equation when it's not the cause of critique.

Most of us on this blog are just ordinary folks that are sick and tired of our culture, way-of-life being destroyed. We're also tired of feeling unsafe and threatened any time we want to go into a city or a neighborhood.

Is that Racist (TM) to you?

I belong to a group that tries to adopt rescued dogs to good homes. We give presentations at various venues, never had any trouble. But once we did the local amusement park, and we were beset by the gangs of feral teenagers. They kept trying to hit the dogs in the face, said they were going to make them bite so they could sue me. It was such a funny game to bait whitey, who was bound by the chains of civil behavior, not to mention the threat of accusations of racism. Like a lot of people, I think I have been tolerant of their hateful, ugly behavior too long. They are poisoning our world. As in other cities, civic celebrations have been marred by violence – usually a shooting or two – by these vicious kids. Enough!

I know right, because white people never riot when in large groups!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bXb1IT7gY8&feature=related

Native Africans were civil Fo Shizzle Ma Nizzle dey trea dey slafes vary wel?

Paul
Here's another clamoring Afrocentric buffoon by the name of DEVO who's polluting the site. Can you please intervene? They're flocking to this site like a moth to a flame.
I wonder if it's not another of Desi's new persona, but then I wonder. She just might be infecting other members of her tribe into spreading their feverish unwarranted indignation at us.

@ KEVO
This site is not for you, besides what you're describing up there is being done to your people by your people all over the African continent. Do you know the definition of a "roi-nègre"?

If you're not happy being an American citizen, then I would invite you to leave for any one of these peaceful Sub-Saharan African countries: Congo, Zimbabwe, Rhodesia, Somalia, Liberia, Nigeria, the Ivory Coast, SA just to cite a few.

Liberia was created especially for the freed American slaves. I would strongly suggest you make it your next holiday destination. I am convinced you'll find great resonance with it's inhabitants.

And now, that being said: would you please clear the air.

Well Kevo Factorial 37 000 white females <— note emphasis are raped by black guys each year. 0 Black females are raped by white men (or asians)

ALL ARE not GUILTY!

"Native Africans were civil"

and slave holders.

THIS is the most racist site I have ever been to in my life… I mean come on! First: You guys say that blacks insult, rape, steal, kill…. HAHA! are you serious!?! – you are nothing but a bunch of racist white people getting your BLACK 101 teaching from the media! Talk about being civilized?? We were lynched, drowned, babies killed, hung, genitals chopped off for you amusement, burnt alive, and heavily propagandize from opposing White-Euro governments. There are many blacks, including myself, who are completely capable of creating and or participate in a ordered society. There are so many people with mental issues it dosent make any sense. EVERYBODY'S CRAZY!! You wanna know the truth about all of this. WE NEED CHRIST! plane and simple. We all have dirt and have done GREAT (if there were a such thing as a higher case, I would use it!) EVIL!! Romans, Greeks, British, Americans!! DO YOU HAVE ANY CLUE WHAT WHITE (or Black) governments have done in the course of history, especially war. Man is not innocent – ALL ARE GUILTY! Yea so what – a bunch of black kids hang out here of there – BIG DEAL – Native Americans were civil – Native Africans were civil – in fact there ways of war was influenced by the European nations. Africans were naturally and always a communal people – there idea of war esp the Zulus and Swaziland was one of only NECCESARY terms. White governments went to war for Land and Money. POWERED BY GREED!

It is silly and self-destructive to think that race is the basis of our mess. The black folks got seduced into the entitlement mentality during the '60's by the radicals who took over from ML King, and by politicians who thought that throwing money at a problem would solve it.
.
There are plenty and growing numbers of blacks who have a bit of common sense and reject the entitlement nonsense.
.
Congratulating ourselves on being white will solve nobody's problem. We humans are in this together, and we will not get our on our own.
.
The second great commandment tells us to love our neighbor, not the nearest white person, just like we love ourselves. Nothing but obedience to God will turn things around.

I guess they will just keep living King's dream. Where I live decent people can't even go to the theatre's to see a movie anymore. Police officers have to be stationed at the cinemas on Friday and Saturday nights. Thx Dr. King.

Love this site. This entry especially. Ive know for years that many places are not safe anymore. Places like amusement parks, the movies, public pools and the like are not safe anymore and are to be avoided.
Im not going to put a blanket statement out that all black people are the cause of this, although many of them seem to hate whites and the rest of them are silent about what is happening.
Avoiding amusement parks and carnivals has been something I have been doing for many years.
Its nice to see that there is a blog adressing this issue.
By the way, isnt it ironic that this discussion is about how there is an element of black people that ruined places that were supposed to be fun and there are black people that post here to harrass and annoy the white people who post here?

"So, the short version is: The problem is with the CULTURE, not the COLOR."

Sorry to disagree, but black violent crime and black illegitimacy are worldwide, as is low IQ.

"@Jones,
Why are you even wasting your time here?"

Her name is not "Jones", her name is Diarrhea, and we've all been asking her this same question for months.

She has an unhealthy obsession with white males, and she fantasizes that a white male is going to marry her, and sire her biracial offspring. Of course, since she's already a "light-skinded sista", the kids are going to look white.

We're all hoping that one day she'll get a job or a boyfriend, but until then it looks like we're stuck with her.

Marseilles, Paris, London, Molenbeek Belgium, Rotterdam, Amsterdam and so on. Everywhere Muslims go in a large number they set up a parallel state when the numbers are correct.

Last anon,

Sorry you are done with the site. Perhaps you can go to Philadelphia, Chicago or other major cities and work on stopping Black people from engaging in behavior that gives people the impression they are some kind of "subhuman animal"…

You left out Detroit, the Paris of the west, in the name check you insensitive clod!

"So what does that mean? I win a prize?"

It means that you sound like a broken record stuck on repeat.

It means that you write things that are breathtakingly unoriginal and trite.

It means that the concepts of statistics, probability, and proportion are completely foreign to you.

The same thing holds true with Muslims. If there are only a few in a locality, they are much more willing to assimilate to the local culture, to "fit in". Once their numbers rise high enough, though, they begin to resist normative American social values and cling more tightly to their dysfunctional cultural roots. (I'm not even talking jihad here; I'm talking about a tribal honor/shame culture that is so focused on discovering and retaliating for any hint of "disrespect" that it can't see its own self-sabotaging behaviors.)

Seems to me that the urban black/ ghetto culture has these same flaws. And YES, there are whites who have the same behavior patterns. The thing is, whites don't have the easy excuse of "it's not my fault; it's that everybody else is racist" … so at least SOMETIMES people from "white trash" households can be persuaded to see that THEIR OWN BEHAVIORS are the chains that hold them back.

