Today is one month since World Freestyle Day (1st September). To mark the day, the World Freestyle Football Association teamed up with&nb...;
01.10.2020
The World Freestyle Football Association (WFFA) has teamed up with the Global Esports Federation (GEF) as an affiliate member of their global allia...
17.08.2020
The World Freestyle Football Association is world governing body for the sport of freestyle football. It is committed to growing awareness of and participation in freestyle football worldwide.
Anyone can get into freestyle football – all you need is a ball! It is the art and sport of juggling a football using all parts of the body to entertain audiences and outperform opponents in competitions. It is a fusion of tricks with a ball, dance and music.
The Association owns the World Freestyle Football Championships and have created a rankings system and support structure that allows anyone to pick up a ball and not only enjoy the sport, but also develop their own pathway to becoming a professional.
The Association has been established upon a backbone of community development and education. This means we recognise the power this exciting sport has to inspire healthy active lifestyles for young people all over the world. Aside from growing the sport as a full time profession for the athletes, the Association is committed to teaching key life skills, nutrition and academics through freestyle football.
There are 106 country members in the network, which means a registered group of people and organisations in 106 countries of the world are committed to growing freestyle football as a sport in its own right and to delivering the social opportunity through the sport too.
Whilst there are just over 10,000 freestyle football athletes in the world right now, the total number of people who participate and enjoy freestyle football can be paralleled to mainstream football, because everyone who plays football will juggle with the ball at some stage and this forms the foundation of freestyle. Therefore one could suggest that participation is estimated at over 400 million, with a direct audience of 1.47 billion football fans around the globe who enjoy the entertainment of freestyle football.
Freestyle Football is however a completely different discipline to football (soccer) when you get really into the sport. It is about pushing the body to extreme limits, allowing creativity to flow and owning the ball in your own unique way.
Training freestyle football can dramatically build core fundamental skills that are useful in all aspects of life and across other sport disciplines. These include body awareness, balance, rhythm, control, touch, co-ordination and more intrinsic benefits such as self-confidence, respect, patience and taking responsibility.
Freestyle Football has something for everyone. It is a sport that allows males and females equal rights and that absolutely anyone can enjoy from whatever environment they find themselves in. The World Freestyle Football Association was created to make sure everyone gets the chance to be recognized as part of a community.
The World Freestyle Football Association is a non-profit organisation registered in Canada (Company number 1041184-1).
Football Freestyle is the art of doing tricks with a football. However if you scratch the surface you'll soon discover that it's more than just tricks. For freestylers today it's an art form, a sport and a lifestyle. It's difficult to pin point the exact moment in time where freestyle truly began.
Over 2000 years ago games such as Chinlone, Jianzi and Sepak Takraw in Southern and South East Asia all embraced many skills that relate directly to the art and sport as we know it today, but where freestyle football really began to form was in the 20th century. When you think about fundamental freestyle tricks such as the 'Neck Stall' and 'Around The World’; These were first performed in the 1800’s by circus performers such as Enrico Rastelli and Francis Brunn. If you watch videos of their performances today you can see many similarities to every modern day freestyler.
Despite the tricks, this was not 'freestyle football' - it was juggling. It wasn't until the 1980’s that freestyle became strongly associated to football. Diego Maradona, probably the best footballer in the world at that time, was the first person to perform these fundamental moves on a global stage and this pushed football freestyle into existence. Mr Woo and Kang Sung Min, two South Korean freestylers, would train with a football for up to 8 hours a day developing this new found art form. Later it was Mr Woo who carried freestyle football through the nineties virtually alone, showcasing new tricks such as sole juggling to audiences all over the world.
Even then, freestyle football was considered a novelty and only practiced by a handful of people across the globe. For freestyle football to develop it needed another push. At the beginning of the new millennium several significant events helped propel freestyle football into a new era, giving it an identity for the first time. Brazilian football icon Ronaldinho starred in Nike commercials, alongside Mr Woo, which glamorised freestyle. Soufiane Touzani, from the Netherlands introduced a new style of lower tricks and thanks to the internet and the fast developing mobile industry these videos travelled like wild fire. Suddenly everybody knew what freestyle football was. This inspired millions and freestyle football as we know it began.
Now globally known as freestyle football, a sport was born. Freestylers began to realise that there were no rules and no limitations. Different styles were developed such as; lowers, uppers, sitdowns, grounds and blocking. Because of the huge influx of newcomers to the sport, there was a sudden urgency to leave your own mark on the culture, meaning that the difficulty and level quickly rose. The next step for freestyle football to continue evolving and developing was to host live competitions. Battling one on one for national, continental and world titles would give freestylers a new sense of meaning to their daily training. The first major competition of this kind was Red Bull Street Style in 2008, which was hosted in Sao Paolo, Brazil. Sean Garnier won this competition with a style and look that hadn’t been seen in the public eye before. All of this meant that freestyle football was becoming a sport in its own right.
The World Freestyle Football Association was established by leading freestylers and personnel from within the scene to develop support and structure for this exciting culture and sport.
Super Ball; the first 'open' world championship, where anybody can compete opened up the competitive side of the sport to new possibilities. It created competitions within the event, which would cater for freestylers with ranging styles, recognising that there is not just one true way to judge a freestyler. It was and is a competition for freestylers, by freestylers. Super Ball is now an annual event hosted in the Czech Republic and has become somewhat of an annual pilgrimage for freestylers from all corners of the world to come together and celebrate the culture and progress of freestyle football.
In 2015, legendary footballer and icon for freestyle football Ronaldinho was recognised by the World Association as ambassador for the sport.
Today competitions are organised across all habitable contents and videos are being shared by millions of people on a monthly basis.
Member Subassociations:
EFFA - European Freestyle Football Association
NAFFA - North American Freestyle Football Association
SAFFA - South American Freestyle Football Association
APFFA - Asia - Pacific Freestyle Football Association
AFFA - African Freestyle Football Association
This document outlines the core components and official rules of freestyle football competitions that are acknowledged by the World Freestyle Football Association (WFFA).
This is to be seen as the minimum requirements for any event worldwide, although they can be altered to suit the needs of non‐official events (events in which no world rankings points are available) if appropriate.
As world body for freestyle football development, WFFA have created criteria for a globally recognized judging structure and format. This is developed with input from freestylers across the globe to ensure accuracy.
All official national and international events in the WFFA network must adhere to these criteria and it is expected that anyone else organizing freestyle football events will incorporate this system to ensure satisfaction from all participants.
WFFA has educated a team of official judges that can be offered to any event anywhere if required. They are experienced individuals who have worked with the sport of freestyle football extensively as athletes and officials. It is understood by WFFA that any judge of any freestyle football event must be actively involved in the sport of freestyle. Judges don’t always have to be active freestylers, as long as they can accurately assess the sport and understand all the criteria below well (see point 2.1.4)
Athlete can only gather points for world ranking from maximum of 3 events in a year
WFFA recognizes that some countries have larger number of participants and standard of freestyler. To compensate this an Event Weighting system is be introduced on Area Level tier system. This system allows the best athletes to be recognized at any circumstances.
