Conference paper Open Access

Is San Diu a Cantonese variety or is it something else? A historical phonological analysis of the Sinitic words in San Diu

Sung, Matthew

San Diu, a language spoken in Northern Vietnam which is mostly found in Tuyen Quang, Thai Nguyen, Vinh Phuc, Bac Giang and Quang Ninh provinces is understudied. The genetic relationship between San Diu and other languages is still not clear. There have been claims that San Diu is a form of Chinese language (Pham & Nguyen 2014: 89). Edmondson and Gregorson (2007: 744) stated that it is a form of archaic Cantonese, possibly related to Pinghua which is spoken in modern day Guangxi, China. Haudricourt (1960) compared a 5 language in the region of Moncay as well as Cantonese and Hakka and classified San Diu under Hakka. In Nguyen’s (2013) study, she compared San Diu vocabularies with three Chinese dialects: Yue (Guangzhou), Hakka (Meixian) and Southern Min (Teochew) and found that around 2/3 of the San Diu vocabularies are similar to Hakka (lexically and for some, phonetically).

To explore the genetic classification of San Diu further, I will be using shared innovations as a criteria for classification in this paper. This is another way to falsify previous claims and the observation made by surface synchronic comparison between Chinese dialects and San Diu. Innovations that are prototypical and unique to three Chinese dialect groups were chosen and compared with San Diu. Over 400 syllables were analysed overall. The result shows that, firstly, a huge amount of words are not from a Sinitic origin. Secondly, San Diu shares innovations with Yue and Hakka. I argue that the Sinitic words in San Diu largely come from Yue, since more innovations are shared with Yue than Hakka. This does not dispute the possibility that Hakka words did not make their way to San Diu, however. Further studies are needed for a deeper understanding to the origin of this language.

Files (910.3 kB)
Name Size
2019P-365-Sung.pdf
md5:812112c8ab7a22fd45ac65e51a127bce
910.3 kB Download
134
117
views
downloads
Views 134
Downloads 117
Data volume 106.5 MB
Unique views 124
Unique downloads 103

Share

Cite as