So yes, there's a problem with some of the "minority cultures" in this country. Too many minorities, both blacks and Muslims, seem to believe that they come into this world "perfected": that there are no standards which apply to them; that they deserve respect yet have no obligation to show respect to others; and that they have an absolute right to act on whatever whim or impulse seizes them at any given moment.

So, the short version is: The problem is with the CULTURE, not the COLOR.

But — how do we fix a culture? Especially when any criticism is pounced upon by the "Professional Grievance Mongers" (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, CAIR, etc) as PROOF of our racism, bigotry, and all around "hate"?

@Jones,

Why are you even wasting your time here? These people want to believe that black Americans are some kind of subhuman animal, let 'em believe it. Screw 'em.

I'm done with this site.

"But most reasonable people know that bad behavior knows no race, color, or creed."

Congratulations!!

You are the ONE MILLIONTH person to mindlessly type this tired platitude!"

Congratulations!!

You are the ONE MILLIONTH person to mindlessly type this tired platitude!

So what does that mean? I win a prize? Does such a statement typed one million times make it any less true? ell you what, I'll give myself the prize of never again visiting this site. It's a total waste of time.

@"Jones":

"So, you can take the credit for freeing the slaves but not take credit ("guilt") for the horrors of lynching? Understandable, but odd."

What are you on about, jackanape? I haven't said a word about lynching in this entire thread.

That must be one of the voices in your head, Desiree.

"But most reasonable people know that bad behavior knows no race, color, or creed."

True, that's a fact…but then how do you explain gratuitous & extreme violence so present among the least evolved?

I was horrified at the sight of victims of groids in Sub-Saharan Africa and the US. These images are shocking but what shocks me the most is the mere mention of these heinous crimes is considered taboo by the DWL crowd. The complicit attitude of those so-called 'anti-racists' is criminal. They're the ones that are encouraging such behavior by refusing to take a stand and denouncing these atrocities.

The world we live in is totally insane!

The Negro Jones Said:

"A. Please explain the basis of your use of "black racists" in the context of the victimization of non-blacks. By the use of that term you are essentially implying that blacks seek out non-blacks, due to skin color difference, to harm.

B. Please cite information showing that the minority percentage of interracial crime done by blacks is due to racism. Be honest enough to admit it's total garbage if you cannot. "

I'll take this one.

A. In Ohio, negros are running around screaming "It's a Black World" as they assault Whites. They attack in Mobs in Chicago selectively targeting Whites. In Denver, they use the term "Beat Whitey Night" to orchestrate their attacks via text messaging, which is pretty good for for shitskins. Twenty-seven attacks in Denver alone that involve only black on White crime. In Philadelphia, negros use the term "Polar Bear Hunting" for the systemic targeting and assault and Robbery of Whites. These are racist attacks by negros against other people not of African linage with documented evidence supporting the case, either text messages, Audio, witness statements, or video.

B. You are wrong in your statement, a Majority of Interracial crime (90%) is perpetrated by negros. (See: http://projects.nytimes.com/crime/homicides/map) for crime of murder in New York. Click on Race of Perp, remembering that negros are only 25% of population. But Let's take Rape. Number of negro females raped by Whites. ZERO. Now number of White women raped by black men. 37 000+. One hundred a DAY. This huge discrepancy can only be explained by racial hatred. Rapes, as the DWL say, is a crime of hate and the desire to control; and based on this reality, negros hate and desire to control White women. Further, as negros live among negros, this rape must accomplished by a negro leaving its nest and seeking out a White woman to rape. The Knoxville Horror or the rape of Anne Pressly are good examples. Anne Pressly was in her own home when she was attacked. Her face was beaten with a piece of firewood so violently that she was unrecognizable, the blood was cut off to her brain due to the jawbone being driven back so as to cut off her carotid artery and her blood was found on the ceiling. (http://youtu.be/0gerNn_ml-g).

"3. Almost all those lynched were people guilty or rape and murder."

This is wrong. May I just say that I find it interesting that you list "rape" before "murder." Word order is a fascinating thing. Assuming you are a white male, it makes perfect sense for you to put "rape" first given history. The white male has always wanted to maintain the white female's "purity" and black male-white female contact – social and sexual – was a constant, irrational fear of virtually all white men. Sex was the most loathsome of contact, rape being incidental, but rape could more justify acting on the paranoia.

Anyway, about 50 women were lynched during lynching's recorded history. One woman, Mary Turner, an innocent black whose husband was murdered by whites looking for another black who'd killed his white boss after years of abuse, was lynched gruesomely.

All she'd done was protest her innocent husband's murder.

What you don't seem to be grasping is that designating the word "guilty" to lynchings is part of the faulty public consciousness regarding lynching. Guilt had nothing to do with it as lynching was the very dealing out of "justice" (yeah, right) without due process of law.

You apparently have it in your head that lynching was noble and that the victims were perhaps criminals who got away with it. No, the vast majority of lynching victims were never tried – who knows if they were guilty beyond an accusation.

You're assuming, which is contradictory to history.

Again, I don't know why you are tying to defend the practice by suggesting the victims were guilty. If they'd been proven guilty, they'd be in jail, not tortured, maimed, and killed. This was a barbaric act; there is no justifying such absolute cruelty.

If you are human – and I will assume you are – no amount of anti-black feelings would prevent you from losing your lunch. Most American whites would find that level of overt racial hate and violence too much to bear. We are all so far-removed from it.

Even with our white fair-weather bigots and quasi-nationalists, the savagery of lynching would cause considerable disquiet. This is a testament, I think, to how far we've come.

Seriously, don't justify lynching. It's not something to get behind. It really isn't.

"However, we did free them, then allow them to stay in the country.

And so, once again…you're welcome."

So, you can take the credit for freeing the slaves but not take credit ("guilt") for the horrors of lynching? Understandable, but odd.

And for the record, I am not Desiree, Diarrhea, or whoever else is a "Negro troll." I'm also not a black man in his fifties.

So you do block comments? I believed I was on topic: Jim Crow and lynching.

I admit the Mary Turner lynching was pretty graphic. What they did to her unborn child was disgusting.

I'll re-paste without that inclusion:

"1. Lynching was crime control and nothing more. Yes, more blacks were lynched than whites but blacks also committed more crime than whites."

Black lynching had nothing to do with crime control. It was extra-legal, retributive, and most importantly, was public participatory. Even CHILDREN participated. It functioned as social control, the intention and effect being keeping blacks faithless in the justice system and in agreement with the racial "status quo." Jim Crow then replaced lynching; it was the new form of social control.

The most violent lynchings were at the accusation – not proof because these were extra-legal actions – of rape of a white female. Castration was almost always a part of the torture process, which suggests that lynching of black men had a psychological importance to white males, who were the organizers of these executions, based in sex. The symbolism was in upholding white male superiority within the social milieu.