Area Level = how strong is local scene represented compared to the world according to different strength factors (except world open championship). Tiers are created by Sub-committee members and respected members of community.
Strength factors within areas:
Area Level tiers examples
|
Tier |
National |
Continental |
|
G-6 |
Poland, Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, Russia, Japan |
|
|
Strong |
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, UK, China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Turkey, UAE, Vietnam, Australia, Chile, Morocco, USA |
Europe, South America, Asia - Pacific |
|
Medium |
Argentina, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bolivia, Canada, Croatia, Czech republic, Egypt, Ghana, Greece, Ireland, Kazakhstan, KSA, Malaysia, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Thailand, Uruguay |
North America, Africa |
|
Low |
Algeria, Brunei, Afghanistan, Guatemala, Kenya, Serbia, Ecuador, Slovakia, Portugal, Kuwait… |
|
National
|
Tier |
Winner |
Runner up |
3rd place |
4th place |
Quarter |
Top 16 |
Elimination |
Entry |
|
G-6 |
125 |
75 |
55 |
45 |
25 |
10 |
5 |
1 |
|
Strong |
115 |
70 |
50 |
40 |
25 |
10 |
5 |
1 |
|
Medium |
100 |
60 |
45 |
35 |
15 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
|
Low |
90 |
50 |
35 |
30 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
International Open
|
Winner |
Runner up |
3rd place |
4th place |
Quarter |
Top 16 |
Top 32 |
Elimination |
Entry |
|
200 |
115 |
75 |
70 |
35 |
15 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
Continental
|
Tier |
Winner |
Runner up |
3rd place |
4th place |
Quarter |
Top 16 |
Elimination |
Entry |
|
Strong |
250 |
150 |
110 |
90 |
45 |
25 |
10 |
1 |
|
Medium |
210 |
115 |
75 |
70 |
35 |
15 |
8 |
1 |
World Open
|
Winner |
Runner up |
3rd place |
4th place |
Quarter |
Top 16 |
Top 32 |
Elimination |
Entry |
|
500 |
300 |
210 |
180 |
90 |
45 |
20 |
10 |
1 |
The stage is designed to qualify the strongest participants for the final round. It is really important to do this properly to avoid unhappy athletes and ensure all runs on time.
Each competition will have different numbers of participants, so WFFA have identified the two following options that must be used at qualification stage:
General Penalty Committee is formed in each continent sustaining from sub-committee members. Matters of this committee is part of continental committee meeting once every second month.
3.3.1 Reporting
3.3.2 Process
3.3.3 Conclusion
The guidelines for giving scores:
It is also possible to give 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 or 4.5 points if you mean that the performance for a player was somewhere between the scores mentioned above.The point-giving must be given based on the main criteria and the sub-criteria. The criteria and sub-criteria are:
Overall performance – how difficult his full performance generally is
Response in moves– a clear response to your opponent's tricks, style or concepts
The sum of the general level in Uppers, Lowers, Sitdowns, Transitions, Acrobaticsand Ground moves
Original style – original composition of tricks, unique execution of moves
Original moves – new, unusual, unexpected tricks
Variety in general – ability to not repeat tricks or always tricks of the same kind in competition and over competitions
Variety within battle – ability to not repeat tricks within the battle
Cleanness – clean execution of tricks
Flow – ability to move the ball around body without hesitation
Style – how good looking the tricks are being performed
Dynamics – strength and speed of movements
Musicality – hitting the beat or clearly shows that he is following the music
Battle attitude – showing your confidence and/or attitude. Attitude is about creating battle vibe and adding value to performance, done with respect
Control – general control of the ball on stage
Mistakes – dropping the ball or creating mistake
Note: Freestyle battle is not a routine. Every judge has in mind that a battle is also about adjusting to the opponent, having freedom in your sets and keeping the artistic part of freestyle.
This section goes more in depth in each criterion. It contains detailed explanation of every criteria and its sub-criteria as well as how every criteria relates to every other criteria.
4. 2. 1. Difficulty («how difficult is a freestylers full performance, including response in moves»)
Difficulty is described by these sub-criteria:
How difficult in general it is for an average person to do his full performance. This is the most important sub-criterion in the difficulty criterion.
A freestyler can respond to various aspects in a battle, such as:
Considering how good an athlete does in response in a battle is, there are four considerations:
It is important that it is clearto the judge that he respondedto his opponent.
How Difficulty relates to every other criteria
Allround
In allround you sum up the general level of an athlete in every sub-criteria (Uppers, Lowers, Sitdowns, Transitions and Acrobatics). This means that it is very smart for the athletes to master every style in freestyle football the best way possible.
The difficulty judge however, looks at how difficult in general an athletes level is. In this criterion the judge are able to give more credibility to athletes that are very specialized in some styles.
For example, a freestyler showing excellent lowers, poor uppers and poor sitdowns could get a high score in difficulty, but lower score in allround. And a freestyler who does good uppers, lowers and sitdowns could get a good score in allround, but lower score in difficulty.
Originality
When you as a difficulty judge see an original move, you should only think of how difficultit most likely is for an average person todothat trick. You do not give points for the difficulty of creating that trick or the originality. The same goes with variety. You are only considering the trick or performance itself and how difficult that is to do.
It is therefore wrong as a difficulty-judge to give points for an original trick because it is hard to create new tricks, since the athlete should get enough points from the originality judge for this.
Execution
Considering style, cleanness, flow, dynamics: A difficulty judge only takes the difficultyof doing a trick for example clean compared to not clean. The difference between clean and not clean does not necessarily have to be that big in difficulty (for example an unclean PATW against a very clean patw). This means that as a difficulty judge you only take this small difference into consideration, whereas the execution judge will take this very much into consideration. The same goes for musicality and battle attitude, i.e. how difficult is it to include musicality and battle attitude into the performance.
Control
Almost no focus on the control or the mistakes. The difficulty judge should have focus on what the player manages to do and the difficulty of this. It is of course difficult to be consistent and don´t do drops, but this will be enough taken care of by the control-judge. Remember however that if a player drops a lot of times, he won´t be able to do very many difficult moves, thus a very bad control will affect the difficulty score as well. You should also consider how difficult it is to be able to do a hard trick/performance with a certain degree of control.
4. 2. 2. Allround («what is the sum of your level in the five parts of allround»)
Allround is the general ability to perform all parts of freestyle football the best way possible. It is the sum of the general level in every style, that is to be considered.
There are generally five parts of allround, which are: Uppers, Lowers, Sitdowns, Transitions and Acrobatics,and Ground moves (not required).
The fundamental categories of allround in freestyle football are:
Lowers: consists of tricks with your feet while standing
Note: Both parts do not have to be shown to fulfil the allround-criterion.
Uppers: tricks with your upper body
Note: Both parts do not have to be shown to fulfil the allround-criterion.
Sitdowns: tricks while sitting down
Note: There are a lot of different variations within sitdowns, but you do not have to show every part to fulfil the allround criterion.
Transitions: moves from one basic category to another
Note: You do not have to show transitions from every basic aspect to another to fulfil the allround criterion.
