Matter - anti-matter galaxies, superclusters, and cosmology
electron = anti or opposite spin of positron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution
positron
= anti or opposite spin of electron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution
electron-positron annihilation
= The collision between galaxies of opposite spin (NGC 2207 and IC 2163)
1. The ether
consists of ether particles moving in all directions at velocity c [15].
2. An electron is
a vortex in the ether having a counter clockwise spin, with the rate of spin also having
a velocity of c and a translational velocity less than c. 3.
A positron is a vortex in the ether having a clockwise spin, with the rate of spin also
having a velocity of c and a translational velocity less than c. It is well known that electron-positron annihilation generally occurs with the production of two 511 kev gamma rays
(considered to be massless photons). For this, we will consider the electron to be analogous to a dust devil spinning counter clockwise in a dust storm (Fig. 1). Like a hurricane
in the northern hemisphere, it veers left. The positron is similar, but spins clockwise and veers right. Both the electron
and positron, of course, are considered to be matter. They have xyz dimensions, locations, and masses of about 1/1836 of the hydrogen atom. Because they veer toward each
other, two dust devils of opposite spin have a tendency to collide, demonstrating what
is normally thought of as “attraction.” They “annihilate” each
other, becoming indistinguishable parts of their environments. Electron-positron annihilation is similar, with the kinetic
energy calculated for the group of ether particles within the electron being ½mv2 . Similarly, the kinetic energy calculated for the group of ether particles within the positron is ½mv2 . Equal and opposite reactions according to Newton‟s Third Law result in the total energy change of mv2 . Because the velocity of the ether particles is c, the resulting increase in motion of the ether particles in the
environment is equivalent to E = mc2 . This produces
a “shock wave” within the ether that appears as an electromagnetic wave, a motion within the ether medium having
a frequency corresponding to 511 kev. Galaxies of opposite spin provide a visible model of the disruptive effect of the collision between two vortices (Fig. 2). This speculation satisfies two important claims: 1. E = mc2 2. CONSERVATION: Matter and the motion of matter neither can be created nor destroyed.
antimatter = opposite spin = corpor in ethe'ic solution in
opposite spin = Electron–positron
Electron–positron
annihilation occurs when an electron (e−) and a positron (e+, the electron's antiparticle) collide. The result of the
collision is the annihilation of the electron and positron, and the creation of gamma ray photons or, at higher energies,
other particles: e− + e+ → γ + γ [e- e+ annihilation, γ
energy] -
Zero (0) point energy is where the electromagnetic spectrum comes full circle (O), the beginning
and the ending:
10 = complete = 100% = 0 = ether [the zero point flux]
0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10
0-1-2-3-4-0-6-7-8-9-0
= Zero point energy at both ends of the spectrum and in the center of the vortex
The electromagnetic spectrum (beyond
Gamma Rays) known as the zero point spectrum.
-
The end result of antimatter meeting matter is a release of energy
proportional
to the mass as the mass-energy equivalence equation, E=mc2 shows.[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
-
Electron–positron annihilation occurs when an electron (e−) and a positron (e+, the electron's antiparticle)
collide.
-
Voidance = Vacuum = annihilation = collision = release of zero point energy as Gamma Rays and beyond
Voidance annihilation equation (formula):
- 33 (negative vortexya -) + 33 (positive vortexya +) = O (the concept of
zero, zero point energy, release of energy, Gamma Ray photons and beyond
-
Zero point energy is at the center,
the center of the vortex, where the highest compression is = highest frequency = shortest wavelength = Gamma Rays and beyond
= highest power
- The center is where the positive + and negative - vortex'ya (electromagnetism) meet,
collide, or voided = 0 = unified, is where the strong nuclear force meets the weak nuclear force, where gravitation meets
radiation. Minus-1-2-3-4-0-6-7-8-9+Plus (>------Vortex'ya--------<)
Fundamental Force
(>----Unified field-------<) Unification physics -
Walter
Russell said "for each solid is surrounded by a minus zero equal-and-opposite vacuity of the plus zero which we call
matter." -
OAHSPE'S BOOK OF COSMOGONY [1881] Chapter 8:
1. Let ether [the
zero point flux]*stand as one,..and matter [corpor] as four. To ether give
motion [power] one hundred, or ninety-nine
(as the case may be); to matter [corpor] give zero*,
*Zero point flux, flow, dynamic, power to produce motion = 99 or
100 %, corpor no power to produce motion.