To even try to support such barbarism shows you know absolutely nothing about the practice! If you want to legitimize the torture of men and women, by all means, believe in sorry rhetoric.

But you are mistaken in your history. No amount of sophism will change this. Lynching victims were murdered.

"2. More blacks are killed each year by other blacks than during the entire history of lynching. More whites are killed by blacks every year as well."

Lynching figures are considered conservative and are only based on those reported. Most significantly is that racial terrorism was being committed against black men and women and was fully condoned and participated in by the white public.

Recall the postcards.

The majority of crime is intraracial. More whites are killed by whites each year than those killed by blacks. But may I correctly assume that those murder victims don't matter much to you?

So if you want to rail against what you perceived this country as becoming, just look in your ancestors'
mirror.

Wad b dat mean wen nod in Ebionics?

"Could it be that the troll Desirée aka Diarrhoea is back again this time posing as Jones?"

Does a bear shit in the woods?

"But most reasonable people know that bad behavior knows no race, color, or creed."

Congratulations!!

You are the ONE MILLIONTH person to mindlessly type this tired platitude!

said…

Good God, Bro. Anonymous,

Is that the best you can come up with? Ever think that, in historical context, that statement might be true?"

That whatever happened in Tenn has doomed blacks to an eternity of dysfunction? Yeah, sure. Funny how other races are able to pick up the pieces. Ie, Japan.

"Whitey could have picked his own damn cotton and left the Africans the hell alone. So if you want to rail against what you perceived this country as becoming, just look in your ancestors'
mirror."

Yeah, I agree with the first part. Importing slaves was obviously a serious error.

However, we did free them, then allow them to stay in the country.

And so, once again…you're welcome.

@ Jones

Could it be that the troll Desirée aka Diarrhoea is back again this time posing as Jones? I might be new to this blog but I'm well aware of her presence and the fact that she's hellbent on convincing us that her people are ultimately justified in their incessant quest for reparations from whitey. It seems that the social laws or etiquette you're pointing up in the above post were merely there to instill a modicum of civility amongst the Black folks, since civility as a rule is not innate in Black culture. Some of these laws might have been restrictive towards Blacks, but overall they made sense as your kind needs to benefit from a framework to behave properly is civilized societies.

All etiquette is history now and look at what's happening in BRA.

Sorry Jones, I never suffered from white guilt and refuse to be swayed by your arguments that are aimed at justifying a group's inability to succeed despite having been clearly advantaged by many reforms from the mid-60's onward.

P.S. In the mid-50's Ghana and South Korea had more or less the same per capita GDP. At that time, resource-rich Ghana seemed to have the edge. Unfortunately, Ghana was peopled by Ghanians and Korea by Koreans, so things took a predictable turn.

said…

"Soros/Jones/Snapes is a white man"

No, "Jones" is Desiree, a demented Negro troll.

"Had Greenwood survived, the black people there just might have gotten around to building that amusement park."

The incredibly shocking and unexpected translation of this statement:

"It's whitey's fault."

Good God, Bro. Anonymous,

Is that the best you can come up with? Ever think that, in historical context, that statement might be true?

Whitey could have picked his own damn cotton and left the Africans the hell alone. So if you want to rail against what you perceived this country as becoming, just look in your ancestors'
mirror.

Critical thought is too much for yours and the other feeble minds that post on this site. Have a great day.

I'm the 51-year-old black man. I am not some woman, nor am I Jones, who put forth some good points. I stumbled on this site a month ago and know this site is all about tapping into some folks' fears, biases and prejudices against one race. You all continue to believe what you want to believe.

But most reasonable people know that bad behavior knows no race, color, or creed. I pray you all who want to talk about how bad blacks are for America will come to realize that.

Let's get down to brass tacks.

I don't care about lynchings, Jim Crow, racism or any of the bad things that happened to blacks. I don't care about Selma, or buses, or lunch counters, or any of that nonsense.

I don't care about what happened in 19-dickety-do or 18-dickety-do.

I am not the least bit convinced of any scholarship produced proving that blacks are eternal victims simply because I do not care.

I don't care because I do not live in the past. I live in the present and the future. And what does the present and the future reveal? It reveals that blacks are a threat. They are a violent and dangerous group of people that will eventually have to be dealt with by military means. Keep in mind that the hippie generation of guilty white liberals is dying off and those remaining are being murdered by black thugs (good riddance.) The wildings in Chicago took place in the wealthiest area of Chicago, full of Obama voters and other white liberal garbage. They will become reluctant segregationists just to protect themselves…and the black will be gotten rid of.

"This is complete and utter bullshit."

No, it's complete and utter truth.

Diarrhea, in all the months (years?) that you've been posting here, you have not changed a single mind about anything.

Congratulations on being consistent.

BTW, in case I haven't mentioned this to you…no white man is ever going to marry you. Although there are some who will take you out on dates, then bang you like a cheap whore (as I'm sure plenty already have), none is going to marry you. You can't hide who you are, and when a white guy sees the real white-hating black-racist that you are, he will run for the hills.

Remember you heard it here first.

Soros/Jones/Snapes is a white man…..Paul is a black man. Rules for radicals…agitate.–the Man.

Awesome article! You are a damn good man! Blacks really have ruined America. I'm sick of their whining (and that of all other "minorities", or soon-to-be-majorities", unless we end immigration), and I hate their criminality. What the US needs is an organization specifically geared towards gathering in as many whites as possible, and then representing our interests as the NAACP does for blacks. What do you think?

Also, consider posting some of your stuff at majorityrights.com. I think it would be most welcome.

Jim Crow laws. Number of Black women raped by whites. 0 Same as now.

Now number of white women raped by black men. 37 000+

"These riots were almost always started by black people raping, robbing or murdering whites."

The rallying cry for the riots was what you've listed but the reaction suggests that these reasons are ultimately incidental, if they even occurred (history's shown that accusations, rumors, and innuendo were enough to incite whites – they needn't have hard proof) and, therefore, to justify the actions of the rioters based on a "rallying cry" is ridiculous.

Blacks were low on the totem pole and if one offended it would have been easy to simply put them behind bars.

The race riot was much like the lynching: it was a form of retributive social control and an act of terrorism against blacks. It was used to assert superiority and keep blacks in their established place within society. If one person offended against a white, what would be the reason to tear down the whole neighborhood of innocent blacks unless the goal was to maintain social stratification?

A word on Jim Crow: the decline of Southern lynching and the advent of Jim Crow are linked. Since blacks were kept in line with Jim Crow, terrorism was no longer needed for social control and maintenance of the "status quo."

