Vodka boycott in U.S. spreads on concerns over gay rights in Russia

Related Topics

1 of 5. A piece of carpet with a logo of Stolichnaya, a brand of Russian vodka, is marked with black tape during a news conference at Micky's nightclub in West Hollywood, California August 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Alcorn

Thu Aug 1, 2013 5:51pm EDT

(Reuters) - Gay rights activists in New York City dumped vodka onto the street on Wednesday to protest new laws in Russia targeting homosexuals, as a growing number of gay bar owners across the United States vowed to stop pouring Russian vodka.

"Boycotts are set for a reason. We're trying to influence change, and maybe change what's happening in Russia," said Chuck Hyde, general manager of Sidetrack, the largest gay bar in Chicago, which stopped carrying Stolichnaya about a week ago.

The boycott was called last week by gay rights activist and Seattle-based sex advice columnist Dan Savage in response to anti-gay violence and restrictive laws in Russia. Since then, owners of mostly gay bars from San Francisco to New York have vowed to stop serving Stolichnaya and other Russian vodka.

Gay rights advocates in New York City, carrying signs that read "Russian vodka: infused with hate," gathered outside the Russian consulate on Wednesday protesting Russia's stance on gay issues. They emptied bottles of Russian vodka onto the pavement.

The call to "dump Russian vodka" came after Russian investigators said in May that a 23-year-old man had been tortured and killed after revealing to a friend that he was gay.

In June, Russian president Vladimir Putin signed a law banning gay "propaganda," which critics have said effectively disallows all gay rights rallies and could be used to prosecute anyone voicing support for homosexuals. Putin also banned same-sex couples from adopting Russian children.

The boycott has focused heavily on Stolichnaya vodka, which is made from Russian ingredients, even though the company has said it supports gay rights.

In an open letter sent a day after Savage's call for a boycott, Val Mendeleev, chief executive of Stolichnaya's parent company the SPI Group, distanced his enterprise from the Kremlin's policies and emphasized that the Russian government has no ownership stake in the Luxembourg-based company.

"Stolichnaya Vodka has always been, and continues to be a fervent supporter and friend to the LGBT community," he wrote. "We also thank the community for having adopted Stoli as their vodka of preference."

Russia is due to host the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Savage wrote in a column last week that an Olympic boycott was neither practical nor necessarily desirable.

"There is something we can do right here, right now, in Seattle and other U.S. cities to show our solidarity with Russian queers and their allies and to help to draw international attention to the persecution of gay men, lesbians, bisexuals, trans people, and straight allies in Putin's increasingly fascistic Russia: DUMP RUSSIAN VODKA," he wrote.

Savage was on vacation and did not immediately respond to an email request on Wednesday for comment on the widening boycott.

Ben Kampler, a bartender at the Stonewall Inn bar in New York City's Greenwich Village, said most gay bars in the area, including Stonewall, had joined the boycott.

"It's pretty much every bar in the area," he said, adding that the bar had asked brands like Absolut to supply vodka to match the Stoli flavors that are popular with customers.

Moby Dick, a bar in San Francisco's Castro neighborhood, joined the boycott last week but its owner, Joe Cappelletti, said he stopped it on Wednesday after learning that Stolichnaya has been a longtime advocate of gay rights.

(Additional reporting by Mary Wisniewski in Chicago, Edith Honan in New York, Laila Kearney in San Francisco; Editing by Cynthia Johnston, Toni Reinhold)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
SKYDRIFTER wrote:
If sexual practices are to be identified in terms of “communities;” why isn’t the ‘decency’ standard of (presumably) history – “don’t ask; don’t tell” – seen as a universal, reasonable, practical and social expectation; and a ‘solution?’

The ‘sex acts’ which are at least ‘implied’ by the gay/lesbian ‘communities’ are also reasonably presumed to be on the ‘menu’ of normal/typical hetero-sexuals – traditionally embracing the “don’t ask; don’t tell” standard, in the light of ordinary civilized “decency.” In the hetero-sexual ‘community;’ that’s been the “zero-problem” standard obviously available to any ‘sexual community.’

Thus, if there are any space aliens observing the human race from a distance; can anyone doubt that they would be scratching their heads – trying to discover any ‘logic’ in (public) issues/disputes such as this?

Okay, punish Russia – pour all that Danish vodka down the drain and boycott any further imports of that Danish vodka – Russia will get the message! (“Americans are more stupid and irrational than previously suspected!”) And, for emphasis, why not pour the Swedish vodka down the drain, as well – doesn’t “Smirnoff” sound Russian?

What is it, with this “sexual tribalism?” None of it makes (rational) sense.

At least not until the pertinent and obvious “political pathology” is examined. Then, those same “observing space aliens” would ‘get it;’ the underlying ‘core’ issue is “trust” – with little possibility that the planet terra firma residents will ever figure it out.

Aug 01, 2013 4:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Michael4yah wrote:
Send me twenty cases. I think we need to unsuport this boycott.

Aug 01, 2013 6:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RonRaygun wrote:
I’d pick vodka over gays any day of the week!

Aug 01, 2013 7:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.