Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to SlashdotTV! (Video) 130
Posted
by
timothy
from the film-at-eleven dept.
from the film-at-eleven dept.
You may have noticed that we've posted quite a few original videos on Slashdot in the past few months. Rather than being the work of a few rogue editors with newly-acquired Christmas cameras, this was part of the groundwork for a new site we're launching today. SlashdotTV, found at http://tv.slashdot.org, will let you easily find and watch all of our videos in one convenient location. In addition to Slashdot content, you also can watch videos from our sister sites, SourceForge and ThinkGeek. The site is brand new, and we're interested in hearing your feedback -- what you think about it, and what kind of videos you'd like to see. Currently, you can embed our videos on your own site or show them to your friends with our share feature. Commenting is coming soon. Check back often for new videos, and keep watching!
Timmeey! (Score:5, Funny)
Timothy checks out Ubuntu TV
Timothy Gets a MakerBot Replicator Demo at CES
Timothy Lord Checks Out Keyboards & Tech At CES
Timothy Lord @ Metrix Create:Space in Seattle
Timothy Lord Checks Out Steve Jackson Games' Latest
what you think about it, and what kind of videos you'd like to see
We want more videos were timothy checks out and looks at things!
Re:Timmeey! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
I would pay to actually see that. Obviously Timothy or one of his socks has mod points right now.
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Why use the hosts file when you could just switch to Gamemaker?
Re: (Score:1)
Hey, who left the door open and let in all the crazy?
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
He takes after the Dear Leader [tumblr.com]
.
It's Not April Yet (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It's Not April Yet (Score:5, Funny)
On Sunday I'm expecting lots of videos with ponies.
Re: (Score:2)
April 1 is on a Sunday this year? SWEET! Then I don't have to see it.
Stop doing it in Flash (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Stop doing it in Flash (Score:5, Insightful)
Of all the sites that could go HTML5 video only, this should be the first.
Re:Stop doing it in Flash (Score:4, Funny)
Just like "we" were the first with UTF-8
Re: (Score:3)
Just like "we" were the first with UTF-8
Never had it working fully.
I'll bet you £1000 that the Pound Sterling sign prior to the integer in this sentence is preceeded by the letter A with a circumflex above it. This has been broken since the change to Unicode was made, and never fixed.
Re: (Score:2)
I had no idea unicode was supported at all it certainly doesn't work in my journal. I've got some cyrillic below that doesn't show up at all.
- I don't see the preceding two words at all in preview.
köszönöm szépen - this Hungarian looks o.k. in the preview though. In my journal entries it always previews o.k. but then gets all jacked up once I save.
Re:Stop doing it in Flash (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm... Let me check the password protection...
***************
Re: (Score:2)
Har vi fått äkta Unicode-stöd??
Re: (Score:2)
Aw, damn, and well before my 60th birthday, too.
Any Stockholm-area Slashdotters who want to collect can meet me this Friday night during Happy Hour at Akkurat for their complimentary starköl. :(
Re:Stop doing it in Flash (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand. Flash blockers are for preventing the runtime from loading, saving CPU cycles and the user from obnoxious content. The HTML5 video tag shouldn't eat any CPU if the video doesn't play on page load. And it can't be used for anything but video.
Re:Stop doing it in Flash (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Plus, when the masters of the internet decide to outlaw video-blocking, it won't matter whether our newly TV-ized internet is managed by a shitty plugin or a shitty markup language.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
You need to seek psychiatric help.
This is not a joke. I am not aiming to get a +2 Funny, nor am I insulting or trolling you. You seriously need to get some professional medical attention.
Re: (Score:1)
Stop doing the videos in Flash. It's a proprietary wrapper usable on a decreasing number of platforms. Better formats for video already exist. If you want old, then go with MPEG. If you want new, go with WebM. Either way, you'll both reach a larger audience and future-proof your work.
No mobile access. Less resolution than a Youtube video. Lame.
Ads...lots of ads. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ads...lots of ads. (Score:4, Insightful)
If it was ad-free, and therefore a paid service, few would buy it. As long as they clearly mark the sponsored content I'm fine with it.
