Republicans aren't suddenly going to vote for her plans because they're means-tested. You just go to the bargaining table with your own party with a much weaker position.Because her chances of getting elected/actually getting policy through > his possibility of getting elected and getting policy through
They had Andy's daddy as one right before Bevin.I find it hard to imagine Kentucky getting a democratic governor even if bevin is total shit.
Please look into WarrenRepublicans aren't suddenly going to vote for her plans because they're means-tested. You just go to the bargaining table with your own party with a much weaker position.
Electability is just Democrats voting for who they think can appeal to "middle america schmoes" instead of voting for their interests.
This talking point comes from two places: Conservatives, and the Far Left.
Briahna did a good job exposing what "Means Testing" complaints are really about: Upper-Middle class young people upset about potentially getting left out of future benefits because they're personally well off.Republicans aren't suddenly going to vote for her plans because they're means-tested. You just go to the bargaining table with your own party with a much weaker position.
Electability is just Democrats voting for who they think can appeal to "middle america schmoes" instead of voting for their interests.
I don't think Bloomberg is dumb enough to actually do it. Threaten it? Sure. But he knows the numbers and is smart enough not to.
I mean, the perception of KY is that their citizens are Pavlov'd to hate Democrats even if it means loathing turtlefuck. I guess it's an effective strategy
The more you know. I hope Bloomberg stays the f out.James K. Polk, the 11th President of the United States, entered the Presidential race in the midst of the Democratic convention. In terms of proximity to a party's primary, Polk is the latest campaigner to be elected President.
You might be right. I just happened across it under Trump's "America First" tweet and had never seen it before so assumed it was new.
So what’s the overall rating?
I suppose that is the free money Yang promised.I think it was here that someone mentioned PredictIt today, and I had no idea that Yang has been third on that site to be the nominee for months. lol
41-54.
You just want Trump's numbers?
(Obviously more at the link.)Today, 41 percent of registered voters approve of the job President Trump is doing, while 54 percent disapprove.
It's because they are only polling democrats just like the fox news poll, believe me.41-54.
Interesting tidbit: Even Ras has Trump at a negative approval at 49-50.
boy that seems to be his go to move huh
Ask Obama what happens when you lose the midterms.Im 100% sure that posts like this one will be everywhere the second Warren becomes president.
"Careful Liz, dont be too reformist. You dont want to lose the midterms, right?"
Trump has no clue what Trump is doing in Syria.I literally have no clue what Trump is doing in Syria. Like, what the fuck??
just a total disaster on every front
There isn’t a strategy or any forethoughtI literally have no clue what Trump is doing in Syria. Like, what the fuck??
just a total disaster on every front
I don’t think “means tested” really describes many of Warren’s plans. Most of them are universal in their coverage.Republicans aren't suddenly going to vote for her plans because they're means-tested. You just go to the bargaining table with your own party with a much weaker position.
Electability is just Democrats voting for who they think can appeal to "middle america schmoes" instead of voting for their interests.
Nice to see him confirm the reporting in the shittiest way possible.
The strategy is to deflect from the actually problem and just say liberals are mad that he talked to Tucker Carlson when it’s not itI don't really get Zuck's strategy with that message, does he just want to write another ad for Warren and make her point for her?
Batman tho
he's sounding like a businessman downplaying the malice of the republican party because that's what he is. it's a standard both-side-ing phrase for those who want to pretend there's middle ground between hate and decency.I don't really get Zuck's strategy with that message, does he just want to write another ad for Warren and make her point for her?
"We're either up or we're getting up" at a gun violence rally