One million dollars — that’s the amount of punitive damages
that convicted bomber Brett Kimberlin is seeking from myself and
four other bloggers in a
lawsuit recently filed in Maryland. Kimberlin filed this
lawsuit pro se (charging “malicious prosecution,
conspiracy to abuse process, defamation, false light invasion of
privacy, harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
and stalking”) more than two weeks ago, but I haven’t written much
about this suit because I haven’t yet retained counsel.
The fact that Democrats and their liberal allies in the media
will not condemn Brett Kimberlin has angered me since May 2012,
when I first started covering the story (see my American
Spectator articles “Terror
by Any Other Name” and “Online
Armageddon”). Because Kimberlin once claimed to have sold
marijuana to Dan Quayle, he was celebrated by many liberals —
including Doonesbury cartoonist Gary Trudeau — as a
political prisoner of sorts. Liberals ignored the facts about the
crimes
of which Kimberlin was convicted in 1981 and sentenced to 50 years
in federal prison. He eventually served only 17 years of that
sentence, and since his release in 2001, Kimberlin has promoted
himself as a progressive, an “activist-musician” as the
Washington Post’s Monica Hesse called Kimberlin in a 2007
feature profile.
The true story of the “Speedway Bomber” who terrorized an Indiana
town, planting a bomb that blew off the leg of a Vietnam
veteran, evidently isn’t something the Washington Post
considers newsworthy. And neither has the Post shown any
interest in Kimberlin’s legal war against blogger Aaron Walker that
resulted in
Walker being briefly arrested last year and ordered by a Maryland
judge to stop writing about Kimberlin.
Words can scarcely express my contempt for the Washington
Post and its wretched dishonesty in this regard — but
hey, I felt obliged to try. My scorn for that filthy disgrace to
the profession of journalism is mentioned in Kimberlin’s lawsuit,
perhaps because as a
convicted perjurer, Kimberlin feels a deep affinity for the
kind of wretchedly dishonest people employed by the Washington
Post. A lawyer would probably advise that it wouldn’t behoove
me to say much more about the 1978 shooting of the grandmother of
a
young Indiana girl toward whom Brett Kimberlin reportedly
showed
“strange affection.” Since the Washington Post
has said nothing at all about
the unsolved murder of Julia Scyphers, however, I felt obliged
to mention it briefly.
The eminent California attorney Ken White, famed for his defense
of First Amendment rights, is
seeking Maryland lawyers to help represent myself and my
co-defendants, and shares his opinion on a key claim by
Kimberlin:
One of the problems with Kimberlin’s complaint about being
called a pedophile is that his detractors disclosed the factual
basis for using that epithet against him. Among other things, they
pointed out that (1) Kimberlin has said sexually creepy
things about teenaged girls; (2) Mark Singer’s book
about Kimberlin describes a relationship with an underaged
girl that some find inappropriate and suggestive
of pedophilia; (3) Kimberlin’s wife accused him of having sex
with her before she was 16, and in 2013 filed charges against him
on that basis, although prosecutors declined to prosecute the case
and she apparently later retracted and disavowed the
charges after the defendants wrote about them;
and (4) even accepting Kimberlin’s position that he did not have
sex with his wife before she was 16, by his own version of events
it appears that he met her in Russia before she was 16 when he was
in his 40s, she traveled to the United States, and they
married when she was 16 and he in his 40s.
You can and should read the whole thing.
RCV| 9.18.13 @ 12:41PM
When you do retain counsel, the first advice he or she is likely to give you is to stop writing about the case. You're only providing more ammunition for the plaintiff.
Albert Constantine Jr.| 9.18.13 @ 5:33PM
Of course, in most libel cases, the truth is a defense.