For everyone saying that Jim Crow was solely to protect whites from blacks, that is pure fantasy. The laws were about maintaining white superiority. Just look at the laws on social etiquette norms:

– A black man couldn't offer to shake the hand of a white man because it implied equality;
– White motorists had right-of-way at all intersections;
– Blacks had to step aside to whites on the sidewalk, even an older black to a white child;
– Blacks had to refer to whites using Mr., Mrs., madam, sir, etc. but whites could use blacks' first names, never reciprocating the courtesy;
– Blacks could not be affectionate with each other in public, although whites could;
– In conversation, blacks could:
Never assert or even intimate that a White person is lying.
Never impute dishonorable intentions to a White person.
Never suggest that a White person is from an inferior class.
Never lay claim to, or overly demonstrate, superior knowledge or intelligence.
Never curse a White person.
Never laugh derisively at a White person.
Never comment upon the appearance of a White female.

That was the etiquette, not the black codes. All of this social rigidity denotes that Jim Crow legislation was solely due to maintaining white racial superiority; it had nothing to do with protecting whites from crime. That is a fanciful myth.

On the contrary, Jim Crow was brought about (a) to uphold white superiority of all types, and (b) to prevent social equality because it could lead to interracial sexual unions.

"B" had been a fear since Reconstruction.

"Jim Crow protected millions of whites from rape, robbery and murder at the hands of blacks."

This is complete and utter bullshit. This is rhetoric, not fact. You're trying to justify the institutionalized racism against a group of people due to their skin color by arguing a hypothetical projection, which is just fallacious if you even knew the overt racism faced by these people. Blacks knew better than to "go fussin' with" white people during Jim Crow!

Even with a documented crime rate among blacks that was disproportionate to that of whites (crime-poverty correlate), blacks were not out hunting whites like pigs.

That is wrong and an exercise in blatant historical inaccuracy.

"It is a much more just system than what we have today where whites and others are routinely victimized by black racists."

Please explain the basis of your use of "black racists" in the context of the victimization of non-blacks. By the use of that term you are essentially implying that blacks seek out non-blacks, due to skin color difference, to harm.

Please cite information showing that the minority percentage of interracial crime done by blacks is due to racism. Be honest enough to admit it's total garbage if you cannot.

What a coincidence, the "51-year-old black man" who calls himself "Jones" uses the exact same phrasing that Diarrhea uses, along with her tedious, long-winded posting style.

What are the odds?

Jones,

You need look NO FURTHER than the FBI's own crime statistics to see who the real perpetrators are. Also, the Justice Dept's. stats. on the subject of black on white crime.

You're defending the indefensible and trying to to say that blacks aren't responsible or aren't committing crimes in grossly improportional amounts than whites are.

Just admit to yourself that blacks have a problem with authority, a problem with criminal pathological behavior, and a problem with blaming others for their own failures. Until blacks come to these realizations, they'll never hope to getting along in a polite society. And there will always be racial strife, animosity, and antagonisms galore.

Liars lie, but the statistics don't.

Also, just search YouTube for more typical black pathological behaviors. You see in this age of instant communication and ubiquitous cell camera use, it's become impossible for the MSM to lie about typical black behavior.

We can now bypass the censors and the culture distorters. Video after video on YT, just prove the truth that blacks are frequently violent and hostile.

And, for the record, no one deserves to be lynched. Today's public consciousness about lynching is actually an insult to the victims. These were heinous, savage acts reminiscent of Dark Ages-Middle Ages European public torture-sport.

How then would you describe the numerous incidents that happened over Memorial Day Weekend? The Community celebrating with a slight excess of vibrance and enthusiasm???

"Had King wrote his piece in the late 1800s-early 1900s, it could easily be argued that a young girl going into Funtown would be strung up by whites."

Only if she started killing and attacking white people. But then again that's why blacks were kept out in the first place. We can see why by the everyday crimes of blacks that are well documented on this website.

"Are you talking about individual crime? American society into the 1960s was like Apartheid. Jim Crow prevented mixing."

Jim Crow protected millions of whites from rape, robbery and murder at the hands of blacks. It is a much more just system than what we have today where whites and others are routinely victimized by black racists.

Jones:

"Even in the 60s, racial violence was primarily something done by blacks."

This is inaccurate. The majority of violent race riots, even into the 1960s, were done by whites and race riots done by blacks were functions of poverty and despair."

Wrong as usual. The last white-on-black race riot was the Detroit riots of 1943. These riots were almost always started by black people raping, robbing or murdering whites.

Most black riots today are caused by black criminals being shot or beaten by police or by just the usual black racism.

A good book on the subject is "Negrophobia." As the title suggests, it is a leftist book but it doesn't try and pretend that whites attacked blacks for no reason.

Here is a good review:

http://www.amren.com/ar/2001/10/index.html#article1

Jones,

More white people are killed by blacks each year in America than all of the blacks that were lynched from the end of the civil war to today.

Look it up.

But it's kind of like a protest sign I saw during the channon christian murder trial:

"We used to lynch them, now they shoot us"

Jones:

1. Lynching was crime control and nothing more. Yes, more blacks were lynched than whites but blacks also committed more crime than whites.

2. More blacks are killed each year by other blacks than during the entire history of lynching. More whites are killed by blacks every year as well.

3. Almost all those lynched were people guilty or rape and murder.

An excellent book on the history of lynching is "Lynching — History and Analysis," by Prof. Dwight Murphey. An excellent review can be found here:

http://www.amren.com/ar/1995/10/index.html

Historical tables on African-American criminality
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57359399/Historical-Criminal-Tables

"Are you talking about individual crime? American society into the 1960s was like Apartheid. Jim Crow prevented mixing."

Blacks were free to walk on the same public city streets as whites. There were no pass laws (if you know what i'm referring to) like there were in Apartheid South Africa. Also, Jim Crow laws were phased out nearly everywhere in the North in the period following the Civil War.

