Linepithema humile (Argentine ant)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Introductions
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Biology and Ecology
- Climate
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Threatened Species
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Bibliography
- References
- Links to Websites
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Linepithema humile (Mayr, 1868)
Preferred Common Name
- Argentine ant
Other Scientific Names
- Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr, 1868)
International Common Names
- Spanish: hormiga Argentina; hormiga invasora (Argentina)
- French: fourmi d'Argentine
- Portuguese: formiga Argentina; formiga-Argentina
Local Common Names
- Argentina: hormiga invasora
- Denmark: argentinsk myre
- Germany: Argentinische Ameise
- Sweden: argentinsk myra
EPPO code
- IRIDHU (Iridomyrmex humilis)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageL. humile is one of the most invasive and problematic ant species in the world according to the Invasive Species Specialist Group (www.issg.org/database). Native to South America, it has spread worldwide in areas with Mediterranean-type climates usually associated with disturbed habitats as a result of human commercial activities. Its capacity to tolerate a wide range of abiotic conditions, its generalist dietary requirements and its unicolonial organization, which lead to the formation of large supercolonies, allow the species to spread easily and occupy a wide range of areas. In these areas, L. humile has impacted native ant faunas leading to changes in arthropod communities, ant-vertebrate interactions and ant-plant relationships. Its presence has also had economic effects, such as damage to infrastructure, and negative effects on crops and plantations due to its mutualistic interactions with hemipterans, which can affect the growth and production of the host plant.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Hymenoptera
- Family: Formicidae
- Genus: Linepithema
- Species: Linepithema humile
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pagePrior to Shattuck’s revision in 1992 (Shattuck, 1992), the species was included in the genus Iridomyrmex under the Latin name of Iridomyrmex humilis.
Description
Top of pageThe workers of L. humile are small (2-3 mm long), brown and monomorphic. Their body surface is free of erect hairs on the dorsum, thorax and head. Their petiole is small and composed of a single segment (Newell and Barber, 1913).
Distribution
Top of pageL. humile is native to the Paraná River drainage basin in subtropical South America (between northern Argentina, southern Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay) (Suarez et al., 2001; Tsutsui and Suarez, 2003; Wild, 2004). In Argentina both native and invasive colonies have been reported.
The distribution map includes records based on specimens of L. humile from collections in the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), California, USA; Museo Argentina de Ciencias Naturales (MACN), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZSP), São Paulo, Brazil; Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, Florida; Entomology Museum, Oregon Department of Agriculture; and The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Feb 2022Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Lesotho | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Namibia | Present | Introduced | |||||
South Africa | Present | Introduced | 1901 | Invasive | |||
Zimbabwe | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Asia |
|||||||
Japan | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Honshu | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
South Korea | Present | 2019 | |||||
United Arab Emirates | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Europe |
|||||||
Belgium | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland | |||
Bulgaria | Present | Introduced | 1992 | ||||
Czechia | Present | Introduced | 1945 | ||||
France | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Corsica | Present | Introduced | 1970 | Invasive | |||
Germany | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Italy | Present | Introduced | 1920 | ||||
-Sicily | Present | Introduced | 1926 | Invasive | |||
Monaco | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Netherlands | Present | Introduced | |||||
Norway | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Gómez et al. (2005) | ||||
Portugal | Present | Introduced | 1900 | Invasive | |||
-Azores | Present | Introduced | 1940 | ||||
-Madeira | Present | Introduced | 1882 | Invasive | |||
Spain | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Canary Islands | Present | Introduced | 1965 | Invasive | |||
Switzerland | Present | Introduced | 1980 | Invasive | |||
United Kingdom | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
North America |
|||||||
Bermuda | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Cuba | Present | Introduced | 1995 | Invasive | |||
El Salvador | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
Mexico | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
United States | Present | Introduced | 1891 | Invasive | |||
-Alabama | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Arizona | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Arkansas | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-California | Present | Introduced | 1907 | Invasive | |||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, Florida | |||
-Georgia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | 1940 | Invasive | |||
-Illinois | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Louisiana | Present | Introduced | 1891 | Invasive | |||
-Maryland | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Minnesota | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Mississippi | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Missouri | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Nevada | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
-North Carolina | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Oregon | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Entomology Museum, Oregon Department of Agriculture | |||
-South Carolina | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Tennessee | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Texas | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Washington | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present, Localized | Introduced | 1939 | Invasive | |||
-New South Wales | Present, Few occurrences | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois | |||
-Tasmania | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Victoria | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Western Australia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
New Zealand | Present, Localized | Introduced | 2000 | Invasive | |||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present | Native | |||||
Brazil | Present | Native | |||||
-Amazonas | Present | ||||||
-Goias | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo | |||
-Mato Grosso do Sul | Present | ||||||
-Minas Gerais | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo | |||
-Rio de Janeiro | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo | |||
-Rio Grande do Sul | Present | ||||||
Chile | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
-Easter Island | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
Colombia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
Ecuador | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County | |||
Paraguay | Present | Native | |||||
Peru | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Uruguay | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Venezuela | Present | Introduced | Invasive |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of page
In Hawaii, L. humile has frequently been intercepted in goods shipped from California. In Honolulu its establishment was first reported in 1940 (Zimmerman, 1941). It reached Maui by 1950 (Wilson and Taylor, 1967) and Haleakala National Park by 1967 (Huddleston and Fluker, 1968). The date when L. humile reached the island of Hawaii remains unknown.