- "The energy of the vacuum has been analyzed
and described by many researchers. Walter Russell reported to have found a means to harness this vacuum." http://www.rexresearch.com/russellcoil/russellcoil.htm -
---4-3-2-1-0+1+2+3+4 = Octave of energy
_________|--------
= center, nucleus, void, vacuum, highest compression, the zero point of creation, potent unseen, 99-100%
_________|-------- = zero point, infinitesimal, ethe'ic, subatomic, quantum, singularity, oneness, entanglement, EPR effect
-33 (negative) plus + 33 (positive) = zero, voidance equation
zero point energy = center of vortex = void = vacuum
= highest compression = highest energy = gamma rays and beyond = nucleur (nucleus) energy
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and
Prophecy Chapter II:
5. In the case of a vortex in etherea (that is after the manner of a whirlwind on the earth), the
corporeal solutions are propelled toward the centre thereof in greater density.
Greater density at the center of the
vortex = higher compression = higher frequency = shorter wavelength = gamma rays and beyond = atomic-nuclear radiation, release
of energy, E=mc^2, multiplication of power -
The positron or antielectron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the electron. The positron has an electric charge of +1e, a spin of ½, and has the same mass as an electron. When a low-energy positron collides with a low-energy electron, annihilation
occurs, resulting in the production of two or more gamma ray photons (see electron–positron annihilation).
In particle physics, antimatter is material composed of antiparticles, which have the same mass as particles of ordinary matter but have opposite charge and
quantum spin. Antiparticles bind with each other to form antimatter in the same way
that normal particles bind to form normal matter. For example, a positron (the antiparticle
of the electron, with symbol e+) and an antiproton (symbol p) can form an antihydrogen
atom. Furthermore, mixing matter and antimatter can lead to the annihilation of both,
in the same way that mixing antiparticles and particles does, thus giving rise to high-energy
photons (gamma rays) or other particle–antiparticle pairs. The end result of antimatter
meeting matter is a release of energy proportional to the mass as the mass-energy equivalence
equation, E=mc2 shows.[1]
NASA is...looking for X-ray
and gamma-ray signatures of annihilation events in colliding superclusters.[13]
Superclusters are large groups of smaller galaxy
groups and clusters and are among the largest known structures of the cosmos. The
existence of superclusters indicates that the galaxies in our Universe are not uniformly distributed; most of them are drawn
together in groups and clusters, with groups containing up to 50 galaxies and clusters up to several thousand galaxies. Those
groups and clusters and additional isolated galaxies in turn form even larger structures called superclusters. Local Supercluster, It contains the Local Group with our galaxy, the Milky Way. It also contains the Virgo Cluster
near its center, and is sometimes called the Virgo Supercluster. It is thought to contain over 47,000 galaxies.
There are about 50 galaxies in our Local Group (see list
of nearest galaxies for a complete list), of the order of 100,000 in our Local Supercluster and an estimated number of about
170 billion in all of the observable universe. The discovery of the nature of galaxies as
distinct from other nebulae (interstellar clouds) was made in the 1920s.
Galaxies were first discovered in the 1920s (1924). Oahspe
in 1881, 43 years earlier spoke about clusters of stars, millions of stars occupying one vortex (galaxy) with one center of
gravity (so-called).
gal·ax·y A system of millions or billions of stars, together with gas and dust, held together by gravitational attraction. Google Galaxy definition Oahspe Book of Cosmology
and Prophecy V: 23. In the case of double stars, and triplets, and so on, if conjoined, the
centre of gravitation (so-called) is not to each one, but to the intervening centre between them. The polarity of such a group
is as to the vortex. Think not, however, that double stars or triplets or quadruples are the limit of combinations in one
vortex. There are clusters of planets, hundreds of them, thousands, and even millions, that sometimes occupy one vortex. 24. As a globe can be annihilated, so can a vortex, and so can vortexya; for none of these are things of themselves
in fact, but combinations in some given place or condition; but the corpor of such expression of known forms and figures and
motions can not be annihilated.