Old Negro crime:
http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2011/05/crime-today-and-yesterday.html
(…)
On the first day of January, 1910, the total prison population of the United States was 136,472. […] In every section of the country the percentage of Negroes among prisoners and juvenile delinquents was much higher than their percentage in the general population. For the country as a whole the Negroes constituted 10.7 per cent of the total population, while they constituted 30.6 per cent of the prison population. In the South they made up 29.8 per cent of the population and 70.1 per cent of the prisoners; in the North they were 1.8 per cent of the population and 13.1 per cent of the prisoners; in the West 0.7 per cent of the population and 5.9 per cent of the prisoners. (Reuter, 1927)
(…)
Smyrna, Del., Aug. 9. As has been the case yearly for a dozen years there was a fatal shooting affray at the Negro [Christian] camp meeting at Friend-ship last night. Howard Hollis, a Negro of Clayton, Del., was shot in both legs during the fight. … It is not known who shot Hollis as bullets were flying thick and fast during the melee."
Baltimore Sun, Aug. 10, 1915. (Collins, 1918)
(…)
In the city of Philadelphia the increasing number of bold and daring crimes committed by Negroes in the last ten years [1889-1899] has focused the attention of the city on this subject. There is a widespread feeling that something is wrong with a race that is responsible for so much crime, and that strong remedies are called for. One has but to visit the corridors of the public buildings, when the courts are in session, to realize the part played in law-breaking by the Negro population. (DuBois, 1899)

Roanoke, Va., March 29. Drunken Negroes took charge of an excursion train between this city and Winston-Salem last night and as a consequence Sidney Wood of Winston-Salem is dead at Martinsville, and two-score other Negroes are more or less wounded. Knives, razors, and pistols played prominent parts in the melee […] The train was stopped several times by Negroes pulling the bell cord, and the train was cut in two several times, leaving a number of coaches behind with a second section following […] The three coaches which were cut off were filled with white people […] When the train reached Bassetts, in Henry County, every Negro in two coaches was apparently in a fight. The screams of the terror-stricken women added to the excitement.
Baltimore Sun, March 30, 1910 (Collins, 1918)
(…)
In 1809 [in Philadelphia] the leading colored churches united in a society to suppress crime and were cordially endorsed by the public for this action. After the war immigration to the city increased and the stress of hard times bore heavily on the lower classes. Complaints of petty thefts and murderous assaults on peaceable citizens now began to increase, and in numbers of cases they were traced to Negroes. The better class of colored citizens felt the accusation and held a meeting to denounce crime and take a firm stand against their own criminal class. (DuBois, 1899)
(…)

"So now our kids who are in the 90th percentile miss out on gifted/advanced classes so those last few spots can go to the top black kids (who only place at the 85th percentile)."

Please cite this and prove that it is so widespread that you can make such a generalization. It just sounds like rhetoric.

"Never mind that quite a few white folks were lynched as well,and that the practice usually required quite a bit of provocation. Let that go for the purposes of argument."

Many whites had been lynched but it pales (no pun intended) by comparison. The enormous disparity between reported lynchings strongly suggest it was social control when it came to blacks.

The function of ALL lynching was execution without due process; a mere accusation could get someone lynched. It's fantasy that it was a man acquitted for a crime he did and then got his "just desserts" by the public.

History has demonstrated otherwise. "Provocation" was many times contrived and manufactured. If someone was guilty, they could have easily been tried and convicted in court. But lynchings were extra-legal and not a function of the justice system by ANY means.

And, for the record, no one deserves to be lynched. Today's public consciousness about lynching is actually an insult to the victims. These were heinous, savage acts reminiscent of Dark Ages-Middle Ages European public torture-sport.

"Even in the 60s, racial violence was primarily something done by blacks."

This is inaccurate. The majority of violent race riots, even into the 1960s, were done by whites and race riots done by blacks were functions of poverty and despair.

http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6545/

Some examples of white riots:

Wilmington Insurrection of 1898
Tulsa Race Riot of 1921,
Memphis Riots of 1866,
Springfield Race Riot of 1908,
Omaha Race Riot of 1919.

Please link to information saying otherwise. Your claim is historically flawed.

Are you talking about individual crime? American society into the 1960s was like Apartheid. Jim Crow prevented mixing.

Please link to your basis. Your statement is odd.

"Of course, the media only showed up when whites retalitated (sic) to make it seem like evil whites were oppressing poor, peaceful blacks."

Please cite this. This sounds more like rhetoric than anything else. Please provide a link.

"Most blacks call themselves "entrepreneurs" or "event organizers". They are constantly conspiring to get more money to set up a criminal enterprise."

Do you have a link to support this? Otherwise, this is an anecdotal fallacy. How many blacks do you know that have set up criminal enterprises? You must have been a star witness in many racketeering cases!

"Such savage reactions were rare, and certianly (sic) not the "likely" outcome."

The poster was being facetious. While I doubt a 1960s black child would be strung up on a Ferris wheel (this reaction would have immediately expedited the goals of the Civil Rights leaders because there was a positive correlation between the violence done by white supremacists/segregationists and the disgust felt by more moderately "racist" whites to this violence), it's fallacious to claim the reactions were "rare." By the time hard records for lynchings were available – 1882 – and the last recorded lynching – 1968 – almost 3500 blacks were killed.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingsstate.html

It's only reasonable to assume that more lynchings of blacks occurred before 1882 (although most lynched during slavery were white abolitionists or sympathizers to blacks – about 10% were black) and that the numbers are conservative.

Lynching was social control and involved members of the town. This is primarily why lynchings were most common following the Civil War and prior to the initiation of Jim Crow laws; when blacks gained some social mobility previously unavailable to them as slaves, the white=good/black=bad dichotomy was challenged as blacks went into government, became lawyers, and opened universities. The only way to keep blacks underfoot was through terrorism. It's a misnomer that lynching was punishment for crime – lynching was extra-legal. Today's public consciousness about lynchings is that it was secretive, came about via "mob mentality," or was viewed as shameful by the majority of whites but all of that's incorrect. Lynchings are considered uniquely American and were public spectacles to be enjoyed by white townsfolk.

Remember the postcards. The lynching of Jesse Washington – a mentally retarded 17-year-old – incurred 15,000 spectators, including children. He was beaten, burned, castrated; he tried to climb up the pole to get away from the flames. One white man stated the event made him embarrassed for his country and ashamed of being white. Jesse's corpse was displayed in the black community as a "warning."

He'd been accused of killing a white woman but the TX judge had severe doubts. Townsfolk meted out "justice" on their own, even though he was innocent and had been muscled into confession.

I think the most significant thing to remember is that these were publicly condoned acts of violence and were retributive in that it made blacks keenly aware that they had to keep with the "status quo." Punishment for "crime" would merely be incidental – it was for social control.

Had King wrote his piece in the late 1800s-early 1900s, it could easily be argued that a young girl going into Funtown would be strung up by whites.

Just not in the 1960s. She could have been pelted with rocks or shouted down with racial slurs by the patrons, though. Had she been a part of a landmark "decision" to allow blacks into Funtown, she also could have had her home bombed.

All of these reactions are steeped in precedent.

Anonymous at 9:46, I recognized the "51 year old black man" as the black female troll, too. She consistently makes the same grammatical and syntactical mistakes and the same linguistic quirks (failure to differentiate; there doesn't (sic) seem to be; businesses ran (sic) by blacks).

"Had Greenwood survived, the black people there just might have gotten around to building that amusement park."

The incredibly shocking and unexpected translation of this statement:

"It's whitey's fault."

"Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard."

Yeah, sure. Retard.

