Whoever went out of their way to get Holly Lawford-Smith's Twitter account suspended is risible. She was suspended the first time for no good reason, has been back for a while in a low-key way, and now someone with a grudge has presumably decided to settle a score. Petty as hell.
-
-
-
Replying to @emsmartster @Docstockk
I am friend with Louise and in regular contact with her. I have met and followed Holly for a while. I know there has been a misunderstanding between them both that has escalated and become toxic but I can guarantee that Louise has nothing to do with Holly's suspension.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ladyduckpojok @emsmartster
There are plenty of people who loyally piled straight into that particular escalation fairly viciously on behalf of Louise. (Also, just as a matter of epistemic caution, I don't know how you could guarantee that about anyone).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I rarely comment as don't want to exacerbate what should never have been online. And that's what most responsible people do. But I've seen HLS unfairly demolished by those with no idea about complete story. There are two sides to every story, tho Twitter isn't place for any of it
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Jamie Hunter Retweeted Jamie Hunter
She relied on utter nonsense to make completely unfounded allegations and was communicating with an account clearly setting out to cause trouble in the GC movement to the point she believed a complete fabrication and contacted Louise’s lawyer. https://t.co/fVCwnM0UBg https://twitter.com/edzellphoto/status/1236063220915417089?s=21 …
Jamie Hunter added,
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @edzellphoto @Docstockk and
Having that kind of paranoia/narcissism pointed out is not a ‘demolition’ anymore than it is ‘literal murder’ to point out that the TRAs are being bloody silly.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Don't confuse "one side is keeping a stoic silence in face of constant drip of partial information, hinting, drama, and self-justification" with "I know all relevant facts". If we're trading cod-psychological diagnoses, I'd say you are projecting wildly on basis of v limited fact
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.