Above Oahspe also talks
bout annihilation, matter (corpor) and energy cannot be destroyed, it is just broken down into energy and smaller pieces (particles). From Electron–positron annihilation you get gamma ray photons or other particles [corpor] Photon = zero rest mass. Electron > Photon
Subatomic
(corpor in ethe'ic solution) Quantum particle size:
Planck's
constant = 6.62606957 × 10-34 m2 kg / s
....electron
mass = 9.10938291 × 10-31 kilograms (rest mass)
Google’s
built-in calculator function
6.62606957 ×
10-34 = 32.2606957 (Planck's constant)
9.10938291 ×
10-31 = 60.0938291 (electron rest mass)
10 x (-34)
= -340 (Planck's constant)
10 x (-31) = -310 (electron
rest mass)
Planck's constant < electron rest
mass
An electron has a small mass, less than 0.1% the
mass of an atom. 100 divided by 0.1 = 1000 times smaller than an atom.
Electron–positron annihilation occurs when an electron (e−) and a positron (e+, the electron's antiparticle)
collide. The result of the collision is the annihilation of the electron and positron,
and the creation of gamma ray photons or, at higher energies, other particles: - In the 1960s, satellites
designed to detect nuclear bomb explosions on Earth picked up short bursts of gamma rays coming from random points in the
distant Universe. Since this discovery, the cause of gamma ray bursts (sometimes called GRBs) has
been debated. It is now thought that they occur when a black hole is formed by an extremely powerful type of supernova.
They may also occur when neutron stars collide. Gamma-ray bursts
(GRBs) are flashes of gamma rays associated with extremely energetic explosions that have been observed
in distant galaxies. They are the brightest electromagnetic events known to occur in the universe.
Bursts can last from ten milliseconds to several minutes. The initial burst is usually followed by a longer-lived
"afterglow" emitted at longer wavelengths (X-ray, ultraviolet, optical, infrared, microwave and radio). - Cosmic microwave background radiation could be the long lived
"afterglow" from the collision of galaxy Superclusters instead of the "Big Bang" theory. A supercluster
known as a filament, as it is long and thin, has run through an area with a high density of galaxies, causing many collisions.
It is still going and will cause further collisions. -
Most observed GRBs
are believed to consist of a narrow beam of intense radiation released during a supernova... GRBs were first detected in 1967 by the Vela satellites, a series of satellites designed to detect
covert nuclear weapons tests. ...subsequent studies of the galaxies and supernovae
associated with the bursts, clarified the distance and luminosity of GRBs. These facts definitively
placed them in distant galaxies and also connected long GRBs with the explosion of massive stars, the only
possible source for the energy outputs observed. Oahspe God's Book of Ben Plate - SHA'MAEL ...talks about the vortex of the red star bursts
(explosion), red star scattered and gone, and connects it with a great light (luminosity,
intense radiation) in the roadway of the firmament (sky).
NGC 2207 and IC 2163 are a pair of colliding spiral galaxies about 80
million light-years away[2] in the constellation Canis Major. Both galaxies were discovered by John Herschel in 1835.
So far four supernovae have been observed in NGC 2207 (SN 1975A, SN 1999ec, SN 2003H and SN 2013ai). NGC 2207 is
in the process of tidal stripping IC 2163.
This matter-energy conversion (E=mc2 = mc2=E) frequently takes the form of electron-positron annihilation.
Basically an electron and a positron (an anti-electron) are drawn together due to their opposite charges. When they inevitably
collide their material existence comes to an end and they are turned into gamma ray photons. In
an opposite process, two gamma ray photons can be converted into an electron-positron pair, bringing forth matter from whence
none existed. Evidence for these interactions is visible in bubble chamber experiments, such as shown above.
Here we see electrons and positrons produced simultaneously from individual
gamma rays within a bubble chamber. The particles curl in opposite directions due to an applied magnetic field. The gamma
rays don’t leave tracks in the chamber because they have no electric charge. This is
certainly amazing. Somehow the hard and heavy substance of matter converts into seemingly massless, sinusoidal electric fields,
i.e. light waves, and vice-versa.
The sub-atomic particles curl in opposite directions = galaxies
of opposite spin (NGC 2207 and IC 2163) electron = anti or opposite spin of positron (axial,
orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution = matter positron = anti or opposite spin of electron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic
solution = anti-matter
electron-positron collision
= corpor in ethe'ic solution x axial and orbitic velocity = particle accelerator = m x a = mc2 = Energy = Vortexya = matter-energy conversion (E=mc2) gamma ray photons
converted into an electron-positron pair = matter formation = vortex'ya force = compression = bringing together = creation
= mass = gravitation electron-positron pair converted into gamma ray photons = energy formation = liberated vortex'ya
= taking apart = uncreation = destruction = collision = explosion = fire = radiation --- Planet-star-galaxy mergers evolve to globular
or elliptical form - - Oahspe
Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 3:
22. ...But were the earth's vortex to be swallowed in the vortex of
another planet, then the earth would be precipitated as a globe to such planet. Such is the case as regardeth
double stars, and triplets and quadruplets, especially where they are in contact...