You guys need to segregate America. Give the blacks a couple of Southern States and make them move there. Then, make any liberal white who wants a multi-racial society go there too. But it will never happen whilst Jews control your media and your dollar, and white Libtards agree with them. Same in Europe, except blacks and moslems need to be sent packing to Africa and Pakistan. Otherwise, we'll all be Zimbabwe.

I once had a black friend from Africa who was embarrased by black Americans. Had he been White, he would have been considered a racist.

One of my friends from Africa would never be spoken to by "liberals". His crime? He did not have access to a supply of "weed".

Come on now, you know that Dr. King's letter from a Birmingham Jail was written in 1963. Let's employ some intellectual honesty. Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard.

The more likely outcome of a young black girl trying to go to "Funtown" in 1963 is that she would have been told that she wasn't allowed inside and that she'd have to go elsewhere for entertainment. And if she persisted in trying to get in,then just possibly the police would have been called in and she would have been – just possibly – charged with misdemeanor trespassing,or something similar. I very much doubt that a lynching would have ever been in the cards.

I ax u y she nod alou in?
Izzit cos she liek 2days blak peepels an haf no respec'?

SBPDL,

Thank you for your reply and posting my comment directed at you.

I simply pointed out the fact in my original censored comment that Six Flags in Gurnee, IL has (since the early 90's) and continues to be a suffocating experience when one encounter large packs of negros in matching uniforms.

My second point was directed at the talk in the comments about civilization 101. I remarked that Mexicans make Mexico.

My final point was about the cause root. Thus, the jew behind the curtain – do the research. Can you not see the fact that we have been under the heel of jewish created Communism since 1913?
Have you read the Russian #1 Report(1919)? Please find the time – http://christogenea.org/resources/RussiaNo1.pdf

Kevin MacDonald's book Critique of Culture is a fine read; however, I will pass on his site.

A Kosher Nazi is controlled opposition – a goy pen handler.

I have been visiting your site since its inception and I have enjoyed many of your posts. All I can hope for is that you come to understand the correct why of the matter that sickens our Western Culture.

Until next time…

Excellent! Well done! Spot on! Every white person in the US needs to read this truth document. If your black, and you don't like it, don't rail at the author who is only relaying the truth to a sleeping, but awaking, white population.

I spent eight years in the military, and I can assure you as a white person you want nothing the black race has to offer. All races got along with each other very well in the Marines, except the blacks, and my cross training with the other branches proved the same. They were a PITA from boot camp to the day I got out. Unfortunately they are still a PITA.

"Perhaps not amusement parks, but Black Americans did have their own institutions and centers of commerce. No doubt you've heard of Greenwood, in Tulsa, OK, called the "Black Wall Street." Alas, some black folk made the mistake of sticking up for another black man who was accused by a white woman of accosting her in an elevator."

Greenwood was built for blacks by the government with Reconstruction money and consisted of a few banks, restaurants and hotels. By white standards it was an average neighborhood. But if that is the "black Wall Street" it is nothing to brag about.

A black man tried to rape a white woman and the blacks tried to protect him (with guns). There was a race riot and the blacks lost.

Incidentaly, the "black Wall Street" was rebuilt after the riots. By the 60s it was just another black ghetto.

"Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard."

Not true. She would would have been told politely that Negroes were not allowed in Funland.

Even in the 60s, racial violence was primarily something done by blacks. The only difference was that whites would sometimes retaliate (like Hispanics do to blacks today).

Of course, the media only showed up when whites retalitated to make it seem like evil whites were oppressing poor, peaceful blacks.

June 10, 11:49 a.m.,

"Jews and others used to be barred from many institutions. Did they cry because they couldn't get into a certain country club or resort?

No, they built their own resorts, banks, clubs ..etc.

I would have respected blacks a lot more had they just built their own amusement parks."

Perhaps not amusement parks, but Black Americans did have their own institutions and centers of commerce. No doubt you've heard of Greenwood, in Tulsa, OK, called the "Black Wall Street." Alas, some black folk made the mistake of sticking up for another black man who was accused by a white woman of accosting her in an elevator.

The result? Whites pretty much destroyed Greenwood, even going as far as bombing it from the air. The 90th anniversary of this sad event just passed, on May 31.

Folks post from this site are looking at the here and now, and not through the lens of American history.

Had Greenwood survived, the black people there just might have gotten around to building that amusement park.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwood,_Tulsa,_Oklahoma

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_Race_Riot

LAPD wrote:

"Every endeavour I saw blacks undertake, with well publicized funding through donations, always ended up being a criminal business."

I too have found this to be true in my interactions with blacks. Most blacks call themselves "entrepreneurs" or "event organizers". They are constantly conspiring to get more money to set up a criminal enterprise. Black are not good managers of their own personal funds, and so are unable to be good stewards of other people's money.

Unfortunately, there are literally millions of taxpayer dollars available to blacks, and it is always wasted.

More FERAL on FERAL behavior…and again occuring at FERAL Paradise!

Dozens Brawl Outside Downtown San Jose McDonald’s; 2 Stabbed

Go on…take a wild guess….

OK Stuff, now Diarrhea is posing as a 51 year-old black man who writes "ain't" alongside "I surmise"?? The only thing she forgot in her post was "LOL".

"So let's try to employ some critical thinking skills (surprise, yes I can do that also) and look at the behavior of individuals as opposed to entire groups, but then there would be no reason for this site, I surmise."

Come on now, you know that Dr. King's letter from a Birmingham Jail was written in 1963. Let's employ some intellectual honesty. Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard.

The more likely outcome of a young black girl trying to go to "Funtown" in 1963 is that she would have been told that she wasn't allowed inside and that she'd have to go elsewhere for entertainment. And if she persisted in trying to get in,then just possibly the police would have been called in and she would have been – just possibly – charged with misdemeanor trespassing,or something similar. I very much doubt that a lynching would have ever been in the cards.

And since you brought up the subject of lynching,I have a question for you.

As we are told,every time a black man or woman gets accused of anything at all,the practice of lynching is an indelible stain on the fabric of the United States,and can never be bleached out,and all of us pale folks are morally bound to pay to make up for it,forever and ever,and can't ever get out from under the debt we owe the black folks for extra-judicially executing some of them. ( Never mind that quite a few white folks were lynched as well,and that the practice usually required quite a bit of provocation. Let that go for the purposes of argument. )

My question is this-without a doubt,blacks were lynched. I'm perfectly comfortable admitting that there were certainly some innocent victims of the process.

Are you,Sir,willing to acknowledge that there were some blacks who were guilty of whatever it was that got the locals excited to begin with?

http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/jcj01

That's the URL for an article about a 1916 lynching in Waco,Texas. Was the conduct of the mob horrendous? Absolutely.
But what about the conduct that got the mob riled up to begin with?

"Let's employ some intellectual honesty. Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard."

