Behind an Old Subway Wall, a Glimpse of an Even Older One

Columbus Circle mosaicPhotographs by David W. Dunlap/The New York Times A prototype decorative mosaic from around 1901, before the subway opened, is visible behind the current station wall at 59th Street-Columbus Circle. The uptown No. 1 platform is at the far left.

When people compare New York to Rome, the reference is not usually meant to be flattering. But our town shares at least one inspiring quality with the Eternal City. Just about anytime you knock an old wall down, there is an even older wall behind it.

Columbus Circle mosaic The old mosaic’s guilloche pattern can be discerned under the decorative plaque by Grueby Faience.

Another keyhole to the past opened recently on the uptown platform of the No. 1 train at the 59th Street-Columbus Circle station. Through a gap in the current wall, under one of the ceramic plaques of Columbus’s flagship, an unusual pattern can be discerned dimly: an interwoven guilloche pattern — sort of like a two-dimensional challah crust — in red and yellow mosaic tiles.

Viewed from a perch on the nearby bench, the wall reveals more of itself. (We spread out a newspaper on the seating area, taking advantage of the broad utility of the print medium.) Next to the guilloche border is a large blue-gray mosaic medallion, enclosing a four-lobed pattern known as a quatrefoil. It’s unclear whether it is a true mosaic, with individual tiles, or a mosaic pattern stamped on to a large surface.

What we do know is that it stretches far back into the past; to 1901, in fact, three years before the subway actually opened. In “Silver Connections” (1984), his monumental history and description of the New York subway, Philip Ashforth Coppola described the Columbus Circle station as having played a critical role in the development of the system. “It was virtually the first station to be completed in structural form,” he wrote. “Because of this, the architects used its walls as an art gallery, experimenting with decorative ideas in various colors of tiles and other materials.”

After their brief service at the turn of the century, Mr. Coppola wrote, “all these preliminary experiments were covered over and forgotten.” They were replaced by something far more gorgeous: museum-quality terra cotta ornamentation in the Arts and Crafts style, designed and manufactured by the renowned Grueby Faience Company of Boston. The Grueby artwork has been on public display for 106 years.

DESCRIPTIONThe New York Times A ceramic plaque found nearby has been restored.

But in 2007, at the beginning of the extensive rehabilitation of the station, vestiges of the past started coming back to light again, as the walls that were erected in front of the prototypes were taken down. First to emerge was a blue-and-white Art Nouveau plaque by the American Encaustic Tiling Company.

This plaque has since been restored and is to be relocated elsewhere in the station. The guilloche-and-medallion wall came into public view only recently. It won’t be long before it is reimmured. But there is good news for armchair archaeologists among the straphangers.

“We are well aware of the historical significance of this find,” said Charles F. Seaton, speaking for New York City Transit, “and we are working on a design for a window in the wall so this treasure can be shared with the public at some future date.”

Now, that sounds like something they’d do in Rome.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

As a historian I often think of myself as a modern Paul Drake to an unseen Perry Mason. Historical research is nothing more than detective work, digging up parts of the past that at one time were known by everyone. I don’t find anything new, I just discover the past. Trust me, it’s pretty cool!

That is magical. New York keeps demolishing itself, but the past finds a way to hang around.

must these things be moved/re-covered? i haven’t a station renovation plan at hand, so can’t tell if i should be yelling ‘philistines!’

I would have been sooooooooo impressed by this find, but since the economy is soooooooooooooo bad, I am in the doldrums and could care less about this “find.”

Hey, New York Times, how about making those photos accompanying the article ENLARGEABLE?!

Some of us want to see the details!

Why not write about what has become of all the lovely original tile work in the old South Ferry #1 station, which has apparently been left to deteriorate. Why couldn’t they incorporate any of that beautiful tile into the new station design?

#5 has it exactly right. OR THE THE IMAJES BIGGER.

Why not restore and make visible the entire old wall. If it stood for over a century, it should be in fine shape.

Why waste money covering it up?

Come on, MTA, do something right.

Awesome find, now if only the MTA will dig out the 76th St station for all us riders to use now that would be great, stop hiding it.

crush it; smash it; make it into flour…

As of today 11/18/2010 – the opening in the wall showing those 1901 mosaics has been covered over as the contractor will be tiling over that section as was originally planned.

So much for the “we are working on a design for a window in the wall so this treasure can be shared with the public at some future date”.