Acrobatics: handstand, backflip or other moves including acrobatic moves
Note: To get recognition for an acrobatic move, it must involve a move with the ball. For example, to lock the ball between your feet and do a backflip will not be rewarded so much, but a backflip catch is well rewarded. You do not have to show more than one well executed acrobatic move to fulfil the allround criterion.
Ground moves: moves with the ball on the ground
Note: Ground moves is not required to fulfil the allround criterion but can be rewarded as a bonus.
How Allround relates to every other criteria
Difficulty
In allround you basically sum up an athletes allround ability, meaning that he takes an athletes level of difficulty in every sub-criterion into consideration and sum it up. The relationship to difficulty is explained more in detail at “How Difficulty relates to every other criteria: Allround”.
Originality
You do not give credibility for people that are having an original style or doing original moves. this is being taken care of in the originality criterion. However, the amount of variety within competition and battle will automatically sort of be taken into consideration in the allround criterion since allround ability is about showing a variety of different tricks in different styles.
Execution
An allround judge should not take an athletes execution too much into consideration, because that is the job done by the execution judge. For example if a freestyler does very unclean sitdowns, the difficulty judge should give the amount of minus points he deserves for the difference in difficulty from doing clean sitdowns. It may be more difficult to do cleaner sitdowns however, and that is what the difficulty judge should consider. So if the sitdowns are very unclean, that athlete will generally get enough punishment through the execution-criterion. For the allround judge the same applies: If an athlete masters every sub-criterion very well but has bad execution, this should ideally only be punished by the difference in difficulty between doing it with good and bad execution. The bad execution gets enough punished through the execution judge.
Control
As an allround judge you should not be taking control too much into consideration. The allround judge should focus on what the player manages to do and the allround ability of this. But it also depends on the battle: If an athlete can show that he has great allround skills, but drops the ball occasionally because he is taking bigger risks, that freestyler could still get many points in allround criterion, but less points in the control criterion. If however an athlete clearly drops the ball because of lack of allround skills, that will automatically give him less points in the allround criterion, as well as in the control criterion. Remember that if a player drops a lot of times, he will not be able to show that much allround skills, and it will therefore affect the allround score.
4. 2. 3. Originality («how unique/original are your moves and how much variety does your performance have»)
Originality relates specifically to the artistic and creative approach to freestyle football.
There are different ways in which a football freestyler can be considered as original. The judges should be aware of them. Here are the two main ways a freestyler can be original:
An originality judge should have a wide vocabulary of the universal moves in every style so that they can best determine if a move is new, copied or has been improved.
Biting: Bitingis a universal term that relates to the complete copying of a move or style without improving it or making it different in any way. There are not penalties for biting, however, no merits or points are awarded in the originality criterion to the style or move in which is deemed as a bite.
Repeating:The originality judge must take into account repeating. If an athlete comes out with the same moves all the time without adding something new, then the value of the moves will decrease dramatically in the originality criterion.
How Originality relates to every other criteria
Difficulty
Difficulty is a very small part of the originality criterion, which should not be taken very much into consideration. How unique/different his style or trick is, is the most important. Even though a difficult, original move is worth more, this is not the focus point. A very easy technical, but very original trick is still very original, and the difficulty of the trick will be taken care of by the difficulty-judge.
Allround
If you are only original in one style, this will not give the same score as having the same amount of originality in every style. This is not the most important part, since it is almost impossible to be original in every basic aspect in every battle. How unique/different his style or trick is, is still the most important but it is appreciated if the player does something original / have a variation in more than one style.
Execution
The execution of your original move/style could make it more worth just like in difficulty, but this is not the focus point.
Control
Do not focus on thegeneralcontrol at all.But regarding a specific trick, it depends on the circumstances. If a freestyler clearly did an original move, but failed juggling afterwards –he will get rewarded for this trick, but not as much if he landed it perfectly. But if the originality judge can see the freestylers thought behind the trick, but he was nowhere near landing it, he will not be rewarded for it.
4. 2. 4. Execution («how good is a freestylers’ style, cleanness, flow and dynamics of your performance?»)
Execution is about the way you do your tricks. The criterion is described by these sub-criteria:
Performing tricks the way they ideally should be done. This means having clean revolutions around the ball and not skipping movements.
Going nice and effortless from trick to trick without pauses or making the ball stop.
A trick can be done with nice flow and clean revolutions, without making it necessarily look good. Style takes care of the aesthetics of the performance.
Bringing energy to the stage, using big parts of the stage and showing strength and speed on movements.
Note: it should be clear to the judges that it was his intention to follow the music or hit the beat
Battle attitude is about confidence:
Being able to convey self confidence. Confidence can be displayed by characteristics such as:
Notes: Battle attitude should be done with respect and with the spirit of the sport. A freestyler does not have to show every sub-criterion to fulfil the execution criterion.
How Execution relates to every other criteria
Difficulty
It is more difficult to execute a difficult trick cleanly, than it is to execute an easy trick cleanly. If you are not doing difficult tricks, it is not possible to get excellent execution. You must do difficult tricks and show good style to get good execution. You get points for doing easy tricks clean and with good flow and dynamic as well, but you can’t get top score without doing some difficult tricks. This means that difficulty does play a role for the execution judge, even though the focus lays on the execution itself.
Allround
It is of course a plus to have good execution in every style, but the focus should be on how the athletes’ execution is in general. The judge should focus on what the player does and its execution.
Originality
No focus on the originality.
Control
Generally, the execution judge should have his focus on the execution on the moves the freestylers manage to do. Not on the general control or mistakes an athlete shows. However, a mistake or loss of control could affect the amount of flow for example. So, control will automatically still have a small effect on the execution criterion, even though this is not the focus.
4. 2. 5. Control (“mistakes and general control”)
Control-criterion is described through two sub-criteria:
Showing a surplus of control of the tricks being performed and making it look easy. This means not «running» after the ball or obviously not having a consistent control.
This has to do with the objective fact of failing a trick. Dropping the ball to the ground, using hands or failing a trick you obviously tried to do.
A big drop where the ball goes off the stage counts more than a small drop, but it should not be a significant difference in the control criterion. The big drop will also count for other criteria as well, since he loses time and will not be able to do as many difficult, original and/or allround moves.
How Control relates to every other criteria
Difficulty
It is more difficult to do difficult moves with solid control and no drops, rather than easy moves with solid control and no drops. This means that if you are not doing difficult tricks, it is not possible to get excellent control. You must do difficult tricks and show good control here to get good control. You get points for doing no drops and easy tricks solid as well, but especially good control if it is difficult as well. This means that difficulty does play a role for the control judge, even though the focus lays on the control and mistakes itself. If you show a very good general control, but also take many risks because you want to get difficulty, you can still win the control criterion with more drops than the other. As a judge it is also easy to see when an athlete does tricks with surplus of control, rather than barely managing to do it.
Allround
It is of course a plus to have good control in every style, but the focus should be on how an athletes control is in general.
Originality
No focus on the originality.