Re: (Score:2)
As long as you fill it with tons of ads, that's cool with me. I love slashvertisements! Maybe you can even couch a few of them in "product reviews"? That may squeak a few more ads in front of people, what do you say?
In the video, they explicitly said they are going to run slashvertisements. Maybe if you WTFV...oh nevermind.
I appreciate they're up-front about it at least.
Just make a YouTube page (Score:2, Interesting)
This is about 12 years too late.
Re: (Score:3)
They Could follow the advice of the comments and use modern container files, modern html to display it, high res (like HD res, not 360 px instead of 240 px like youtube), make torrent available, working RSS feeds of the video files ready to feed into mythnettv and the other TV appliances...
Re: (Score:3)
Slashdot has been my point of primary internet interaction for a while now. My first comment [slashdot.org] was posted almost 11 years ago - so I figure I've been here regularly for at least that long. I've done meet ups with slashdot friends 4 times over the years, the most recent was just a couple weeks ago. I'm not a neutral party - I have a bias towards the site. If I didn't like it I wouldn't have stayed this long.
There are problems to be sure - but I do believe the site still has value. There are still a significant
My Opinion (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that having a new tv.slashdot.org is completely fine and even a little cool. However, my preference is that these videos should only be posted to that site, and not to "regular" Slashdot. Or at least provide a standard tag or category which we can filter out if we choose. We know where to go if we want to watch videos - the TV icon at the top (nice job on that btw, it was immediately obvious to me what that new icon signified even before reading this article). Otherwise, I'm just looking for text blurbs and snarky/humorous user comments, sometimes with optional videos behind the summary's links. Maybe we can just get the story summary text, with a link below the summary that says "Check out the video over on Slashdot TV!"?
Oh, transcripts for all videos on the TV site would be helpful for many as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Transcripts, Transcript (Score:2)
I think that may just be in the pipeline ;)
For now, here's the Transcript for this video.
-----
Title: Welcome to SlashdotTV
Description: Welcoe to SlashdotTV, the / dedicated channel for all video on / Slashdot. This new site lets you / easily browse and watch videos / based on a number of criteria, / including title, subject keywords, / popularity, and those handpicked / by the site's dedicated editors.
[00:00] <TITLE>
The S
Re: (Score:2)
Of all the things that users have been asking for, this was not on the list. Do you even listen?
What next - powerpoint slide decks?
I want to be able to exclude it from the list of stories - life is too short to look at a video that takes 5 to 10 minutes to say what I can glom from reading a story in 30 seconds.
April 1st (Score:2)
Does this bring back the chat roulette feature?
Sharing? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
and I'll have to check it out when I'm not at work.
The specs on this are going to be interesting. Not at work, not on a phone with poor data coverage, not in a meeting, not in a teleconference, not while "watching" tv... this is what, like 1% of my /. time?
Is it just me...or? (Score:5, Insightful)
I actually don't like video content on the web; for a variety of reasons, but the primary one is that the audio from the video would give me away at work.
I mean, I hope this works out and is the revenue generator you hope it is, but as I think many of us are viewing the site from work, I don't know how popular a destination it's going to be.
Re: (Score:2)
My video usage:
At work: Videos without audio (double points if it has closed captioning)
At home: Videos in the background so I only hear the audio... usually pulling up a song I haven't heard in a while on YouTube.
The only time I pay attention to both the audio and video is when watching Netflix... and even then I usually have Netflix on my right monitor, Minecraft on my center monitor and Opera on my left monitor so it doesn't get my undivided attention. Videos lack the interactivity to keep me fully enter
You're not alone. I prefer text. (Score:2)
The contents of a three-minute video can generally be typed up into a half-page of text and read in thirty seconds.
The exceptions are walk-throughs that are difficult to describe in writing, or content that requires visual or audio.
For me, it's not a matter of being seen goofing off. I have headphones. But it's more a use of my time. If I'm going to goof off, I want to goof off *efficiently*.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Your boss doesn't allow headphones at work?
Some jobs require awareness of phones ringing, people talking from across the room, etc.
TLDW (Score:2)
what kind of videos you'd like to see
Rickrolls and pr0n? Mostly the latter?
