Letters

America’s more complex health-care system is criticized for being too expensive, but the coronavirus response may show that we get what we pay for and redundancy in critical-care capabilities is a blessing, not a curse, in a pandemic.

The high failure rate of most Cuban doctors attempting certification in the U.S. and in South American countries to practice as physicians would tend to corroborate watered-down Cuban academic standards.

These are the same airlines that have been nickel-and-diming us for a number of years with baggage fees, cancellation and change fees, and even a fee for selecting a seat.

In the 1960s, when I was a medical resident, the common ventilator was the Bird Mark 7, a simple green box that is cheap, treats respiratory failure and functions without electricity.

I am on the board of a small manufacturing company which has eight weeks of leeway before the company runs out of money due to the drop in sales. I have a very hard time believing that any government agency will be able to pull a plan together in as little as eight weeks.

I take exception to Paul G. Vallas’s assessment that interruptions to on-site teaching “can have catastrophic consequences on educational development.”

Your editorial “The Economic Rout Accelerates” (March 19) notes that young folks think they’ll “live forever,” which is why so many are ignoring our leaders’ requests—and orders—to avoid congregating in groups that could spread the virus.

Relying on risk-weighted measures also leaves the impression that banks are adequately capitalized when, in fact, they’re marginally capitalized at best.

Degrees in the health sciences act only as an entry-level platform upon which students need to build to gain hands-on experience in approved training programs followed by demonstration of ongoing competency.

View More