Execution
If it is clear that a freestyler had bad execution in order to save a trick and not drop the ball, the control judge should take this into consideration.
| # | Name | Nickname | Country | Pts. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Erlend Fagerli | Erlend | Norway | 615 | 115 | 0 | 500 |
| 2 | Felipe Poblete | Pip3 | Chile | 385 | 115 | 250 | 20 |
| 3 | Ibuki Yoshida | Ibuki | Japan | 325 | 75 | 250 | 0 |
| 4 | Sebastian Ortiz | Boyka | Colombia | 305 | 125 | 0 | 180 |
| 5 | Yo Katusyama | Yo | Japan | 300 | 0 | 0 | 300 |
| 6 | Philip Warren Gertsson | PWG | Philippines | 285 | 90 | 150 | 45 |
| 7 | Luis Reyes | Luis | Peru | 245 | 115 | 110 | 20 |
| 8 | Sebastian Peňa | Machine | Colombia | 235 | 25 | 0 | 210 |
| 9 | Abdoul Titi Kone | Titi | Ivory Coast | 220 | 0 | 220 | 0 |
| 10 | Alvaro Lopez | Alvaro | Spain | 205 | 115 | 0 | 90 |
| 11 | Jesse Marlet | Jesse | Netherlands | 205 | 115 | 0 | 90 |
| 12 | Diego Urzua | Degox | Chile | 190 | 20 | 150 | 20 |
| 13 | Yousef Riesco | Yorok | Egypt | 190 | 60 | 130 | 0 |
| 14 | Ricardo Fabiano De Araújo | Ricardinho | Brazil | 170 | 125 | 0 | 45 |
| 15 | Brynjar Fagerli | Brynjar | Norway | 160 | 70 | 0 | 90 |
| 16 | Viktor Olofson | VLO | Sweden | 160 | 115 | 0 | 45 |
| 17 | Ahmadreza Allameh Falsafi | Ahmadreza | Iran | 160 | 115 | 45 | 0 |
| 18 | Kazane Shimazaki | Kazane | Japan | 155 | 0 | 110 | 45 |
| 19 | Akinobu Komine | Aki | Japan | 145 | 55 | 90 | 0 |
| 20 | Michael Molina | Chile | 140 | 50 | 90 | 0 | |
| 21 | Weihan Liang | Wei | China | 140 | 115 | 25 | 0 |
| 22 | Patrick Shaw | Patshaw | USA | 135 | 115 | 0 | 20 |
| 23 | Antonio Noguez | Antonio | Mexico | 133 | 125 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | Kim Taehee | Kim | South Korea | 125 | 100 | 25 | 0 |
| 25 | Anatoliy Yanchev | McPro | Russia | 125 | 125 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | Kosuke Takahashi | Ko-suke | Japan | 125 | 125 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | Lukasz Chwieduk | Luki | Poland | 125 | 125 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | Jaromir Poprawa | JRK | Poland | 120 | 75 | 0 | 45 |
| 29 | Robert Guzik | Guzik | Poland | 115 | 25 | 0 | 90 |
| 30 | Nico Gondra | Nico | Argentina | 115 | 70 | 45 | 0 |
| 31 | Sipho Busakwe | Sipho | South Africa | 115 | 100 | 15 | 0 |
| 32 | Adam Szabados | Hungary | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | |
| 33 | Vladislav Kostuchenko | KVP | Belarus | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | Alexander Wessberg | Sander | Finland | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | Daniel Pražák | Dany | Czech republic | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | Luca Chiarvesio | Italy | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | |
| 37 | Sushant Waydande | Sushant | India | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | Jordan Meunier | Jordan | France | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | Marcel Gurk | Germany | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | |
| 40 | Ardhi Andryadi | Indonesia | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | |
| 41 | Simon Atli Larsen | Simon | Denmark | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | Nicolas Augustinoy | Nico | Argentina | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | Jay Hennicke | Jay | Australia | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | Ngoc Phat Nguyen | Vietnam | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | |
| 45 | Jamie Bruno | Magnet | Canada | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | Marc Jonin | Marki | Switzerland | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 47 | Soufiane El Marnissi | Bencok | Belgium | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | Mohannad Hosam | Mohannad | Egypt | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 49 | Sven Fielitz | Luxembourg | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 50 | Chunyin Lai | Hong Kong | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 51 | Fahad al Braiki | UAE | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 52 | Nurseid Dosmagambet | Nurs | Kazachstan | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 53 | Guillermo Lobo Morales | Guillermo | Costa Rica | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 54 | Kenneth Zelaya | Kenneth | El Salvador | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 55 | Maximiliano Garcia | Masi | Argentina | 95 | 50 | 45 | 0 |
| 56 | Georg Lingard | Jojje | Sweden | 90 | 70 | 0 | 20 |
| 57 | Ashley Floorise Mkhize | Floorise | South Africa | 90 | 0 | 90 | 0 |
| 58 | Abdullah Emad | Emad | Sudan | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0 |
| 59 | Wai Ching Ma | Hong Kong | 80 | 70 | 10 | 0 | |
| 60 | Priit Leppik | Priit | Finland | 78 | 70 | 0 | 8 |
| 61 | Puneet Dhundele | India | 75 | 50 | 25 | 0 | |
| 62 | Lali Bi | Bilal | China | 75 | 50 | 25 | 0 |
| 63 | Joao Othavyo | Brazil | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| 64 | Jhonny Peňa | Colombia | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| 65 | Bruno Loth | Nono | France | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | Timur Alekseev | Alekseev | Russia | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
| 67 | Kotaro Tokuda | Tokura | Japan | 70 | 25 | 0 | 45 |
| 68 | Sindre Herre | Sindre | Norway | 70 | 50 | 0 | 20 |
| 69 | Mart Pool | Mart | Netherlands | 70 | 50 | 0 | 20 |
| 70 | Fernando Puerto | Futbolin | Colombia | 70 | 45 | 25 | 0 |
| 71 | Pankaj Suriyal | Pankaj | India | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| 72 | Lucas Morales | Chile | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | |
| 73 | Alexey Zhurakovskiy | Zhura | Ukraine | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| 74 | Hermen Voerknecht | Hermen | Netherlands | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| 75 | FAJAR FIRMANSYAH | Indonesia | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | |
| 76 | Chris Bennet Bröker | CBB | Germany | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| 77 | Jakob Semajer Garic | Jokas | Denmark | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| 78 | Matthieu Pierron | Matthieu | France | 65 | 45 | 0 | 20 |
| 79 | Nicolas Morales | M3ga Nico | Chile | 65 | 20 | 45 | 0 |
| 80 | Jonathan Amot Olsen | Olsen | Norway | 60 | 40 | 0 | 20 |
| 81 | Pavel Tsagelnikov | pashaff | Belarus | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| 82 | Emilio Namahuju | Emilio | South Africa | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| 83 | Cyprian Mikita | Cypro | Belgium | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| 84 | Simon Müller | Switzerland | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | |
| 85 | Michal Horvat | Horvy | Czech republic | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| 86 | Mohamed Mazghi | Luxembourg | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | |
| 87 | Anderson Oliveira | Anderson | Brazil | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
| 88 | Anton Pavlinov | Pavlinoff | Russia | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
| 89 | Szymon Skalski | Szymo | Poland | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
| 90 | Tristan Gac | France | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 | |
| 91 | Ruslan Rylkou | Reno | Belarus | 53 | 45 | 0 | 8 |
| 92 | Zhu Song | Song | China | 50 | 40 | 10 | 0 |
| 93 | Rohit Mallah | India | 50 | 40 | 10 | 0 | |
| 94 | Quencer Reyes | Philippines | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |
| 95 | Simon Strandahl | Simon | Sweden | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 96 | Samuel Weller | Samu | Germany | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 97 | Christopher Arlit Bach | OG | Denmark | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 98 | Fikri Sirath | Indonesia | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |
| 99 | Kalle Kaskismaa | Finland | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |
| 100 | Vlad Tsymbaliuk | Vlad_Uppers | Ukraine | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 101 | Osman Roa | Osman | Colombia | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| 102 | Griffin Berridge | Griffin | United Kingdom | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| 103 | Mikhail Plischenko | AnyOne | Russia | 45 | 25 | 0 | 20 |
| 104 | Jordan Morrison | Australia | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0 | |
| 105 | MohammadSaeid Hamidzade | Leosaeid | Iran | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0 |
| 106 | Mohammadreza Tajiki | Tajiki | Iran | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0 |
| 107 | Aleksandr Melnikov | molodoy | Russia | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| 108 | Janis Koller | Switzerland | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 | |
| 109 | Lylian Altmayer | Luxembourg | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 | |
| 110 | Martijn Debbaut | Martijn | Belgium | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| 111 | Petr Zach | Zachy | Czech republic | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| 112 | Mido Abdella | Mido | Egypt | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| 113 | Maciej Leja | Poland | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 | |
| 114 | Shizuki Tanaka | Shizuki | Japan | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| 115 | ABDI NEGARA | Indonesia | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
| 116 | Ricardo Rehländer | Germany | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