23. In the case of double
stars, and triplets, and so on, if conjoined, the centre of gravitation (so-called) is not to each one, but to the intervening
centre between them....
There are clusters of planets, hundreds of them, thousands, and even millions,
that sometimes occupy one vortex [a galaxy].
25. Though the general form of a vortex, as before stated, in its
beginning is long, funnel-shaped (like a whirlwind), its ultimate is toward a globular form. And though the current of a vortex
is spiral, at first, its currents ultimate toward less spirality. - precipitated
1.Cause (an event or situation,
typically a bad one) to happen suddenly, unexpectedly, or prematurely.
2.Cause to move suddenly and with force: "suddenly
the ladder broke, precipitating them down into a heap".
Google precipitated definition
-
Oahspe's use
of the word "precipitated" matches NASA's word "collide" and "disruption", and Oahspe's use
of the
word "conjoined" matches NASA's word "merge". Oahspe's use of the phrase "its ultimate
is toward a globular form"
matches NASA's use of the phrase "evolve into a giant elliptical galaxy". - Above Oahspe
states that when Planets-stars-galaxies collide or merge (swallowed in the vortex), they evolve to globular or elliptical
form (from spiral to globular or ellipitical). - Galaxy Collisions
Background Information:
Back in the mid-1970s it was
becoming obvious that peculiar galaxies that did not fit into the usual classifications could be explained by knowledge of
tidal interactions. We now know that galaxies can, and usually do experience many collisions or tidal interactions over the
course of their existence, which are strong enough to profoundly impact their structure and speed up their evolutionary processes.
The term "tidal interaction"..."tidal gravity forces".
http://www.oglethorpe.edu/faculty/~m_rulison/astronomy/group/fall%2099/galaxy_collisions.htm - Scientist didn't discover that spiral galaxies collide, merge and evolve into elliptical (globular)
galaxies untill after the mid-1970s. Oahspe (in 1881) more than 92 years BEFORE had this same information. Nasa uses the termes
"tidal interaction" and "tidal gravity forces" and Oahspe uses the term "vortexian tide" - Oahspe
Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 11:9
Outward spiral waves from a spinning vortex produce a push force that cause the observed so-called expansion
and acceleration of the universe. -
Astronomical Sources of Microwave Radiation
Active
galaxies (AGN), powered by supermassive black holes at their cores, produce microwave radiation, and are some of the strongest
emitters. Additionally, these black hole engines will create massive jets and lobes that glow brightly in the microwave. These
lobes can sometimes be larger than the entire galaxy.
-
Similarly, the center of our own Milky Way Galaxy is a source
of microwave radiation. Likely this is linked to the theorized supermassive black hole at our galaxy's core. While ours is
not an Active Galaxy, the center is still quite a dynamic place.
-
Pulsars (rotating neutron stars) are also strong
sources of microwave radiation. These powerful, compact objects are second only to black holes in terms of ultimate density.
With powerful magnetic fields and fast rotation rates broad spectrum radiation is produced, with the microwave emission being
particularly strong.
-
When a microwave telescope is pointed in nearly all directions a faint microwave glow is
apparent. This is known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).
-
The CMB is uniform across the entire observable
Universe (with error). Discovered in 1964 by radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, a discovery for which they
won the Nobel Prize in 1978
http://space.about.com/od/astronomydictionary/g/Microwave-Radiation.htm-
New Cosmology.
Vortex Theory against the Big-Bang Theory. Rotating galaxies produce radiation (radio and microwaves).
-
The cosmic microwave background radiation
is the radiation that has been produced by billions of galaxies spread throughout the universe that has ever existed.
-
There are so many spiral shaped galaxies all over the universe.
-
Spinning galaxies produce outward spiral waves,
that produce a push force that causes the observed so-called expansion and acceleration of the universe.
The vortex property
of galaxies produce outward spiral waves (propagating away from it).