According to Newell and Barber (1913), L. humile is supposed to have been introduced into New Orleans by means of the coffee ships passing back and forth between that city and Brazilian ports, as this was the only way of communication between New Orleans and the areas native to the species, and because the ants were first noticed near the areas where these ships unloaded their cargoes.
The date at which L. humile reached the Iberian Peninsula also remains unknown, but the first reported observations of the species in this area were in Oporto (the western part of the Peninsula) and date back to 1894 (Martins, 1907). This means that the first introduction of the ant would probably have been much earlier, perhaps in the 1800s, as a result of the intense commercial shipping between the Iberian Peninsula and the Río de la Plata region, the native area of this species (Tsutsui et al., 2001).
Introductions
Top of pageIntroduced to | Introduced from | Year | Reason | Introduced by | Established in wild through | References | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural reproduction | Continuous restocking | |||||||
New Zealand | 1990 | Yes | No | Green (1990) | Accidental introduction |
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageL. humile has two main dispersion processes: diffusion dispersal through budding and long-distance jump dispersion through human-mediated transport (Suarez et al., 2001). The former is the mechanism used by the ant to extend the invasion to contiguous habitats and is characterized by a low rate of spread (Suarez et al., 2001). The latter is the process responsible for its worldwide dispersion outside its natural range and may involve anything from a few to a thousand kilometres. Jump-dispersal linked to human-mediated transport is nowadays the main factor behind the expansion of the invasion to new areas. It means that, in global terms, the risk of the introduction of the species into new areas is extremely high, since preventing its accidental transport is almost impossible.
Habitat
Top of pageL. humile appears to be more successful in subtropical and Mediterranean climates than in extremely cold, arid or tropical climates (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990; Passera, 1994). Where it has been introduced, this species is mainly found in close association with humans, with a preference for anthropogenically disturbed areas, but it also has the capacity to invade natural ecosystems around the world (Holway, 1995; Human and Gordon, 1996; Suarez et al., 2001; Gomez et al., 2003; Carpintero et al., 2005).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Protected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Principal habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Principal habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Buildings | Principal habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural forests | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Scrub / shrublands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageNearly all of the effects of L. humile on crops or plantations are due to its mutualistic interactions with hemipterans, which are protected from their natural enemies by the ant, thereby producing a large increase in their populations and so affecting the host plant (Newell and Barber, 1913; Ness and Bronstein, 2004).
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageGenetics
In native populations of L. humile, workers from different nests compete aggressively for resources. The introduced populations of the species are characterized by a lack of aggressive behaviour between workers from different nests, leading to the formation of unicolonies. These unicolonies can consist of cooperative interconnected nests ranging over thousands of kilometres, as is the case of the so-called European supercolonies (Giraud et al., 2002), with high densities of workers leading to a numerical dominance over native ant species (Holway et al., 2002a). This lack of a capacity of workers in introduced populations to distinguish between workers from other nests seems to be related to a lower level of genetic diversity compared with the native populations. This has resulted in the elimination of the mechanisms required for workers to recognize workers from a different nest (Tsutsui et al., 2000).
Once virgin queens are fertilized, workers cut off their wings. This allows ovarian maturation and consequent production of eggs (Passera and Aron, 1993). Fertilized eggs (also known as diploid eggs) will develop into females (workers and queens), and the non-fertilized ones (also known as haploid eggs) will develop into males.
Queens lay eggs during most of the year except in winter, due to a physiological rest period. There are two periods during the remainder of the year when egg laying is at its maximum: one in spring and the other, to a lesser extent, in autumn (Benois, 1973). In June and July there is a strong demographic increase in males and workers, respectively, and virgin queens appear in the nest from June to August (Benois, 1973).