You want to talk about intellectual honesty, then make such a ridiculous statement? Such savage reactions were rare, and certianly not the "likely" outcome.

"I ain't going to say there aren't some seriously bad actors among black folks (mostly of the younger generation)but the gross generalizations of black behavior are way over the top."

These behaviors are much more common among blacks than any other group – even if you control for income. And its getting worse.

"Believe it or not, some of us move into "good" school districts also."

And after enough of you do, typically when the student body becomes around 20-25% black, your children destroy the school.

"So let's try to employ some critical thinking skills (surprise, yes I can do that also) and look at the behavior of individuals as opposed to entire groups, but then there would be no reason for this site, I surmise."

Actually, it would seem that your critical thinking skills are lacking. Let's say you have 1,000 people in Group A, and 500 of them engage in "generic negative behavior." You also have 1,000 people in Group B, but only 10 of them engage in "generic negative behavior."

Group B represents a pleasant community, with only 1% of the population engaging in negative behavior. Add 500 people from Group A, and now you have 260 negatives out of 1500 people. You've jumped from 1% negative to about 17% negative.

And that's the problem. It doesn't matter if there are some good black individuals and some bad – the bad percentage is too high. Adding a large group of blacks to a white community ALWAYS brings down the standard of living.

More crime, more violence; more need for social services, more police, higher taxes; worse driving with less respect for traffic laws; higher insurance rates; more poorly maintained homes/yards and lower property values; decreasing school performance resulting in lower standards and eventually widespread institutional cheating to boost black scores; money spent on alarm systems and services because your kids are breaking into homes.

On and on, and all accompanied by the constant cries of racism, that its all in the imaginations of white people. We simply imagine that our communities were better before you came along. The isn't a 100% correlation so it isn't fair to notice that the correlation is pretty damn strong. And the constant demands of consessions to "make up" for the racism. So now our kids who are in the 90th percentile miss out on gifted/advanced classes so those last few spots can go to the top black kids (who only place at the 85th percentile).

So, sorry, 51 yr-old black guy. You might be a nice guy; you might be smart, hard-working, and upright. But the people you bring along destroy our communities. And are the main reason for the downfall of this country.

"I myself have been telling diluted forms of what you all have been saying to many black children in hopes they improve their behavior. "

Former militant,

Good, that's exactly why I post here. It's my simple desire that blacks will do exactly what you're doing. Start shaming your own people into more disciplined behavior and tell them to quit blaming the white man for all their problems-it's really that simple for me.

When whites are being unreasonable I have no problem saying so, blacks need to do the same with their people. Thanks.

"I wish that blacks had the abilities to make and successfully run an amusement park but everyone, including blacks, know they simply do not possess the acumen to do so in a legal way."

This is an odd statement.

There are many businesses ran by blacks that are not illegal. I'm sure they could run an amusement park, as well as the various black millionaires and billionaires (Oprah, Bob Johnson), and be successful.

Keeping riffraff out of a park is another story. Riffraff seem to follow normal people where ever we go. It's like the old saying: "Misery loves company."

"Every endeavour I saw blacks undertake, with well publicized funding through donations, always ended up being a criminal business."

It makes sense that you'd only see criminal businesses seeing that you are retired LAPD. If police officers don't see crime, we have a big problem on our hands!

What I don't understand is how you can generalize an entire group based on your expected encounters with riffraff who happen to be black. That makes little rational sense.

"Maccu Piccu could not be replicated by Africans today, let alone Africans 600 years ago. I'd rather live anywhere in Mexico than anywhere in Africa."

There was a fortification called Great Zimbabwe.
http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/zimb/hd_zimb.htm

It's interesting how similar the Soapstone monoliths made by the Bantus are to statuary in Ancient Egypt.

"To some people, little green men are more plausible builders than Cholos."

A cholo would be a mestizo, mixed Native American and white. Seeing that Europeans came over and saw the even more complex and communally functional societies of the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas by comparison, a cholo's lack of building skills could be a result of their white admixture.

I always thought the "little green men" theory for Egypt, Native America, and Easter Island was based in bigotry.

"Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard."

The lynching postcard is a little known part of America's racial history. It's macabre when you actually see them.

http://withoutsanctuary.org/main.html

Click the "photos" side link. It turns your stomach when you imagine someone received a postcard like that in the mail and had no qualms about it. It could easily read, "We had ourselves a BBQ last night. Love your son."

I actually saw one just like this:
http://www.theseamericans.org/wp-content/gallery/american-lynching/jesse-washington-lynching-postcard-wos.jpg

A 1960s black child would hardly be the type to incur scorn from whites for anything besides their skin color.

It's actually strange anyone would use King's piece in the way it is used in this blog post. I am sure many blacks from King's era – those who got to witness the Civil Rights struggles – dislike mainstream black "culture."

Black culture, I feel, is best exemplified by the older generations before crack entered the community under "peculiar circumstances."

Recommended reading: "Dark Alliance" by Gary Webb. Recommended film: "Deep Cover" (because it's a great movie)

I, too, think a failure to differentiate shows a level of dishonesty. The majority of people don't break the law and that pattern does not change when you isolate a particular group. Even if you bring up the "Disproportionately" trope, you'd have to be honest to admit 1 in 4 blacks live in poverty. This is compared to about 2 in 10 for whites.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/tables/11s0710.pdf

We see the same correlation in the high crime rates among poor Native Americans: they are 2X as likely to be crime victims than non-Indians. Interestingly, whites commit 60% of the violent crime and 80% of the sexual assaults experienced by Native American victims.

"This site is about Black people. I approve or decline comments based on that one criteria. Posting here is a privilege."

Does this include approving/declining based on (perceived) race? There doesn't seem to be too many dissenting opinions and I can imagine many blacks would have things to say.

I was just curious to know if blacks are allowed, since they are your subject.

We will benefit from the "talented tenth" (ie. CHarles Murray, Ray Charles, etc) who can pass White Civ 101 and leave the rest to their own devices.

The "talented tenth" actively and enthusiastically run interference for their ghetto brethren. Witness [email protected]:35. "Some bad actors"? Being over half of violent felons with a population of just 13% is not to have "some bad actors." It is to be a problem population.

Will the talented tenth renounce Affirmative Action? Will they accept genetic differences in IQ? Are they willing to live in a country that is unashamed of being an invention of Caucasians only? Are they willing to "get over" slavery?

Your "talented tenth" will produce children, and their children will have children. As generations come to pass, reversion to the mean occurs.

Let me say this plainly: half measures are no longer good enough.

If your precious heart quails at the thought of living in a country with no blacks whatsoever, that's your problem. And you'd better fix it.