-
The spiral waves push against other galaxies
causing a repulsion, expansion of distance between the galaxies. The only exception to this spiral repulsion is when the galaxies
are bound by the same vortex (master vortex).
-
Galactic vortex spiral waves are the cause for the red-shift of
galaxies. Red-shift or expansion is created by the ethe'ic waves produced by the spinning spiral galaxies. Check out: The theory on the website above is very similar to the theory I recieved from thought and inspiration
independently of the above site. -
How galaxies and stars (worlds) are created:
OAHSPE:
Book of Thor CHAPTER IV:
12...Amidst the ethe'ic waves, the ethereans gather up the atomic elements floating therein,
and, giving them axic motion, propelling them forth, aggregating the while, till, from a mite, it groweth as large as the
whole earth [or star, or galaxy].
Oahspe - Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II:
1. THERE are two known things
in the universe: ethe and corpor. The former is the solvent of the latter.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSOGONY CH. III:12 says "vortexya,
in fact, is no substance or thing as such; but is the vortex in axial and ORBITIC MOTION, or, in other words, corpor in an
etheic solution. 13....When a portion of this solution is given a rotary motion it is called a vortex.
Oahspe Book of
Cosmology and Prophecy Chapter II:
5. In the case of a vortex in etherea (that is after the manner of a whirlwind on
the earth), the corporeal solutions are propelled toward the centre thereof in greater density.
6. When it is sufficiently
dense ...it is called ...a planet [star, or galaxy].
New Theory = Vortex star formation = galaxy formation
New Theory
Shows How ‘Zombie Vortices’ Play a Role in Star Formation
August 21, 2013
UC Berkeley researchers have
developed a model that shows how vortices help destabilize the disk so that gas can spiral inward toward a forming star.
http://scitechdaily.com/new-theory-shows-how-zombie-vortices-play-a-role-in-star-formation/ OAHSPE
Book of Jehovih CHAPTER 3: 4. By the power
of rotation, swift driving at the periphery, I condense the atmospherean worlds that float in the
firmament; and these become My corporeal worlds. In the midst of the vortices I made them, and by
the power of the vortices I turn them on their axes, and carry them in the orbits I allotted to them. 6. For each and every corporeal world I created a vortex
first, and by its rotation and from the places in the firmament where it traveled, I caused
the vortex to conceive the corporeal world. 7. To make the sun
I created a great vortex, and within this vortex and subject to it, I made the vortices of many of the corporeal
worlds. The sun vortex I caused to rotate, and I gave it power to carry other vortices within it. According to their density
and position, they are thus carried forth and around the sun.
Vortex creation of the stars, galaxies and universe vs. the "Big Bang" theory. Interesting to note here is the fact that there is no physical mechanism in the
near-vacuum of outer space to compress gas into a ball. A cloud of hydrogen gas must be compressed to a small enough size
so that gravity can dominate it. For example, our own sun is a stable sphere of gas. But what force could initially press
it into a ball? Scientists have no answer. Experiments indicate that it would be next to impossible for floating gas molecules
out in space to clump together. There is nothing to compress it. How could the stars evolve from floating gasses? Gravity
is not a sufficient mechanism to do this. In outer space, the gas is millions of times more expansive than the critical compressed
size needed for gravity to hold it as a stable star. Because of this, outward gas pressures cause these clouds to keep spreading
outward! They do not pull together, but instead gradually move outward. In spite of all the starry theories of the evolutionists,
the fact remains that gas in outer space always has a density so rarified that it is far less than the emptiest atmospheric
vacuum bottle in any laboratory in the world! How could such rarified hydrogen "push itself" into planets and stars?
How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids] get there?
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II: 12. But nowhere in etherea is there
a solution of corpor sufficient to put itself in motion; nor sufficient to condense itself; nor to provide the road of its
travel.
"Few cosmologists [theorists about the origin of matter
and the universe] today would dispute the view that our expanding universe began with a bang—a big hot bang—about
18 billion years ago. Paradoxically, no cosmologist could now tell you how the Big Bang ultimately gave rise to galaxies,
stars, and other cosmic lumps.
"As one sky
scientist, IBM's Philip E. Seiden, put it, 'The Standard Big Bang model does not give rise to lumpiness. That model assumes
the universe started out as a globally smooth, homogeneous expanding gas. If you apply the laws of physics to this model,
you get a universe that is uniform, a cosmic vastness of evenly distributed atoms with no organization of any kind . .
