LAB NOTES




 


PREVIOUS COLUMNS
 Does Dolly have old age on the lamb?
 Have we lost The Right Stuff?
 Blue moons for a distant Jupiter?




Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions

Asteroid collisions--how do they rate?


By Wil McCarthy

The Shroud of Turin--thought by some to be a divine artifact--draws its name from Torino, the west Italian city where the shroud has resided for the last 526 years. As of June 1999, the city has had another potential act of God to boast about: Catastrophic Asteroid Impact!

Following comet Shoemaker-Levy's spectacular 1994 run-in with the planet Jupiter, a rash of movies, TV shows and news reports have educated Earthlings about the perils of falling rock. Or ice, as the case may be. And indeed, the Earth is bombarded daily by some 400 tons of material, mainly dust, pebbles and snow from interplanetary space that drift across our orbit at just the right (or wrong) time.

Usually these "meteorites" burn up in the atmosphere, but a few of them reach the ground, where, being hot and heavy and bullet-fast, they occasionally destroy property. Death or injury by meteor is extremely rare--only about one out of every 100 million deaths occurs that way--but if a really large rock or snowball struck the Earth at an interplanetary velocity of 7-50 kilometers per second, we'd all have reason to fear. In fact, there are close calls of this sort all the time, such as KA2, the locomotive-sized asteroid that passed between the Earth and moon in 1993, and the more recent 1997XF11, which initially appeared to be on an encounter course with Earth in the year 2028, until better astronomical data showed that it wasn't.

And there are not-so-close calls, too, like the K-T impact, which is thought to have killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, and the Barringer impact that left a mile-wide crater in Arizona around 50,000 B.C., and the Tunguska event of 1908--this very century!--in which a suspected cometary impact flattened Siberian trees over an area of 22,000 square kilometers. Actually, it wasn't even a real impact: the comet vaporized in the atmosphere, releasing its energy in the form of a fiery shockwave. It's just our good fortune that the release took place in one of the remotest wilderness areas on Earth, 92 kilometers from the nearest village (where roofs and windows were nonetheless blown out).

Speed kills

Comets, as the Siberians learned, are generally more dangerous than asteroids, because they move a lot faster. Kinetic energy is measured by E=(1/2)mV2, meaning the energy (i.e, heat and shock) released by an impact increases linearly with the object's mass, but exponentially with its velocity. In other words, twice the mass means twice the damage, but twice the velocity means four times the damage. In astronomy, as in traffic, speed kills.

To be a threat to humans, a celestial object must first, obviously, have an orbit that intersects Earth's. Next, it needs either (a) enough mass to reach the ground intact and cause damage on impact, (b) enough kinetic energy to release a destructive burst of heat (i.e., an explosion) into the atmosphere, or (c) both of the above.

According to our best current estimates, there are at least 4,000 asteroids that fit this description, plus an unknown number of comets lurking far beyond the orbit of Neptune, in tall, skinny orbits that bring them sunward on a schedule measured in decades or centuries. Now, just because these orbits cross ours doesn't mean a collision is inevitable--by definition intersecting ellipses touch at only two points, and both the impactor and impactee would have to occupy one of those points at the same time. Synchronization is critical. But with that much junk flying around, major impacts do happen.

What does "major" mean?

But both the press and the public have rightly asked: What does "major" mean? When a new object is spotted that might or might not threaten Earth, how do we measure that threat in an easily understandable way? MIT astronomer Richard Binzel proposed a solution at the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in Torino this summer, where it was immediately adopted as the "Torino Scale."

Like the Richter scale for measuring the intensity of earthquakes, Torino is partly a measure of energy release. It includes an additional factor, though, crucial for assessing the immediacy of concern: probability of near-term impact. As orbits drift over millions of years, any Earth-crossing object could eventually sidle into collision position; as with weather, chaos theory prevents us from predicting these motions beyond a certain time horizon. What we want to know is, over the span of the decades when our calculations are accurate, what might and might not be dangerous?

The scale's highest rating, 10, indicates an object with a near 100 percent chance of causing a global climatic catastrophe, such as a mile-wide asteroid on a certain collision course. Such Torino 10 impacts, which occur every 100,000 to 1 million years, are a major driver of Earthly evolution (just ask the dinosaurs), but are unlikely to threaten our current civilization.

Regional devastation

Next down are the "red" ratings of 9 and 8, indicating certain impacts of varying severity. A 9 points to regional devastation of the Tunguska or Barringer variety, in which whole nations might easily be destroyed. This happens on Earth every 1,000-100,000 years. An 8 indicates a more localized destruction of the sort that occurs every 50-1,000 years, i.e., well within the time span of human society. It's probably here that we should find the greatest levels of international concern, as part of an overall disaster planning effort that encompasses major earthquakes, volcanos and other assorted "big ones."

In the "orange" zone, Torino ratings of 7, 6 and 5 describe close encounters with objects that have a sigificant chance of striking our planet. Again, the high number points to a global problem, the low to a local one. As such an encounter approached, astronomers' observations would presumably upgrade or downgrade the threat as orbit predictions improved.

The "yellow" zone, from 4-2, points to objects with a 1 percent or greater chance of collision within the next few decades, and the "green" rating of 1 indicates a nonzero but measurable chance of collision. The scale's lowest rating, a "zero" or "white," is applied to objects with either a negligible chance of hitting the Earth, or a kinetic energy too low to wreak significant havoc. Even with a 100% chance of collision, objects momentous enough to destroy a car or even a house are in the same everyday category as hail and avalanches--usually harmless, though occasionally fatal to an unlucky few.

The other class of Torino 0 objects are large, distant bodies whose orbits won't carry them close to Earth anytime soon. These, God love 'em, will spare 100 percent of us for as long as we care to predict. Interestingly, of the hundreds of Earth-crossing asteroids and comets astronomers have detected so far, all fall into this latter category. And with any luck, it'll stay that way for a good long while.


Wil McCarthy is a rocket guidance engineer, robot designer, science fiction author and occasional aquanaut. He has contributed to three interplanetary spacecraft, five communication and weather satellites, a line of landmine-clearing robots, and some other "really cool stuff" he can't tell us about. His short fiction has graced the pages of Analog, Asimov's, SF Age and other major markets, and his novel-length works include Aggressor Six, the New York Times Notable Bloom, and upcoming The Collapsium.




Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Classics
Anime | Sound Space | Site of the Week | Letters | Lab Notes


Copyright © 1998-2003, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.