@Former Black Militant

William Shockley noted that unskilled and skilled blacks had on average of 5.4 and 1.9 children respectively. The outcome, he predicted, would be an increase in unskilled blacks relative to skilled blacks.

His proposal was to offer blacks with IQs under 100 payment to be sterilized.

Although Shockley was denounced as a racist, his proposal would create a black "super race" of highly intelligent and well-behaved negros.

I once had a black friend from Africa who was embarrased by black Americans. Had he been White, he would have been considered a racist.

When I was in high school (mostly black), I noted that only about 10 percent of the black students weren't ghetto-ized. Sadly, even most of those bought into the victimization nonsense.

@Paul

This is an excellent post. Thanks for all you are doing.

Anon at 4:35 PM: I would guess that most of us here know pleasant, responsible Black people, at least the older ones among us. But however we might feel about our particular co-workers, we all realize that a town with 30,000 Whites is a much better place than a town with 25,000 Whites and 5000 Blacks. Where Blacks exist in any more than token numbers, you've got trouble. That's just how it is. If the problem was just individuals, there'd not be a problem.

"I hear you. But it is a shame that poor whites cannot enjoy affordable amusement/entertainment anymore. Poor whites were protected by segregation – the most sane and just solution to our racial reality – until the evil, insane, perverted "civil rights" movement destroyed that safety zone."

I wonder how much wealth is wasted by whites in a given year trying to escape Black Tyranny. Whites have to live in far more expensive neighborhoods, take far more expensive vacations, spend far more money on schools, etc just to escape black dysfunction.

Thanks for censoring my comment about six flags gurnee. I heard you were a kosher nazi – seems about right how you misdirect the cause and origins with nonsense and labels. The word is out on you…

You would have to show this to fly on a plane or go to an amusement park. I am sure there would still be accusations of racism because most black will fail this test initially but maybe that would push people to take classes or get smarter and think about their actions.

This is a people pool you are only allowed enter when you pass Civilisation 101.

Ret'd LAPD here. Over the years I spent as a police officer I watched how blacks turned every opportunity for advancement into an opportunity for criminal enterprise. I wish that blacks had the abilities to make and successfully run an amusement park but everyone, including blacks, know they simply do not possess the acumen to do so in a legal way.

Every endeavour I saw blacks undertake, with well publicized funding through donations, always ended up being a criminal business. A pre school that became a drug dealing operation, employment centers that were nothing but scams to get more government monies, etc. It was endless. No one ever owned up to having any responsibility, it was always due to the "culture of racism" that "doomed blacks to fail". Sure, some blacks went to jail and subsequently prison for their misdeeds, but the propaganda to defend them and deflect focus on what they did usually lead to reduced charges from a scared DA's office.

I always worked divisions with high black populations and saw firsthand how natural they were at being violent, belligerent, and parasitic with no remorse or consideration for their actions until AFTER they did something. When I observed what these blacks were doing, MLK and his "dream" never crossed my mind. These people were doing what came naturally no matter how many blacks and DWL's yammer otherwise.

Anon at 10:30AM: Perhaps those who believe that extraterrestrials built the Inca and Mayan cities think that way because they can't imagine Hispanics accomplishing anything. To some people, little green men are more plausible builders than Cholos.

Come on now, you know that Dr. King's letter from a Birmingham Jail was written in 1963. Let's employ some intellectual honesty. Had a young black girl gone to "Funtown" in the 1960s, she'd likely be set upon by a white mob and hanged from the Ferris wheel and photographed for a postcard.

I ain't going to say there aren't some seriously bad actors among black folks (mostly of the younger generation)but the gross generalizations of black behavior are way over the top.

I'm a 51-year-old African American man and trust us, those of my generation don't like that ghetto-acting crap either. Believe it or not, some of us move into "good" school districts also.

So let's try to employ some critical thinking skills (surprise, yes I can do that also) and look at the behavior of individuals as opposed to entire groups, but then there would be no reason for this site, I surmise.

"What happened to the American dream? It was replaced by Dr. King's dream, and the worst part is it came true."

Wow dude that was powerful! That quote belongs on the future monument to the collapsed pre-Obama America.

It's sad to see the places have to shut down. Even in the little town of Fayette Alabama, they had to shut down the public swimming pool due to blacks harassing the white girls.

The good thing is, most blacks can't swim, so they stay out of the lakes and rivers.

"My proposal for segregation is that there should be some sort of intelligence card one should have that could be integrated into Driver's licenses that show one is capable of civilized behavior and logical thinking."

I think it should be behaviorally-based as opposed to IQ-based. I know good, decent, law-abiding blacks who are not necessarily high-IQ, but are civilized and well-behaved.

Most black criminals begin breaking the law at an early age, and continue for life. Once they begin to establish a rap sheet, they should be denied the liberty to travel freely among the civilized.

I use to love going to Safari land in Six Flags Great Adventure, NJ.
It now seems redundant.

Speaking of Seattle: WA state Supreme Court overturns a first-degree murder conviction because…. the prosecutor axed racis' questions.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015279772_overturned10m.html

DGB

SBPDL, I have really enjoyed reading your articles of late, though I am Black I agree with most of what you are saying but as a black man (color only) I fear for my own well-being and future of my children. I don't like being around ignorant black people either and they embarrass me too and I do not want to be lumped in together with ignorant people because of my skin color which I have no control over. My proposal for segregation is that there should be some sort of intelligence card one should have that could be integrated into Driver's licenses that show one is capable of civilized behavior and logical thinking. You would have to show this to fly on a plane or go to an amusement park. I am sure there would still be accusations of racism because most black will fail this test initially but maybe that would push people to take classes or get smarter and think about their actions. Again, I feel your pain white people but you all are very smart, there has to be a better way than color separation, that seems beneath an advanced mentality such as yours. Again, to commentators I think more black people need to hear what you all have to say maybe some would change, I don't think they know your anger is reaching critical mass. I myself have been telling diluted forms of what you all have been saying to many black children in hopes they improve their behavior.

I just wanted to throw this out there, Anthony Weiner gets caught taking pictures of his penis and sending it out to women. Charlie Rangel, who was indicted on 11 charges of fraud, defends Weiner in the court of public opinion. The end result? 50% of NY's polled say Weiner should stay.

What do you think that number would be if a politician was caught saying the word nigger in a chat room or private conversation???

We live in a world where elected officials found guilty of fraud or lying to cover up the pictures of their penis sent out on the internet are able to stay in office but a person who says nigger would be vehemently attacked from all sides.

Research has shown they spend dispproportionate $s on high profile consumer goods like cars and clothings, not so much on long term durables like homes, financial instruments, etc.

Once upon time buying Giffin goods, buying more of something as the price increases (completely irrational), was only observed in rats hooked on cocaine.

You have a strong case for the Economics Prize in Memory of Alfred Nobbel.