"How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids]
get there? No one can say, at least not yet and perhaps not ever." —*Ben Patrusky, "Why is the Cosmos Lumpy?"
in Science 81, June 1981, p. 96. I believe Oahspe's "etheic solution in rotary
motion" or vortex is the cause of compressing inter-stellar gas into a ball that creates stars and planets.
John Bell, interviewed by Paul Davies in "The Ghost in the Atom"
has suggested that an aether theory might help resolve the EPR paradox by allowing a reference frame in which signals go faster
than light. He suggests Lorentz contraction is perfectly coherent, not inconsistent with relativity, and could produce an
aether theory perfectly consistent with the Michelson-Morley experiment. Bell suggests the aether was wrongly rejected on
purely philosophical grounds: "what is unobservable does not exist" [p.49]. Einstein found the non-aether theory
simpler and more elegant, but Bell suggests that doesn't rule it out. Besides the arguments based on his interpretation of
quantum mechanics, Bell also suggests resurrecting the aether because it is a useful pedagogical device. That is, many problems
are solved more easily by imagining the existence of an aether.
Quantum mechanics can be used to describe spacetime as being "bitty" at extremely small scales, fluctuating
and generating particle pairs that appear and disappear incredibly quickly. Instead of being "smooth", the vacuum
is described as looking like "quantum foam". It has been suggested that this seething mass of virtual particles
may be the equivalent in modern physics of a particulate aether.
Dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical aether. Modern physics is full
of concepts such as free space, spin foam, Planck particles, quantum wave state (QWS), zero-point energy, quantum foam, and
vacuum energy. - The 19th century had the ether, the 20th
century had the quantum wave state, quantum foam and the EPR Effect (inseparabilty). ---------------- The Big Bang theory is based on redshift, what if scientists interpretation of redshift is wrong? Redshift of stars and universe expansion, The Big Bang theory Does redshift have
to do with age or length of time not speed of expansion? - Redshift
is NOT due to age
You have heard that distant galaxies do appear to be more 'blue in color' than nearby galaxies, and
this is the case, but this is not related to any blueshift, but rather due to the fact that distant galaxies, because one
is looking back in time to see them at great distances, are younger (a galaxy at a distance of 5 billion light years has stars
on average 5 billion years younger than the stars in nearby galaxies). Light from young galaxies is dominated by hot, blue
stars, much younger than yellow and red stars such as our own sun. Thus the distant galaxies appear blue, even as their light
is redshifted.
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/questions/blueshift.html -
In physics (especially astrophysics), redshift happens when
light seen coming from an object that is moving away is proportionally increased in wavelength, or shifted to the red end
of the spectrum. Cosmological redshift is seen due to the expansion of the universe,
and sufficiently distant light sources (generally more than a few million light years away) show redshift corresponding to
the rate of increase of their distance from Earth. Conversely, a decrease in wavelength is
called blueshift and is generally seen when a light-emitting object moves toward an observer The
most distant objects exhibit larger redshifts corresponding to the Hubble flow of the universe. The largest observed redshift,
corresponding to the greatest distance and furthest back in time, - BLUE SHIFTED GALAXIES There are more almost 7000 blue-shifted galaxies listed in the NED1 web site. Being blue-shifted means that they
are approaching the earth CONCLUSION In the last two year
almost 200 blue-shifted galaxies have been added to the NED web site—most likely credit to the Hubble telescope. The
pattern that they form in the sky seems to be a useful tool to explore our universe. 1 This
research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. comment: When I said Dynamic Universe Model explains the existence of Blue shifted Galaxies, people laughed at me, How can
this phenomenon be explained in a purely expanding Universe model….? -
DYNAMIC UNIVERSE MODEL 32%
are Blue shifted Galaxies - There are two key pieces of evidence for Big Bang theory. These
are red shift and the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation. - Astronomers estimate that their are billions and billions of galaxies
in the observable universe (as well as some seven trillion dwarf galaxies) . Here's how astronomers breakout the visible
universe within 14 billion light years: Superclusters in the visible universe = 10 million
Galaxy groups in the visible universe = 25 billion
Large galaxies in the visible universe = 350 billion
Dwarf galaxies in the visible universe = 7 trillion
Stars in the visible universe = 30 billion trillion (3x10²²)
Astronomers realized this past year that they may have underestimated the
number of galaxies in some parts of the universe by as much as 90 percent, according to a study in 2011 by Matthew Hayes of
the University of Geneva's observatory, who led the investigation using the world's most advanced optical instrument -- Europe's
Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, which has four 8.2-meter (26.65-feet) behemoths. They turned two of the giants towards
a well-studied area of deep space called the GOODS-South field. In the case of very distant,
old galaxies, the telltale light may not reach Earth as it is blocked by interstellar clouds of dust and gas -- and, as a
result, these galaxies are missed by the map-makers. "Astronomers always knew they were
missing some fraction of the galaxies... but for the first time we now have a measurement. The number of missed galaxies is
substantial," said Matthew Hayes of the University of Geneva's observatory, who led the investigation. Comments: So this mysterious cosmic fog just turned out to be distant, blurry galaxies.