Seriously, short videos. TLDW = too long didn't watch. Please no "I recorded this rant because I can't be bothered to transcribe it"
Even more seriously you're not going to displace youtube as the home of precious kitty videos. Or even pony videos. On the other hand, as far as I know, the "screencast" market is unserved. Yes there is "A" site for ruby screencasts, and "A" site for vim screencasts. But there is no "the tech screencast" site... that I know of.
Does not work in Safari (Score:3)
Does not work in Safari, unlike youtube and 99% of all other online video sites which work fine in Safari (Mac OS X)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Does not work in Safari, unlike youtube and 99% of all other online video sites which work fine in Safari (Mac OS X)
also doesnt work in Opera
clip embedded in this post works, but all the clips under tv.slash... just dont show up
Related Links (Score:2)
I like the Related Links that Slashdot gives for this.
Linode Exploit Caused Theft of Thousands of Bitcoins
European Parliament Blocks Copyright Reform With 113% Voter Turnout
Microsoft's Azure Cloud Suffers Major Downtime
Foxconn's Other Dirty Secret: the World's Largest "Internship" Program
Sony's New CEO To Look Beyond Hardware
Which boils down to theft, fraud, downtime, unpaid labor and Sony (always a winner). Nice to know what we can expect.
flash? seriously? (Score:1)
It always make me laugh the way slashdot posts all these supposedly technologically progressive articles but then uses some obsolete proprietary tech like flash for its videos. Did Adobe give you some payola to use that crap or what?
Re: (Score:2)
Less videos than YouTube. No wireless. (Score:2)
Well, good luck with it, but text rules (Score:1)
I find text to be 10x faster to process than watching a video. Text is easier to skim, it's easier to search, a page of text can explain something in more detail and more precisely than 10 minutes of video, and it probably takes up 1000x less space/bandwidth, etc. When I watch video documentation it feels like everything is in slow motion compared to reading. As a bonus, text is also usable by people with visual and/or sound impairments, when using the right equipment.
Resorting to video is like the equiv
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't watch... (Score:4, Funny)
If I watch, I think it will count against my Bandwidth Cap
Catchy Tune (Score:2)
Now look at them yo-yo's that's the way you do it
You play the video on the STV
That ain't workin' that's the way you do it
Money for nothin' and chicks for free
Now that ain't workin' that's the way you do it
Lemme tell ya them guys ain't dumb
Maybe get a blister on your little finger
Maybe get a blister on your thumb
I Want My /.TV (Score:3)
Now look at them yo-yo's that's the way you do it /.TV
You play the keyboards [slashdot.org] on the
Great (Score:2)
This must be piracy (Score:2)
Frequent advertising (Score:2)
How about an initial commercial and then 1 per 15 minutes of video content viewed.
It's March 28 (Score:2)
Provide a transcript (Score:2)
I find that unless there's actually something cool which you really need to see in action to understand, I'm much happier reading than watching something. So if you're doing an interview, provide a transcript.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm running Fedora too - but haven't had any problems. Chrome and Firefox have played the videos well - so I wonder what the difference is. My plugins for Firefox list Shockwave Flash 11.0 r1
Works fine on both my machines - Fedora 16, one is 32 bit the other 64. So it's possible.
Exclamation mark in title! (Score:2)
I'd like to see a time-based analysis on the use of exclamation marks in article titles (such as this one). I reckon that it'll be indicative and illuminating :|
A simple plea (Score:2)
Slashdot TV looks great and it looks like you'll do something good with it.
Here is my concern however. Eventually, all internet sites try to become Facebook or Myspace or whatever the "it" network is that week. The problem with this is that what makes Slashdot great is that it's not for general consumption. It's for a higher standard of technical knowledge or those with the desire to attain that.
If you try to make Slashdot into a cash cow that behaves just like Facebook, you will fail two ways. First, the p
Will never visit. (Score:2)
Will never visit.
Just like idle.slashdot.org (whose sarcastic "Waste of your time. Don't ever go there" I feel is the best advice I've heard).
Whenever there's been a video post, I've been quite quick to complain about it (and I'm not the only one), so yeah, shove them off into tv.slashdot.org so I can ignore it totally.