| 117 | Bohdi Bos | Bohdi | Netherlands | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| 118 | Robin Stafverfeldt | Sweden | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
| 119 | Igor Samoded | Ukraine | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
| 120 | Eeli Järvinen | Finland | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
| 121 | Bryan Pino | Bryan | Chile | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| 122 | Maxi Galarza | Maxi | Argentina | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| 123 | Mads Fristed Navne | Fristed | Denmark | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| 124 | Ebrahim Rashid | Atie | South Africa | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| 125 | Cecil Chiila | Cecil | Zambia | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| 126 | Van Ael Abdarrahaman | Van Ael | Comoros | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| 127 | Mohamed Betahar | Logic | Algeria | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| 128 | Masaru Saito | Fuji | Japan | 35 | 10 | 25 | 0 |
| 129 | Fares Abdi | Fares | Egypt | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| 130 | Adam Křížek | Adam | Czech republic | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| 131 | Chrisval de Castro | Philippines | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | |
| 132 | Said Mamedov | Belgium | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | |
| 133 | Denis Popovichenko | Belarus | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | |
| 134 | Mario Wiesendanger | Switzerland | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | |
| 135 | Kyle Rinquest | Loogi | South Africa | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| 136 | Layth Huraish | Joker | Luxembourg | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| 137 | Thiago Saltori | Thiago | Brazil | 33 | 25 | 0 | 8 |
| 138 | Hugo Vilese | Hugo | Netherlands | 33 | 25 | 0 | 8 |
| 139 | Pawel Kwit | Ronnie | Poland | 30 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| 140 | Hui Chen | ChenHui (陈辉) | China | 30 | 20 | 10 | 0 |
| 141 | Kelong Peng | China | 30 | 20 | 10 | 0 | |
| 142 | Ziyu Liao | Cris (廖子煜) | China | 30 | 20 | 10 | 0 |
| 143 | Jessa Alquino | Philippines | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
| 144 | Yuto Yabuta | Yu-To | Japan | 25 | 5 | 0 | 20 |
| 145 | Harold Rodriguez | Harold | Colombia | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 146 | Camilo Yanten | Kamilo | Colombia | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 147 | Santiago Narvaez | Santi | Colombia | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 148 | Leon Pokrovsky | Leon | Japan | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 149 | Ehsan Mousavi Nejad Kashafi | Esimo | Iran | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 150 | Paulo Concha | Paulo | Chile | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 151 | Minjae Jo | Jo | South Korea | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 152 | Jose Alberto Menacho Caballero | Bolivia | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | |
| 153 | Esteban Gomez | Esteban | Colombia | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 154 | Jianfa Peng | PKF (彭健发) | Hong Kong | 25 | 20 | 5 | 0 |
| 155 | Minna Marlo | Finland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 156 | Veeraj Anbuselvan | India | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 157 | Vadim Kirilenko | Vados | Ukraine | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 158 | Caspar van Tent | Netherlands | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 159 | Carl Helenelund | Landrou | Sweden | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 160 | Nils Effinghausen | Germany | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 161 | Kamei Akira | Akira | Japan | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 162 | Marcus Holmberg | Sweden | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 163 | Dani Anggara | Indonesia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 164 | Sam Gallo | France | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 165 | Leo Finland | Leo | Finland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 166 | Sebastian Ljungkvist | Denmark | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 167 | Arie Ardiansyah | Indonesia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 168 | Olle Wallinder | Olle | Sweden | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 169 | Patrick Bäurer | Germany | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 170 | Anders Borg Petersen | Borg | Denmark | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 171 | Konrad Ciesiołkiewicz | Konrad | Poland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 172 | Lintang Dika | Indonesia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 173 | Brian Morales | France | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 174 | Bas van der Kaay | Bas | Netherlands | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 175 | Jonas Landén | Brumbass | Denmark | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 176 | Mateusz Przenzak | Poland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 177 | Keisuke Kikkawa | Keisuke | Japan | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 178 | Piotr Kielar | Piotr | Poland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 179 | Ilya Sosnin | Sosnin | Russia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 180 | Igo Matos | Brazil | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 181 | Sigve Lamark Monsen | Sigve | Norway | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 182 | ADE MAHENDRA | Indonesia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 183 | Olavi Jaroma | Finland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 184 | Raghul Raja | India | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 185 | Jonas Clasen | Denmark | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 186 | Dani Mukund | Dani | India | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 187 | Anton Popov | Tony | Russia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 188 | Akshay Yadav | Akshay | India | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 189 | Jonatan Brekke | Norway | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 190 | Dmitriy Shved | Shved | Russia | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 191 | Gabriel Perke | Gabriel | Brazil | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 192 | Masamichi Tominaga | Tommy | Japan | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 193 | Bailey Regt | Bailey | Netherlands | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 194 | Tommy Sagmoen | Norway | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 195 | Sondre Aksnes | Norway | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 196 | Igor Makidonov | Makros | Ukraine | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 197 | Edvin Belin | Sweden | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 198 | Nicolas Riviere | France | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 199 | Jannik Singpiel | Jannik | Germany | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 200 | Samppu | Finland | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 201 | Wilfried dos Santos | Wiwi | France | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 202 | Alexander Voyevoda | Ukraine | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 203 | Roman Shershen | Remych | Ukraine | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 204 | Moises Carruyo Guillen | Veneco | Chile | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 205 | Mohamed El Khayari | Moha | Spain | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 206 | Francisco Alonso Valverde | Lince | Spain | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 207 | Sergio Sanchez | Sergio | Spain | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 208 | Rodrigo Castillo | Rodrigo | Argentina | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 209 | Hector Rozas | Hector | Chile | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 210 | Oscar Lencina | Oscar | Argentina | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 211 | Ignacio Chavez | Ignacio | Argentina | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 212 | Rodrigo Rozas | Rigo | Chile | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 213 | Ruben Castro | Ruben | Argentina | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 214 | Hailong Zhang | Sea Dragon (张海龙) | China | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 |
| 215 | Hsin Lei Tang | Spider (唐心磊) | China | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 |
| 216 | Chenyang Zhou | Zhou (周晨阳) | China | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 |
| 217 | Xiati Dili | Dilshat (迪力夏提) | China | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 |
| 218 | Benjamin John | Nigeria | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | |
| 219 | Michael Safi | Safi | Mozambique | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| 220 | Joel Asare | Ghana | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | |
| 221 | Annas Sebar | Annas | Morocco | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| 222 | Samir Saidi | Saidi | Algeria | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| 223 | Austin Abariabote | Nigeria | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | |
| 224 | Blessed Ezeakabudu | Blessed | Nigeria | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| 225 | Junya Hitomi | Japan | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | |
| 226 | Masahide Kurashita | Miyabi | Japan | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 |
| 227 | Mikhail Azarenok | MiJail | Belarus | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 228 | Sergey Shmots | Sergey-Steep | Belarus | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 229 | Mohamed Ghazy | Ghazy | Egypt | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 230 | Laurin Zaugg | Switzerland | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 231 | Daniel Kománek | Czech republic | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 232 | Mohaimen Shaban | Luxembourg | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 233 | Zilla Paral | Zilla | South Africa | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 234 | Mohammad Gamal Aboakl | Gamey | Egypt | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 235 | Muslim Aliyev | Belgium | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 236 | Egor Telushko | Egorko | Belarus | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 237 | Diaa Didoz | Diaa | Egypt | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 238 | Amer Basmaji | Luxembourg | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 239 | Kirill Bylinsky | Battlestorm | Belarus | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 240 | Jakub Nekuda | N3ky | Czech republic | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 241 | Julien Coutaz | Switzerland | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 242 | Juliette Dron | Belgium | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 243 | Oliver Hannibal | Luxembourg | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 244 | Paddy Mohlolo | Paddy | South Africa | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 245 | Peso Abd Eimobdy | Peso | Egypt | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 246 | Thomas Stemgee | Thomas | Belgium | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 247 | Štěpán Klimek | Štěpán | Czech republic | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 248 | Nicolas Rossier | Switzerland | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 249 | Tiago Teixeira | Luxembourg | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 250 | Oscar Dlamini | Oscar | South Africa | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 251 | Matthias Boesel | Switzerland | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 252 | Diallo Mahmed | Belgium | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 253 | Shane Namahuju | Shane | South Africa | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 254 | Marek Hrabovský | Hraby | Czech republic | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 255 | Jia Li | Leike (李佳) | China | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 |
| 256 | Lei Wang | Asura (王雷) | China | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| 257 | Yinuo Xiao | Sammy (肖以诺) | China | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| 258 | Ryo Sato | Ryo | Japan | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 259 | Tsukasa Sugiura | Tsukasa | Japan | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 260 | Heru Daisak | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 261 | Joran Engelen | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 262 | Sami Aks | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 263 | Marius Digranes | Marius | Norway | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 264 | Even Berglund | Norway | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 265 | Ralf König | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 266 | Daiki Suto | Daikichi | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 267 | Renaud Mauleon | Renaud | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 268 | Mateusz Sieja | Amsti | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 269 | Hafidh Sungkar | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 270 | Rémy Coquelle | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 271 | Mohnish Nikam | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 272 | Daniel Mikolajek | Mikolaj | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 273 | Jared Panugalinog | Philippines | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 274 | Dmitriy Osmeknin | Diplomat | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 275 | Akimitsu Kusunoki | Akkey | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 276 | Naryoh Susenoh | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 277 | Geert Jan Meun | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 278 | Vyas S | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 279 | Konrad Dybaś | Kondzio | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 280 | Aleksander Tarasov | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 281 | Dhiwakar | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 282 | Dmitriy Romanenko | De_Lise | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 283 | Jusha Tadros | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 284 | Tatsuya Adachi | Adachinho | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 285 | Alexander Arshin | Arshin | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 286 | Joep Robben | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 287 | Thomas Hanias | Tomy | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 288 | Travis Thibble | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 289 | Bartłomiej Rak | Kala | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 290 | Rafli Awal | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 291 | Jannis Stein | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 292 | Naoyuki Nagae | Nao | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 293 | Frank van der Wielen | Frank | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 294 | M Rizky Ramadhan | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 295 | Tom Voisine | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 296 | Dennis Lucito | Philippines | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 297 | Florian Kaulen | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 298 | Patrick Rehberger | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 299 | Dawid Koczur | Dako | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 300 | Dawid Jarzebowski | Jarzeboś | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 301 | Nikita Sivov | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 302 | Tatsuki Kusanagi | Nagi | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 303 | Kevin van den Berg | Kefs | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 304 | Kelvin Auliardo | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 305 | Douwe Schmersal | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 306 | Silje Trohaug | Norway | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 307 | Maxim Zherebtsov | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 308 | Tom Hauser | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 309 | Kaito Ushio | Usshi | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 310 | Syauqi | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 311 | Finn Eekkert | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 312 | Pierre Houël | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 313 | Sandeep Singh | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 314 | Rico Mercado | Philippines | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 315 | Daniel Rood | Netherlands | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 316 | Dawid Biegun | Zegan | Poland | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 317 | Rishat Faridonov | Rishat | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 318 | Mael Auffret | Mael | France | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 319 | Lukas Jingga | Indonesia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 320 | Pascal Banausencourt | Pascal | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 321 | Sushant Suvarna | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 322 | Dennis Balbin | Philippines | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 323 | Archis Patil | Archie Crispy | India | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 324 | Ben Schneider | Germany | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 325 | Kohey Moriwaki | Kuro | Japan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 326 | German Minin | Russia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| 327 | Yu Hao Tseng | YuPao (曾郁豪) | China | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 328 | Izu Yuri | Yuri Kamalio | Japan | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 329 | Rowdy Heinen | Rowdy | Netherlands | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 330 | Tom Kentta | Tom Kentta | Australia | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 331 | Antonio Sanz del Peso | Anto Sanz | Spain | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 332 | Kunal Rathi | Kunal | India | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 333 | Hongyi Huang | TK | China | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 334 | Yesheng Zhang | Zhang | China | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 335 | Youyou Wu | Wu (吴优优) | China | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| 336 | Dong Rang | R.Diamond (冉东) | China | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| 337 | Wujiawen Wujia | Jiawen (邬嘉文) | China | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| 338 | Fei Sun | SuN (孙飞) | China | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| 339 | Lukas Tref | Switzerland | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 340 | Rinse Goossens | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 341 | Poto GP | Poto | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 342 | Mohamed Samir | Samir | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 343 | Bryan Van Buyten | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 344 | Mzoo Mandela | Mzoo | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 345 | Andrey Mareckiy | Belarus | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 346 | Matoug Mohamed Amine | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 347 | Bingo Josias | Bingo | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 348 | Nikolay Stahovich | Belarus | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 349 | Abd El Rahman El Garhy | Rahman | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 350 | Tanguy André | Switzerland | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 351 | Svetlana Belyakovich | Sveta | Belarus | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 352 | Bilal Marso | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 353 | Siyabonga Khubeka | Khube | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 354 | Ahmed Ghazy | Ghazy | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 355 | William Cochard | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 356 | Mpho Rabutla | Mpho | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 357 | Ahmed Tarek | Tarek | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 358 | Aleks Pham | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 359 | Zain Patel | Zain | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 360 | Sergey Gordeychlik | Chinook | Belarus | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 361 | Ahmed Lotfy | Lotfy | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 362 | Kabelo Gill | Kabelo | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 363 | Thomas Gillet | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 364 | Roman Kazemi | Belarus | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 365 | Youssef Hosaam PK | Hosaam | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 366 | Adam Chelh | Belgium | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 367 | Bongi Nkosi | Bongi | South Africa | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 368 | Gleb Shalaev | Belarus | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 369 | Basem Mamdouh Ageba | Basem | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 370 | Mahmoud Ahmed Bedo | Bedo | Egypt | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 371 | Yulin Liu | Yulin (刘钰琳) | China | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 372 | Kanako Uhara | Kanako | Japan | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 373 | Hiroyuki Kaneko | Hiro-K | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 374 | Gen Iwafuji | GEN | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 375 | Syota Watanabe | Syo-ta | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 376 | Hiroki Matsumoto | Teto | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 377 | Shunpei Ono | Shun-P | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 378 | Yuri Izu | Yuri Kamalio | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 379 | Ryuichi Shida | LYU | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 380 | Daiki Makimoto | Mckey | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 381 | Daichi Tanabe | Daichi | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 382 | Kota Kataoka | ko-ta | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 383 | Kenta Irimajiri | Majiri | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 384 | Yushi Okaya | yushi | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 385 | Atsushi Tamura | Atsushi | Japan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 386 | Han Cen | SXS (岑汉) | China | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 387 | Lixun Gu | Lixun Gu (古丽逊) | China | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 388 | Kun Yang | Tubasa (杨坤) | China | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 389 | Patrik Kundrát | Patrik | Czech republic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
For anyone organizing an event, make sure you email info@thewffa.org to register it on the world freestyle calendar. WFFA is keen to support and promote all events in the sport/art of freestyle football, so even if your event cannot be classified to qualify for world ranking point, we could still help.
We encourage everyone to take part in as many events as possible (even non-WFFA accredited events) to gain experience. Online competiotions are not rewarded with points. The rankings system is in place to determine every year who ultimately the most successful freestyler around the world is. WFFA believes a true winner is somebody who has the ability to perform both the art and sport of freestyle football on a consistently world class level.
World Freestyle Football Rankings
|
Soccerex:
|
SuperBall:
|
SWRL:
|
Travel insurance cot:
|
||
|
|
||
Participation in Freestyle Football for women is rapidly growing throughout the world, with more people developing themselves as professional full-time athletes.
Many people may believe freestyle football to be a new sport for women, however we can actually go back to the beginning of the 20thcentury to see how circus artist Trixie Larue already performing many of the tricks that we see in the sport today. Ronaldinha then released a series of videos online, which popularized the ambition for more women to perform tricks with a football.
In the early 2000’s, the first ever professional female freestyler, Sandy Levitas from France, also known as ‘Bambi ball’, was breaking barriers and performing next to the pioneers of male freestyle such as Palle, Nam the Man, Abbas Farid and more.
This paved the way for many more girls to come into the sport including the likes of Kitti Szasz (Hungary), Melody Donchet (France), Kathy Vije (The Netherlands) and Laura Biondo (Venezuela), who were competing alongside the men. This is still allowed to this day, however the first women only freestyle competition was launched in 2011.
Today the WFFA wants to continue to build a sport with equal opportunities for all.
Female Freestyle Football Competitions
This document outlines the core components and official rules of female freestyle football competitions that are acknowledged by the World Freestyle Football Association (WFFA).
This is to be seen as the minimum requirements for any event worldwide, although they can be altered to suit the needs of non‐official events (events in which no world rankings points are available) if appropriate.
Contents
1. World Ranking
1.1. Entry details
- The season runs from 1st January to 31st December each year.
- WFFA recognized events must be open for anyone to enter in the first round.
- More than one girl from one same country can participate simultaneously in the same competition.
- There is no age restriction unless specifically stated in the entry requirements.
1.2. Event Weighting
Athletes can gather World Ranking points from entering two tiers of events during the year. The number of events that apply and extra tiers will be increased in the years ahead.
1 Star Event – Online League
2 Star Event – World Open Live Events
1.3. Points
1-Star Events
|
Winner |
Runner up |
3rdPlace |
4thPlace |
Quarter |
Top 16 |
Entry |
|
200 |
115 |
75 |
70 |
35 |
15 |
5 |
2-Star Events
|
Winner |
Runner up |
3rdPlace |
4thPlace |
Quarter |
Entry |
|
250 |
150 |
110 |
90 |
45 |
10 |
2. Women’s Freestyle League: Online
The WFFA Women’s Freestyle League is a series of competitions online, designed with the aim of increasing the participation and standard levels of female freestyle on a global basis, motivating all athletes to train and stay active within the scene.
The league consists of 2 or more online competitions per year where females battle each other to gain WFFA ranking points and special prizes.
2.1. Rules
2.1.1. Part 1 Qualification; Routine
Players will send their non-edited 90-second freestyle routine video to laura@thewffa.org.
The 16 best players will advance onto the second part — the online battles.
These videos will be ranked by 3 international professional freestylers appointed by the WFFA. Judges will consider the overall performance.
2.1.1.1. Video Requirements
2.1.1.2. Qualification Video Considerations
2.1.2. Part 2 Online Battles
Based on their performance in the freestyle routines, 16 female athletes will be chosen to compete on the online battles.
Online battles work just like live ones: each player has three x 30-second rounds.
Player A will send her first 30 second round to player B. Player B will then reply by sending her 1st round of 30 seconds to player A. This continues until both players send their three rounds. After, all rounds are combined by the battle supervisor, the finished battle will be sent to the judges, who will then decide and announce the winner.
Online battles will be held through an email thread which will include the two freestylers in contention and a WFFA Women’s League battle supervisor who will make sure that players send their rounds on time.
2.1.2.1. Battle Structure
There will be eight initial battles, which will be structured according to the ranking of the routine videos. For example, the freestyler who was ranked first will battle the one who ranked 16th, the one ranked 2nd will battle against the one ranked 15th, and so on.
