Den of Geek

What we learned from The Avengers trailer

James Hunt


James combs through the trailer for Joss Whedon's The Avengers to examine just what it's told us about the film...

Published on Oct 12, 2011


We've seen glimpses, here and there - stills, teaser trailers, production designs - but only now have we finally got a good look at next summer's premiere Marvel blockbuster (Spider-who?) in the form of a the first full-length trailer for The Avengers. And let's not beat around the bush: it's looking nothing short of epic.

But what does it tell us about the film?

Prepare to see the Marvel Universe

Cramming the 'Big Three' - Iron Man, Thor and Captain America - onto one screen would have been a monumental job in itself, but director Joss Whedon has had to contend with an even bigger one than that.

This trailer alone features characters from four separate movie franchises, and some created specifically for the film. With, at the very least, Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, the Black Widow, Hawkeye, the Hulk, Loki, and Nick Fury laying claim to starring roles, make no mistake: this is going to be one sprawling movie.

And not only that, but it's also introducing a couple of major Marvel locations into the movie-verse. Early on, we get a glimpse of a complex that bears a suspicious visual resemblance to The Triskelion complex - the headquarters of SHIELD in the Marvel 'Ultimate' universe. In a flyby of New York, we see Stark Tower.

Previous Marvel Studios films have been light on iconic locations, preferring a more real-world approach. This one looks like it'll change all that, truly putting the Marvel Universe on the screen for the first time.

In part, that's because this film is finally using New York to full effect. Batman has Gotham, Superman has Metropolis, but New York will always be the centre of the Marvel Universe, as established by the writers and artists who lived and worked there in the 60s, laying the groundwork for all we see today.

Whedon clearly acknowledges that, and we get several sweeping images of the city. We've had a good look at versions of 'Marvel' New York in both the Spider-Man and Fantastic Four films, but its appearance in the Marvel Studios-verse is both long overdue, and very welcome.



But, of course, let's not forget the biggest extension of the Marvel Universe so far...

SKRULLS! (probably)

The trailer dances lightly around the issue, trying its best to paint Loki as the film's sole villain - but we all know that's not going to happen. Loki already got beat down once, there's no way he's capable of defeating the entire team alone - nor, indeed, is he dumb enough to try. All those shots of soldiers, cops, civilians and Avengers staring gravely at the sky strongly suggests that the plot of Avengers is indeed going to follow that of the Ultimates Vol. 1 graphic novel, in which the team's first mission together involves fighting off an attempted alien invasion of Earth.

It might seem like a leap, but let's not forget - both Thor and Captain America went to great pains to remind us of the 'World Tree' - a network of wormholes in space which connects our planet with several other 'realms', including Asgard. Loki himself was lost in one of those wormholes at the climax of Thor, and the Red Skull suffered an apparently similar fate due to the 'tesseract' (that's the Cosmic Cube, to us geeks) energy at the end of Captain America.

Add to that the use of Skrulls in leaked concept work for a cancelled Avengers console game, and it seems almost certain that Loki's return will coincide with the arrival of alien villains from one of the Nine Worlds that we haven't yet seen (if not a mystery 10th.)

And, finally, let's consider Tony Stark's penultimate line in the trailer: "If we can't protect the Earth...". Well, that makes it sound like a global scale threat is indeed on the cards. Maybe they won't be Skrulls in the typical sense. But an attempted invasion from another world, masterminded by Loki, seems almost certain to be the threat that finally assembles the Avengers.



Makeovers!

As well as bringing back the stars of the previous Marvel Studios films, Whedon & Co. have also given them a visual overhaul.

The trailer gives us a good look at Captain America's new uniform - an updated redesign of his WWII outfit, and the most openly superhero-esque of them all. In his time away, Thor has an updated version of his movie outfit. Iron Man, once again, has new armour (the Mark VII armour?) and the Black Widow has a nod to her comicbook identity in the form of a Black Widow detail on the belt of her SHIELD jumpsuit.



Of course, the biggest change is in the appearance of Bruce Banner, who is wearing his third face in as many movies. From the short glimpse we get, The Hulk himself looks better than ever, and the visual nod to the TV series with Banner's shirt ripping around one bicep is indeed a cute one.

