Home Arguments iPhone App Recent Comments Translations Links Support SkS

Twitter RSS Posts RSS Posts RSS Posts RSS Posts

to support
Skeptical Science
iPhone app

Download 		Android app

Download
Nokia app

Download


It's the sun
Climate's changed before
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Ice age predicted in the 70s
We're heading into an ice age
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...


Username
Password
Keep me logged in
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Friday, 3 September, 2010

New presentation debunking Monckton's critique of IPCC predictions

Alden Griffith at Fool Me Once has released a new presentation, this one debunking Christopher Monckton's critique of the IPCC predictions of global warming. It's an in-depth critique where Alden directly compares the IPCC projections to observations and Monckton's graphs. He's also included  detailed notes and graphs beneath the video presentation (yes, I've already asked if I could use his notes as an Advanced Rebuttal so stay tuned for that). In the meantime, check out his fantastic presentation.

Posted by John Cook at 12:09 PM

Bookmark and Share Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 6:

  1. Superb analysis. According to the Climate Scoreboard we are headed toward +4 C by 2100.
  2. Alden is putting together some really great presentations here. I hope he keeps more of these coming.
  3. citizenschallenge at 04:24 AM on 4 September, 2010
    Ditto to that.
    Great educational video.
    Keep them coming!

    Since we are on the topic of Monckton I'd like to mention my layperson's critique of SPPI and their braintrust Chris Monckton. I'm reviewing aspects of Monckton's message that are beneath the dignity of serious scientists to pursue. Claims and issues that are nonetheless relevant to the struggle against the "AGW is a Hoax" industry. If you curious please visit:

    http://citizenschallenge.blogspot.com



    Peter M.
  4. factfinder... Can you direct us to where the greenhouse effect was disproved in 1909?
  5. citizenschallenge at 07:16 AM on 4 September, 2010
    factfinder while you're at it, how about a little detail on the following:

    "Physics is based on Experimental data - not "empirical evidence that > Has Been Shown To Be Caused By Dozens Of Other Causes."

    What other causes have shown the physics of GHG's to be false?
  6. "fact" finder - your comment about "fairy tales" is somewhat ironic. However, to have any sensible discussion here, perhaps you would outline what you think is a reasonable process for you to distinguish "fact" from "lie"? Then we might be able to help you sort out a few fictions.

Post a Comment

Political, off-topic or ad hominem comments will be deleted. Comments Policy...

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.
© Copyright 2010 John Cook Links | Translations | About Us | Contact Us