For the first time in its 230-year history, the Supreme Court will hear arguments via telephone and everyone can listen in.
The order for additional briefing raised at least the possibility that the justices were looking for a way to avoid deciding the merits of the politically volatile case.
Three conservative justices said the court was โmanipulatedโ to keep from clarifying the Second Amendment issue.
Only Alito dissents in decision that government must make good on its promise to share costs.
Citing the coronavirus pandemic, leaders in New York, Vermont, Illinois and Connecticut had said the program was making even those legally entitled to benefits such as Medicaid wary of accessing them.
Environmentalists welcomed the ruling, saying it will protect rivers, lakes and oceans from pollution.
Majority says Congress intended for agency to take lead in toxic-cleanup plans
The justices split in their decision, revealing a deep divide on when to overturn precedent.
Conservative states say fighting coronavirus can include abortion bans, but courts have disagreed.
A case stemming from President Trumpโs efforts to shield his financial records is among those scheduled to be heard.
They want women seeking early stage medication abortions to be exempted from Gov. Greg Abbottโs executive order.
Gov. Greg Abbott has restricted nonessential procedures to preserve medical resources.
A dissenting judge said the decision is based not on law but the โsubject matter of this case.โ
The decision by a three-judge panel comes after a nearly two-decade hiatus on federal executions.
Conservative majority prevails in the fight between Republicans and Democrats on the issue of extending absentee balloting.
The justices did not bridge their usual divisions in a case with partisan implications.
But workers would have to prove that age was a deciding factor in an adverse employment action to receive monetary damages or reinstatement.
Some cases may be rescheduled. The justices may consider โother alternativesโ if arguments canโt be held in the courtroom.
The violent encounter led to an acquittal and a lawsuit against the officers who arrested James King in 2014.
A retired justice has already weighed in, ruling against the Trump administrationโs attempt to punish uncooperative local authorities in an appeals court decision.