But as for Ruffalo himself? Let's just say, if he wasn't referred to as such, it'd be difficult to realise that he was Bruce Banner. Not one of Banner's three primary physical attributes - that he's thin, diminutive and wears round-framed spectacles - are represented here. Yes, we'd all prefer it if Ed Norton was back for another go, but even leaving that aside, Ruffalo is a poor substitute, visually speaking. Let's hope he can act his way past that handicap.



And What We Didn't See?

As well as any actual visual confirmation of an alien menace, there were a few things we definitely didn't see in this trailer - and what's left out tells us just as much about the film as what's in it.

For a start, there's no hint of any of the main cast's love interests - no Natalie Portman, Gwyneth Paltrow, nor even the woman who is (probably) Sharon Carter, Amanda Righetti. Admittedly, there's no evidence that either of the former pair will appear in the film at all, and maybe they're trying to keep those plots for the 'main' movie strands, rather than this battle-royale of a picture. But it'd be nice to see cameos at the very least.

And if they aren't in the film, that also begs the question of where, if anywhere, the movie's romantic subplot will come from. No-one does a big action film without one, after all. Could Hawkeye and the Black Widow reprise their comic book relationship? Maybe. It would give them both a concrete role in the story, if nothing else.



That said, there's no hint of any other sidekicks either. Agent Coulson gets a brief look in, but there's no Maria Hill. Presumably, too, someone has already come up with a reason to keep War Machine out of the team and thus out of the movie. Thor's Asgardian friends are trapped in Asgard (but then, he's supposed to be as well...) so we can also assume they're stuck off-world somewhere.

However, as in the comics, it seems as though one of the biggest problems with The Avengers movie is going to be answering why, in a world full of super-powered/superhuman individuals, we're only seeing these particular ones responding to such a major threat.

Lastly, even though we got a short spotlight on the team's own trademark weapons - Cap's Shield, Thor's Hammer, Iron Man's Armour and even Hawkeye's bow - we didn't get to see the Cosmic Cube at all. The Thor credits sting made it pretty clear that it fulfils some role in Loki's schemes - perhaps they just didn't have room for it!

Although Whedon's movies have been a bit hit & miss in the past, this trailer makes it clear that The Avengers is, at the very least, going to look like the film Marvel fans always imagined.

It's rare that a movie can rival the combination of comic book art and a reader's imagination, but this is very close to doing so. It's impossible to say whether the film is going to be good or bad so far in advance, but a trailer this high-octane has undoubtedly left even the most cautious of expectations raised.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here. And be our Facebook chum here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By ruinawish 1 October 12, 2011 09:11:50 AM

I wish Iron Man had more of a radical update. The kid with his Avengers Iron Man action figure isn't going to be too different to the kid with his Iron Man Iron Man (lol) action figure

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Timon 1 October 12, 2011 09:24:10 AM

"Whedon's movies have been a bit hit & miss in the past" - he's only directed one! And Serenity was great.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By fuzzcaminski 1 October 12, 2011 09:46:00 AM

He's written a lot of films though, Alien Ressurection, Titan A.E., Toy Stoy's screenplay to name but a few

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Cerpyncarpiog 1 October 12, 2011 10:00:28 AM

Yes, but in those cases he'd have no control on the finished output. So saying his movies have been hit and miss is unfair. Serenity being a great movie.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By jameshunt 1 October 12, 2011 11:07:02 AM

@Cerpyncarpiog Semantics. How's Whedon's TV work? Hit & miss. The point was that he's had spotty output in terms of both writing and directing, and that remains true regardless of how you slice up his career.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Bird171 1 October 12, 2011 11:49:14 AM

One, you do see the cube. Its attached to the staff you see just as stark is saying, "i dont play well with others" and you see it again in loki's hands later on near the end of the trailer. Mark Ruffalo's banner does have his glasses, he is just not wearing them all the time like norton did. You see Ruffalo take them off in the teaser after Captain America. They've already confirmed that Hawkeye and Widow with have some kind of ramance in the movie.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By boynamedsue 1 October 12, 2011 12:15:25 PM