Nutrition
L. humile is an omnivorous species. Its diet is basically composed of liquid food (Markin, 1970b; Abril et al., 2007), but it also contains a small percentage of solid food, mainly insects (Abril et al., 2007). The collection of liquid food is related to the feeding of males and workers which feed mainly on carbohydrates, the principal nutrient of the liquid food collected. This, for the most part, consists of honeydew or nectar. The collection of solid food is linked to the feeding of larvae and queens. Due to its high protein content, this is the main nutrient consumed by these individuals for their development and egg-laying, respectively (Markin, 1970a; Abril et al., 2007).
Associations
Environmental Requirements
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
C - Temperate/Mesothermal climate | Preferred | Average temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°C |
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageThere are no recorded cases of natural enemies of L. humile in its introduced range (Orr et al., 2001).
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageNatural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)
The dispersion of L. humile worldwide is produced via accidental transportation by means of human commercial activities. This means of dispersion is commonly known as long-distance jump dispersion (Suarez et al., 2001) and allows dispersion from a few to thousands of kilometres. There is also evidence of accidental dispersion of small fragments of colonies by means of road vehicles (Hee et al., 2000).
Intentional Introduction
There are no recorded instances of the intentional introduction of L. humile.
Pathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Containers and packaging - wood | Yes | Yes | ||
Debris and waste associated with human activities | Yes | Yes | ||
Land vehicles | Yes | Yes | ||
Mulch, straw, baskets and sod | Yes | Yes | ||
Plants or parts of plants | Yes | Yes | ||
Soil, sand and gravel | Yes | Yes |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Economic Impact
Top of pageL. humile produces negative economic effects when invading crops and plantations because of its mutualistic interactions with hemipterans, which can affect the growth and production of the host plant (Buckley, 1987; Ness and Bronstein, 2004).
There is also evidence of its capacity to transfer the pathogenic fungus Phytophthora citricola to Persea americana plantations, with a resulting serious economic impact (El-Hamalawi and Menge, 1996).
Environmental Impact
Top of pageImpact on Biodiversity
Threatened Species
Top of pageSocial Impact
Top of pageThere is no relevant information on any negative social impact of this ant species.
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Is a habitat generalist
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
- Highly mobile locally
- Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
- Has high reproductive potential
- Gregarious
- Altered trophic level
- Conflict
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Infrastructure damage
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts forestry
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition (unspecified)
- Herbivory/grazing/browsing
- Predation
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult/costly to control
Detection and Inspection
Top of pageThe easiest way to detect L. humile on the crop is by searching for foraging workers on the trunk or the stem of the plant, because they associate closely with honeydew-producing hemipterans while searching out honeydew.
The Pacific Invasive Ant Key (PIAKey) manual Pacific Invasive Ants Taxonomy Workshop Manual can both be used in identifying invasive ants in the Pacific region.
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageL. humile is easily distinguishable from other species of ants by its extremely fast movements and high number of recruitment workers. The workers, when crushed between the fingers, give off no perceptible odour, and this characteristic allows the species to be distinguished from other similar ants like Iridomirmex analis, as well as from other similar ant species from the genus Tapinoma.
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Prevention
Eradication
Containment/Zoning
Control
Cultural control and sanitary measures
Biological control
Chemical control
Baits can be used to control L. humile invasions by using workers as a vehicle for transmitting toxins through tropholaxis to larvae and queens. Baits consist of an active toxic ingredient and an attractant in the form of a food resource (Rust, 2001). This method has resulted in significant reductions in L. humile numbers in infected areas (Forschler, 1997; Vega and Rust, 2003). One example of this is the reduction of the invasion in the Haleakala National Park, Hawaii, by using granular baits (Krushelnycky et al., 2004). However, this method is only successful temporarily, as suspension of the treatment leads to regeneration of the ant population and renewed expansion of the invasion (Krushelnycky et al., 2004).
IPM Progammes
Bibliography
Top of pageAntWeb, 2006. Linepithema humile http://antweb.org/getComparison.do?rank=species&genus=linepithema&name=humile&project=&project=
Cammell, M. E., Way, M. J. and Paiva, M. R. 1996. Diversity and structure of ant communities associated with oak, pine, eucalyptus and arable habitats in Portugal. Insectes Sociaux, 43: 37-46.
Carney, S.E., Byerley, M.B. and Holway, D.A. 2003. Invasive Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) do not replace native ants as seed dispersers of Dendromecon rigida (Papaveraceae) in California, USA, Oecologia 135: 576–582.
Christian, C. E. 2001. Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413: 635-639.
