Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


READY TO DEFEND: Oath Keepers speak out at inaugural conference

Group appeals to current, former police, military members to uphold Constitution
















No amount of controversy will keep Oath Keepers from educating people about what it means to support and defend the Constitution.

That was the message Saturday during the kickoff of the group's inaugural national conference, a two-day event that comes at a time when Oath Keepers is experiencing a surge in membership and notoriety.


Most Popular Stories
  • READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States
  • NORM: Wynn to scalpers: Oh no you don't
  • NORM: Regis and Kelly taping at Encore
  • POLICEMEN'S DEATHS: Sheriff says crash that killed officer was preventable
  • Man killed, woman injured in shooting near Sahara and Nellis
  • THREE DEAD: Bodies found in home
  • READY TO DEFEND: Oath Keepers speak out at inaugural conference
  • THREE ARRESTED: Shooting followed gang rules
  • U2 fans get 360 degrees of rock
  • Three were on a 'mission' that ended with an early Sunday morning slaying




  • Started earlier this year by Las Vegas resident Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers is a nonprofit organization made up primarily of current and former police and military personnel who renew their oaths to the Constitution.

    Rhodes, a former Army paratrooper and Yale University Law School graduate, opened the conference at Texas Station with a warning that Washington politicians cannot be trusted to uphold their oaths to the Constitution.

    "That's why we have a civic duty to keep our oaths," Rhodes told about a hundred fellow Oath Keepers in the hotel ballroom.

    Less pep rally than American history seminar, the first day of the conference focused in great part on the history and structure of the Constitution. Most of the day's sessions were open to the public.

    Navy Cmdr. David Gillie, a board member of Oath Keepers and the group's national Navy liaison, conducted a public oath ceremony Saturday afternoon.

    "This group stands for things that have needed to be said for a long time," Gillie said in an interview with the Review-Journal. "It's about fidelity to our oaths."

    In a nearly two-hour speech, Rhodes implored members to fight labels that critics, most notably the Southern Poverty Law Center, have put on the group.

    Rhodes, 44, said Oath Keepers isn't about the political left or political right, but rather about a commitment to honor the Bill of Rights.

    Oath Keepers has a "Declaration of Orders We Will Not Obey." The directives to disobey include unlawfully disarming Americans or forcing them into detention camps, conducting warrantless searches, or imposing martial law.

    By honoring the Constitution, Rhodes said, the United States will never become Nazi Germany or again allow abuses like the detention of Americans of Japanese descent during World War II.

    The group has close to 2,000 dues-paying members, twice the number it had last week, said Dave Freeman, a board member and the group's national peace officer liaison.

    Oath Keepers has heard from thousands more who have expressed interest in becoming members, Freeman said.

    A Review-Journal profile of Oath Keepers last week helped thrust Rhodes into the national media spotlight.

    Appearing on the MSNBC show "Hardball," Rhodes was questioned by host Chris Matthews about his "vigilante group" and on his "strange view of the world."

    Matthews talked about a recent Southern Poverty Law Center report that identified Oath Keepers as a "particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival," a movement the law center said could carry out acts of anti-government and racist violence.

    Lou Dobbs of CNN had a different opinion of Oath Keepers. On his radio show, Dobbs praised Rhodes for efforts that should bring "solace and comfort" to everyone.

    Both Dobbs and Rhodes accused the Southern Poverty Law Center of perpetuating the same kind of intolerance it claims to condemn.

    Rhodes said during his Saturday speech that he is offended by any suggestion that "anti-illegal immigration, pro-gun, and pro-Constitution" groups are dangerous extremists.

    "I have grave fears about the encroachment of federal powers over states and individuals," said Elias Alias, head of the group's Montana chapter.

    At its core, Oath Keepers stands for the importance of military and law enforcement oaths, said P. Jeffrey Black, a member of Oath Keepers' board of directors and its national federal law enforcement liaison.

    "My oath to the Constitution is to provide protection and welfare for the citizens of this country," said Black, a federal air marshal who has filed numerous whistle-blower complaints against the Transportation Security Administration. "I think all law enforcement officers should be reminded of the true meaning of the oath they took, and their responsibilities to uphold that oath."

    Contact reporter Alan Maimon at amaimon @reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0404.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 171 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    think twice wrote on October 27, 2009 01:15 PM: Brandon, like so many oath keepers in the last 2,150 responses, you immediately patronize and generalize, "...I'm sure you see what you want to see" and "from a non-informed progressive liberal who understands absolutely nothing about our constitution..."
    How do you know Angry@ is not a Constitutional attorney? How can you assume ANY knowledge of him based solely on his observation?

    If your members want to be taken seriously for anything but the gun-power so many of them brag about on these blogs, you will be required to rationally address the objections of non-member readers, or take your place in the line-up of right-wing-nut orgs that have destroyed all vestiges of credibility in the conservative movement.

    On the YT clip, Rhodes states:

    "They call you an Extremist. So what they're calling you is a terrorist. They're saying 'You're the equivalent of Timothy McVeigh."

    Talk about a stretch...This inflammatory rhetoric is the hallmark of the org.

    Fringe lunatics though some may believe them to be, a Caution to all who underestimate these people; their numbers are not accurately reflected at this event.

    Here is the best indicator of what these people intend for those who disagree with them, taken directly from their site:
    http://oathkeeperswatch.blogspot.com/
    22. The problem is, we can’t just kill them in the streets.
    Nor can we try them for treason and summarily execute them.
    But we CAN make their worthless lives miserable, by having a
    few of us at their heels at all times. Surveillance of their homes
    and offices, tracking their movements, greeting their public
    appearances with non-violent protests.
    Active Law enforcement and Military who are members are too smart to have appeared at this event.