Sorry, but I (used to) come on here for information and news. It takes HUNDREDS of times longer to convey that information in a video than it does on a text page, which is why I don't watch
Partner with YouTube or Vimeo, or do HTML5 please. (Score:4, Insightful)
I hate watching videos on a conventional computer. I prefer to watch them on a tablet or real TV.
If you were to partner with either YouTube or Vimeo, I could use existing integrations for set-top boxes or the app on my iPad to view the stuff.
If you were to just to HTML5 video, I could at least bring the video up on my iPhone and "AirPlay" it to my TV.
As it is, I can't even watch it in Google Chrome. I've removed the generic Flash player from my computer, but I do allow Chrome to maintain and use its own internal copy. But even that copy can't play your videos. I am guessing that this is because I've got paranoid security settings, forbidding Flash from ever using any local storage at all (because I don't trust advertisers).
So, in short, I certainly can't see the videos in my preferred way, and when I try to view them the way I'm "supposed to", I get a blank screen with no warnings or errors or anything.
Do Not Want.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, well, HTML5, whatever.
I believe ALL videos should be done in ASCII (3D ASCII for things like Avatar).
Re: (Score:2)
Suck for you but what do you know works fine on my preferred ways like on my laptop and HTC Amaze.
Yay for more crap (Score:2)
The clueless twats who took over /. are destroying the site and the community with your hare-brained ideas. I'd like to see videos of them choking on wiffle-bats.
Re: (Score:1)
There are more important things for Slashdot to do (Score:5, Insightful)
At this risk of sounding like a troll, or maybe just a fuddy-duddy: I think there are more important things for Slashdot to work on than adding new features.
There are a lot of bugs and limitations on the site. The last time Slashdot posted one of their "Hey, look what we did!" [slashdot.org] stories there were a lot of good positive often-repeated suggestions - many of which were ignored. Unicode support was moderated to 5 many times in that story. Instead we get achievements, idle, and Slashdot TV. Unicode support, working & faster preview, better comments section, etc. were top suggestions that have been ignored for years. Maybe I'm biased: I use Slashdot because it is entirely text based so this feature doesn't excite me terribly. Nonetheless, I think priorities need to be straightened here.
IPv6 (Score:1)
Maybe you shall focus on enabling IPv6 on your existing sites before launching new ones.
No. (Score:3)
There goes my bandwidth cap (Score:1)
Sigh.
There goes the last shred of readability in IE7 (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Subtitles (Score:2)
I think each video should have subtitles. There's many deaf readers here on slashdot and also many like to check in at work where they have to keep sound off.
Really it's a basic accessibility feature that is often ignored. Not to thrilled about Apple's digital textbooks containing non-subtitled videos. Yay the first book I can't "read", now THAT'S thinking differently. So as more of the web becomes video more people are finding themselves shut out.
So please add subtitles to all videos.
how? (Score:1)
I have videos on my site and it is not easy to implement (without using an external provider)
Really Like It (Score:2)
I have enjoyed the videos so far and I think this is a great idea.
This will be added to the stuff I watch on PATV [penny-arcade.com] as well as Geek And Sundry [geekandsundry.com]. (Which has a slew of great shows - though I'm most stoked about Wil Wheaton's tabletop gaming show and The Guild.)
Here I'd love to see stuff that shows off what slashdot is about - tech (especially FOSS tech) at a deeper depth than the 'non-technical' folks are interested in. I enjoyed the HD tv bit - since I don't know jack about tvs. But it did feel awfully fluffy.
Seriously? SlashdotTV? (Score:2)
How about spending less time on ... stuff ... like this, and more time on learning how to write headlines, how to select good submissions, how to avoid duplicate stories, how to perform even cursory verification of content, how to avoid typographical errors, and how to copyedit poor text? You know, things that enhance quality.
Ha! (Score:2)
Will it be all repeats, just like the main site? (Score:1)
Will it be all repeats, just like the main site?
antennae? (Score:1)
gentlemen (Score:2)
Arghhh - Fixed width site (Score:1)
Do not want.
Over 50% wasted white space when I go full screen is not going to make it an enjoyable experience.
Slashdot has a chance here to one-up YouTube and get it right.
-
Lotto - A tax on people who are bad at math