Commonwealth of Australia. 2006a. Threat abatement plan to reduce the impacts of tramp ants on biodiversity in Australia and its territories, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/pubs/tramp-ants.pdf
Commonwealth of Australia. 2006b. Background document for the threat abatement plan to reduce the impacts of tramp ants on biodiversity in Australia and its territories, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/pubs/tramp-ants-background.pdf
CONABIO. 2008. Sistema de información sobre especies invasoras en México. Especies invasoras - Insectos. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Fecha de acceso. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Especies_invasoras_-_Insectos
Department of the Environment and Heritage (DEH), 2005. Draft Threat Abatement Plan for for Reduction in Impacts of Tramp Ants on Biodiversity in Australia and its Territories
Earlham College. 2002. Introduced Species in Hawaii (Senior Seminar 2002) http://www.earlham.edu/~biol/hawaii/ants.htm
Fluker, S. S. 1969. Sympatric associations among selected ant species and some effects of ants on sugarcane mealybugs in Hawaii. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawaii, 96 pp.
Fluker, S. S. and Beardsley, J. W. 1970. Sympatric associations of three ants: Iridomyrmex humilis, Pheidole megacephala, and Anoplolepis longipes in Hawaii. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63: 1290-96.
Forschler, B. T. and Evans, G. M. 1994. Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) foraging activity response to selected containerized baits. J. Entomol. Sci. 29(2): 209-214.
Green, C. 2005. Argentine ant update, Dawn Chorus 60: 8. Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi.
Haney, P. 1984. A different approach to the Argentine ant problem. Citrograph 69(6): 140-146.
Harris, R. J. 2002. Potential impact of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in New Zealand and options for its control. Science for Conservation 196. 36 pp. http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-technical/SFC196.pdf
Harris, R.; Abbott, K.; Barton, K.; Berry, J.; Don, W.; Gunawardana, D.; Lester, P.; Rees, J.; Stanley, M.; Sutherland, A.; Toft, R. 2005: Invasive ant pest risk assessment project for Biosecurity New Zealand. Series of unpublished Landcare Research contract reports to Biosecurity New Zealand. BAH/35/2004-1. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biocons/invertebrates/Ants/ant_pest_risk.asp
Harris, R.J., 2001. Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and other adventive ants in New Zealand. DOC Internal Series 7 http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-technical/DSIS7.pdf
Hartley, Stephen, Harris, Richard & Lester, Philip J., 2006. Quantifying uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant. Ecology Letters 9 (9), 1068-1079.
Hawaiian Ecosystems at Risk (HEAR) Project. 2005. Haleakala Field Station. U.S. Geological Survey (Biological Resources Division /Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center). http://www.hear.org/usgs-brd-pierc-hfs/index.html#Projects
Holway, D. A. 1998. Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116: 252-258.
Holway, D. A., L. Lach, A. V. Suarez, N. D. Tsutsui, and T. J. Case. 2002. The ecological causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual review of ecology and systematics 33:181-233.
Holway, D.A., Lach, L., Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N.D. and Case, T.J. 2002a. The Causes and Consequences of Ant Invasions, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 181-233.
Hooper, L. M. 1995. The biology of the Southern Fire Ant, Solenopsis xyloni (McCook) and its predation of the California Least Tern, Sterna antillarum browni (Mearns). MSc Thesis, University of California Riverside.
Hooper-Bui, L. and Rust, M. K. 2000. Oral toxicity of abamectin, boric acid, fipronil, and hydramethylnon to laboratory colonies of Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Economic Entomology 93(3): 858-864.
Human, K. G. and Gordon, D. M. 1997. Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in northern California. Conservation Biology 11(5): 1242-1248.
Krushelnycky, P. D. and Joe, S. M. 1997. Harmful Non-Indigenous Species report on Argentine ant. Hawaiian Ecosystems at Risk website. http://www.hear.org/hnis/reports/HNIS-LinHum.pdf
Krushelnycky, P. D. and Reimer, N. J. 1998. Bait preference by the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii. Environmental Entomology 27: 1482-1487.
Krushelnycky, P. D. and Reimer, N. J. 1998. Efficacy of Maxforce bait for control of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii. Environmental Entomology 27: 1473-1481.
Krushelnycky, P. D., Hodges, C. S. N., Medeiros, A. C. and Loope, L. L. 2001. Interaction between the Hawaiian dark-rumped petrel and the Argentine ant in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii. Studies in Avian Biology 22: 243-246.
Krushelnycky, P. D.; E. Van Gelder, L. L. Loope, and R. Gillespie., 2002. The status of invasive ant control in the conservation of island systems. In Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species: 406 - 414. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. IUCN. Gland. Switzerland and Cambridge. UK.