    @ leftandsmart, I hope you're ready. We'll need you....


    Brandon wrote on October 27, 2009 11:46 AM: I love it. First off I'm not sure what video you watched but there was a person of color in the video, front and center. Hopefully that makes you feel better. I'm sure you saw what you wanted to see rather than what was actually there. Not that I would expect anything different from a non-informed progressive liberal who understands absolutely nothing about what our constitution represents and proceeds to knock the people who swear to uphold it.


    Angry@Imbeciles wrote on October 27, 2009 10:34 AM: Just watched the video of these clowns at Texas Station. Not a person of color in the entire thing.

    Lot of unemployed, angry white men crying like little girls that a black man is President. Cry little girls cry.

    By the way you dorks. The short hair guys with the ZZtop beards are SKIN HEAD RACISTS! Fools!


    indethink wrote on October 27, 2009 08:30 AM: perry, it matters very much who is in office, because the political party holding power gets to decide which issues are discussed and voted on in committees.

    That's how Republicans stifled Democrats' efforts at improving domestic issues (infrastructure, regulation, education, health care, etc) for the first half of this decade.


    perry wrote on October 27, 2009 04:59 AM: it doesn't matter whos in office all of the are corrupt as long there is there money to make


    crazy or what? wrote on October 26, 2009 04:47 PM: mad wrote on October 25, 2009 09:43 AM: THe Constitution was not written to reflect a Republican/Democrat paradigm. I didn't read in the article that these men suppport or condemn Obama or Bush. They seem to recognize a building threat more powrful than a political party or president.

    And most here are forgetting just the other day; Obama declares a National emergency over the swine flu. What was that Presidential Order signed by Bush; in a National emergency, the President can declare Martial Law with NO say so needed from Congress.

    I wonder how many people are going to remember calling other people “nut jobs” or “wing nuts”, if they are forced at the end of a gun to line up and get a vaccine or carted off to a special camp for the sick.


    steve wrote on October 26, 2009 01:23 PM: WOW, IT SURE WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE IF ALL THE CONCERN WE ARE SEEING NOW WAS AROUND DURING THE LAST EIGHT YEARS BUT I GUESS TOO MANY PEOPLE GOT THIER NEWS FROM RUSH AND FOX AND WERE TOLD HOW WONDERFUL THE REPUBLICANS WERE. REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS ARE TOO CONCERNED ABOUT THIER CORPORATE SPONSORS RATHER THAN THOSE WHO ELECT THEM TO OFFICE AND THAT HAS COME TO PASS BECAUSE WE THE PUBLIC ALLOWED IT. INSTEAD OF ELECTING PEOPLE WHO ARE HONEST AND HARD WORKING WE ELECT THE ONE'S WHO HAVE THE LOUDEST MOUTH AND NO BRAINS AND WHEN WE GET PEOPLE WHO SEEM TO BE IF SOME INTELLIGENCE SOME OF US WHO ARE JUST PLANE STUPID WANT TO CALL THEM SOCIALIST OR MARXIST AND HAVE NOT A CLUE WHAT IT MEANS ,ONLY THAT SOME IDIOT ON A TALK SHOW SAID IT SO IT MUST BE SO. THIS COUNTRY HAS BEEN DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND BY POLITICIANS WHO CARE ONLY ABOUT THEMSELVES, THEY HAVE ALLOWED JOBS TO MOVE OFF SHORE, THEY HAVE AIDED THE BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES BY ALLOWING THEM UNABATED ACCESS TO MARKETS SO THAT THEY ARE ABLE TO PRICE AND FEE US TO DEATH, MEAN WHILE OUR INFRASTRUCTURE IS SHOT TO HELL, WE SHOULD HAVE BETTER ROADS AND RAIL TRANSPORTATION BY NOW NOT TO MENTION BETTER EDUCATION BUT NO, WHAT WE HAVE BECOME IS A NATION THAT IS ALMOST 3RD WORLD BECAUSE WE LET A BUNCH OF RADIO AND TV HACKS TELL WHO WE SHOULD BE CALLING NAMES AND SO CALLED NEWS ORGANIZATIONS PROMOTING DISCOURSE AND LIES RATHER THEN PUTTING THE POLS ON THE HOT SEAT. YEP I THINK WE'VE GOT JUST WHAT WE DESERVE AND NOW WE HAVE A BUNCH OF IDIOTS TRYING TO TELL US WHAT WE SHOULD THINK AND IF YOU DON'T AGREE YOU'RE A COMMUNIST.


    SamT wrote on October 26, 2009 12:06 PM: @Flush: By "smacked," do you mean assault with battery, or mere assualt?


    Joe C wrote on October 26, 2009 11:16 AM: To think twice,

    My suggestion if our elected leaders do the job they were elected to do and not become corrupted by their position and enrich friends or those wealthy responsible for helping them win election.
    Than they would not have to be labeled in a manner you find distasteful.

    Again we need no more proof about failure, inaptness or corruption than the condition of our country.

    The one vote all Americans have as far as choosing leaders is the president; we are pretty much at the mercy of how others vote when it comes to congress.

    Our presidential leaders all come out of the same factory producing the same product with different names.
    When citizens vote, we are now always voting for what we feel is the lesser of two evils.
    Not someone we feel good about.
    The system itself has become corrupted and controlled, and when voting it’s like voting for the flu or pneumonia, not matter how you vote you will be sick afterwards.

    It’s not criminal to have an opinion about our criminals we elected, of course, with the new hate crime laws, it soon could be.


    think twice wrote on October 26, 2009 10:42 AM: Joe C, a reminder: you are using "criminals and cons not doing their jobs" to describe Presidents elected by the American people in Democratic elections.

    Who's the criminal here?


    Read All Comments