Prolegomena to Ethics

Front Cover
Clarendon Press, 2003 - Philosophy - 477 pages
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
This is a new edition of T. H. Green's Prolegomena to Ethics (1883), a classic of modern philosophy, in which Green sets out his perfectionist ethical theory. In addition to the text of the Prolegomena itself, this new edition provides an introductory essay, a bibliographical essay, and an index. Brink's extended editorial introduction examines the context, themes, and significance of Green's work and will be of special interest to readers working on the history of ethics, ethical theory, political philosophy, and nineteenth century philosophy.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Editors Introduction
xiii
CONTENTS
xix
Preface to the First Edition 1883
cxv
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MORAL IDEALCONTINUED
cxxxix
Use and necessity of the distinction between nature and spirit
54
CHAPTER II
63
And it is implicitly admitted that the perceiving consciousness is
70
and thus shows the existence of an eternal consciousness in man
75
But the development of our personality depends on society and
225
It does enjoin however at least all the particular duties in which
226
And though it is true that a man might think of his good
228
It implies the consciousness of self and others as persons
232
If we take its abstract expression in the formula suum cuique
243
This idea of justice and of a duty to man as man is at once a priori
249
determination of the content of the idea of good
254
But can the good which satisfies the self be a sum of pleasures?
260

Nor does the epithet free take away all meaning from the word
77
Illustration of this by the process of reading where a general
81
But does not this imply that man himself is in part a mere product
89
and that the appearance of the distinctively human consciousness
95
Thus the form in which it presents a good to itself is conditioned
102
The existence of action from such motives is far more certain than
103
But the Chief Good according to the theory is the greatest possible
104
To say that the motive is the outcome of circumstances
110
It is true that the act does necessarily proceed from the motive
116
For example the instinctive impulse to obtain food without
121
по Remorse and selfreformation are intelligible on this view which
122
II2 But the question itself implies that the questioner is not this but
125
And 3 the same action of selfconsciousness is farther implied
127
Or is it a real unity arising from the action of a single principle in
132
And in some cases there is a still more complete involution of desire
135
But human individuality is a consciousness of self which supervenes
139
And this is equally the case whether the adopted desire is good
141
then are we to reconcile this with the obvious difference of intellect
146
Not only is selfsatisfaction sought in ways known to involve
159
To refuse to call this identification desire would be arbitrary
162
But it is misleading to say that mere thought is not will or that will
168
The assumptions that it is that it is present to a divine
173
The Moral Ideal and Moral Progress
174
Hence we suppose it to be realised in nations or in the progress
184
On the ground according to Mill that men knowing both do prefer
185
It is only through it that certain desires on the reality of which
191
The circle is inevitable for in the account of an agent whose
195
175 As being such reproduction under limitations man is not merely
199
CHAPTER II
206
Progress of Humanity again can mean only progress of personal
212
And although this realisation would seem to imply a difference
218
Even if it were conceived as a succession of pleasures desire for
273
And this would be seen if the questions were considered
279
It may however be objected 1 that our definition of virtue does
289
The conception thence arising even if we confine our view
297
But it may be said the effect in this case is a new kind of action
300
For the dangers arising from inadequate theories and from
312
For such forms must be theoretically inadequate to spiritual
318
Thus though there cannot really be more than one duty in a given
324
In any case it can hardly be held that the selfdenying man obtains
327
It is an illusion to suppose that the desires of different men
333
Its prevalence may be ascribed apart from theoretical mistakes
337
Ideal virtue then being defined as selfdevoted activity to
339
The Application of Moral Philosophy to the Guidance
346
but as an illustration will show the difficulty of explaining
350
Indeed but for our imperfect knowledge we should see that in
352
Are we to suppose then that the Chief Good contemplated by
360
But if conscientiousness has thus an intrinsic value can we further
364
And this it is the creator of existing moral practice and in
370
The content of the obligation they assert is blended with
388
Such enlightenment however to be of practical value presupposes
396
At the same time the question may be raised whether this definition
402
But in reality while either theory may suffice for the ordinary cases
409
Again if it be maintained that a course of action if generally
415
A duty must be explained to mean ultimately an act pleasing
421
35I And this danger might become real if the Hedonistic criterion
428
Hence though the idea of human perfection cannot enable us
436
On the other hand the conception of the good as human perfection
445
But desirable when it is distinguished from desired seems to
451
appealed to
458
Translations
473
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2003)

T. H. Green (1836-1882) was White's Professor of Moral Philosophy, University of Oxford. David O. Brink is in the Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego.

Bibliographic information