Acquiring the Habit of Changing Governments Through Elections

First Published August 4, 2014 Research Article

Authors

1
 
New York University, New York City, USA
by this author
First Published Online: August 4, 2014

Changing governments through elections is a rare and a recent practice. Yielding office the first time is foreboding because it entails the risk that the gesture would not be reciprocated, but the habit develops rapidly once the first step is taken. This article provides evidence for these assertions by examining about 3,000 elections in the world since 1788.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98, 808-842.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., Yared, P. (2009). Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56, 1043-1058.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Banks, A. (2005). Cross-National Time Series Data Archive. Retrieved from www.databanksinternational.com
Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Przeworski, A. (2006). The political economy of redistribution under democracy. Economic Theory, 29, 271-290.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Boix, C., Stokes, S. C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55, 517-549.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bushnell, D. (1993). The making of modern Colombia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Carter, D. B., Signorino, C. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18, 271-292.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cercas, J. (2011). The anatomy of a moment. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
Collier, S., Sater, W. F. (1996). A history of Chile, 1808-1994. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. (2008). Authoritarian elections and leadership succession, 1975–2000. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego.
Google Scholar
Dunn, S. (2004). Jefferson’s second revolution: The election crisis of 1800 and the triumph of republicanism. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Escribà Folch, A. (2014). Accountable for what? Regime types, performance, and the fate of outgoing dictators, 1946–2004. Democratization, 20, 160-185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fearon, J. (2011). Self-enforcing democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1661-1708.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Geddes, B. (2005, September). Why parties and elections in authoritarian regimes? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Geddes, B. (2009, September). How autocrats defend themselves against armed rivals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Google Scholar
Geddes, B., Wright, J., Frantz, E. (2013). Autocratic regimes code book. Available from dictators.la.psu.edu
Google Scholar
Geddes, B., Wright, J., Frantz, E. (2014). New data set: Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 305-309.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Getty, J. A. (1991). State and society under Stalin: Constitutions and elections in the 1930s. Slavic Review, 50, 18-35.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Goemans, H. E. (2008). Which way out? The manner and consequences of losing office. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 771-794.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hyde, S. D. (2011). The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma: Why election monitoring became an international norm? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lehoucq, F. (2002). Can parties police themselves? Electoral governance and democratization. International Political Science Review, 23, 29-46.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Maddison, A. (2010). Statistics on world population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1-2008 AD. Retrieved from www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/home.htm
Google Scholar
Makarenko, B. (in press). The role of elections in democracy. In Przeworski, A. (Ed.), Democracy in a Russian mirror. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Mozaffar, S., Schedler, A. (2002). The comparative study of electoral governance—Introduction. International Political Science Review, 23, 5-27.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Nalepa, M. (2010). Skeletons in the closet: Transitional justice in post-communist Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Posada-Carbó, E. (2000). Electoral juggling: A comparative history of the corruption of suffrage in Latin America, 1830-1930. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32, 611-644.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Posada-Carbó, E. (2008, September 18-21). Historical sequences and the origins of democracy in Colombia, 1808–1886. Draft for presentation at the Conference “Origins of Democracy in the Americas, 1770s-1870s,” Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, IN.
Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Przeworski, A. (2005). Democracy as an equilibrium. Public Choice, 123, 253-273.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. R., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Przeworski, A., Asadurian, T., Thomas, A. B. (2012). The origins of parliamentary responsibility. In Ginsburg, T. (Ed.), Comparative constitutional design (pp. 101-137). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Przeworski, A., Rivero, G., Xi, T. (2014). Elections as a method of processing conflicts (Working paper, June). Department of Politics, New York University, New York.
Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2013). Political Institutions and Political Events (PIPE) [Data set]. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/nyu.edu/adam-przeworski/
Google Scholar
Rouquie, A. (1994). The military in Latin American politics since 1930. In Bethell, L. (Ed.). The Cambridge history of Latin America, Volume VI, Part 2: 1930 to the present (pp. 233-306). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Schlögel, K. (2014). Moscow 1937. Boston, MA: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Simpser, A. (2013). More than winning: Why governments and parties manipulate elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sparks, A. (1994). Tomorrow is another country. Johannesburg, South Africa: Struik.
Google Scholar
Vanhanen, T. (1997). Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Weisberger, B. A. (2000). America afire: Jefferson, Adams, and the first contested election. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Google Scholar
Wright, J., Escribà Folch, A. (2012). Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: Transitions to democracy and subsequent autocracy. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 283-309.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

CPS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
CPS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP152.43
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $195.42