Lieberburg, I., Kranz, P. M. and Seip, A. 1975. Bermudian ants revisited: the status and interaction of Pheidole megacephala and Iridomyrmex humilis. Ecology 56: 473–478.
Majer, J. D. 1994. Spread of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile), with special reference to Western Australia. In Williams D. F. (ed.) Exotic ants: Biology, impact and control of introduced species: 163-173.
Markin, G. P. 1968. Nest relationship of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 41(4): 511-516.
Markin, G. P. 1970. The seasonal life cycle of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in southern California. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63(5): 1238-1243.
McGlynn, T.P. 1999. The Worldwide Transfer of Ants: Geographical Distribution and Ecological Invasions, Journal of Biogeography 26(3): 535-548.
Monash University, March 2005. Argentine ant researcher recognised for her work. Newsline http://www.monash.edu.au/news/newsline/story/336
Nishida, G. M. and Evenhuis, N. L. 2000. Arthropod pests of conservation significance in the Pacific: A preliminary assessment of selected groups. In Invasive Species in the Pacific: A Technical Review and Draft Regional Strategy. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, Samoa: 115-142.
O’Dowd, D.J., Green, P.T. and Lake, P.S. 1999. Status, Impact, and Recommendations for Research and Management of Exotic Invasive Ants in Christmas Island National Park. Centre for the Analysis and Management of Biological Invasions: Clayton (Victoria, Australia).
Pacific Ant Prevention Programme, March 2004. Pacific Invasive Ant Group (PIAG) on behalf of the IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG).
Rizo, J. L. F. 1995. Reflexiones sobre las hormigas "vagabundas" de Cuba. Cocuyo 3: 11-22.
Robertson, H. G. Argentine ant bibliography.
Sarnat, E. M. (December 4, 2008) PIAkey: Identification guide to ants of the Pacific Islands, Edition 2.0, Lucid v. 3.4. USDA/APHIS/PPQ Center for Plant Health Science and Technology and University of California — Davis. http://www.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/PIAkey/index.html
Stanley, M. C. 2004. Review of the efficacy of baits used for ant control and eradication. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0405/044. Prepared for: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biocons/invertebrates/ants/BaitEfficacyReport.pdf
Suarez, A. V., Bolger, D. T. and Case, T. J. 1998. Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79(6): 2041-2056.
Tasman District Council (TDC) & Biosecurity New Zealand Summary of proceedings: New Zealand Invasive Ant Workshop: Argentine Ant (Linepithema humile) & Darwin Ant (Doleromyrma darwiniana) 29th April 2005 http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biosecurity/stowaways/Ants/documents/NZInvasiveantworkshopApril2005.pdf
Tsutsui, N. D. and T. J. Case. 2001. Population genetics and colony structure of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in its native and introduced ranges. Evolution 55:976-985.
van Schagen, J. J., Davis, P. R. and Widner, M. A. 1994. Ant pests of Western Australia, with particular reference to the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). In Williams, D. F. (ed.) Exotic Ants: Biology, Impact and Control of Introduced Species: 174-180.
Varnham, K. 2006. Non-native species in UK Overseas Territories: a review. JNCC Report 372. Peterborough: United Kingdom. http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3660
Walker, K. 2006. Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) Pest and Diseases Image Library. Updated on 29/08/2006 12:06:40 PM. http://www.padil.gov.au/viewPestDiagnosticImages.aspx?id=615
Ward, P. S. 1987. Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the Lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55(2): 1-16.
Wilson, E. O. 1951. Variation and adaptation in the imported fire ant. Evolution 5: 68-79.
References
Top of pageBuckley R, 1987. Ant-plant-Homopteran interactions. Advances in Ecological Research, 16:53-85.
Forschler B, 1997. A prescription for ant control success. Pest Control, 65(6):34-38.
Wilson EO, Taylor RW, 1967. The Ants of Polynesia. Pacific Insects Monograph, 14:1-109.
Distribution References
Barber E R, 1916. Bulletin. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 23 pp.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Newell W, Barber T C, 1913. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bureau of Entomology Bulletin, 98 pp.
Silva Dias J C, 1955. Separata do Boletim da Junta Nacional das Frutas, Lisboa. 117 pp.
Wilson E O, Taylor R W, 1967. The Ants of Polynesia. 109 pp.
Links to Websites
Top of pageWebsite | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Contributors
Top of page29/04/08 Original text by:
Crisanto Gómez, Universitat de Girona, Dept Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Ciències, Campus de Montilivi7071- Girona, Spain
Silvia Abril, Universitat de Girona, Dept Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Ciències7071- Girona, Spain
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/