This is not surprising. Perhaps next we will find that the microwave background radiation is just more blurred and distant
galaxies. It either goes on forever and ever, or there is eventually a Truman Show-wall at some point. The galaxies actions & performances look the same between early Universe and current Universe. For that large
number of galaxies, this is a strong indication that there is no early Universe at all. This situation gives sign that the
Universe model is closer to "Cloud & rain model" rather than "The Big Bang theory." - The Galactic Background Radiation The
ever-present sound of our galaxy ...the ever-present galactic background radio noise.
It can always be heard but not always at the same strength. The discovery of the origin of this background noise is usually
marked as the birth of radio astronomy. the Milky Way appears to us as a fuzzy band
of light arching across the sky... - A European space observatory has discovered something peculiar
about our galaxy: it’s humming in microwaves and, for the moment, the source of the radiation is a complete mystery. The Planck space observatory was launched in 2009 to analyze small fluctuations in the ubiquitous cosmic microwave
background (CMB) — complementing data gathered by NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe. To understand the
structure of the CMB is to open a window on the conditions immediately after the Big Bang. This extremely faint radiation
is the ancient “echo” of the creation of the Universe over 14 billion years ago. - Cosmic microwave background radiation could be the long lived
"afterglow" from the collision of galaxy Superclusters instead of the "Big Bang" theory. A supercluster known as a filament, as it is long and thin, has run through an area
with a high density of galaxies, causing many collisions. It is still going and will cause further collisions. - If scientists interpretation of redshift is wrong, and scientists
interpretation of the COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION (CMBR) is wrong, and the Big Bang theory is largley based on redshift
and the CMBR, then perhaps there was no big bang and the Universe has always existed. The ALL MOTION was His speech. Oahspe Book of Jehovih: Chapter I: 1. ALL was. ALL is. ALL ever shall be. The ALL spake, and Motion was, and is, and ever shall be;...The ALL MOTION
was His speech. [In the begining was the word (Motion) and the word was with God (the
Creator), and the word (Vortex Motion) was God (the Creative Ethe'ic Force) John 1:1 the Bible. http://biblehub.com/john/1-1.htm. The Creator is the unmoving mover, that created all motion (the whole universe is in motion)] 4.
By virtue of My presence all things are. By virtue of My presence is life. By virtue of My presence are the living brought
forth into life. I am the QUICKENER, the MOVER, the CREATOR, the DESTROYER. I am FIRST and LAST. Another
big difference between Oahspe and the Bible is the drawings in Oahspe, the Bible has no drawings or artwork from it's authors.
Oahspe has drawings and artwork of things man did not and could not have known in 1881. 