It seems they skipped over one major fact: the trailer makes it clear this movie is going to be about bringing these 4 rather massive egoes together into a unit. "I dont play well with others." Cap giving Stark shit. At one point didnt we see Thor slamming down on Cap? I feel like this should ahve been mentioned in the article because it seems the trailer (and actor interviews) have made it clear this is going to be a heavy plot in the movie...which is kind of lame IMO. All these beginning stories are getting somewhat overplayed. Why cant they make a movie where the team is already together and fighting. I get it (I guess) how in this one they NEED to do a origin story since we've really had 6 movies leading up to it, but still Im sick of seeing the first movie that really is just setting up for a sequel when things are as they should be as I feel this movie will be doing.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Holmes 1 October 12, 2011 02:14:33 PM

That would be Ultimates Vol 2 regarding the Skrull invasion... And I don't see this as being an 'origins' story per se - they clearly need to spend a bit of time establishing relationships / tension between the members of the team, and it certainly doesn't look like they'll skimp on the action.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By DavidFullam 1 October 12, 2011 02:32:30 PM

Losing Ed Norton was a huge mistake in my opinion, but otherwise I am there opening day.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By hensoloo1ax 1 October 12, 2011 03:54:16 PM

Saying Joss Wheedons film work has been scrappy is really unfair. Very few of the films we're aware he worked on were filmed using his complete scripts. They'd usually been passed through other writers by the time shooting happened. Factor in studio interference, directors and editing and you're left with little to pin on him. Interestingly Empire did a big article on Pixar earlier this year (maybe late last year) where John Lassester and others said they didn't realise how good a script could be until Joss Wheedon worked on Toy Story. And look what that gave us. I'm not so blind as to not see the flaws in some of his work (Angel started weak and Buffy didn't always maintain its season 2 high) but Joss is boss.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Josh29 1 October 12, 2011 04:09:48 PM

I would very much like them to spread this out over a trilogy, give them some time to fully develop the plot and relationship between the characters, rather than attempt to squeeze it into a single film.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By DougRed4 1 October 12, 2011 06:32:09 PM

There ARE three movies scheduled. And perhaps the reason we see some of the heroes fighting each other is because they ARE Skrulls (just a possibility).

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Pukerama 1 October 13, 2011 12:45:39 AM

The shot of Thor about to hammer down on Captain America had me the most intrigued... why would they be fighting eachother? Hmmmm....

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Peeley 1 October 13, 2011 09:54:11 AM

How is Whedon's TV work 'spotty' or hit and miss? Buffy was groundbreaking stuff and thoroughly inventive and entertaining (ok, we can blame most of the CW network on it so it has some faults). Angel was dark, funny and always of a high quality. Firefly is an undisputed classic. Dollhouse was ambitious and fast paced...once you got past the first 4 or 5 episodes it was a fantastic sci-fi show that has rarely been rivalled since. Ok, so 3 out of those 4 were cancelled...but what do the suits know? And his comic book work on X-Men stands up as one of the series' classic runs. The Avengers could not be in safer hands.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By RacheyMay 1 October 13, 2011 12:11:06 PM

After seeing that trailer I'm optimistic :-) I'll be saving my Odeon points for this!

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By jameshunt 1 October 14, 2011 01:08:15 AM

@Peeley I love Joss Whedon, to the extent that I own everything I physically can of his, but I'm not blind to his faults. Buffy S5-7 were very weak. Angel S4 was a total mess. Dollhouse spent its entire first season confused about what it even was, and he ended the Buffy Season 8 comic with a note that essentially said "sorry, that didn't work did it?". Having Joss Whedon's name attached to something is a guarantee that it'll be ambitious and intelligent, but not that it'll be consistently good. If nothing else, the number of times his TV work has been cancelled suggests that his ability to please the masses is far from assured, and a film like Avengers really needs to do exactly that.

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By desandman 1 October 14, 2011 01:54:33 AM

Why do they always show Captain America without his mask/helmut?

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By intheshadows 1 October 14, 2011 06:51:51 AM

...that no-one likes Nine Inch Nails?

Re: What we learned from The Avengers trailer
Posted By Peeley 1 October 14, 2011 12:35:26 PM

Good! I don't want The Avengers to please the masses! Just me and my fellow geek brethren. I want them to spend $200 mill on a geek-tastic film that references the comics to such a degree that muggles can't understand it. I want a complex, non-mainstream plot with no concessions towards children or chavs alike!...I can but dream. Seriously though, just have faith. (Obviously if the Avengers turns out to be disappointing I will be a broken shell of a man, quietly weeping in my cinema seat in a similar manner to when the credits rolled on Indiana Jones and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.)
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
The Avengers
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Advertisement