The 8 winners will move on to quarter final battles that will happen in the same way.
The competition will continue then with semi-finals, battle for 3rdplace and the final all following the same online battle method described above.
2.1.3 Other information
Ball must be no smaller than size 4.5 and no larger than size 5. For more details contact a WFFA representative.
Only the first video per freestyler will be accepted. If videos don’t respect the rules in terms of duration, the format or the ball, then athlete will be automatically eliminated.
2.2. 2019 Dates
|
1stWomen’s Online League |
2ndWomen’s Online League |
|
March 15 – May 31 |
October 1 – December 22 * |
* There will be an interruption from November 8thuntil November 20thduring which RBSS live event will happen.
** From July 15 until August 16 the Online qualifiers for RBSS will be held with the same rules.
|
1st Women’s Online League |
2nd Women’s Online League |
|
- Qualification videos must be sent by March 15. - Judges announcement of top 16 qualified for next stage will be on the March 25. - Online battles will proceed from March 28th until May 31st.
|
- Qualification videos must be sent by October 1st.
- Judges announcement of top 16 qualified for next stage will be on the October 10.
- Online battles will proceed from October 1st until December 22nd with a break in mid-November for RBSS live event.
|
|
Top 16 battles
28th March player 2 set 1 7th April player 1 set 3
Results top 16 battles will be announced on April 12
|
Top 16 battles
12th October player 2 set 1 22nd October player 1 set 3
Results top 16 battles will be announced on October 27
|
|
Top 8 battles – Quarter Finals
14th April player 2 set 1 24th April player 1 set 3
Results of top 8 battles will be announced on April 29
|
Top 8 battles – Quarter Finals
29th October player 2 set 1 8th November player 1 set 3
Results of top 8 battles will be announced on November 13
|
|
Top 4 battles – Semi Finals
1st May player 2 set 1 11th May player 1 set 3
Results of top 8 battles will be announced on May 16
|
Top 4 battles – Semi Finals
20th November player 2 set 1 30th November player 1 set 3
Results of top 8 battles will be announced on December 5
|
|
Final Battle & 3rdplace battle
18th May player 2 set 1 28th May player 1 set 3
Final results will be announced on May 31
|
Final Battle & 3rdplace battle
7th December player 2 set 1 17th December player 1 set 3
Final results will be announced on December 22
|
2.3. Judges & Prizes
Judges & Prizes for each Women’s League event will be announced through the WFFA social media channels closer to the dates of the competitions.
3.0. Women’s Freestyle League: Live
The same entry and judging criteria apply for both men and women at the live events. See event and rules pages for more information.
The Freestyle Football World Masters is a World Championship event visiting major cities around the world. The participants are the top 16 freestyle football athletes in world today, as determined by the World Rankings published by the World Freestyle Football Association at the end of each year. They are all competing throughout various challenges to ultimately win the title of Freestyle Football World Masters Champion.
Freestyle Football can be uniquely identified as a SpArt. It is a mixture of an ‘Art’, which involves performing choreographed routines to music with a football and a ‘Sport’ as athletes then compete head to head over 3-minute knockout battles with judges scoring them on Originality, Execution and Technical difficulty.
Event HistoryThe World Freestyle Masters came out from the Freestyle Football World Tour which was created as a one off event in 2011 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The events was won by the UK's Andrew Henderson.
In 2013 the World Tour was staged in 2 venues, London UK & Dubai, UAE. The year was dominated by Poland Michryc who won both events and the Overall World Tour Crown.
In 2014 World Tour was hosted in amazing city of Beijing, China and returned to London once more to famous O2 arena. Carlos Iacon from Argentina finished on second place each of the event but accumulating the most points overall he became a champion of World Tour 2014.
After one year break in 2015, World Tour has come back with 2016 edition starting in Calgary, Canada with first leg and finishing in Melbourne, Australia with incredible set up and PR acitivities. This year was dominated by unstoppable englishman Andrew Henderson.
In 2017 there has been another break and with 2018 the World Freestyle Masters was created to focus on one event per year only and make it unforgettable experience for every participant. Hosting the first official World Freestyle Masters event in Tokyo, Japan together with World Street Soccer Championship and DAZN as a title partner, WFFA believes in bright future of this event.
Hosting an Freestyle Football World Masters Event
If your city would like to host a Freestyle Football World Tour Event then applications are now currently open to host a 2018 and 2019 Event.
If you are interested in receiving a Host City Pack then please get in contact with us by emailing info@thewffa.org
Freestylers anywhere in the world can earn points by competing in events that are recognised by the World Freestyle Football Association as either 1, 2 or 3-star competitions. These points are accumulated throughout each calendar year and go towards their position in the World Rankings. 1-Star events are national championships. 2-star events are continental opens and there is one 3-star event each year, which is Super Ball. There are many more competitions each year outside of the world ranking qualifiers, in which Freestylers can also be recognised for a chance to win one of the Wild Card spaces in the Freestyle Football World Masters.
Note: In event of a Freestyler qualifying twice (ie through Top 8 on 2013 Tour & Top 6 in World Rankings) then the spot is offered to following player in ranking.
Event Format & Rules
The competition is held in well known battle format.
Battles are 3 minutes long with each freestyler having 3 x 30 second rounds to outperform each other and impress the judges. At this stage, technical difficulty of the tricks and how each freestyler responds to their opponent are also critical factors for the judges to consider.
Freestylers have to abide by the Battle Rules which can be seen here
Judges are established freestylers who are held in high regard by the community and are knowledgeable on the rapidly progressing tricks within the sport.
There are 3 judges in each event who will decide instantly the result of each battle without consulting each other.
| Name | Nickname | Country | Pts. stage 1 | Pts. stage 2 | Pts. stage 3 | Total pts. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brynjar Fagerli | Brynjar | Norway | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Emil Källdoff | Källdoff | Sweden | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Erlend Fagerli | Erlend | Norway | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Esteban Hernandez Acosta | El Pantera | Mexico | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Gautier Jean-Marie André Fayolle | Gautier | France | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Jesse Marlet | Jesse | Netherlands | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Jordan Valentino Morisson | Jordan | Australia | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Lukasz Czeslaw Chwieduk | Luki | Poland | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Michal Rycaj | Michryc | Poland | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Duarte | Pedrinho | Brazil | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Philip Warren Gertsson | PWG | Philippines | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Ricardo Chahini de Araujo | Ricardinho | Brazil | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Sebastian Ortiz Hernandez | Boyka | Colombia | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Szymon Maciej Skalski | Szymo | Poland | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Tobias Brandal Busaet | Tobias | Norway | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Yo Katsuyama | Yo | Japan | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Sunday | Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday | Saturday |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th April | 26th April | 27th April | 28th April | 29th April | 30th April | 1st |
2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th |
9th | 10th | 11th | 12th | 13th | 14th | 15th |
16th | 17th | 18th | 19th | 20th | 21st | 22nd |
23rd | 24th | 25th | 26th | 27th | 28th | 29th |
30th | 31st | 1st June | 2nd June | 3rd June | 4th June | 5th June |
|
|
Read more