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Above image on the right, Oahspe plate Illustrations of corporeal worlds
number 4 titled SHAPE OF OUR UNIVERSE, showing spheroidal disk shape of our universe (galaxy) and the
position of the sun about 1/3 or 1/4 distance from the center as drawn by John Ballou Newbrough in 1881. Another name
for a galaxy is an island universe. At the time in 1881 man did not know the size of the galaxy, and man thought the Sun
was in the center of the universe. Newbrough got the size (relative to the sun), shape, and position of our sun (25% distance
away from center) correct in his drawing of our island universe (galaxy). You can even see parts of the spiral arms of
our Milky Way galaxy in Newbrough's drawing (along the outer parts of the disk shape).  The shape of the Milky Way as deduced from star counts
by William Herschel in 1785; the solar system was assumed to be near the center. The first
attempt to describe the shape of the Milky Way and the position of the Sun in it was carried out by William Herschel in 1785 by carefully counting the number of stars in different regions of the sky. He produced a diagram of the shape of
the galaxy with the solar system close to the center.[27] Using a refined approach, Kapteyn in 1920 arrived at the picture of a small (diameter about 15 kiloparsecs) ellipsoid galaxy with the Sun close to the
center...In 1755, Immanuel Kant introduced the term "island Universe" for these
.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy island universe
Web definitions
A galaxy is a massive, gravitationally bound system
that consists of stars and stellar remnants, an interstellar medium of gas and dust,...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_universe How did scientists determine our location within the Milky Way galaxy? "The position of the sun in the Milky Way can be further pinned down by measuring the distance to all the stars
we can see. In the late 18th century, astronomer William Herschel tried to do this, concluding that the earth was in the center
of a 'grindstone'-shaped cloud of stars. But Herschel was not aware of the presence of small particles of interstellar dust,
which obscure the light from the most distant stars in the Milky Way. We appeared to be in the center of the cloud because
we could see no further in all directions. To a person tied to a tree in a foggy forest, it looks like the forest stretches
equally away in all directions, wherever one is. "A major breakthrough in moving the earth
from the center of the galaxy to a point about 3/5 away from the edge came in the early decades of this century, when Harlow
Shapley measured the distance to the large clusters of stars called globular clusters. He found they were distributed in a
spherical distribution about 100,000 light-years in diameter, centered on a location in the constellation Sagittarius. Shapley
concluded (and other astronomers have since verified) that the center of the distribution of globular clusters is the center
of the Milky Way as well, so our galaxy looks like a flat disk of stars embedded in a spherical cloud, or 'halo,' of globular
clusters. "In the past 75 years, astronomers have refined this picture, using a variety
of techniques of radio, optical, infrared and even x-ray astronomy, to fill in the details: the location of spiral arms, clouds
of gas and dust, concentrations of moleculesand so on. The essential modern picture is that our solar system is located on
the inner edge of a spiral arm, about 25,000 light-years from the center of the galaxy, which is in the direction of the constellation
of Sagittarius. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-did-scientists-determ Even in the early twentieth century, the prevailing view was that our Sun was
the center of not only the Galaxy, but also of the universe. ...before the early part of the twentieth
century, astronomers had a markedly different view of the stellar system we inhabit...Like the Copernican revolution before
them, the twin ideas--that the Sun is not at the center of the Galaxy and that the Galaxy is not the center of the universe--required
both time and hard observational evidence before they gained widespread acceptance. Harlow
Shapley (November 2, 1885 – October 20, 1972) was an American astronomer. He is notable for his groundbreaking 1918 work using Cepheid variables to estimate the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the sun's position within it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlow_Shapley It wasn't untill 1918 that astronomers discovered that our Sun was not at the center
of the Galaxy, but Oahspe contained this knowledge 37 YEARS BEFORE in 1881 in a drawing done by John Ballou Newbrough under
the direct inspiration from the higher heavens. Oahspe also got the shape of our galaxy right, a disk shape instead of barred,
elliptical, or irregular shape like many other galaxies. http://www.sacred-texts.com/oah/oah/oah401.htm#img_pl60 For centuries, astronomers asked many basic questions about the Milky Way. What is
it? What is it made of? What is it shaped like? These questions were difficult to answer for several reasons. - We live inside the Milky Way. It's like living inside a gigantic box and asking, what is the box shaped like?
What is it made of? How do you know?
- Early astronomers were limited by technology.
The early telescopes weren't very large, didn't have much range and couldn't magnify great distances or resolve them.
- Early telescopes could detect only visible light. The Milky Way contains a lot of dust that obstructed their
views. In some directions, looking at the Milky Way is like looking through a dust storm.
The 20th century brought great advancements in telescope technology. Large optical, radio,
infrared, and X-ray telescopes (both ground-based and orbiting space telescopes) allowed astronomers to peer through the
vast quantities of dust and far into space. With these tools, they could piece together what the Milky Way actually looks
like. What they discovered was amazing: - The
Milky Way is actually a galaxy -- a large system of stars, gas (mostly hydrogen), dust and dark matter that orbits a common center and is bound together by gravity.
- Our galaxy is spiral-shaped.[disk]
- Contrary
to popular belief, our solar system is not at the center of the galaxy.
- The Milky Way
is but one of billions of galaxies in the universe.
- http://science.howstuffworks.com/milky-way.htm
 
|
