Yea I just don't understand why op did that ? This is about gears 5.with a comment like that u r gonna derail the thread before it even starts . Shame really.
I would not use fake artificial Gifs to prove a pointMy post on it from the OT.
Regarding it being the best visuals by far this gen, based only on this tiny snippet, I'd have to strongly disagree. Imo there are a few other games that do snowy environments far more convincingly, with more realistic snow deformation, effects and granularity, as well as more detail and scope in the environments themselves. That said, these other games aren't 60fps so it's not exactly a fair comparison, though saying that we don't yet know the scale of Gears 5's environments either, so that factors in too.
I haven't played the game but I have seen plenty direct feed footage and it's never looked as good as his shots would indicate. Your shots are far more reasonable, you can see a few flat areas and they don't look near flawless with perfect lighting and color grading. It's a great looking game but I always found the praise for it a little overwhelming based on everything I'd seen.I think OP screwed up with the "best ever" commentary and now the thread has become a versus one. Shame.
No.
His images are of gameplay sans HUD. The vignette blur is part of the game. I generally disapprove of photomode to show off graphics as they tend to add visual enhancements to a still frame (unless devs explicitly say otherwise).
Here are a couple of in-game shots that I took (running on Pro):
Well yes, that indicates the Madden games are very good multi-player titles. Same with FIFA. What were you expecting?
Hyperbole will derail a thread real quick, which is what happened here.
So you haven't even played the game, but earlier you disregard actual gameplay screens with the following.
Lol.
Yup. Playing the tech test on an X and a well calibrated OLED, it's literally no contest. It is absolutely the most visually stunning game I've seen so far. Beats out any game anyone can bring up to compare it to.
It's always the ones who haven't played HZD, that call the gifs fake and shots doctored( despite sunhi saying he just plays with color gradient and some blurring to pop the action ).that's actually a testament to GG for making such engine .
I can judge a game's visuals without having played it and there's a big difference between your shots and i-Lo. Watching direct feed uncompressed 4k footage is basically the same as playing the game.
Not trying to derail, but my point is metacritic isn’t exactly the best source to use to say a game is “good”
Looking at previous threads I'm leaning towards it being on purpose.
Something running at 60FPS doesn't mean it looks better than a 30FPS game. Frame rate has nothing to do with graphics and art style.
Just FYI I updated that post with another screen a bit of new info.
its still more than a month out lol, we wont know that for some time.
Yes but is it 4k 60fps on console? What gears is achieving is very impressive.Horizon looks better to me. By a lot.
OP own fault for starting the thread with that statement. You say it's easily the best looking game, people disagree and post images to counter you. The op basically made this thread about what the best looking game is instead about gears 5 in their very first sentence.
Most people calling Gears 5 unimpressive have not played it.
What do you expect from SonyEra at this point? Kids need to grow up and not to take other peoples opinions as a shot against their preferred plastic.
Is that campaign 60fps or 4K (native?) 30fps like the last game? Insofar as MP is concerned, they have gone the route of 60fps since GeoW 4.
